All integer solutions to the inequality. Linear inequalities, examples, solutions

Inequality is an expression with, ≤, or ≥. For example, 3x - 5 Solving an inequality means finding all the values ​​of the variables for which the inequality is true. Each of these numbers is a solution to the inequality, and the set of all such solutions is its many solutions. Inequalities that have the same set of solutions are called equivalent inequalities.

Linear inequalities

The principles for solving inequalities are similar to the principles for solving equations.

Principles for solving inequalities
For any real numbers a, b, and c:
The principle of adding inequalities: If a Multiplication principle for inequalities: If a 0 is true then ac If a bc is also true.
Similar statements also apply for a ≤ b.

When both sides of an inequality are multiplied by a negative number, the sign of the inequality must be reversed.
First-level inequalities, as in example 1 (below), are called linear inequalities.

Example 1 Solve each of the following inequalities. Then draw a set of solutions.
a) 3x - 5 b) 13 - 7x ≥ 10x - 4
Solution
Any number less than 11/5 is a solution.
The set of solutions is (x|x
To check, we can draw a graph of y 1 = 3x - 5 and y 2 = 6 - 2x. Then it is clear that for x
The solution set is (x|x ≤ 1), or (-∞, 1]. The graph of the solution set is shown below.

Double inequalities

When two inequalities are connected by a word And, or, then it is formed double inequality. Double inequality like
-3 And 2x + 5 ≤ 7
called connected, because it uses And. Entry -3 Double inequalities can be solved using the principles of addition and multiplication of inequalities.

Example 2 Solve -3 Solution We have

Set of solutions (x|x ≤ -1 or x > 3). We can also write the solution using interval notation and the symbol for associations or including both sets: (-∞ -1] (3, ∞). The graph of the solution set is shown below.

To check, let's plot y 1 = 2x - 5, y 2 = -7, and y 3 = 1. Note that for (x|x ≤ -1 or x > 3), y 1 ≤ y 2 or y 1 > y 3 .

Inequalities with absolute value (modulus)

Inequalities sometimes contain moduli. The following properties are used to solve them.
For a > 0 and algebraic expression x:
|x| |x| > a is equivalent to x or x > a.
Similar statements for |x| ≤ a and |x| ≥ a.

For example,
|x| |y| ≥ 1 is equivalent to y ≤ -1 or y ≥ 1;
and |2x + 3| ≤ 4 is equivalent to -4 ≤ 2x + 3 ≤ 4.

Example 4 Solve each of the following inequalities. Graph the set of solutions.
a) |3x + 2| b) |5 - 2x| ≥ 1

Solution
a) |3x + 2|

The solution set is (x|-7/3
b) |5 - 2x| ≥ 1
The solution set is (x|x ≤ 2 or x ≥ 3), or (-∞, 2]. The integers that are included in this interval are -3; -2; -1; 0; 1. There are 5 of them in total.

4) How many integers are solutions to the system of inequalities?

For example, the inequality is the expression \(x>5\).

Types of inequalities:

If \(a\) and \(b\) are numbers or , then the inequality is called numerical. It's actually just comparing two numbers. Such inequalities are divided into faithful And unfaithful.

For example:
\(-5<2\) - верное числовое неравенство, ведь \(-5\) действительно меньше \(2\);

\(17+3\geq 115\) is an incorrect numerical inequality, since \(17+3=20\), and \(20\) is less than \(115\) (and not greater than or equal to).

If \(a\) and \(b\) are expressions containing a variable, then we have inequality with variable. Such inequalities are divided into types depending on the content:

\(2x+1\geq4(5-x)\)				Variable only to the first power
\(3x^2-x+5>0\)				There is a variable in the second power (square), but there are no higher powers (third, fourth, etc.)
\(\log_(4)((x+1))<3\)
\(2^(x)\leq8^(5x-2)\)

... and so on.

What is the solution to an inequality?

If you substitute a number instead of a variable into an inequality, it will turn into a numeric one.

If a given value for x turns the original inequality into a true numerical one, then it is called solution to inequality. If not, then this value is not a solution. And to solve inequality– you need to find all its solutions (or show that there are none).

For example, if we substitute the number \(7\) into the linear inequality \(x+6>10\), we get the correct numerical inequality: \(13>10\). And if we substitute \(2\), there will be an incorrect numerical inequality \(8>10\). That is, \(7\) is a solution to the original inequality, but \(2\) is not.

