Falsification of world history is an attempt to change the modern world order. Falsification of the history of the Second World War - as an ideological weapon of the West against modern Russia

REPOST

The more you analyze the information on the falsification of history, the more the sinister role of the Vatican emerges in this total deception of humanity. And apparently it is no coincidence that the many kilometers and multi-tiered storage facilities of the Vatican Library contain numerous artifacts and authentic written sources of ancient civilizations that are inaccessible to ordinary people. Why did this “center of Catholicism,” which the Vatican claims to be, need all this? Yes, the whole point is that not only official history, but also the Catholic religion itself, was also falsified and created with the help of many fictitious myths in much later times of the Middle Ages. For example, the English historian E. Johnson, exploring the history of Catholicism, came to surprising conclusions, which he outlined in his book “Letters of Paul.” Here they are:

— The Acts of the Apostles were written in the middle of the 16th century.

— The Latin Bible, together with the Hebrew Bible, are the earliest existing texts of the Bible (Latin). In this case, the whole story falls into the sixteenth century. The final version of the Bible text, accepted by the Catholic Church as the official one, was published in 1589-1592.

— The Gutenberg Bible (supposedly printed in 1456) is most likely one of the fairy tales of historians, which arose after someone in the 16th century or even later needed to “prove” the existence of the Bible already in the middle of the 15th century. The publication of the Bible was dated backdated. The extremely high typographic quality of the “Gutenberg” edition indicates that this Bible could only have been printed after a period of development of typographic art.

— The New Testament was formed gradually and was created by monks in monasteries, like Acts and Epistles in the form of fragments, and then the mosaic of the New Testament was compiled from the fragments.

— The Acts of the Apostles were written about 500 years ago. They were the basis for the composition of the New Testament. This is the introduction to the New Testament. The persons, places and times are all fictitious. The work was carried out by monks and was coordinated and disseminated in the monasteries during the early reformation.

- Tertullian, Eusebius of Caesarea, Jerome, Origen and Augustine - these authors and their works were invented by Latin medieval monks.

— The works of Eusebius were written in Latin by medieval monks in Paris. They were then translated into Greek to show that the early churches were formed in Greece.

— “Jerome” and “Augustine” are not the names of people who wrote more than 1,400 years ago, but the pseudonym of a monastic faction of the Renaissance.

— The monks created the doctrine of original sin.

— In dogmatic and polemical writings, Tertullian mentions only 1 and 2 letters to Timothy, letters to the Gallatians, Romans, Corinthians and Philippians.

— The legend about the works of Marcion appears relatively late, and is placed under the title “Tertullian”.

— Tertullian first formulated the concept of the Trinity and laid the foundation for ecclesiastical Latin.

— It is impossible to say definitely about Jewish culture before 1492. It was apparently written about in Hebrew around the middle of the sixteenth century.

— The works of rabbis older than the 15th century have not survived. Very few books earlier than the 15th century AD have survived.

— The first book in Hebrew was printed in a place called Soncino, near Cremona, but it can be found that even the date of printing of the 16th century is very doubtful.

— It is difficult to trace the appearance of Hebrew in Christian books even in the first half of the sixteenth century.

— Kabbalah, or tradition, turns out to be an invention of the Renaissance.

— Again and again the absurd theory is imposed that the Jews were the first in everything.

The last conclusion is especially valuable because it indicates in whose interests the Vatican carried out a total falsification of history and the Christian religion. That is why the falsifiers tried to adjust the official history to the “Torah” and included the Jewish Old Testament in the “Christianity” they invented, making it essentially a “branch” of Judaism.

And if Judaism is the religion of God’s “chosen” people, then Christianity and other religions of the “biblical project” are religions for “goyim”, whose destiny is to serve the “God’s chosen people”. That is why in these religions the psychology of “slaves of God”, slaves of the tribal god of the Jews, Yahweh-Jehovah, who promised the Jews, for fulfilling his covenants, to give possession of the whole world along with the property of the “goyim”, is so persistently implanted.

