Lomov biography. Boris Fedorovich Lomov: biography

Boris Lomov

Mental regulation of activity. Selected writings

Dedicated to the 35th anniversary of the Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Systematic study of the mental in the concept of B. F. Lomov

The contribution of a scientist to science and his place in its history are determined by innovation in the formulation and solution of scientific problems, the fundamental nature of research, the breadth and versatility of interests, reliance on spiritual values inherited from previous generations, the ability to quickly respond to the demands of life and bring scientific ideas to their concrete incarnation, the trace that he left in the minds and hearts of his students. All these criteria are fully consistent with the activities of Boris Fedorovich Lomov, an outstanding psychologist, a talented organizer of science, and a highly humane personality.

A talented scientist and an outstanding organizer of science, a brilliant teacher and speaker, a wise and attentive mentor of young people, a wonderful, sensitive, spiritually rich person - this is how Boris Fedorovich was remembered by those who were given a happy opportunity to communicate with him and work under his leadership. The formation of B. F. Lomov as a scientist took place at the Leningrad School of Psychology, known for its rich scientific traditions and the humanistic orientation of research. His teacher was one of the founders of this scientific school, the outstanding Soviet psychologist B. G. Ananiev.

After graduating from the psychological department of the Faculty of Philosophy of Leningrad University, B.F. Lomov entered the graduate school of the Research Institute of Pedagogy, where, under the guidance of B.G. drawings".

In 1957, Boris Fedorovich began his teaching and research activities at Leningrad University, where he lectured on experimental psychology, labor and engineering psychology, and mathematical statistics. According to the students who listened to him, Lomov the lecturer was distinguished by the depth and thoroughness of the coverage of the material, the originality of his judgments, the liveliness and intelligibility of the presentation of the most complex issues, and fluency in the subject. The activity and initiative of the young scientist, his organizational talent lead to the fact that he becomes one of the closest associates and assistants of B. G. Ananiev in the work of creating a psychology department at Leningrad State University. And it was Lomov, as the most promising scientist and leader, that Ananyev entrusted with his brainchild, recommending him in 1966 to the position of the first dean of the faculty. In a short period of leadership of the faculty, Boris Fedorovich carried out a lot of scientific and organizational work, especially in terms of creating educational experimental laboratories. Under him, the faculty went through the most difficult, initial, moment of its history, found its face.

The scientific interests of BF Lomov at the first stage of his research work are connected with the development of general psychological problems. He studies the features of spatial representations and bimanual touch, conducts an experimental study of the interaction of hands in the process of feeling and theoretically substantiates the role of touch in the implementation of practical actions, considers the problem of the formation and dynamics of sensory images and graphic skills. The results of the scientific search are presented by Lomov in the work “The Formation of Graphic Knowledge and Skills in Schoolchildren” (1959), awarded by the Leningrad Research Institute of Pedagogy, as well as in the work prepared jointly with B. G. Ananiev, L. M. Vekker, A. V. Yarmolenko "Touch in the processes of knowledge and labor" (1959), awarded the prize. K. D. Ushinsky.

The 1960s in our country were marked by serious shifts in the field of scientific and technological progress. The emergence of new complex technical devices, the development of production automation objectively put forward on the agenda and made the problem of interaction between man and technology urgent. Boris Fedorovich, having caught and realized this trend, is included in the development of new complex and responsible problems, becoming, in essence, one of the founders of domestic engineering psychology. The subject of his study is the problems of information interaction between a person and technical devices; search for optimal forms and methods of controlling mechanisms and technological processes; study of patterns of reception, processing, storage and use of information; consideration of a person as a central link in the management system and the subject of the labor process. He determined the fundamental principles of Soviet engineering psychology, its program, tasks and development paths. Lomov's works such as Man and Technology (1966), which won the first prize at Leningrad State University, are devoted to these problems; "Man in the control system" (1967); later - "Man and Automata" (1984), etc.

In 1963, Boris Fedorovich defended his doctoral dissertation on problems of engineering psychology and received the title of professor. In 1965 he was elected a corresponding member of the APN of the RSFSR, and in 1968 a corresponding member of the APN of the USSR.