However, the inequality \(x+6>10\) has other solutions. Indeed, we will get the correct numerical inequalities when substituting \(5\), and \(12\), and \(138\)... And how can we find all possible solutions? For this they use For our case we have:

\(x+6>10\) \(|-6\)
\(x>4\)

That is, any number greater than four will suit us. Now you need to write down the answer. Solutions to inequalities are usually written numerically, additionally marking them on the number axis with shading. For our case we have:

Answer: \(x\in(4;+\infty)\)

When does the sign of an inequality change?

There is one big trap in inequalities that students really “love” to fall into:

When multiplying (or dividing) an inequality by a negative number, it is reversed (“more” by “less”, “more or equal” by “less than or equal”, and so on)

Why is this happening? To understand this, let's look at the transformations of the numerical inequality \(3>1\). It is correct, three is indeed greater than one. First, let's try to multiply it by any positive number, for example, two:

\(3>1\) \(|\cdot2\)
\(6>2\)

As we can see, after multiplication the inequality remains true. And no matter what positive number we multiply by, we will always get the correct inequality. Now let’s try to multiply by a negative number, for example, minus three:

\(3>1\) \(|\cdot(-3)\)
\(-9>-3\)

The result is an incorrect inequality, because minus nine is less than minus three! That is, in order for the inequality to become true (and therefore, the transformation of multiplication by negative was “legal”), you need to reverse the comparison sign, like this: \(−9<− 3\).
With division it will work out the same way, you can check it yourself.

The rule written above applies to all types of inequalities, not just numerical ones.

Example: Solve the inequality \(2(x+1)-1<7+8x\)
Solution:

\(2x+2-1<7+8x\)	Let's move \(8x\) to the left, and \(2\) and \(-1\) to the right, not forgetting to change the signs
\(2x-8x<7-2+1\)
\(-6x<6\) \(|:(-6)\)	Let's divide both sides of the inequality by \(-6\), not forgetting to change from “less” to “more”
	Let's mark a numerical interval on the axis. Inequality, therefore we “prick out” the value \(-1\) itself and do not take it as an answer
	Let's write the answer as an interval

Answer: \(x\in(-1;\infty)\)

Inequalities and disability

Inequalities, just like equations, can have restrictions on , that is, on the values ​​of x. Accordingly, those values ​​that are unacceptable according to the DZ should be excluded from the range of solutions.

Example: Solve the inequality \(\sqrt(x+1)<3\)

Solution: It is clear that in order for the left side to be less than \(3\), the radical expression must be less than \(9\) (after all, from \(9\) just \(3\)). We get:

\(x+1<9\) \(|-1\)
\(x<8\)

All? Any value of x smaller than \(8\) will suit us? No! Because if we take, for example, the value \(-5\) that seems to fit the requirement, it will not be a solution to the original inequality, since it will lead us to calculating the root of a negative number.

\(\sqrt(-5+1)<3\)
\(\sqrt(-4)<3\)

Therefore, we must also take into account the restrictions on the value of X - it cannot be such that there is a negative number under the root. Thus, we have the second requirement for x:

\(x+1\geq0\)
\(x\geq-1\)

And for x to be the final solution, it must satisfy both requirements at once: it must be less than \(8\) (to be a solution) and greater than \(-1\) (to be admissible in principle). Plotting it on the number line, we have the final answer:

Answer: \(\left[-1;8\right)\)

After obtaining initial information about inequalities with variables, we move on to the question of solving them. We will analyze the solution of linear inequalities with one variable and all the methods for solving them with algorithms and examples. Only linear equations with one variable will be considered.

Yandex.RTB R-A-339285-1

What is linear inequality?

First, you need to define a linear equation and find out its standard form and how it will differ from others. From the school course we have that there is no fundamental difference between inequalities, so it is necessary to use several definitions.

Definition 1

Linear inequality with one variable x is an inequality of the form a · x + b > 0, when any inequality sign is used instead of >< , ≤ , ≥ , а и b являются действительными числами, где a ≠ 0 .

Definition 2

Inequalities a x< c или a · x >c, with x being a variable and a and c being some numbers, is called linear inequalities with one variable.

