The operating principle of the UFO engine. UFO and antigravity

The materials presented here sometimes contradict themselves. I deliberately do not remove these contradictions - let everyone try to find for themselves what they like and awakens technical thought.

In a nutshell, here is the actual design of a flying saucer engine. Perhaps not quite Schauberger. It’s interesting that sometimes some ideas appear. Different people, in different places, different times, but similar thoughts come. Either people are the same, or the laws of nature. Would you believe that I have never read or even heard of Schauberger’s work before (I mean his engine running on environmental energy, and also having levitating properties)? But when I accidentally (thanks to the Internet) came across a description of his designs, I was simply amazed at how similar what I had been thinking about for a long time was to his ideas. Externally, the Schauberger engine looks like this:

Its internal structure is like this (turned upside down in relation to the photographs):

So that you understand that I am not clinging to someone else’s glory, I will try to explain its device in the simplest language, because nowhere is it really described how it works, despite its seemingly fairly extensive representation on the Internet. In some places there is an opinion that this engine is a hoax and cannot work at all. But I think that's not true. I'll try to explain. Undoubtedly, the main part of the engine is this strange at first glance wheel (in the picture above it is marked on the left with an incomprehensible inscription, apparently “turbine”).

Despite the apparent complexity of the main part, it can be easily manufactured. A development of a similarity of such a turbine is shown below and presumably can be cut out of a metal plate 250x500 mm thick 1-2 mm and bent accordingly. Centering of the turbine will occur automatically during rotation (it is proposed to attach the turbine to the axis of the motor-generator using 3 radial springs at 120 degrees - the turbine “itself” will find its center of rotation).

The turbine itself will have the appearance of a “jester’s crown.” It is the “jester” and not the “king” - I apologize for such an unnormative term-comparison. But in my opinion, this is the most convenient way to explain that the turbine has spiral blades, radially bent from the center to the periphery.

At first glance, it looks like some kind of devilry from 24 corkscrews rotating in a circle for opening bottles. Why is this necessary? Here I link to my own website for a chapter on the origins of tornadoes. Schauberger in this design created ideal conditions for the formation of a group of mini-tornadoes and the central tornado itself, which is the driving force of this design. At the first stage, the air is twisted around the axis of the electric motor using such a wheel. But the same air, when thrown due to centrifugal force to the periphery, passes through the corkscrews of the wheel and receives rotation along the axis of each of the 24 corkscrews. Air swirls simultaneously around 2 axes of rotation. And rotation simultaneously around 2 axes this is such an amazing thing! Try to pick up a high-speed electric motor with a handwheel on the axis and rotate it around the axis of your own hand. Very interesting sensations. When turning the motor, you feel forces that are not acting in the directions you expect.

So, this wheel forms 24 mini-tornadoes, which, bending around the inner surface of the upper part of the engine (which looks like a copper basin in the photo below) along a very interesting trajectory (still rotate the motor!) break out onto the inner cone of the engine and move further to the outlet.

It is better to observe the process further in transverse cross-section to understand what a tornado looks like when viewed from above. The first cut just below the "copper basin" is this cross-section of a tornado. The other 2 are closer to the outlet. It was inconvenient to draw 24 balls, so I left only 9, the principle is still the same. Moreover, this particular drawing somehow strangely echoes the drawing on the wheat fields in England. Further, everywhere, appropriately and inappropriately, I will try to draw these wild analogies. Moreover, I saw photographs of the drawings in the margins much later than I completed all of the above. Isn't it strange: this cartoon below and the drawing on a wheat field were created absolutely independently of each other? However, even the number of minivortices coincided.

So 24(9) balls, twisted from small vortices, roll inside along the wall of the circle. The walls of each ball rotate in opposite directions relative to their neighbors. I will consider these balls as a dual medium: it seems to be a ball, since it rolls like a part of a ball bearing and is subject to the laws of mechanics, but at the same time it is air, subject to the laws of hydrodynamics. These balls, in any collision between neighbor and neighbor, have the intention of “running into” each other and thus moving towards the center of the structure, all at the same time (try to see this in the cartoon on the left), and at the same time the opposite movement of the walls of the neighboring balls - this is according to Bernoulli's law is a rarefied medium, it turns out that the balls are “attracted” to each other. As a result, this entire mass of rotating air is pulled towards the center, accelerates significantly (because the diameter of the structure decreases), moving lower and ultimately flies out through the nozzle from the bottom of the structure. As the corkscrew wheel rotates, it constantly feeds these mini-vortex bearings and draws in air from outside. Schauberger claims that this process becomes self-sustaining. A truly natural tornado can exist for a long time and obviously its very existence is supported only by the presence of a pressure difference between the external environment and the internal cone of the tornado. And inside the engine, a vacuum zone forms right in the center. This means that the surrounding air should tend there, falling on the turbine blades with “corkscrews” and being involved in a complex rotation trajectory, which could be called a “self-turning donut”. This is how it seems to me the basic principles of operation of this engine. In my opinion, such a process can really be called some kind of opposite to an ordinary explosion( explosion) , since the substance does not fly apart, but vice versa strive to converge on one point(to the base of the vortex). Schauberger called this process implosion.

I drew these 3 frames with spinning roller balls and again a strange thought came to mind. On television again there was a story about the next appearance of unusual circles in the wheat fields of England (and not only there). But if I didn’t have an animator to illustrate my ideas, I would try to describe the contraction of a vortex to a point in the first graphic editor I came across with something like this drawing. In my opinion, this drawing on a wheat field is a clear illustration of the processes occurring in a tornado and calls for the following main conclusion: the rotating mini-vortices that make up the tornado are attracted to each other and tend to the main center of rotation. And here it is the minivortices that are drawn. Please note that next to each main circle, several additional ones are carefully drawn, directly indicating that several mini-processes are depicted here, moving in a spiral towards the center. More precisely, there are 6 of them and they work exactly as depicted in my cartoon a little higher. It is absolutely certain that a volumetric process is drawn here on a plane (vortex - tornado - tornado). Who drew this and why is a separate big question. Even during the day, creating several such geometrically accurate circles is a big problem. How about drawing about 400 at night? It is unlikely that this could have been done by just a madman. Maybe this can be understood as a kind of hint drawing?

Let's return again to Schauberger. Witnesses to the operation of the Schauberger engine claimed that only air and water served as fuel. Perhaps they were a little wrong. Most likely it was air and obviously alcohol (by the way, it looked like water). During operation, the engine must literally devour the surrounding air, and then it’s time to slip fuel into it and set it on fire, further facilitating the process of vortex formation. With a large amount of oxygen, the flame of alcohol is almost invisible. So the result was a “flameless and smokeless engine” as described in some publications.

I came to approximately the same type of design in my conclusions and propose something vaguely reminiscent of Schauberger’s “windmill”; the work is generally based on the same principles. I was inspired by the funnel of water pouring out of the bathroom and what happens inside the structures below occurs according to the same laws.