As for E. Johnson’s preliminary conclusions, here’s what is written about them in the book published by Conceptual, called “How and Why Scriptures Are Made Sacred”:

“In truth, Johnson's conclusions are shocking to Christians and to traditionalist historians. Not only does the author give us a completely different chronology of the history of the Christian church, he also talks about the construction of the texts of “sacred” scripture in order to ensure dominance over the Christian world.

According to Johnson, the Benedictine monks compiled a symbol of faith and the Gospel, invented characters: the founders of the church, Christian scientists, the apostles with their messages and deeds, to whom they attributed their own thoughts. Accordingly, it turns out that during the Reformation, a handful of healers carried out a transformation of Christian doctrine, created the Catholic Church in Europe and began the expansion of the Latin modification of Christianity.

Let us note that not only Johnson, but also other Western researchers wrote about the forgeries of Christian books by the Latins. For example, Barthelemy Germont, a French Jesuit from Orleans (1663-1712), believed that ancient manuscripts with texts of St. Augustine and even Gospel manuscripts were forged in the Benedictine monastery of Corby before the 13th century. Many works by Augustine, Jerome, Isidore of Seville, Bernard, etc. - forged. According to Germont, the books of Holy Scripture also underwent changes. The Gospel of Luke and several letters of the Apostle Paul...

The Latin Church did not create new sacred books, but was only engaged, in accordance with the tasks assigned to it by global governance, in “correcting” texts and adding relevant sections, which radically changed the essence of Christian doctrine.”

Thus, Catholicism is not real Christianity, but a religion of hidden Satanism that has nothing to do with the teachings of Christ. It is no coincidence that it was Catholicism that proclaimed the crucifixion of Christ as a symbol of faith - a symbol of a bloody satanic sacrifice to the dark egregor, which Christians are forced to worship, who are not for nothing called the “flock” (herd), essentially consisting of “sacrificial rams”, which are sacrificed to everything the dark satanic egregor with the help of first the Inquisition, and then the “crusades”, religious wars, and then revolutionaries, riots, wars, terrorism, etc.

And in this aspect, the attempts of the current leadership of the Russian Orthodox Church to “lie down” to the Vatican are a real betrayal of their flock and help to globalists in creating an ecumenist religion based on Judaism - the “Church of Satan”, into which all other religions of the “biblical project” should merge. It is the Vatican that acts as the center of unification of this satanic religion, which the Illuminati wants to impose on the whole world.

In his book The Committee of 300, former British intelligence officer John Coleman writes: “ An open conspiracy against God and man, which includes the enslavement of the majority of people remaining on this earth after wars, disasters and massacres, operates without much concealment... What are the goals of this secret elite group, the heirs of the Illuminati, the cult of Dionysus, the cult of Isis, the Cathars , Bogomilov? Members of this elite group, who also call themselves "OLYMPIANS" (they truly believe that they are equal in stature and power to the legendary gods of Olympus, who placed themselves, like their god Lucifer, above our true God) firmly believe that they are called upon by divine right to do the following:

(1) Establish the reign of a One World Government - New World Order with a unified church and monetary system under their control. Few people know that the One World Government began to create its "church" in the 1920-30s, for it recognized the need to provide an outlet for humanity's natural need for religious faith, and therefore it established a "church" organization to channel this faith into what it desired. channel yourself...

(3) The destruction of religions, and especially Christianity, with the sole exception of its created religion, mentioned above...

(14) Promoting the spread of religious cults such as the Muslim Brotherhood, Muslim fundamentalists of various persuasions, Sikhism, as well as carrying out experiments in murder on the model of Jim Jones's Sons of Sam...