Boris Fedorovich entered the history of psychology as the creator of the first engineering psychology laboratory in our country, organized by him in 1959 on the basis of Leningrad University. Here, under his leadership, many subsequently famous scientists began their careers in science, accumulated experience in conducting engineering and psychological research, and worked out forms of interaction with practice. Moreover, it was not just about creating a new field of knowledge - engineering psychology and the formation of an original new scientific school; the result was much larger, had a deep historical meaning. Psychology in the 1950s and 1960s was at a crossroads. The cruel repressions of the 1930s that fell upon psychology still remained in my memory, and the consequences of the Pavlovsk session of 1950 were extremely painful and acute. an important step towards the destruction of the status of psychology, artificially created by the efforts of ideology, as a science with an extremely narrow zone of practical application. During these years, that feature of Boris Fedorovich's scientific thinking, which favorably distinguished him and allowed him to advance among the leaders of Russian psychology, was especially clearly manifested - his high sensitivity to the demands of life, his ability to reformulate practical problems in the language of science, to bring scientific ideas to their concrete embodiment. Not every scientist has been given this gift. Boris Fedorovich possessed it to the fullest. He subtly felt life, its pain points, considered psychology not as an abstract, armchair knowledge, but as that field of science that should study a living real person in his concrete life activity. This orientation, strengthening over the years, turned into his scientific credo, took shape in the principle of the unity of theory, experiment and practice.

And although there were people who reproached Lomov for striving to ground psychology, to technocratize it, it seems that these statements were determined by a lack of understanding of the fruitfulness and innovation of his approach, an unwillingness to part with the usual forms of organizing scientific work, and most importantly, a fear of presenting their scientific results to an impartial and objective court. practices. All the more unfounded were the reproaches addressed to Boris Fedorovich himself that he was a narrowly oriented scientist of applied orientation. The point is that Boris Fedorovich surprisingly combined the abilities of both the most profound theoretician and methodologist of psychology, and the subtle scientist-experimenter, and the courageous, inventive psychologist-practitioner. And it was this excellent combination of abilities that determined, to a large extent, his appointment as director of the first psychological institute in the country in the system of the Academy of Sciences, created by decree of the Presidium of the USSR Academy of Sciences on December 16, 1971.

Based on the principles of system methodology and the experience of his predecessors and teachers in the development of problems of complex human knowledge - V. M. Bekhterev, B. G. Ananiev, V. N. Myasishchev and other scientists - Lomov substantiated the scientific strategy for the development of the Institute, including a holistic approach in the study of mental reality, a combination of fundamental and applied research, the use of a variety of conceptual foundations in the development of topical theoretical and practical problems of psychology. This scientific ideology was embodied in the organizational structure of the Institute: its laboratories cover all levels of the psyche with their problems - from its natural neuro-physiological foundation to the highest general psychological and socio-psychological levels. Under the leadership of Lomov, the Institute has become an authoritative, productive center for scientific and practical psychological research.

Boris Fedorovich Lomov

Lomov Boris Fedorovich (1927-1989) - Russian psychologist. Biography. In 1951 he graduated from the psychological department of the Faculty of Philosophy of the Leningrad State University. In 1954 he defended his Ph.D. thesis on the problem of the psychology of polytechnic education, in 1963 - his doctoral dissertation on engineering psychology. In 1959, he organized the country's first laboratory of engineering psychology, together with B. G. Ananiev created the Faculty of Psychology of the Leningrad State University, worked at the Institute of Pedagogy of the Leningrad branch of the RSFSR APS. Since 1967 - Head of the Department of Science of the Ministry of Education of the USSR and the Laboratory of Sensory Processes of the Research Institute of General and Pedagogical Psychology. Since 1971, he headed the Institute of Psychology of the USSR Academy of Sciences, Corresponding Member of the USSR Academy of Sciences (1967), Corresponding Member of the USSR Academy of Sciences (1976). Editor-in-Chief of the journal "Psychological Journal" and member of the editorial board of the journal "Questions of Psychology". From 1968 to 1983 he headed the Society of Psychologists of the USSR. Research. He is one of the leading methodologists of an integrated approach in psychology and initiators of the development of engineering psychology in Russia. Conducted - from the standpoint of an integrated approach - the development of general theoretical problems of psychology, was engaged in research in the field of engineering psychology and the psychology of cognitive processes.