The difference from the Schauberger mechanism is the absence of an external cone, along which the Schauberger pulls the vortex to the center and throws it out through the nozzle, as well as a simpler design of the wheel for forming the vortex (in fact, it is a regular centrifugal pump). My simplification of Schauberger’s design (cartoon on the left) is due to the simple idea that a natural tornado does not need all such tricks (although the “corkscrew” wheel that he came up with causes nothing but admiration - in the simplest and most effective way it spins the air flow along 2 perpendicular axes of rotation !). My task is to spin the flow into a small tornado as simply as possible and preferably with the complete absence of mechanical parts. This can be achieved by using not the turbine of a centrifugal pump for spinning, but by using something similar to the MHD engine described on the Electric Motor page. The design is completely devoid of moving parts (except for the vortex itself). It turned out something like the one shown in the cartoon on the right. The yellow color is an attempt to depict burning fuel (possibly kerosene?). Moreover, for an MHD engine there must be conductive kerosene (possibly salted?). Then they told me that there must be a sodium additive. Roughly speaking, this is an attempt to reproduce a formidable natural phenomenon in a tin can. And even more precisely a process, the essence of which is clear from the cartoon below.

"Tornado in a glass" "Just a tornado"

For the first time, Einstein saw the left drawing in an ordinary glass of tea and floating tea leaves (let's call it Einstein's glass). Take a close look: the central ascending part is the “trunk of a tornado” (only in the left picture it lifts tea leaves, and in the right picture there are houses and cars). It is strange that Einstein himself did not draw such conclusions. And Schauberger seems to have done it. Almost all designs that are offered on this site are based on the process that occurs in this cup.

So to speak - some points for the main engine of a flying saucer. True only for the atmosphere. And the issues of horizontal flight have not yet been addressed. Can you imagine how useful a device with such an engine would be, say, for emergency services? Remember the fire at the Ostankino TV tower and the complete helplessness of the helicopter flying around? And by the way, photographs of some UFOs, even by their very appearance, make one think that they have a central engine operating on the principles of the tin can described above, and such a machine would be much more useful than an ordinary helicopter. Simply irreplaceable. The torque is compensated by the presence of several engines on one platform. About the same as in the bottom photo. In my opinion, there are 3 inverted Schauberger engines (Repulsine B type) powered by one central nozzle. And it would probably be more correct to place Repulsin like this:

In the photo, UFO Adamsky is supported by 3 (or 4?) engines similar to Repulsine B. These engines are attached to the bottom of the “hat” and generate 3 or 4 tornadoes on which the entire structure “dangles”. One big and three smaller ones.

Let's return again to the Schauberger engine as an energy generator. The processes occurring in the Einstein glass are undoubtedly the basis for the operation of the engine. Let's try to achieve a stable process. To do this, spin the water in the container using a disk on the axis of the electric motor. After spinning up, the water will move along a complex trajectory. (fluid movement is described on the website www.evert.de, a computer drawing from this site is shown). Very interesting conclusions can be drawn from this figure. The linear speed of water movement along this entire ornate path is constant and is determined by the linear speed movement of the disk edges. The liquid accelerated by the disk spirals down and is then pushed towards the center. At this moment, the angular velocity of water rotation increases. (A striking analogue of such an increase in rotation speed is the rotation of a thread with a load when winding this thread around a finger). The liquid rises upward with increased angular velocity and rests against the central part of the disk. Here's the fun part. The speed of water rotation in the central region is higher than the speed of rotation of the disk! The water "pushes" the disk in the direction of rotation. The rotating flow supports itself! Almost like a perpetual motion machine. But as always, friction forces get in the way. And the process is quite stable and low-damping. By the way, getting a little distracted: if you spin water in an ordinary bucket, even without the help of a disk, the rotation of the water will still occur according to the same laws and the water will rotate for quite a long time, because here too there is self-sustaining rotation of the water - it’s just that no one ever pays attention to it (it is enough to tightly close the lid of the bucket, poured exactly to the brim - the rotation will stop quite quickly). What do I mean by this? There is only one thing - a vortex is very easy to obtain when spinning a liquid or gas under unequal conditions of rotation from above and below, and this is an almost ready-made self-sustaining system. You need very little energy and the process will be undamped. Moreover: the vortex absorbs energy in the form of heat from the environment! Now I'll try to explain. Consider a simplified diagram of the Schauberger engine. If we ignore everything secondary, the design fits into the following simple diagram, which in fact is nothing more than a continuation of the idea Einstein glasses A.

Inside at the top there is a rotating disk (red). Below is a small vertical plate. This achieves uneven conditions during rotation for the lower and upper layers of water (air?). On the left is the heat exchanger (more on it later). On top is a motor-generator, which initially works as a process starter, and after reaching tornado mode, it works to remove energy. The valve on the heat exchanger is a process switch. The arrow on the left is the working fluid of the device heated by the environment.

What happens when this device operates? It's simple. Centrifugal forces create increased pressure at the walls of the vessel. And the vacuum in the central part. Due to the higher angular velocity of rotation of the upper layers of water (air) compared to the lower ones, a meridional flow is created, descending along the walls of the vessel. And rising in the central part (in nature this is nothing more than the “trunk of a tornado”). Liquid (gas), moving along its sophisticated trajectory, either ends up in a compression region, or in a rarefaction region. Let's remember the simplest law of physics - the Boyle-Mariotte law. If you take a certain mass of gas, then during forced compression the gas heats up. And under vacuum it cools. It is in the central part of the device that the water-air mixture enters the area of ​​forced rarefaction by centrifugal forces. In this case, for the final mass of gas, decrease in temperature and increase in volume. This increase in volume gives an increase in the kinetic movement of the flow from bottom to top along the central axis of the device. This recharged jet with new energy enters the turbine disk, causing it to spin faster and produce an even more intense vortex. which creates an even higher vacuum and so on and so forth. The cooled, moist air is thrown out into the heat exchanger tube by centrifugal force. Ideally, the heat exchanger temperature is around absolute zero. The environment surrounding the heat exchanger, which is normal from our point of view, is an “environment with excess energy”. The heat exchanger is heated by it and thermal energy enters the device, ultimately being converted into the rotation of a “self-turning donut” from the moist air inside the device.

I would like to make a short note about the Ranque effect (temperature separation of the gas stream in the so-called “Ranque tubes”). No one really explains this effect. But in my opinion everything is simple. There is the Boyle-Mariotte law (the product of pressure and volume at a constant temperature is a constant value) and everything happens according to this law. The gas circulating in the meridional direction in our device alternately experiences either compression or rarefaction. It either heats up or cools down relative to the “normal” temperature. That's the whole effect of temperature separation. By the way, has anyone tried to inject water in there? It should be a very interesting effect. Something like passing the “dew point” with sudden cooling.