(15) Spreading the ideas of “religious liberation” throughout the world with the aim of undermining existing religions and especially Christianity ... "

Therefore, people should know what is actually happening in relation to the increasing contacts between hierarchs of different faiths, and that the declared “bringing together and unification” of world religions is in fact an integral part of the establishment of a worldwide satanic “new world order”. In this aspect, the falsification of history and religions carried out by the Vatican back in the Middle Ages was a systematic preparatory work of forces hostile to humanity to prepare this truly anti-human plan.

P.S. Vitaly Sundakov talks about this period of distortion of real world history and the “outlining” of a new, truly “dark” reality in his next 12th Lesson of the Russian Language. He tells how the transition of the World Order from the Second Temple to the Third took place, and through whom it was created.

The Soviet Union collapsed almost a quarter of a century ago. Soviet history in the media and in textbooks has long been habitually painted in the dark colors of communist terror, which was supposedly the meaning of the Soviet political system.

It seems that the authorities are waiting for the last witnesses of the Soviet past to die out, and for new generations of Russia to lose all interest in the heroic image of the great country, which for seventy years inspired the whole world with hope for the triumph of justice. In the meantime, other values ​​are promoted and other heroes are glorified.

However, a movement has emerged and is growing in Russian society for the revival of the historical dignity of Russia. This happens following the strengthening of its political position in the world. For now these are public organizations of a club format. Their main task is to combat the falsification of history, opportunistic disinformation and forgery of documents aimed at destroying the unity of the peoples and social groups of our vast country. Essentially, in response to the information aggression of the falsifiers of the past, a search is underway for a consolidating national Russian idea or ideology, despite the vague definition of political diversity in Article 13 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation.

“Forget your family, and you are nobody”

As we know, history is politics directed to the past. Writing history and factual interpretation are purely ideological work. Without the past there is no future. The ideological basis of personal self-identification and patriotism lies, first of all, in historical memory, around which culture and the language of communication in its diversity are formed. Everything together unites people into a society inhabiting a historical territory, and with the development of the economy, a nation is formed from a historical community. If this algorithm of nation formation is destroyed, its identification historical basis is distorted, then society will begin to disintegrate and the nation will not come into being.

The main sign of distortion of historical facts is manifested in the direction of the description of the fact itself, its interpretation. If the orientation is anti-Russian or anti-Russian, anti-Soviet, then probably behind this lies a propaganda goal and disinformation, information intervention in the historical consciousness of Russian society with the aim of its decomposition and the formation of an inferiority complex. This is the direct goal of the so-called Western information war against the Russian Federation and the former Soviet republics.

The goal is neither new nor exceptional. Information sabotage against Russia has been actively used in politics by Western governments for hundreds of years. In this case, fending off the intervention systematically, new historians and journalists studying history need to be able to perceive the factual series of events, linking them to the political situation of the time in which the events occurred, abstracting from modern ideological cliches and not mentally bringing them into the social relations of the past . Only then, based on the analysis and modeling of events, can an alternative interpretation of facts or processes appear to Western propaganda, which will serve to comprehend the past and consolidate society.

Without a decent understanding of the past, it is impossible to build the future without destroying oneself. Moreover, the Russian state, losing the historical continuity of generations, condemning its history and renouncing the choice of previous generations, risks blindly following the ideological guidelines of Western competitors, losing its sovereignty. We have no reason to be ashamed of our past. It was worthy, historically predetermined within the laws of evolution.

Below are several examples of distortions in the interpretation of historical events accepted in Western historiography, and a real alternative to them, based on the cause-and-effect relationships of social processes and facts. This is an exclusively subjective view of the author.

1. There is a strong message that the Red Army and Stalin forcibly imposed communism on Eastern Europe. That is, the fear of the USSR and the Bolsheviks paralyzed the democratic forces in the countries of Eastern Europe, which were allegedly against communism and socialism.

In fact, it was the other way around. By the beginning of World War II, almost all European countries were affected by fascism to varying degrees. The fascisation of Europe was caused by the reaction of the bourgeoisie, primarily financial, to the growing popularity in Europe of left-wing movements and parties, the authority of the Comintern after the First World War.