Since nothing is said about whether the coefficient can be equal to 0, then a strict inequality of the form 0 x > c and 0 x< c может быть записано в виде нестрогого, а именно, a · x ≤ c , a · x ≥ c . Такое уравнение считается линейным.

Their differences are:

• notation form a · x + b > 0 in the first, and a · x > c – in the second;
• admissibility of coefficient a being equal to zero, a ≠ 0 - in the first, and a = 0 - in the second.

It is believed that the inequalities a · x + b > 0 and a · x > c are equivalent, because they are obtained by transferring a term from one part to another. Solving the inequality 0 x + 5 > 0 will lead to the fact that it will need to be solved, and the case a = 0 will not work.

Definition 3

It is believed that linear inequalities in one variable x are inequalities of the form a x + b< 0 , a · x + b >0, a x + b ≤ 0 And a x + b ≥ 0, where a and b are real numbers. Instead of x there can be a regular number.

Based on the rule, we have that 4 x − 1 > 0, 0 z + 2, 3 ≤ 0, - 2 3 x - 2< 0 являются примерами линейных неравенств. А неравенства такого плана, как 5 · x >7 , − 0 , 5 · y ≤ − 1 , 2 are called reducible to linear.

How to solve linear inequality

The main way to solve such inequalities is to use equivalent transformations in order to find the elementary inequalities x< p (≤ , >, ≥) , p which is a certain number, for a ≠ 0, and of the form a< p (≤ , >, ≥) for a = 0.

To solve inequalities in one variable, you can use the interval method or represent it graphically. Any of them can be used separately.

Using equivalent transformations

To solve a linear inequality of the form a x + b< 0 (≤ , >, ≥), it is necessary to apply equivalent inequality transformations. The coefficient may or may not be zero. Let's consider both cases. To find out, you need to adhere to a scheme consisting of 3 points: the essence of the process, the algorithm, and the solution itself.

Definition 4

Algorithm for solving linear inequality a x + b< 0 (≤ , >, ≥) for a ≠ 0

• the number b will be moved to the right side of the inequality with the opposite sign, which will allow us to arrive at the equivalent a x< − b (≤ , > , ≥) ;
• Both sides of the inequality will be divided by a number not equal to 0. Moreover, when a is positive, the sign remains; when a is negative, it changes to the opposite.

Let's consider the application of this algorithm to solve examples.

Example 1

Solve the inequality of the form 3 x + 12 ≤ 0.

Solution

This linear inequality has a = 3 and b = 12. This means that the coefficient a of x is not equal to zero. Let's apply the above algorithms and solve it.

It is necessary to move term 12 to another part of the inequality and change the sign in front of it. Then we get an inequality of the form 3 x ≤ − 12. It is necessary to divide both parts by 3. The sign will not change since 3 is a positive number. We get that (3 x) : 3 ≤ (− 12) : 3, which gives the result x ≤ − 4.

An inequality of the form x ≤ − 4 is equivalent. That is, the solution for 3 x + 12 ≤ 0 is any real number that is less than or equal to 4. The answer is written as an inequality x ≤ − 4, or a numerical interval of the form (− ∞, − 4].

The entire algorithm described above is written like this:

3 x + 12 ≤ 0 ; 3 x ≤ − 12 ; x ≤ − 4 .

Answer: x ≤ − 4 or (− ∞ , − 4 ] .

Example 2

Indicate all available solutions to the inequality − 2, 7 · z > 0.

Solution

From the condition we see that the coefficient a for z is equal to - 2.7, and b is explicitly absent or equal to zero. You can not use the first step of the algorithm, but immediately move on to the second.

We divide both sides of the equation by the number - 2, 7. Since the number is negative, it is necessary to reverse the inequality sign. That is, we get that (− 2, 7 z) : (− 2, 7)< 0: (− 2 , 7) , и дальше z < 0 .

Let us write the entire algorithm in brief form:

− 2, 7 z > 0; z< 0 .

Answer: z< 0 или (− ∞ , 0) .

Example 3

Solve the inequality - 5 x - 15 22 ≤ 0.