By the way, we can draw an interesting conclusion: but in this device it is also oscillatory process! And oscillations have resonance - a sharp increase in amplitude with minimal energy input! Can you imagine how it is possible to stabilize the effect when there are dependencies between the amplitude of oscillations and all influencing parameters? Temperature resonance! It sounds good. And can find excellent application in refrigeration machines.

In my deep conviction, Schauberger was a great man and undeservedly unknown. It seems to me that he still managed to build a generator that seems to extract energy from " NOTHING". More precisely, directly from the environment. Even if this is done very inefficiently, the free nature of this energy should outweigh all arguments against. What is still surprising? On the Internet you can find quite a lot of information about Schauberger’s work. But, apparently, so far There is no technological revolution in energy production. It seems that there are photographs and drawings of structures. However, all the descriptions of the operation of the engine that I have encountered so far are so incomprehensibly monotonous (and from my point of view absolutely incorrect) that it becomes immediately clear - nothing works simply no. I do not pretend to be the ultimate truth. Everything that is described on my website is a chain of continuous contradictions and inaccuracies. Only I am convinced that an engine - a generator with amazing properties that generates, or rather concentrates, energy from the energy of the environment is quite possible and can be manufactured right now.The socio-economic consequences of such an invention, of course, will have no conceivable limits. This is a complete solution to energy problems and a change in the concept of vehicles.

Based on the above, all that remains is to draw a specific design. Well then. As a hypothetical, “virtual” engine, I propose the following “saucepan”:

Vortex motor-generator

This device can perform the following functions:

1. Energy generator. Or rather, a concentrator of energy from the environment. I can’t even dare to say “perpetual motion machine of the 2nd kind.”

2. Heat engine - especially great possibilities for refrigeration and air conditioning. By the way, the working fluid here is not necessarily water-air. Air and freon are quite possible.

3. Gravitational mechanism. This is a rather impudent statement, but I will try to explain. And in 2 ways.

3.1. The weight loss effect of rapidly rotating masses is known. Why does it depend? Let's return again to Fig. Everta. It is clear that with such air rotation, incredible speeds can be achieved (due to the small air mass). The device is not in danger of destruction, unlike, for example, a metal flywheel. By and large, despite all the complexity of the trajectory, each point of this trajectory moves tangentially to the surface of the Earth. And it is quite possible to achieve a linear speed of 8 km/sec on this trajectory. An artificial satellite with an orbit of 1 meter? Will levitation occur in this case? Hm...

3.2. Once upon a time, I came across a TM magazine with an article about gravitational mechanisms (inertioids). About 10 types of mechanisms were described there and immediately explained. why can’t they work fully, that is, fly. True, at the end of the article it was stated that there was still no final verdict on the operation of such devices and the question was open. Therefore, I suggest number 11. At one time I was very interested in the rotation of a simple flywheel on the axis of an electric motor. I held the motor in my hands. Its power was 70 watts, 7000 rpm at U = 24v, the flywheel was an aluminum disk with a diameter of 10 cm, weighing 200 grams. I will explain in detail. so that those interested can try it themselves. If you're interested, of course. When you rotate the handwheel, you get the full feeling that you're already holding a working inertial motion in your hands! It is enough to rotate the structure around the hand - and there is a complete illusion of an incomprehensible pull in a very specific direction. This interesting effect is achieved by rotating simultaneously around 2 axes (motor axis and hand axis). Then an idea appeared that now strangely intersected with the essence of the Schauberger engine. Previously, it seemed to me outright nonsense, although quite interesting. I'll probably draw it a little later.

And now a small conclusion for what is stated on this page. Some general basic principles can be formulated for the operation of devices that produce mechanical energy by "absorbing" energy from the environment:

1. A process is generated that is on the verge of self-support (for example, in hydraulics, a closed vortex like an Einstein glass is an extremely unstable and rather inertial state: examples all the time - a spinning funnel of water, air, a natural tornado; in electrical engineering - an electric motor and a dynamo connected on one axis ). For true self-support, it is necessary to add external energy to such a system. Sometimes very small, compensating for losses due to friction or resistance.

2. Hyperbolizing the process. Up to the resonance that occurs in such a device (in a vortex - heating and cooling of the water-air mixture; in electrical engineering, the induction of electromagnetic fields is obvious)..

3. “Turning” the structure in relation to the environment in such a way that some part of this structure will have energy with a sharply reduced energy potential and will become an absorber of environmental energy (for example, in hydraulics - the central part of the Schauberger engine - ideally this space is approximate to absolute zero in temperature and pressure, so the ordinary environment surrounding this part of the engine has an “excess” of energy. In electrical engineering - it’s more complicated here - the overlap and resonance of fields is obvious, I’ll leave the thought unfinished for now).

4. Release of externally “absorbed” energy from the confined space of the device in the form of mechanical or electrical energy.

Vivid examples of such devices:

Schauberger engine and Clem engine, which is very similar in principle

In electrical engineering - Tesla generator and Searle generator.

Now we can guess what Schauberger’s Repulsine looked like inside. Most likely it was a design similar to the illustration below. The vortex formed in the central part absorbs, with the help of a heat exchanger (essentially a conventional centrifugal pump), the minimum heat from the air passing through the turbine blades that is necessary to support rotation. The engine starts when the turbine spins up and a small amount of water is injected from below. Probably, after reaching tornado mode, water is no longer needed and the only working fluid is air. The pressure inside the engine during operation is reduced in the center and increased at the periphery. The Ranque effect “works” in full. Or rather, it should work even more pronounced than in the “Ranque tubes” (this is because the air swirled in the Ranque tubes is thrown out instantly and rather wastefully, and here this effect “accumulates” during cyclic meridional rotation). The turbine heat exchanger, cooled from below, is heated from above by the forced ambient air. The rejection of this cooled air creates normal jet thrust.

In short, if it really works (I believe if the Schauberger engine really existed, then it was something like this design) - we can consider it an absolutely universal engine-propulsion-generator. Super eco-friendly and fuel-free. With a flow of cold air as exhaust.

Vortex engine-generator-propulsion

The design's manufacturability is at the level of the beginning of the last century, maybe even earlier. Looks like a regular vacuum cleaner. Its simplicity makes you wonder - does it work? But I don’t see any particular contradictions. I believe this picture can get a lot of distribution on the Internet. At least as a discussion point.

An industrial installation for generating electricity might look something like this:

Vortex power plant unit (energy cell?)