Kondakov I.M. Psychology. Illustrated dictionary. // THEM. Kondakov. - 2nd ed. add. And a reworker. - St. Petersburg, 2007, p. 305-306.

Compositions:

Formation of graphic knowledge and skills in students (1959); Touch in the processes of cognition and labor (1959, jointly with B. G. Ananiev); Man and Technology (1963); Man in the control system (1968); Methodological problems of engineering psychology (1977); Methodological and theoretical problems of psychology (1984).

Literature:

Drummers V. A. S. L. Rubinshtein and B. F. Lomov: the continuity of scientific traditions // Psychological journal. 2000. No. 3. Vol. 21; Drummers V. A. B. F. Lomov: a systematic approach to the study of the psyche // Psychological journal. 2002, vol. 23, no. 4.

Scientific area: Place of work: Academic degree: Academic title: Alma mater: Scientific adviser: Notable students: Known as: Awards and prizes:

BF Lomov investigated the categorical apparatus of psychological science, showed the place and role of psychology in the system of other sciences, the internal unity of psychological knowledge. His works contain an analysis of the current state and development of psychology, determine the ways of constructing its theory, and reveal the relationship between theory, experiment, and practice in psychology. In recent years, he paid much attention to the history of Russian psychology, trying to gather together and preserve everything valuable that was created in Russian and Soviet psychological science.

Engineering psychology

BF Lomov is the founder of a scientific school in engineering psychology. Since the late 1950s, he has dealt with the problems of applying psychological laws in the industrial sphere of people's lives. He was one of the first to develop the psychological problems of managing the national economy, proposed a number of methods for increasing labor productivity, and substantiated the need to maintain a friendly and comfortable atmosphere at the enterprise as a condition for maintaining the health of workers. BF Lomov studied the issues of information interaction between a person and technical devices, the search for means of displaying information and optimal (from the position of a person) forms and methods of controlling mechanisms and technological processes. He also explored a number of theoretical and practical problems of psychological evaluation and design of modern technology.

Research results

Theoretical, experimental and applied works of BF Lomov influenced the emergence of new areas of psychological research that meet the interests of related scientific disciplines. He designed and delivered original lecture courses in general and experimental psychology, engineering psychology, and work psychology.

Under the guidance of B. F. Lomov, about 60 candidate and 10 doctoral dissertations were completed and defended.

Main works

"Formation of production skills in schoolchildren" (1959),
"Formation of graphic knowledge and skills in students" (1959),
“Touch in the processes of cognition and labor” (1959, co-authored with B. G. Ananiev),
"Man and Technology: Essays in Engineering Psychology" (1963, 2nd ed. 1966),
"Man in control systems" (1968),
"Legal and socio-psychological aspects of management" (1972, co-authored with V. V. Laptev, V. M. Shepel and V. G. Shorin),
"Psychological Science and Social Practice" (1973),
“On a systematic approach in psychology” (“Questions of Psychology”, 1975, No. 2),
"Fundamentals of building display equipment in automated systems" (1975, et al.);
"Methodological problems of engineering psychology" (1977),
"Experimental psychological research in aviation and astronautics" (1978, co-authored with G. T. Beregov, N. D. Zavalova and V. A. Ponomarenko),
"Scientific foundations for the formation of graphic knowledge, skills and abilities of schoolchildren" (1979, co-authored with A. D. Botvinnikov),
"Anticipation in the structure of activity" (1980, co-authored with E. N. Surkov),
"Man and Automata" (1984),
"Methodological and theoretical problems of psychology" (1984),
“Image in the system of mental regulation of activity” (1986, co-author),
"Verbal coding in cognitive processes" (1986, co-authored with A. V. Belyaeva and V. N. Nosulenko),
Fundamentals of Engineering Psychology: A Textbook (1986, co-author);
"Systematicity in psychology" (1996; see), etc.