Solution

According to the condition, we see that it is necessary to solve the inequality with coefficient a for the variable x, which is equal to - 5, with coefficient b, which corresponds to the fraction - 15 22. It is necessary to solve the inequality by following the algorithm, that is: move - 15 22 to another part with the opposite sign, divide both parts by - 5, change the sign of the inequality:

5 x ≤ 15 22 ; - 5 x: - 5 ≥ 15 22: - 5 x ≥ - 3 22

During the last transition for the right side, the rule for dividing the number with different signs is used 15 22: - 5 = - 15 22: 5, after which we divide the ordinary fraction by the natural number - 15 22: 5 = - 15 22 · 1 5 = - 15 · 1 22 · 5 = - 3 22 .

Answer: x ≥ - 3 22 and [ - 3 22 + ∞) .

Let's consider the case when a = 0. Linear expression of the form a x + b< 0 является неравенством 0 · x + b < 0 , где на рассмотрение берется неравенство вида b < 0 , после чего выясняется, оно верное или нет.

Everything is based on determining the solution to the inequality. For any value of x we ​​obtain a numerical inequality of the form b< 0 , потому что при подстановке любого t вместо переменной x , тогда получаем 0 · t + b < 0 , где b < 0 . В случае, если оно верно, то для его решения подходит любое значение. Когда b < 0 неверно, тогда линейное уравнение не имеет решений, потому как не имеется ни одного значения переменной, которое привело бы верному числовому равенству.

We will consider all judgments in the form of an algorithm for solving linear inequalities 0 x + b< 0 (≤ , > , ≥) :

Definition 5

Numerical inequality of the form b< 0 (≤ , >, ≥) is true, then the original inequality has a solution for any value, and it is false when the original inequality has no solutions.

Example 4

Solve the inequality 0 x + 7 > 0.

Solution

This linear inequality 0 x + 7 > 0 can take any value x. Then we get an inequality of the form 7 > 0. The last inequality is considered true, which means any number can be its solution.

Answer: interval (− ∞ , + ∞) .

Example 5

Find a solution to the inequality 0 x − 12, 7 ≥ 0.

Solution

When substituting the variable x of any number, we obtain that the inequality takes the form − 12, 7 ≥ 0. It is incorrect. That is, 0 x − 12, 7 ≥ 0 has no solutions.

Answer: there are no solutions.

Let's consider solving linear inequalities where both coefficients are equal to zero.

Example 6

Determine the unsolvable inequality from 0 x + 0 > 0 and 0 x + 0 ≥ 0.

Solution

When substituting any number instead of x, we obtain two inequalities of the form 0 > 0 and 0 ≥ 0. The first is incorrect. This means that 0 x + 0 > 0 has no solutions, and 0 x + 0 ≥ 0 has an infinite number of solutions, that is, any number.

Answer: the inequality 0 x + 0 > 0 has no solutions, but 0 x + 0 ≥ 0 has solutions.

This method is discussed in the school mathematics course. The interval method is capable of resolving various types of inequalities, including linear ones.

The interval method is used for linear inequalities when the value of the coefficient x is not equal to 0. Otherwise you will have to calculate using a different method.

Definition 6

The interval method is:

• introducing the function y = a · x + b ;
• searching for zeros to split the domain of definition into intervals;
• definition of signs for their concepts on intervals.

Let's assemble an algorithm for solving linear equations a x + b< 0 (≤ , >, ≥) for a ≠ 0 using the interval method:

• finding the zeros of the function y = a · x + b to solve an equation of the form a · x + b = 0 . If a ≠ 0, then the solution will be a single root, which will take the designation x 0;
• construction of a coordinate line with an image of a point with coordinate x 0, with a strict inequality the point is denoted by a punctured one, with a non-strict inequality – by a shaded one;
• determining the signs of the function y = a · x + b on intervals; for this it is necessary to find the values ​​of the function at points on the interval;
• solving an inequality with signs > or ≥ on the coordinate line, adding shading over the positive interval,< или ≤ над отрицательным промежутком.

Let's look at several examples of solving linear inequalities using the interval method.

Example 6

Solve the inequality − 3 x + 12 > 0.

Solution

It follows from the algorithm that first you need to find the root of the equation − 3 x + 12 = 0. We get that − 3 · x = − 12 , x = 4 . It is necessary to draw a coordinate line where we mark point 4. It will be punctured because the inequality is strict. Consider the drawing below.

It is necessary to determine the signs at the intervals. To determine it on the interval (− ∞, 4), it is necessary to calculate the function y = − 3 x + 12 at x = 3. From here we get that − 3 3 + 12 = 3 > 0. The sign on the interval is positive.