The design is extremely simple. Who said that the “trunk of a tornado” should be directed downward? Let's turn everything upside down (by the way, in Schauberger's pencil sketch at the beginning of the page there is also a question - where is "up and down"). Thus, the generation of an artificial vortex is greatly simplified. What is needed to form a vortex? The answer is - a little ambient heat, moisture and the initial swirl of the moist air mass. Ordinary water is poured into a bowl-shaped container. At the initial stage, the motor-generator, using a turbine with spiral blades, begins to twist the water-air cone and after the structure reaches tornado mode, a absorption of heat from the surrounding air , acceleration of the movement of rarefied air along the center of the vortex And the pressure of this flow on the turbine blades. The motor-generator can be switched to energy collection mode. I leave the description of how the installation works to the bare minimum - the drawing is extremely clear. Although the processes occurring in this device are much more complex and varied (I deliberately omitted the formation of a mini-tornado when the main vortex occurs, as well as possible electrostatic effects). In this picture I just tried to highlight the main thing - the process of self-sustaining vortex is possible and in my opinion quite simple. I don’t know what height the resulting vortex will have (it’s quite possible - this installation could become a “rotor” of a full-scale natural tornado in an open area). And if in nature the process of formation of vortices occurs all the time, and sometimes seemingly without any reason at all, then I propose to treat this device as a set of pieces of iron and other parts that contribute to the “civilized” emergence of a very common natural phenomenon.

A separate question is about the size of this structure. Critics on the Internet don't like it when someone starts talking about the significant size of the proposed structures. Therefore, I will not talk about gigantic sizes (the Messiah machine with a diameter of 50 meters can serve as such a negative example). I much prefer the description of Schauberger's Home Machine Power - the dimensions of this device are about 1 meter in diameter. By the way, what I propose is a kind of symbiosis between these two devices. Only structurally simpler and possibly better. But the minimum dimensions are determined by the laws of nature - I have never seen an air vortex in living nature less than a meter long (a simple example is ordinary turbulence on a dusty road). But if you imagine the maximum dimensions of such a station! The imagination can easily picture a huge installation in an open area, which will provoke the emergence of a real tornado in all its crushing power. Only this tornado is “tamed”, so it always stands in one place - exactly above the power plant. What if we build a complex of large-scale vortex power plants that cool the surrounding space? Here we can already talk about the impact on the climate! It would be a great contribution to the fight against global warming. Here's a little fantasy on this topic:

These structures, it seems to me, can be manufactured in a very wide range of sizes and power, but the most obvious is as a small-sized autonomous source of energy (for example, for a detached house). Do you remember how personal computers were “overwhelmed” by “mainstream computers” at one time? We need to be closer to the consumer!

Everything looks pretty fantastic, of course, but I still want to enhance the impression. And finally figure out what it is Implosion, which Schauberger constantly talked about and try to understand what he wanted to offer?

Let's start with the fact that the entire technogenic civilization currently depends on Explosions. From Latin it is an explosion, an exhaust. The work of any modern heat engine (left side of the figure) is the combustion of fuel in some volume, a sharp increase in temperature and expansion of the working fluid as a result of this combustion. The increased volume of the working fluid presses on the piston, turbine, and is simply thrown back to receive a reactive impulse. Almost any engine operates on the expansion process as a result of fuel combustion, constantly wasting non-renewable resources in the form of gas, oil, coal and uranium. I don’t even want to talk about the waste of such technology - you can imagine it yourself. But the expansion of the working fluid can be obtained as a result of a completely different process! An example is a natural tornado. I'll try to explain a little. Let's imagine. that in some container they began to rotate the working fluid. In the simplest case, it is ordinary air, as in this figure on the right (a miniature model of a natural tornado). An accelerating upward translational movement will immediately appear in the central part. There are at least 3 reasons for this:

1. Due vacuum by centrifugal forces central part of the vortex there's some going on an increase in volume for a finite mass of gas and a decrease in its temperature. This mass is “supported” by the walls of the vessel from the sides, and its bottom from below. There is only one path left for expansion - up.

2. On rarefied part of the gas in the central part Archimedes' law applies- the lighter body “floats up” - something like a balloon, only without the shell.

3. The third reason is the most exotic. Air during rotation acquires significant electrical potential. Positive in the center, negative at the periphery. Despite its simplicity, this model of a tornado (and the tornado itself in the original) is an excellent electrostatic generator (the theory of the occurrence of such an electric potential is best reflected in the materials on the Searle generator). In a real tornado, magnitudes of millions of volts are reached and are manifested in the constant occurrence of lightning in the “eye of the tornado” and its “trunk.” Thus, in the body of a tornado, in the presence of such high voltage, air electrification occurs. A like charges as is known repulse! (positively charged air molecules - devoid of electrons - repel each other). This is how it happens increase in gas pressure due to electrostatic forces!. And this extension again gives an additional impulse to the upward movement of air. I wonder if such an effect is formulated in physics - increase in gas volume when it is electrified? If not, why isn’t it a discovery for you? Having scoured the Internet, I haven’t found anything like this, but there should clearly be an effect. I want to explain everything that has been said with this cartoon and try to prove that A tornado is an electrostatic machine, and structurally the simplest. On the Internet you can find enough designs where the rotor is a simple dielectric cylinder, on the sides of which a high voltage of several tens of kilovolts is simply applied. An avalanche of charged particles flowing between the electrodes simply spins the rotor cylinder.

With this cartoon (a cross-section of a tornado) I would like to summarize what the authors of such designs offer and offer my answer to the question - what makes a tornado actually rotate?

Electrostatic

tornado model

Consider a cross section of a tornado. We'll see something like a ball bearing. Research

If you want to receive news on Facebook, please click "like" ×

//= \app\modules\Comment\Service::render(\app\modules\Comment\Model::TYPE_ARTICLE, $item["id"]); ?>

Now let's look at the operating principle of the UFO engine.

The UFO engine is a density generator, which, when the ship moves, acts bidirectionally, bipolarly, like a magnet. In front of him, as he moves, he creates a field of low density, and behind him - a high one. For an ordinary person to understand, it is like the wind, or like the flow of water from a tap. And for physicists, it’s like the movement of electricity in a conductor, where electrons move from an area of ​​high density to an area of ​​low density. In other words, the UFO is one big electron, and its movement is no different from the natural movement of electrons.

That is why the UFO has such a high speed of movement, which is regulated by increasing or decreasing the power of the generator.

In hover mode, the generator operates unidirectionally, only downwards, creating a density of the environment equal to itself. It's like throwing a potato into a barrel of honey. It will hover and not sink because the density is approximately the same.( Rice. 1 ) The generated high-density field is indicated in red.

In terms of movement, everything is clear and understandable here, so there is no point in going into details. But the spatial jumps of UFOs are already interesting.

So here it is. In order not to bore readers with formulas, let’s consider this using a specific example, the presented frames from the video.

The video was shot very high quality, all the details and all the moments that happen are visible.

You can watch the original video here:LINK A short selection with facts about teleportation is here:LINK 2

Photo 1 In the first photo, the object is quite material, has color, shape and size. The four working areas of the density generator are clearly visible. One is in the center, and is used for hovering and for spatial jumps. And the other three, which are located at the edges, are used only for movement. This video confirms this:Link

Photo 2 In the next shot, the central area of ​​the density generator is turned on. But this time it turns on not unidirectionally but omnidirectionally. On all sides. In this case, all the electrons of each atom that fall within this radius of action of the generator change their orbits upward. That is, the UFO changes its structure. Due to changes in the orbits of electrons, quantum emission occurs, which is accompanied by a flash of visible light.