Other

He was known as an active propagandist of psychological science, spoke in the USSR and abroad with lectures to students, teachers, engineers, production managers. Author of a number of popular science works on psychology, editor of the periodical collection Problems of Engineering Psychology. Organizer and editor-in-chief of the Psychological Journal, member of the editorial board of the journal Questions of Psychology.

Initiator of the publication of the first Soviet "Psychological Encyclopedia".

Organizer and leader of all-Union forums on engineering psychology in Moscow (1964, 1967).

Member of a number of scientific councils of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR and interdepartmental councils for the humanities. Chairman of the Scientific Council of the USSR Academy of Sciences for the comprehensive study of man (1986-1989).

Awards and titles

Memory

Write a review on the article "Lomov, Boris Fedorovich"

An excerpt characterizing Lomov, Boris Fedorovich

“No,” said Princess Mary.
- Now, to please the Moscow girls - il faut etre melancolique. Et il est tres melancolique aupres de m lle Karagin, [one must be melancholy. And he is very melancholy with m elle Karagin,] - said Pierre.
– Vrayment? [Right?] - said Princess Mary, looking into Pierre's kind face and not ceasing to think about her grief. “It would be easier for me,” she thought, if I decided to believe to someone everything that I feel. And I would like to tell Pierre everything. He is so kind and noble. It would be easier for me. He would give me advice!”
- Would you marry him? Pierre asked.
“Ah, my God, Count, there are such moments when I would go for anyone,” Princess Mary suddenly said, unexpectedly for herself, with tears in her voice. “Ah, how hard it is to love a loved one and feel that ... nothing (she continued in a trembling voice) you can do for him except grief, when you know that you cannot change this. Then one thing - to leave, but where should I go? ...
- What are you, what is the matter with you, princess?
But the princess, without finishing, began to cry.
“I don't know what's wrong with me today. Don't listen to me, forget what I told you.
All Pierre's gaiety vanished. He anxiously questioned the princess, asked her to express everything, to confide her grief to him; but she only repeated that she asked him to forget what she said, that she did not remember what she said, and that she had no grief, except for what he knows - grief that the marriage of Prince Andrei threatened to quarrel her father with son.
Have you heard about the Rostovs? she asked to change the conversation. “I was told that they would be coming soon. I also wait for Andre every day. I would like them to meet here.
How does he look at the matter now? asked Pierre, by which he meant the old prince. Princess Mary shook her head.
– But what to do? The year is only a few months away. And it can't be. I would only wish to spare my brother the first few minutes. I wish they would come sooner. I hope to get along with her. You have known them for a long time, - said Princess Marya, - tell me, hand on heart, the whole true truth, what kind of girl is this and how do you find her? But the whole truth; because, you understand, Andrei risks so much by doing this against the will of his father that I would like to know ...
An obscure instinct told Pierre that in these reservations and repeated requests to tell the whole truth, Princess Mary's hostility towards her future daughter-in-law was expressed, that she wanted Pierre not to approve of Prince Andrei's choice; but Pierre said what he felt rather than thought.
"I don't know how to answer your question," he said, blushing, not knowing why. “I definitely don’t know what kind of girl this is; I can't analyze it at all. She is charming. And why, I do not know: that's all that can be said about her. - Princess Mary sighed and the expression on her face said: "Yes, I expected this and was afraid."
- Is she smart? asked Princess Mary. Pierre considered.
“I think not,” he said, “but yes. She does not deign to be smart ... No, she is charming, and nothing more. Princess Mary again shook her head disapprovingly.
“Oh, I so desire to love her!” Tell her that if you see her before me.
“I heard that they will be in the next few days,” said Pierre.
Princess Marya told Pierre her plan of how, as soon as the Rostovs arrived, she would get close to her future daughter-in-law and try to accustom the old prince to her.