Fascist bourgeois political regimes in European countries were the norm. Moreover, many of them hid behind ultra-left slogans of nationalist socialism. This was the case in Italy - the birthplace of fascism - led by Mussolini. Hitler's party was called National Socialist, the national flag of Germany was red with a swastika in a white circle, symbolizing the absolute vitality of the National Socialist idea. This was a calculated propaganda technique by the Nazis during the crisis of the 1930s.

The Second World War was launched as an anti-communist war, in which Germany was the striking force in the intrigue of the financial cartels against the USSR and the core of the anti-Soviet European or Western coalition. Fascist Europe concluded peace treaties with Nazi Germany. This was the quintessence of political strategy in Europe’s next campaign to the East, as a continuation of the First World War. For this purpose, Germany was armed by US and European financiers.

The allies of the USSR, really the Anglo-Saxons, were hypocritical in this war and looked for a profitable middle ground in pitting two major powers against each other and at the same time their historical competitors - Germany and the USSR.

At the same time, one cannot help but say that the birthplace of the communist project Marx-Engels there were France and England, and the project itself was conceived by the British prime minister Palmerston, a skilled political intriguer who tacitly supported Marx, was intended for rival Germany to undermine its economy and state.

Marxov "Manifesto of the Communist Party" was developed and freely published in London in 1848 as the program document of the Communist League, and in Germany the manifesto appeared only in 1872. The First International, as an international organization of workers, was founded in 1864, also in London.

At this time, a complete translation of Marx’s “Capital” was published for the first time in St. Petersburg, and Marxism was a little-known philosophical movement. The Manifesto of the Communist Party was published in Russia only in 1882, and before that there were attempts to translate it into Russian abroad, in particular in Geneva.

In Germany in 1918, a communist political party appeared and, if not for Hitler’s pogroms of the communists, it would have had a chance to come to power. The communist idea also appeared in Eastern Europe earlier than in Tsarist Russia. In 1919, a Soviet republic was proclaimed in Hungary and a Red Army was formed to defend it, while a civil war was in full swing in the RSFSR, in which European internationalists also participated. So Europe was ready for communism long before World War II and Stalin.

Rather, Russia followed European leftist ideas and allowed a grand experiment to take place. There was no dictate to Europe on its part, just as there was never any forced imposition of Russian Orthodoxy. It is no coincidence that after the war in the 70s of the last century, Eurocommunism, different from the Soviet version, was cultivated in Europe. What do the USSR and Stalin have to do with it?

After the victory in 1945, the authority of the USSR and the ideas of socialism were in themselves very high, and the USSR was perceived by the broad masses of the world as a role model in solving such pressing political problems as social justice and the prosperity of peoples, their independence.

Therefore, the influence of left-wing parties in European countries increased sharply as a result of the war, while the right-wing bourgeois parties that collaborated with the Germans in governments during the war collapsed. This is the main reason for the leftward movement of political parties in Europe, as well as in Asia, South America, and Africa. The process also affected the United States. This is how the International Socialist System arose, which was represented by socialist countries and countries with a socialist orientation. And then there were unifications of Eastern European countries into Comecon And Warsaw Pact.

Nobody forced anyone into these organizations. Albania left these organizations of its own free will. Socialist Yugoslavia and Austria did not participate in them, on whose territory there were Soviet troops until 1954, and on the Austrian coat of arms from 1919 to 1934 there was a hammer and sickle.

In order to prevent leftist revolutions in their countries, in America and France, for example, in the post-war period pro-fascist measures were taken and communist parties were banned there. This is an anti-communist policy De Gaulle in France, and McCarthyism in the USA. In Spain and Portugal, the fascist dictatorship was established earlier, but was not overthrown immediately after the war, but only ended decades later due to the death of the dictators Franco And Salazar. It is noteworthy that in Portugal, the constitution of 1974 (the so-called Carnation Revolution) proclaimed a course towards building socialism. Then this article was removed from the text of the constitution.