As you know, plasma is crystals that are capable of holding the exact shape of crystal lattices and, by the way, even the exact DNA helix. (What I mean is that living biological beings can also move in the same way as non-living ones)

Photo 3 Then the third cycle occurs: a bright flash, and the ball disappears.

There is no doubt that at the same moment it appears again, but in another corner of the universe. Therefore, the object appears unexpectedly, as if from nowhere. At the same time, the materialization of UFOs already occurs with the absorption of radiation, which means that electrons move back from outer orbits to inner ones.

How does the movement itself occur?

I only have assumptions about this question.

1) Maybe it's quantum teleportation.

Experiments confirm that quanta can exist in two or even three places at the same time. Therefore, it is quite possible that, being in a state of plasma, all its crystals can be copied by applying some additional energy. Therefore, there are two copies, one of which is material, and the other is at the other end of the universe in a state of plasma. Then, on the contrary, the other goes into plasma, and the first materializes. This can be compared to a switch that operates two light bulbs, where only one of them can glow, although in fact there are two of them. But then it is not clear how information accumulated by one object is stored and transmitted to another.

2) Another version. The movement of plasma (that is, crystal lattices) occurs along a standing torsion wave. There is evidence of teleportation of bacteria from one hermetic test tube to another over fairly large distances, precisely along a standing wave of a torsion field. Unlike quantum theory, teleportation occurs without destroying the original source, and explains the preservation of accumulated information. Also, the torsion field has no time, and the movement occurs instantly.

But the difficulty is that the torsion signal must be precisely directed from one point to another. It's like a laser beam. How to synchronize such precision, given such vast distances and the constant movement of the universe???

Although... Perhaps this huge artificial satellite rotating in geostationary orbit around the sun is a torsion beam navigation system???

Actually, I used to assume that this satellite is a kind of stoker of our sun. Someone is constantly adding wood to the fire. Someone is taking care of our hearth. After all, everyone knows that any fireplace changes its intensity during the combustion process. And the sun burns with the same intensity, at least for the last 10 thousands of years. This means that someone regulates the temperature and creates a comfortable microclimate for us. Video about this

In general, I am sure that teleportation is a transition from a solid state to plasma and back.

P/S I'm going to test an experiment on the teleportation of water from test tube to test tube using a torsion standing wave, at least a few tens of meters to begin with. I will post the results of the experiments after completion.

Dear editors!

In the 9th issue of the magazine “Znannya ta pratsya” (“Knowledge that pratsya”) for 1966, an article by V. Rubtsov “Guests from space­ sa or atmospheric phenomena?

Apparently, someone decided to seriously work on questions about “flying saucers”.

I myself was not an eyewitness to this phenomenon. But I was told about two cases of the appearance of such objects.

I began to think about questions about the principle of their movement in 1958, as soon as heard about UFOs.

What I wrote below is re­ The result of my thoughts on this matter.

Cases of observations of marvelous flying objects over the Earth do not find official recognition in the scientific community for a number of reasons.

1. Objects appear most often where they are not expected;

2. They appear most often when it is not possible to study them with a certain objectivity.

That is why numerous reports about the appearance of these objects are mainly subjective.

And, besides, there is a whole chain of reasons that are put forward to justify not taking messages seriously. ro UFO:

1. An absolutely unknown principle of operation of the engine which: a) operates almost silently; b) makes it possible to move with any accelerations and speeds existing on Earth; c) makes vertical take-off, landing, and “hovering” above the Earth possible.

2. The weight of objects varies widely - from ten to several hundred tons. The weight was determined by the dents on the railway track, as well as the soil, that remained after the objects took off.

When landing on wet ground (arable land) and during takeoff, a circle of scorched soil remains. No increased radiation was detected at the landing site.

4. Objects have an unknown, powerful, but incomprehensible defensive weapon, and it goes off at the moment when the attacker decides to shoot, but does not have time to press the button grill

5. Objects allow you to approach them no more than 30 - 50 meters. About 30 meters away, flashlights and portable receivers stop working.

Such information gives rise to various hypotheses.

1. Is it possible for intelligent beings to arrive on Earth from other worlds? If it's them, then why don't they make an official visit? This issue was discussed most often.

2. On what principle do the engines of these objects operate and is it possible to manufacture such an engine at our level of science and technology?

This question was asked much less frequently. Both questions were answered more or less logically by George Adamski, about whom not very pleasant reviews were written in our literature regarding his claim that he allegedly personally met the aliens and flew on their ships.

1. The aliens have a jellied body that can take any shape. Adamski simply states that the human body has an unusual ability to adapt to life in any, even the most impossible, conditions. But this does not contradict scientific data.

2. Adamski also never says that he flew around Venus or beyond.

He says that he flew to the moon and returned back in one night. But our science and technology can accomplish this task already now.

He claims (1956) that the far side of the Moon is different from what we see from Earth - it is smoother, has fewer craters, lower than the mountain...

The photographs taken and transmitted by the devices fully confirmed this assumption. In the same book, Adamski refers to photo-documentary sources of famous observatories, scientists, and observers.

* * *

Questions about the principle of movement of unknown objects remain unresolved and, perhaps, that is why the messages ro UFO lie rather within the boundaries of self-deception and mysticism and are not studied with the necessary attention. I read everything I could get my hands on about sightings of these objects.

A comparison of some phenomena known in science and technology gives grounds to describe the possible principle of movement of these objects.

It is known that a magnetic field arises around a current-carrying conductor, which tries to compress the current tube with a radial compressive force (Maxwell-Faraday voltage). In technology, this phenomenon is known as the “Pinch effect” - in plasma, the flattening of thin-walled pipes through which a strong current is passed (see Fig. 1),

H - magnetic field strength.

F is a compressive radial force, which is always directed normally to the axis of the conductor with current I. No matter how the conductor is bent, it will always be in a state of equilibrium.

If it were possible to rotate the total vector F relative to the conductor, then (see Fig. 2) it would be possible to obtain the movement of the conductor due to the appearance of the component F’ along the axis of the conductor.

The problem can be solved in this way: break the conductor and insert into the gap­ wind the capacitor, connect the conductor terminals to the alternating current generator and then an alternating electric field (the so-called bias current) will appear between the plates of the capacitor (Fig. 3).

According to the law of electromagnetic induction, an alternating electric field produces a magnetic field that surrounds it. The magnetic field (according to Lenz's law) prevents the electric field from changing - it tries to compress the electric field towards the center (Fig. 4).

However, this force F remains radial, symmetrical and self-balanced. But if you change the shape of the capacitor, the force vector F will reverse and a (horizontal) component F will appear, capable of causing the capacitor to move in a given direction (Fig. 5).