We determine the sign from the interval (4, + ∞), then substitute the value x = 5. We have that − 3 5 + 12 = − 3< 0 . Знак на промежутке является отрицательным. Изобразим на числовой прямой, приведенной ниже.

We solve the inequality with the > sign, and the shading is performed over the positive interval. Consider the drawing below.

From the drawing it is clear that the desired solution has the form (− ∞ , 4) or x< 4 .

Answer: (− ∞ , 4) or x< 4 .

To understand how to depict graphically, it is necessary to consider 4 linear inequalities as an example: 0, 5 x − 1< 0 , 0 , 5 · x − 1 ≤ 0 , 0 , 5 · x − 1 >0 and 0, 5 x − 1 ≥ 0. Their solutions will be the values ​​of x< 2 , x ≤ 2 , x >2 and x ≥ 2. To do this, let's plot the linear function y = 0, 5 x − 1 shown below.

It's clear that

Definition 7

• solving the inequality 0, 5 x − 1< 0 считается промежуток, где график функции y = 0 , 5 · x − 1 располагается ниже О х;
• the solution 0, 5 x − 1 ≤ 0 is considered to be the interval where the function y = 0, 5 x − 1 is lower than O x or coincides;
• the solution 0, 5 · x − 1 > 0 is considered to be an interval, the function is located above O x;
• the solution 0, 5 · x − 1 ≥ 0 is considered to be the interval where the graph above O x or coincides.

The point of graphically solving inequalities is to find the intervals that need to be depicted on the graph. In this case, we find that the left side has y = a · x + b, and the right side has y = 0, and coincides with O x.

Definition 8

The graph of the function y = a x + b is plotted:

• while solving the inequality a x + b< 0 определяется промежуток, где график изображен ниже О х;
• when solving the inequality a · x + b ≤ 0, the interval is determined where the graph is depicted below the O x axis or coincides;
• when solving the inequality a · x + b > 0, the interval is determined where the graph is depicted above O x;
• When solving the inequality a · x + b ≥ 0, the interval is determined where the graph is above O x or coincides.

Example 7

Solve the inequality - 5 · x - 3 > 0 using a graph.

Solution

It is necessary to construct a graph of the linear function - 5 · x - 3 > 0. This line is decreasing because the coefficient of x is negative. To determine the coordinates of the point of its intersection with O x - 5 · x - 3 > 0, we obtain the value - 3 5. Let's depict it graphically.

Solving the inequality with the > sign, then you need to pay attention to the interval above O x. Let us highlight the required part of the plane in red and get that

The required gap is part O x red. This means that the open number ray - ∞ , - 3 5 will be a solution to the inequality. If, according to the condition, we had a non-strict inequality, then the value of the point - 3 5 would also be a solution to the inequality. And it would coincide with O x.

Answer: - ∞ , - 3 5 or x< - 3 5 .

The graphical solution is used when the left side corresponds to the function y = 0 x + b, that is, y = b. Then the straight line will be parallel to O x or coinciding at b = 0. These cases show that the inequality may have no solutions, or the solution may be any number.

Example 8

Determine from the inequalities 0 x + 7< = 0 , 0 · x + 0 ≥ 0 то, которое имеет хотя бы одно решение.

Solution

The representation of y = 0 x + 7 is y = 7, then a coordinate plane will be given with a line parallel to O x and located above O x. So 0 x + 7< = 0 решений не имеет, потому как нет промежутков.

The graph of the function y = 0 x + 0 is considered to be y = 0, that is, the straight line coincides with O x. This means that the inequality 0 x + 0 ≥ 0 has many solutions.

Answer: The second inequality has a solution for any value of x.

Inequalities that reduce to linear

The solution of inequalities can be reduced to the solution of a linear equation, which are called inequalities that reduce to linear.

These inequalities were considered in the school course, since they were a special case of solving inequalities, which led to the opening of parentheses and the reduction of similar terms. For example, consider that 5 − 2 x > 0, 7 (x − 1) + 3 ≤ 4 x − 2 + x, x - 3 5 - 2 x + 1 > 2 7 x.

The inequalities given above are always reduced to the form of a linear equation. After that, the brackets are opened and similar terms are given, transferred from different parts, changing the sign to the opposite.