They may ask, how can we evaluate the events in Hungary in 1956 and Czechoslovakia in 1968, if we do not consider them a dictatorship of the USSR? Very simple. The Warsaw Pact provided for mutual military assistance in crisis situations. The putsch in Hungary and Czechoslovakia was inspired from outside, as was the case much later in Yugoslavia. That's why troops not only from the USSR, but also from Poland, the GDR, and Bulgaria were brought into the Hungarian People's Republic and Czechoslovakia. The operation was collective, and not exclusively Soviet. At the same time, modern Russia does not bear any historical responsibility for these events.

Moreover, the Warsaw Pact provided for a procedure for self-dissolution if a pan-European system of collective security was created. The treaty was open to accession by other countries, regardless of their political system of power, on the basis of equal sovereign rights.

2. Western propaganda and the opposition in Russia are inflating the myth of the notorious Iron Curtain between the USSR and the West, allegedly lowered by the Soviet dictatorship. This is a complete distortion of the essence of the isolation of the USSR. The Iron Curtain was lowered by the West, that is, the economic and political isolation of the USSR was declared, a blockade of its entry into the world market immediately after the establishment of Soviet power after the revolution.

The Second World War did not change the position of Western governments. Churchill's speech at Fulton in 1946, Truman Doctrine and other policy statements of American presidents confirm this fact. The strategy of the “Iron Curtain”, that is, isolation in the post-war period, was implemented in the form of the Cold War. All this continues now in the form of sanctions and trade restrictions, but against Russia.

Nevertheless, the Soviet Union managed to conduct successful foreign trade. In addition to raw materials, timber and oil, products of mechanical engineering, energy and chemical industries, aircraft manufacturing, etc. were exported. For international payments, gold and foreign exchange ruble, which protected the domestic market and CMEA from the influence of the American dollar and ensured market stability. However, this created a shortage of foreign currency in the state treasury, which was necessary for industrial development and foreign policy activities.

Among the intelligentsia, there was a widespread belief that the state was deliberately prohibiting travel abroad for ideological reasons. In fact, the reason for the restrictions was the shortage of foreign currency, since the government had to provide citizens traveling abroad with foreign currency for rubles according to international standards. For the same reason of the currency shortage, trade in foreign consumer goods was organized through the Vneshtorg store system for VPT checks, which were used to pay Soviet citizens instead of currency for work on foreign business trips, and the earned currency itself went to the state treasury.

As for ideological obstacles, for this reason the dissident emigration of the 60s and 70s would hardly have taken place. Compared to the first wave of emigrants, Soviet dissidents did not play any significant role in the ideological confrontation between the West and the USSR; they were dangerous at home, and not abroad, where dissidents were sent out of harm’s way. The very ideological background of the exit restriction has become a kind of legend to cover up the true cause of the problem - saving foreign exchange reserves.

The exchange of tourists and students was also rationed due to the foreign exchange shortage, but there were quotas for the exchange of tourists and students. There were also visa restrictions on both sides. In the USSR, by law, citizens who had access to secret documents were also limited in traveling abroad.

In addition, bilateral agreements on free border crossing were then concluded between states. The USSR did not have such agreements with foreign countries. But this was not determined by ideology, but by the migration policy of each country. One could travel to a socialist country at the invitation of an organization or relatives. The procedure for registering travel to a capitalist country for the same reasons was more complicated. But it depended on the rules of the other side. Nowadays, when almost all restrictions on leaving the Russian Federation have been lifted, restrictive conditions on entry into some countries remain.

What was currency spent on in the USSR? First of all, for foreign policy purposes to ensure a balance of power and global influence of the two systems under the conditions of the blockade and the Cold War, to put it briefly. Peaceful coexistence cost money. Therefore, the USSR supported materially friendly states in their development and ensuring sovereignty. The maintenance of foreign government institutions, provision of maritime navigation, and international communications also required foreign exchange expenses.