Marrying a rich bride in St. Petersburg did not work out for Boris and he came to Moscow for the same purpose. In Moscow, Boris was in indecision between the two richest brides - Julie and Princess Mary. Although Princess Mary, despite her ugliness, seemed to him more attractive than Julie, for some reason he was embarrassed to look after Bolkonskaya. On her last meeting with her, on the old prince's name day, to all his attempts to talk to her about feelings, she answered him inappropriately and obviously did not listen to him.
Julie, on the contrary, although in a special way, peculiar to her alone, but willingly accepted his courtship.
Julie was 27 years old. After the death of her brothers, she became very rich. She was now completely ugly; but I thought that she was not only just as good, but much more attractive than she had been before. She was supported in this delusion by the fact that, firstly, she became a very rich bride, and, secondly, that the older she became, the safer she was for men, the freer it was for men to treat her and, without assuming any obligations, enjoy her dinners, evenings and lively society, gathering with her. A man who ten years ago would have been afraid to go every day to the house where there was a 17-year-old young lady, so as not to compromise her and not to tie himself up, now went to her boldly every day and treated her not as a young lady, but as a a friend who has no gender.
The Karagins' house was the most pleasant and hospitable house in Moscow that winter. In addition to parties and dinners, every day a large company gathered at the Karagins, especially men who had dinner at 12 o'clock in the morning and stayed up until 3 o'clock. There was no ball, festivities, theater that Julie would miss. Her toilets were always the most fashionable. But, despite this, Julie seemed disappointed in everything, told everyone that she did not believe in friendship, or in love, or in any joys of life, and expected peace only there. She adopted the tone of a girl who has suffered great disappointment, a girl who seems to have lost a loved one or was cruelly deceived by him. Although nothing like this happened to her, they looked at her as such, and she herself even believed that she had suffered a lot in life. This melancholy, which did not prevent her from having fun, did not prevent the young people who visited her from having a good time. Each guest, coming to them, gave his debt to the melancholy mood of the hostess and then engaged in secular conversations, and dances, and mental games, and burime tournaments, which were in vogue with the Karagins. Only some young people, including Boris, went deeper into Julie's melancholy mood, and with these young people she had longer and more solitary conversations about the futility of everything worldly, and to them she opened her albums covered with sad images, sayings and poems.
Julie was especially affectionate towards Boris: she regretted his early disappointment in life, offered him those consolations of friendship that she could offer, having suffered so much in her life herself, and opened her album to him. Boris drew two trees for her in an album and wrote: Arbres rustiques, vos sombres rameaux secouent sur moi les tenebres et la melancolie. [Rural trees, your dark boughs shake off gloom and melancholy on me.]
Elsewhere he drew a tomb and wrote:
"La mort est secourable et la mort est tranquille
Ah! contre les douleurs il n "y a pas d" autre asile.
[Death is saving and death is calm;
ABOUT! there is no other refuge against suffering.]
Julie said it was lovely.
- II y a quelque chose de si ravissant dans le sourire de la melancolie, [There is something infinitely charming in a smile of melancholy,] - she said to Boris word for word the passage written out from the book.
- C "est un rayon de lumiere dans l" ombre, une nuance entre la douleur et le desespoir, qui montre la consolation possible. [This is a ray of light in the shadows, a shade between sadness and despair, which indicates the possibility of consolation.] - To this, Boris wrote poetry to her:
"Aliment de poison d" une ame trop sensible,
"Toi, sans qui le bonheur me serait impossible,
"Tendre melancolie, ah, viens me consoler,
Viens calmer les tourments de ma sombre retraite
"Et mele une douceur secrete
"A ces pleurs, que je sens couler."
[Poisonous food of a too sensitive soul,
You, without whom happiness would be impossible for me,
Gentle melancholy, oh come comfort me
Come, calm the torments of my gloomy solitude
And join the secret sweetness
To these tears that I feel flowing.]
Julie played Boris the saddest nocturnes on the harp. Boris read Poor Liza aloud to her and interrupted the reading more than once from excitement, which took his breath away. Meeting in a large society, Julie and Boris looked at each other as the only people in the world who were indifferent, who understood each other.
Anna Mikhailovna, who often traveled to the Karagins, making up her mother's party, meanwhile made accurate inquiries about what was given for Julie (both Penza estates and Nizhny Novgorod forests were given). Anna Mikhailovna, with devotion to the will of Providence and tenderness, looked at the refined sadness that connected her son with rich Julie.