The magnitude of the induction B of the magnetic field H, which arises around the displacement current Icm, can be determined by the formula:

B= m e I (dE/dt)= 10 -13 (l(cm)/d (cm) )U volts* w (gauss).

We obtain the formula by transforming Maxwell’s equations

w tH=E (dE/dt)

l - the contour along which the weight is determined­ magnetic field strength N.

d - the distance between the plates is disk-shaped­ th capacitor.

w =2 p f, f - AC frequency.

Since the electric field separates the magnetic field that compresses it, the work that the fields produce at any point is equal to: E Ad= H Ad

The magnetic field is compressed with force P:

P=(B 2 S)/(25*10 6) (2)

The electric field expands it with a force F.

For a circular magnetic line of radius R and length l =2 p R can be written

dA P =dA F

or

F d R=P* 2 p d R

where

F=2 p P (3)

S - area normal to the magnetic power lines between the capacitor disks (Fig. 6).

Combining formulas (1). (2), (3) into one, we find

F=4*10 -14 (l 2 /d) )U 2 * w 2 (kg).

The resulting form cannot be considered final, since the value of E and m do not remain constant with increasing electromagnetic field density per unit volume. But the formula shows that by changing the dimensions of the disk capacitor ( l ), distance between disks ( d), voltage (U) and current frequency (f ), you can obtain the necessary force of compression of the electric field by the magnetic one.

Such an engine (electrodynamic) uses the forces that arise in the electromagnetic field when its power is sufficient.

In this case, there is no need to take with you a “working fluid” (fuel), which then needs to be thrown away in order to obtain recoil force to move the system. The energy to operate such an engine can be obtained from a small nuclear power plant.

What external characteristics are possible for a hypothetical UFO engine?

1. A powerful electromagnetic field has a narrow directional pattern, which makes its influence safe even at a short distance from it.

If you make a capacitor from three plates, then the field outside the plates will be neutralized by the adjacent, counter-directional one. But the force F remains (Fig. 7).

2. A high-frequency magnetic field causes heating of the moist soil at the landing site of the device. (The phenomenon is used in technology during the heat treatment of metals).

3. Since there will be a voltage on the capacitor plates of tens and hundreds of kilovolts, then in the atmosphere on top­ Due to the device's malfunction, a discharge appears in the form of a glow or halo.

4. The operating time and flight range of such a device is practically limited only by the supply of nuclear fuel.

5. The speed and acceleration that the device can develop are practically unlimited.

It is quite possible that the principle of movement I proposed may turn out to be unrealistic. It's a pity. But to the stars on the ship­ lyakhs built on the principles of multi-stage, ion, plasma, and also electronic, which take with them the body from which they are repelled, you cannot fly.

A modern rocket, no matter how perfect it is, resembles an ordinary boat, which takes with it a supply of water, pushing it out, it moves using recoil force.

Tsiolkovsky proposed an interesting way to go into space, but from the position of classical mechanics. What is needed is a speed unrelated to the initial and final weight of the rocket.

A thrust is required that is not limited by the flow rate of the working fluid.

Unidentified flying objects have been the subject of debate among scientists for decades. The unique abilities of UFOs are perplexing, not allowing us to give any definite explanation for the principle of movement of these objects.

Yuri Koinash, candidate of technical sciences and researcher, made a sensational statement, announcing that he understood the principle that drives UFO engine. Yuri Alekseevich suggested that the shape of the flying saucer is a round wing that creates lift. He was prompted to this idea by the angle at the base of the UFO; it is close to 45 degrees, which is the optimal value in the case of creating lift. Only the propeller of this design is located inside; it can be a rotating liquid or ionized gas, which can be driven by an electromagnetic field. The layer of liquid itself can be very thin, this is enough to provide the required effect. According to Yuri Koinash, in the event of some improvement in the design, as well as an increase in size, the effect will be sufficient for the lifting force to acquire the necessary value for the creation of flying vehicles. The open UFO engine, if successful, could provide earthlings with a universal engine that would allow, for example, a flying taxi, to cheaply get to another city, bypassing traffic jams and traffic lights. The same engine would make it possible to create interstellar ships at near-light speeds.

According to the author’s calculations, the best performance for such a device is mercury, which has a high density. It is curious that Indian vimanas, according to the description, also had a device inside them in which mercury rotated. An ordinary airplane wing experiences the influence of air particles that act on it from the outside, while the UFO body is affected by a force from the inside, creating a colossal lifting effect. The researcher conducted a series of experiments with liquid on a model in which an impeller rotated inside, forcing the water to move along the body of the disk-shaped model, creating a lifting force. He experimented with a completely closed environment, finding that the apparatus lost weight for a while.

Bold ideas always encounter opposition, and only after a while do people understand them. Perhaps this is how the anti-gravity engine is destined to appear.

Relatively recently, especially in Japan, large-scale work was carried out on a new generation of engines for ships that used the Lorentz force with the electrical conductivity of water, that is, attempts were made to assemble an engine for a UFO with their own hands. But over time, the attention of the developers shifted more to the development of a plasma jet engine for an aircraft, since plasma is also capable of conducting current, which may help to unravel the operation of the engine for a UFO. After all, a flame with hot gases emanating from a jet engine is practically also plasma. And if electrodes are placed in it to pass electric current, then the efficiency of using the gas flow rate will increase many times, which will simultaneously increase the traction force.

The secret of the circuit design of this UFO engine is the use of powerful superconducting magnets. The magnetic field they create, when intersecting perpendicularly with the electric current lines of force, causes the emergence of the Lorentz force and the formation of thrust, acting at an angle relative to the electric current and magnetic field along the axis of the aircraft. Due to this, hot exhaust gases escape from the engine nozzle, which is similar to the operation of the UFO engine in the video. A significant limitation is the creation of a powerful magnetic field, which requires superconducting high-temperature electromagnets.

For example, an alloy of thallium with bismuth produces the most powerful fields - 30,000 times higher than the parameters of a conventional magnet, with virtually no consumption of electricity in a state of superconductivity. And the traction force directly depends on the strength of the supplied electric current. Experimental developments created by scientists have made it possible to better understand how the engine of a UFO works.

Moreover, as calculations have shown, if you use nuclear power plants of submarines, then the power of the electric current will be sufficient for high-speed movement in a straight line, for sharp braking, and turning around almost on the spot. Using the principle of operation of the UFO engine, you can accelerate the flow of gases from a jet engine. This idea was applied in the Russian Design Bureau “Fakel”, developing an electroplasma engine for propulsion in space. The first samples had insignificant thrust, which did not allow them to be used for launch into orbit, but in a plasma jet engine the power is much higher, since the hot gases flowing from the engine nozzle initially provide good thrust, and being at the same time plasma, they can be used for additional acceleration using electric current Lorentz force.

In this design of the UFO engine, electrical energy is used to accelerate ionized gas, the speed of outflow of gases reaches 50 km/sec.