The task of world revolution, for which the USSR is accused, was never set by the Soviet leadership after the departure of Trotsky and the collapse of the Comintern. But the myth of the “world revolution of the Soviets” remained, thanks to the slogan of the Comintern era “Proletarians of all countries, unite!” This tradition did not reflect the real Soviet foreign policy, but was tendentiously used in Western anti-Soviet propaganda, now the Soviet threat has been replaced by Russian.

3. Russophobes and the opposition shout about the technological backwardness of the USSR and Russia. But the USSR was not technologically backward. On the contrary, most of the advanced technologies in the world were developed by Soviet scientists, but they were implemented in other countries. For example, laser, television, mobile phone, space exploration and nuclear power.

In military technologies, we were ahead of developed capitalist countries, and we are ahead of them now, but in the production of consumer goods, the state did not allow excess consumer qualities, focusing on domestic demand in the absence of competition. Many high dual-use technologies were unjustifiably classified.

Soviet goods were simple, cheap, and their quality suited the demand of the bulk of the population, and the state saved on this. Although the industry could have produced more complex household appliances, if they had not saved on costs in the light and food industries in order to carry out grandiose space programs - the basis of the country's security. At a time when the West was switching to plastic and food substitutes at the whim of speculators, the USSR preferred natural products and fabrics, and building materials. Today it has been proven that the shortage of goods in the USSR was deliberate, a form of political pressure in the struggle for power.

In fact, based on the results of participation in international exhibitions, our products, including cars, were in fairly wide potential demand abroad among the population due to their low cost and utilitarian nature. This was precisely one of the reasons for the market isolation of the USSR in favor of Western concerns that produced products, for example, the same cars, with inflated consumer properties at a higher price and a relatively short service life, even with well-organized technical service.

Overproduction, an excess of goods in relation to demand lead to overuse of resources and their depletion, an increase in industrial waste and garbage. But a competitive market cannot exist without this glut of goods and intensive financial circulation. Today we see this with our own eyes.

After the collapse of the USSR, Russia entered the world market, but was limited in realizing its capabilities by the obligations of WTO membership. The ruble became freely convertible and unprotected from the influence of stock market conditions. As a result, the economy of the Russian Federation, like those of other former Soviet republics, turned out to be controlled by Western financial cartels. Russia imports consumer goods that it could produce itself with better quality. Gradually, consumption develops into pathological consumerism, which ensures the growth of capital of financial speculators and usurers, morally corrupting society.

What are the benefits for the Russian population from participating in the WTO and is there any? The profits of speculators do not increase the standard of living of the population and the quality of goods.

4. The West has constantly accused the USSR and accuses Russia of aggressiveness, citing far-fetched aggressiveness in the first place among other threats. However, in world history there is no other state with many peace-loving initiatives, as the USSR was and as the Russian Federation is.

At the Genoa Conference in 1922, the Soviet delegation, on behalf of the head of state, proposed general disarmament. The USSR offered peace and fulfillment of the obligations of the previous government (tsarist and bourgeois-republican) regarding debts and compensation for losses of foreign companies from the revolution in exchange for official recognition of the Soviet government as legal and full-fledged in international relations. The West rejected both proposals. The Soviet state remained in a trade blockade and political isolation. The West is now pursuing the same policy towards Russia.

5. Outright lies are being spread in the media and on the Internet that the West was forced to create NATO and expand it due to the threat of a communist invasion from the East. Few people know that initially, after the end of the war, the UN was planned like the pre-war League of Nations, from which the USSR was excluded in 1940. The League of Nations itself collapsed due to insurmountable political differences between its members on the eve of World War II and was formally dissolved in 1946, but after the establishment of the UN in 1945.

USSR membership in the UN was also not envisaged, and the new international organization was conceived by the Western powers as a consolidated instrument in the fight against communism, similar to the League of Nations.