- Toujours charmante et melancolique, cette chere Julieie, [She is still charming and melancholic, this dear Julie.] - she said to her daughter. - Boris says that he rests his soul in your house. He has suffered so many disappointments and is so sensitive,” she told her mother.
“Ah, my friend, how I have become attached to Julie lately,” she said to her son, “I cannot describe to you! And who can't love her? This is such an unearthly creature! Oh Boris, Boris! She was silent for a minute. “And how I feel sorry for her maman,” she continued, “today she showed me reports and letters from Penza (they have a huge estate) and she is poor and all alone: she is so deceived!
Boris smiled slightly, listening to his mother. He meekly laughed at her ingenuous cunning, but he listened and sometimes asked her attentively about the Penza and Nizhny Novgorod estates.
Julie had long been expecting an offer from her melancholic admirer and was ready to accept it; but some kind of secret feeling of disgust for her, for her passionate desire to get married, for her unnaturalness, and a feeling of horror at the renunciation of the possibility of true love still stopped Boris. His vacation was already over. Whole days and every single day he spent with the Karagins, and every day, reasoning with himself, Boris told himself that he would propose tomorrow. But in the presence of Julie, looking at her red face and chin, almost always strewn with powder, at her moist eyes and at the expression on her face, which always showed readiness to immediately move from melancholy to the unnatural rapture of marital happiness, Boris could not utter a decisive word: despite the fact that for a long time in his imagination he considered himself the owner of the Penza and Nizhny Novgorod estates and distributed the use of income from them. Julie saw Boris's indecisiveness and sometimes the thought came to her that she was disgusting to him; but immediately a woman's self-delusion offered her consolation, and she told herself that he was shy only out of love. Her melancholy, however, began to turn into irritability, and not long before Boris left, she undertook a decisive plan. At the same time that Boris' vacation was coming to an end, Anatole Kuragin appeared in Moscow and, of course, in the Karagins' living room, and Julie, suddenly leaving her melancholy, became very cheerful and attentive to Kuragin.
“Mon cher,” Anna Mikhailovna said to her son, “je sais de bonne source que le Prince Basile envoie son fils a Moscou pour lui faire epouser Julieie.” [My dear, I know from reliable sources that Prince Vasily is sending his son to Moscow in order to marry him to Julie.] I love Julie so much that I should feel sorry for her. What do you think, my friend? Anna Mikhailovna said.
The idea of being fooled and losing for nothing this whole month of hard melancholic service under Julie and seeing all the income from the Penza estates already planned and used properly in his imagination in the hands of another - especially in the hands of stupid Anatole, offended Boris. He went to the Karagins with the firm intention of making an offer. Julie greeted him with a cheerful and carefree air, casually talking about how fun she had been at the ball yesterday, and asking when he was coming. Despite the fact that Boris came with the intention of talking about his love and therefore intended to be gentle, he irritably began to talk about female inconstancy: about how women can easily move from sadness to joy and that their mood depends only on who looks after them. Julie was offended and said that it was true that a woman needed variety, that everyone would get tired of the same thing.
“For this I would advise you ...” Boris began, wanting to taunt her; but at that very moment the insulting thought came to him that he might leave Moscow without achieving his goal and losing his labors in vain (which had never happened to him). He stopped in the middle of her speech, lowered his eyes so as not to see her unpleasantly irritated and indecisive face, and said: “I didn’t come here at all to quarrel with you. On the contrary…” He glanced at her to see if he could continue. All her irritation suddenly disappeared, and restless, pleading eyes were fixed on him with greedy expectation. "I can always arrange myself so that I rarely see her," thought Boris. “But the work has begun and must be done!” He blushed, looked up at her, and said to her, “You know how I feel about you!” There was no more need to speak: Julie's face shone with triumph and self-satisfaction; but she forced Boris to tell her everything that is said in such cases, to say that he loves her, and never loved a single woman more than her. She knew that for the Penza estates and Nizhny Novgorod forests she could demand this, and she got what she demanded.
The bride and groom, no longer remembering the trees that showered them with darkness and melancholy, made plans for the future arrangement of a brilliant house in St. Petersburg, made visits and prepared everything for a brilliant wedding.