Similar developments were carried out by the aerospace company Lockheed on the F-117A project. It is not yet known exactly what further work will lead to, but it is assumed that the aircraft will be able to achieve an acceleration of 5 km/sec and jump into space.

Sources: realstrannik.ru, www..ru, nlo-inform.ru, vzglyadzagran.ru

Arizona Desert Mystery - Petrified Forest

Stephen Hawking: the dangerous possibilities of artificial intelligence

Stone balls of Costa Rica

Fear of fear breeds fear

Fear and anxiety attract into our lives everything that we are afraid of, and also have a detrimental effect on health, shorten life and...

The most incredible planets of the Universe

Outside our solar system there are celestial bodies whose existence is difficult to believe. In this article we will present only...

What can be done with a 3D printer

10 most unexpected things that can be printed on a 3D printer The future has already arrived: if you can’t buy something, you can just print it. A 3D printer is one of the most...

Radioactive contamination of the area - a global scenario

Analysts call one of the variants of the Apocalypse the radioactive contamination of a global area caused by a nuclear war. There are two types of infection: short-term, ...

Curse of the Pyramids

“Death will quickly overtake the one who disturbs the peace of the Pharaoh,” says the inscription on the famous pyramid at Giza. Formidable guardians of the secret knowledge of the Atlanteans, hidden in...

Kazakhstan - the birthplace of apple and tulip

Kazakhstan is famous for being the first country to give up nuclear weapons and is also considered the land where the horse was first domesticated. ...

Artificial muscles for a robot

Modern drives for the mechanical “arms” and “legs” of robots are usually electric and pneumatic drives. However, human muscles, in their speed, ...

The appearance of UFOs above the ground, inspection of landing sites, study of the flight path of UFOs led to the conclusion of scientists, mechanical engineers, and engine engineers that the silent movement of a UFO depends on the operation of extraordinary engines (these are not atomic, not hydrogen, do not throw off mass, creating thrust and etc.).

Such engines are clearly not found on earth. And many who think about this problem each reveal it in their own way (Logvin, Karyukin, Koinash and others). But in reality, the engines on a UFO may be completely different from what earthlings imagine.

Let's talk in this regard with Yuri Koinash. In 1971, he graduated from the Frunze Polytechnic Institute with a degree in "Dynamics and Strength of Machines." Mechanical engineer, researcher, candidate of technical sciences, has worked in the field of structural modeling for the last 20 years.

Relatively recently, I became interested in unidentified flying objects and approached this problem from a purely engineering point of view.

With his work, he claims that flying objects (he calls them UFOs) have a propulsion device, and assures that he can calculate the propulsion energy for a “plate” with a diameter of approximately 35 meters.

Yu. Koinash thinks outside the box. I would like to present his work in an abbreviated form in this book, as the thoughts aloud of a research scientist. His manner of presenting the material in an affirmative form should not confuse the reader; this is food for thought.

The power of the propulsion system of an average UAV of the "saucer" type with a diameter of 30-40 meters is relatively small, and it can be approximately estimated by analyzing observational data of the take-off procedure of such devices, as follows.

Let us take the total mass of a UAV of this size to be approximately 50-60 tons, taking into account the well-known fact that after it landed on fields sown with wheat, the plant stems were not crushed, but were crushed by the bottom of the UAV over an area of ​​approximately one thousand square meters. meters. Assuming that the mass of the propulsion device is 5-7 percent of the total mass of the UAV, we obtain a value of the order of 3-4 tons.

According to eyewitnesses, before the UAV takes off, its propulsion dome first begins to rotate and spins up to high speed for about 1 minute, which, of course, indicates the rather limited power of its energy and propulsion systems.

Having approximately calculated the moment of inertia of the annular rotor of a propulsion device with a reduced diameter of 35 meters, an average mass of about 4 tons and, having specified a relatively reliable value of angular velocity equal to 10 rps, with a propulsion spin-up time of about 1 minute, we obtain the power value of the UAV engine within the range 1.5-2 MW. With some margin, it can be taken equal to 3 MW, which approximately corresponds to the engine power of a conventional diesel locomotive.

Taking into account the fact that the power of modern nuclear power plants of ships and submarines is 10-50 MW, we can conclude that the energy supply of such HJIA on Earth is currently, in principle, a very realistic task.

The cold operating principle of a support-free, electromagnetic propulsion device and the adjustable flight speeds of UAVs significantly simplify the manufacturing technology of such devices, since they do not require the use of particularly heat-resistant materials, as in traditional rocket engines and heat-resistant coatings for housings. Therefore, practically any light, strong, well-processed composite compounds or metals, in particular magnesium and its alloys, which have a relatively low melting point and have good casting properties, should be used as structural materials for NLAs.

According to available data, the wreckage of the apparatus of extraterrestrial civilizations that crashed over the coast of Ubatubo (Brazil) in 1957 consisted of magnesium of a special crystalline structure, obtained by the method of directed growth of metals, which generally confirms the assumption made above.

It should be noted that the rotation of the UAV propulsion unit or its entire body during flights in the Earth’s atmosphere significantly affects the aerodynamic properties of the vehicle as a whole. On the one hand, the shock wave that appears in front of the vehicle during movement is not crushed, but is cut by the edges of the rotating propulsion device, and particles of ionized air are thrown away from the body by centrifugal forces, forming a kind of “vacuum capsule” that allows the UAV to move silently at enormous speeds. In this case, the rotation of the propulsion unit or body of the UAV provides the entire apparatus with greater stability during flight due to the well-known gyroscopic effect.

On the other hand, a rotating open propulsion significantly worsens the controllability and maneuverability of a UAV when moving in the atmosphere and hydrosphere of the earth due to the Magnus effect that arises. As is known, during the translational motion of a rotating body in a viscoelastic medium, it is acted upon by a lateral force that appears due to the pressure difference on the lateral surfaces of the body (Magnus force), displacing it in the direction of rotation. This effect is well illustrated, for example, by twisted serves when playing tennis or football.

An approximate calculation using the Bernoulli equation shows that for a spherical UAV with a diameter of 20 meters at a linear flight speed in the dense layers of the Earth’s atmosphere equal to 5 km/s and an angular velocity of rotation of the body equal to 10 rps, the lateral force reaches 130 thousand tons. At lower flight and body rotation speeds, for example, 0.5 km/s and 1 rps, respectively, the lateral force acting on the UAV is approximately 13,00 tons.

This order of magnitude of the lateral force largely determines the unusual dynamic properties of UAVs when flying in the Earth’s atmosphere: instantaneous turns and turns, stops, spiral or zigzag flight trajectories, etc.

Naturally, the action of lateral force greatly interferes with the control of the device in flight, so the designers of extraterrestrial civilizations obviously took the following solution to this problem: they connected two identical UAVs with propulsors rotating in different directions, creating a dumbbell-shaped structure with a rigid connection. This type of ULA has been repeatedly observed recently in a number of countries.