However, this could not be done, thanks to the authority of the then leadership of the Soviet Union, which became one of the founders of the modern UN. It is obvious that, as a counterweight to the anti-communist UN, the Comintern could be revived with the Soviet Union at its head, which caused a lot of concern to world capital before the war. This was a powerful argument in favor of USSR membership in the UN, which did not seek confrontation. The inclusion of the USSR and two union republics - the Ukrainian SSR and the BSSR - into the UN as independent members of the organization was a victory for Soviet diplomacy.

Soviet lawyers, specialists in international law, actively participated in the development of the UN Charter. At their proposal, a Security Council was formed at the UN with the right of veto for each of the five member countries of the Security Council: the winners of WWII and China. The inclusion of China in the UN Security Council was proposed by the Soviet leadership. Thus, the plans of the leading Western powers to escalate the confrontation in the Cold War, which was fraught with the Third World War with the use of nuclear weapons, were thwarted.

As a result, the UN was established in 1945 as a universal subject of international law to develop international cooperation, ensure security and maintain peace on Earth with the authority to form and use peacekeeping armed forces.

Having failed in the UN project, Western states united with the same anti-Soviet and anti-communist goal, creating the North Atlantic Alliance NATO in 1949. This organization was initially not only commercial and political, but also military, which included the combined armed forces of NATO member countries. In response, the military Warsaw Pact Organization appeared in Eastern Europe six years later in 1955., and before that there was already an intergovernmental consultative economic body of the socialist countries of the CMEA (1949). Both organizations were dissolved in 1991.

This is the reason and sequence of the appearance of these international organizations. To this must be added the treacherous expansion of NATO to the east after the dissolution of the Warsaw Pact. So who is the real aggressor here?

6. A special place in Western propaganda is given to the shortage of goods in the USSR, low wages, and the infringement of the rights of agricultural workers. This issue is very difficult to discuss, since there are no unambiguous methods and comparable statistical data to compare two different systems of government and distribution of national income related to solving specific internal economic and social problems.

Of course, the USSR was “catching up with America.” But by what criteria? The Soviet economy was built on the basis of its own resources and labor, and America, which did not fight on its own soil, dominated the world market through dollar speculation and military force.

Nevertheless, today we can quite comparablely compare life in the USSR under socialism with life in the Russian Federation under capitalism in many respects: in terms of income level, personal self-realization and spiritual life.

In Soviet times, real incomes of the population were significantly higher than wages. They consisted of earnings and government subsidies. The state subsidized the costs of maintaining housing and communal services, kindergartens and nurseries, provided free education at all levels from primary to higher special education, maintained at the expense of the budget an extensive network of institutions for out-of-school education and health improvement of children and youth, sports clubs and sections, sports schools and houses of pioneers. Today in Russia this is practically not the case. You have to pay for everything. For many families, comprehensive childcare is unaffordable due to low incomes. Thus, from generation to generation, the marginal part of society is growing as a social base for extremism and criminality.

Speculation on historical events

In addition to the ideological falsification of historical facts and distortion of the essence of the events of the Soviet past, Western political technologists are looking for episodes in our past that could become ideological grounds for the disunity of peoples and regions. That is, they are looking for ideological cracks along which Russia could be split.

Among such events, for example, the episode of the capture of Kazan in 1552 by the Tsar was chosen Ivan IV the Terrible, the main city of the former Kazan ulus of the Golden Horde. This was the fifth campaign against Kazan, the previous ones were unsuccessful, which indicates the power of the Kazan Khanate, comparable to Moscow.

This event is presented by Western and many Soviet historians as the conquest, the conquest by the Russians of the Kazan sovereign Khanate of the Volga Tatars with the aim of expanding Moscow possessions. Thus, the aggressive image of the Russian Moscow state is projected, which should encourage modern Tatars to take historical revenge and stimulate separatist sentiments in Tatarstan.