Count Ilya Andreich arrived in Moscow at the end of January with Natasha and Sonya. The countess was still unwell, and could not go, but it was impossible to wait for her recovery: Prince Andrei was expected to Moscow every day; besides, it was necessary to buy a dowry; The Rostovs' house in Moscow was not heated; in addition, they arrived for a short time, the countess was not with them, and therefore Ilya Andreich decided to stay in Moscow with Marya Dmitrievna Akhrosimova, who had long offered her hospitality to the count.

Lomov Boris Fedorovich (January 28, 1927 - July 11, 1988) - psychologist, doctor of psychological sciences, professor. Graduated from the Department of Psychology of the Faculty of Philosophy of Leningrad State University (1951). In 1963 he defended his doctoral dissertation in engineering psychology. He founded the first laboratory of engineering psychology in the USSR (LSU, 1959), he was the first dean of the Faculty of Psychology of Leningrad State University (1966). Lomov organized and headed the first Institute of Psychology at the USSR Academy of Sciences (1971), founded the Psychological Journal (1980).

Lomov made a significant contribution to the development of engineering and general, pedagogical and social psychology, management psychology and the history of psychology. The core of Lomov's scientific work is the idea of an integrated approach to the study of man.

Major works: "Man and Technology" (1963); «Engineering psychology. Theory, methodology and practical application” (co-authored) (1977); "Anticipation in the structure of activity" (co-authored with E. N. Surkov) (1980); "Methodological and theoretical problems of psychology" (1984), "Issues of general, pedagogical and engineering psychology" (1991).

_________________________________

Materials posted on the site:

(b. 08/30/1948) - full member (academician) of the Russian Academy of Education, Academician-Secretary of the Department of General Secondary Education of the Russian Academy of Education, Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Professor.

In 1980 he graduated from the art and graphics department of the Moscow State Pedagogical Institute named after. V. I. Lenin. In 1986 he defended his Ph.D. thesis on the aesthetic education of schoolchildren, and in 2000 - his doctoral dissertation on the problems of didactics of the socio-cultural block of academic disciplines in the educational space of the school and the specific features of the professional ethno-pedagogical training of teachers of art and folk art culture.

The beginning of Lomov's labor activity is connected with creative work and pedagogical activity. For more than 10 years he worked as a teacher of drawing and drawing in general education schools in Moscow and was actively engaged in scientific activities. Lomov made a great contribution to the development of domestic pedagogical science, culture and art. He developed the concept of a network of in-depth art specialized classes in the system of general education schools and defined, tested and widely implemented the strategy for the development of the educational field "Art".

From 1982 to 1987 Lomov, working as an inspector of universities of the Ministry of Education of the CCCP, led the system of art and graphic faculties and departments of culture of the country's pedagogical universities. With his direct participation, new art and graphic departments and faculties were opened, the package of educational and methodological documentation (curricula, programs, guidelines, manuals and textbooks) was improved and modernized.

From 1991 to 2007 Lomov led the work on the creation of a fundamentally new type of university unit at the Moscow State Regional University - the Faculty of Fine Arts and Folk Crafts. It was here that ethnopedagogy of fine arts developed in practice, where folk crafts and crafts became didactic tools for the educational process.

In 2007, S. P. Lomov, as a rector, headed the Pedagogical Academy of Postgraduate Education, where special attention was paid to the modernization of the retraining system and advanced training of teachers. And in 2009 he was elected to the position of Academician-Secretary of the Russian Academy of Education, where he has been working to the present.