At the same time, two equal but mutually opposite forces acting on the body of both UAVs balanced each other, resulting in increased controllability, maneuverability and stability of the entire apparatus. A similar engineering solution is used in the terrestrial structures of twin-rotor helicopters to compensate for the reaction torques that arise when the helicopter rotors rotate. In this case, the role of a rigid connection between the propulsors (rotors) is performed by the helicopter body itself. An even more ingenious solution is contained in the triangular (Belgian) type of UAV, in which three independent devices are united by three rigid connections or one plane.

Such a UAV flies with one side of the triangle forward, that is, the rear apparatus serves as a universal lateral high-altitude rudder, which greatly simplifies the control of the entire UAV. Rigid connections between autonomous propulsion vehicles can be made in the form of wings with a variable angle of attack, creating additional lift during horizontal flight of such a UAV in the atmosphere.

Such an engineering solution creates a number of advantages for this type of UAV: ​​the harmful influence of the Magnus effect is eliminated, a stable landing of the device on three points is ensured, and its own weight is fairly evenly distributed over three supports, and the overall lifting force and carrying capacity of the entire UAV increases. maneuverability increases and the functionality of the device as a whole expands.

Cylindrical and cigar-shaped objects are carriers of small UAVs and probes designed to perform reconnaissance or research tasks. Small UAVs are located in the cylindrical body of the carrier, like gramophone records in a case, and are pushed out through a hole in the stern using special mechanisms, since they do not have a reverse (reverse) device. After completing the flight, small UAVs independently fly into the carrier body and take their place there.

It should be noted that the exceptionally high accelerations, speeds and maneuverability of all UAVs are ensured due to the very low specific mass of these devices, which in a sense are similar to balloons. The enormous traction force of the unsupported propulsion unit of the UAV with a relatively low mass and large volume of the entire apparatus, plus the Magnus effect and environmental resistance, provide them with the ability to instantly stop, turn and turn around when moving in the atmosphere and hydrosphere of the Earth.

The types of structures discussed above can be classified as middle-class devices that have a relatively short flight range and payload capacity and are designed to perform some small-scale research and local transport communications within the solar system and near-Earth space.

Intergalactic (basic) UAVs, capable of covering colossal distances at speeds many times greater than the speed of light, and possessing enormous resources for long-term flight in outer space, undoubtedly must be large in size, powerful power and propulsion systems, as well as reliable crew support systems, allowing them to have high load capacity and autonomy. Therefore, the basic UAVs of extraterrestrial civilizations are giant disk-shaped structures with a diameter of 10-20 km, consisting of many hexagonal, honeycomb-type, or sectoral spatial modules, divided by decks into a number of floors-compartments, which contain everything necessary for a long flight of the UAV in outer space .

A circular cylindrical module containing the main power plant of the UAV, consisting of two or more nuclear reactors, is located in the center of this spatial structure and serves as its connecting core.

Such devices can only be assembled (mounted) under conditions of weightlessness, for example, in the orbit of a celestial body or in free outer space. Delivery, installation and equipping of modules should be carried out using small and medium-sized towing UAVs, which, perhaps, can later be included in the base ship as peripheral propulsion systems during flight, as well as unique “space boats” when carrying out local expeditions with landing on the surface celestial bodies under study.

Naturally, basic UAVs can only be non-stop, that is, eternally flying, spacecraft, since their enormous own weight and size will not allow them to “land” on planets or stars even with relatively little gravity.

This kind of design of a basic UAV of extraterrestrial civilizations with a diameter of about 20 km, moving in cislunar space at speeds of 200 km/s, has been repeatedly observed over several centuries and was recently filmed by a Japanese astronomer using a video camera built into a powerful telescope.

In this regard, the brilliant foresight of this type of UAV design by the famous scientist and science fiction writer Ivan Efremov back in the 50s in the novel “Andromeda Nebula” is striking; the spacecraft of extraterrestrial civilizations has the appearance of a giant, biconvex, spiral-shaped disk that does not have jet engines.

In outer space, the base UAV moves with constant acceleration in a “vertical” position, that is, with the upper end surface of the body (“ceiling”) forward. In this case, the UAV crew members will be pressed by the force of inertia to the “floor” of the compartments during the entire flight, being in the device, as if in a horizontal position.

In the second half (or segments) of the journey, the base UAV turns 180° and continues its flight at equal speed, that is, braking with the propulsion, as a result of which the crew members will again be “attracted” to the “floor” of the compartments by the force of inertia caused by the slowing down of the ship’s speed. Naturally, under such conditions, the flight for the crew members of the base UAV becomes very comfortable, since throughout the entire flight artificial gravity is created during uniformly accelerated movement of the UAV with a given or required acceleration or uniform deceleration after the UAV rotates 180 degrees. In this case, the UAV crew members travel, figuratively speaking, either “head first” or “feet forward”, after periodically changing the orientation of the UAV in space.

In the zone of active attraction of the celestial body or planet under study, a UAV may “hover” or move in the adjacent outer space in a “horizontal” position, that is, with the side surface of the body forward, which is confirmed by video footage of a Japanese researcher.

The uniformly accelerated mode of movement of UAVs in outer space, in contrast to traditional ballistic (free flight), radically changes the existing understanding of the duration of intergalactic expeditions. Thus, when a UAV moves, even with a relatively small acceleration equal to, for example, 9.981 m/s2, it will exceed the speed of light in just 355 days of flight, covering a distance of about 4.6x1012 km. With further uniformly accelerated motion and the UAV reaching a speed many times greater than the speed of light, the duration of interstellar expeditions becomes comparable to the life expectancy of one generation of crew members, for example, earthlings.

The limited scope of this publication does not allow us to cover all the issues related to the design features of other types of UAVs and to assess the prospects, technical, economic and social consequences of their use on Earth and in outer space, therefore, in conclusion, it is necessary to note the following: there is no doubt that In the near-Earth space, as well as in the atmosphere and hydrosphere of the Earth, an increasing number of unconventionally moving vehicles of extraterrestrial civilizations of various types and modifications, increasingly adapted to terrestrial conditions, have been accumulating for a long time. At the same time, the number of contacts of earthlings with uninvited guests from Space, whose intentions and goals are still unknown, increases every year.

And it’s time for us, earthlings, to finally understand, comprehend and realize that the so-called UFOs are simple man-made devices with unique properties and enormous capabilities, the solution to the structure of which, in order to create them on Earth, should be a task of universal importance and significance.

Naturally, the appearance on Earth of devices with similar properties will apparently attract close attention to them and to us and will lead to a more serious attitude of representatives of extraterrestrial civilizations, creating a whole bunch of additional problems for earthlings that are already visible. Therefore, it is necessary now to move from collecting and discussing ufological folklore to the scientific study and modeling of phenomena associated with UFOs, to the engineering analysis of these structures, as well as to assessing the prospects and consequences of creating such devices on Earth so that this process would be initially controllable , and not spontaneous.