When reducing the inequality 5 − 2 x > 0 to linear, we represent it in such a way that it has the form − 2 x + 5 > 0, and to reduce the second we obtain that 7 (x − 1) + 3 ≤ 4 x − 2 + x . It is necessary to open the brackets, bring similar terms, move all terms to the left side and bring similar terms. It looks like this:

7 x − 7 + 3 ≤ 4 x − 2 + x 7 x − 4 ≤ ​​5 x − 2 7 x − 4 − 5 x + 2 ≤ 0 2 x − 2 ≤ 0

This leads the solution to a linear inequality.

These inequalities are considered linear, since they have the same solution principle, after which it is possible to reduce them to elementary inequalities.

To solve this type of inequality, it is necessary to reduce it to a linear one. It should be done this way:

Definition 9

• open parentheses;
• collect variables on the left and numbers on the right;
• give similar terms;
• divide both sides by the coefficient of x.

Example 9

Solve the inequality 5 · (x + 3) + x ≤ 6 · (x − 3) + 1.

Solution

We open the brackets, then we get an inequality of the form 5 x + 15 + x ≤ 6 x − 18 + 1. After reducing similar terms, we have that 6 x + 15 ≤ 6 x − 17. After moving the terms from the left to the right, we find that 6 x + 15 − 6 x + 17 ≤ 0. Hence there is an inequality of the form 32 ≤ 0 from that obtained by calculating 0 x + 32 ≤ 0. It can be seen that the inequality is false, which means that the inequality given by condition has no solutions.

Answer: no solutions.

It is worth noting that there are many other types of inequalities that can be reduced to linear or inequalities of the type shown above. For example, 5 2 x − 1 ≥ 1 is an exponential equation that reduces to a solution of the linear form 2 x − 1 ≥ 0. These cases will be considered when solving inequalities of this type.

If you notice an error in the text, please highlight it and press Ctrl+Enter

Preliminary information

Definition 1

An inequality of the form $f(x) >(≥)g(x)$, in which $f(x)$ and $g(x)$ are entire rational expressions, is called an entire rational inequality.

Examples of whole rational inequalities are linear, quadratic, and cubic inequalities with two variables.

Definition 2

The value $x$ at which the inequality from the definition of $1$ is satisfied is called the root of the equation.

An example of solving such inequalities:

Example 1

Solve the whole inequality $4x+3 >38-x$.

Solution.

Let's simplify this inequality:

We got a linear inequality. Let's find its solution:

Answer: $(7,∞)$.

In this article we will consider the following methods for solving entire rational inequalities.

Factorization method

This method will be as follows: An equation of the form $f(x)=g(x)$ is written. This equation is reduced to the form $φ(x)=0$ (where $φ(x)=f(x)-g(x)$). Then the function $φ(x)$ is factorized with the minimum possible powers. The rule applies: The product of polynomials equals zero when one of them equals zero. Next, the found roots are marked on the number line and a sign curve is constructed. Depending on the sign of the initial inequality, the answer is written.

Here are examples of solutions this way:

Example 2

Solve by factorization. $y^2-9

Solution.

Let's solve the equation $y^2-9

Using the difference of squares formula, we have

Using the rule that the product of factors is equal to zero, we obtain the following roots: $3$ and $-3$.

Let's draw a curve of signs:

Since the initial inequality has a “less than” sign, we get

Answer: $(-3,3)$.

Example 3

Solve by factorization.

$x^3+3x+2x^2+6 ≥0$

Solution.

Let's solve the following equation:

$x^3+3x+2x^2+6=0$

Let us take out of brackets the common factors from the first two terms and from the last two

$x(x^2+3)+2(x^2+3)=0$

Let's take out the common factor $(x^2+3)$

$(x^2+3)(x+2)=0$

Using the rule that the product of factors is equal to zero, we get:

$x+2=0 \ and \ x^2+3=0$

$x=-2$ and "no roots"

Let's draw a curve of signs:

Since the initial inequality has a “greater than or equal” sign, we get

Answer: $(-∞,-2]$.

Method for introducing a new variable

This method is as follows: Write an equation of the form $f(x)=g(x)$. We solve it as follows: we introduce a new variable to obtain an equation, the method of solving which is already known. We subsequently solve it and return to replacement. From it we will find the solution to the first equation. Next, the found roots are marked on the number line and a sign curve is constructed. Depending on the sign of the initial inequality, the answer is written.