Lomov made a great contribution to the development of domestic pedagogical science as the author of serious scientific works, manuals and books on the methodology of teaching fine arts and professional pedagogical education. His monographs, textbooks, manuals for pupils and students: "Ethnopedagogy of Russian fine arts", "Peculiarities of graphic training of students in a pedagogical university", "Aesthetic education at school", "Ethnopedagogy and folk crafts", "The concept of the educational field of art in a 12-year-old school", "Painting", "Methods of teaching fine arts", "Ornamental composition", "Russian painters of the 18th-19th centuries", "Information technology and art", "Fundamentals of color science", "Didactics of art education", "Education, art and culture in the context of globalization” and others are widely used in the educational process of various professional educational institutions, schools, lyceums, gymnasiums.

Lomov S.P. is a well-known author of textbooks on fine arts for secondary schools of lyceums and gymnasiums. Continuing the line of activity psychology in the harmonious development of schoolchildren, where creativity plays a big role, he builds educational material on the best examples of classical art. All his activities are inextricably linked with pedagogical science, art and education.

Today, Lomov S.P., working at the Russian Academy of Education, oversees the most important issues of reforming and updating the general education school, the development and implementation of new educational standards in all subject areas, fundamental and applied research in pedagogical science, problematic aspects of the construction of the "New School" and the prospect of its development.

Lomov S.P. conducts a lot of social work - he is a member of many scientific, methodological, artistic councils and commissions:
- Chairman of the scientific and methodological commission on artistic and graphic disciplines of the educational and methodological association at the Moscow State Pedagogical University;
- Chairman of the dissertation council for the defense of doctoral and master's theses in pedagogical sciences and art education at Moscow State Pedagogical University;
- Member of the International Association of Schools "UNESCO" since 1991;
- Member of the Board of the Creative Union of Artists of Russia;
- Expert of the Higher Attestation Commission of the Russian Federation on psychological and pedagogical disciplines.

Being the head of a large scientific school, at the origins of which were such outstanding artists as: I. V. Kramskoy, I. E. Repin, P. P. Chistyakov, D. N. Kardovsii, D. D. Zhilinsky, and scientists - A. I. Sapozhnikov, A. V. Bakushinsky, L. S. Vygotsky, V. V. Vanslov, N. N. Rostovtsev, B. F. Lomov, V. S. Kuzin, E. V. Shorokhov, Stanislav Petrovich, continuing their traditions, conducts a great scientific, pedagogical and organizational work. He has published over 150 scientific papers, he is the author of a number of well-known books and textbooks for schools and universities on the methodology of teaching fine arts. Lomov actively works with graduate students and applicants. Under his leadership, more than 40 people defended candidate dissertations, 7 people defended doctoral dissertations, more than 20 pupils became members of the Creative Union of Artists of Russia, 9 of them received international recognition, were awarded honorary diplomas and diplomas.

In his free time from scientific activities, Lomov S.P. is actively engaged in creativity. As a painter, he is known to a wide range of viewers. His watercolors and easel paintings are made in the classical manner of realistic art. They are simple in style, attractive in genre, where landscape motifs evoke feelings of joy and pride in their “small” homeland. He regularly exhibits his paintings both in Russia and abroad.

Lomov S.P. has government awards, diplomas, thanks and diplomas: Honorary Worker of Higher School of the Ministry of Education of the Russian Federation (2001), Certificate of Honor of the Ministry of Education of the Moscow Region (2000); Medal "Worthy" of the Russian Academy of Arts (1999); silver medal of the Creative Union of Artists of Russia (2003); gold medal of the Creative Union of Artists of Russia (2006); diploma of the Russian Academy of Arts for participation in the exhibition "Golden Ring of Russia" (2004); international diplomas for organizing exhibitions in Germany (Munich, Walzheim, Oldenburg, Schrobenhausen), France (Dijon), Italy (Milan), Iceland (Reykjavik), Cyprus (Nicosia), Luxembourg, etc.

Also Lomov S.P. has a number of awards and thanks from public and scientific organizations, educational institutions, both in Russia and abroad.