In fact, Kazan was taken by the troops of the Russian Tsar, which included squads of Kazan Tatars, Mari, Chuvash, Mordovians with their khans and princes. Free Don Cossacks came to the rescue.

The combined forces expelled from Kazan the protege of the Crimean Khan and the Ottoman Empire, who blocked the Volga trade route and raided Russian lands for robberies and seizures of slaves. The slave trade was one of the trades of the Crimean Khanate. After the capture of Kazan, the tsar, according to the custom of that time, himself became the khan of the Volga Tatars, the Volga trade route became free, and the peoples of the Volga region joined the Russian state, for which they repeatedly turned to the tsar. Neither the way of life, nor the faith, nor the customs of the annexed peoples, including the Tatars, were changed or violated by force. However, the capture of Kazan is presented as a war of conquest.

For several years, Turkey tried to restore its influence in the Kazan Khanate and by placing its khan on the throne, organizing rebellion after rebellion against Russia with the help of the Nogais, but was never able to do this. This period is taught as a national liberation war of the Kazan Tatars against the Russians.

The settlement of the provinces of the North Caucasus in the 18th century and later is played out in the same manner. The fact is that most of the settlers were from the regions of Little Russia, the Kuban and Terek Cossacks were mainly formed from the Zaporozhye Cossacks, and therefore, until our time, the original Ukrainian dialect was widespread in the Stavropol and Krasnodar territories, and Ukrainian culture was also introduced. Modern Ukrainian Nazis took this episode of Russian history as the basis for territorial claims against the Russian Federation, threatening to spread their ideology to Kuban and even annex the Kuban lands to Ukraine. They talk about this openly, voicing it in the context of Western scenarios of stimulating the collapse of Russia.

It is no coincidence that scientists - historians, ethnographers, sociologists and political scientists from European and American universities - are quite actively conducting research work in the North Caucasus, reports on which are becoming the property of specialists of a different kind. Probably as a result of such scientific contacts with representatives of the local intelligentsia in Stavropol, the opinion suddenly began to spread that “Russians have lost their culture.” What will happen next?

It is also no coincidence that publications about the peasant war led by Emelyan Pugacheva or about the Pugachev uprising of 1773-1775. This topic has always aroused great interest in Russia. Too many mysteries remain for posterity about that distant event. But what is the intrigue of the current popularity? It lies in just a few lines. The Peasant War is interpreted as a war between two states - Tsarist Russia and the Cossack Yaik (Ural). Pugachev allegedly had a full-fledged government with its own orders and ministers, and the army was regular.

If we compare these interesting statements with the activity of the American embassy in the Urals, then we can judge the possible preparation of some kind of ideological basis for an anti-Russian American project in this region. It is quite possible that the authors of historical studies are not aware of such intentions of the customer. But this does not mean that there are no such intentions at all.

In the same series of historical speculations there is the problem of the revival of the monarchy in Russia; candidates for the royal throne have already been prepared from imaginary Bagrationi-Romanovs.

The public was shocked by the news of a certain scientific dissertation justifying the treason of the commander of the 2nd Shock Army, General Vlasova. They say that in modern anti-communist Russia, Vlasov cannot be considered a traitor, since he did what higher leaders repeated in the Cold War in the 80-90s of the last century. Moreover, the remains of a white general Denikin and his wife were reburied in the Donskoy Monastery in Moscow as a sign of reconciliation of the past. But everyone knows that Anton Ivanovich Denikin refused to cooperate with the Germans against Soviet Russia, although he was an implacable enemy of the Soviet government and the Bolsheviks.

As the old Russian proverb says, you can’t put a scarf on every mouth. Bans on provocative topics will not improve matters here. It is necessary to adequately respond to such challenges with counter-information, new historiography with a clear ideology of statehood.

Based on these conclusions, it becomes clear why numerous artifacts belonging to the ancient highly developed antediluvian civilizations of the Earth are so carefully hushed up and “not noticed” by official science. And the point here is not only to hide from us the high technologies of these civilizations, but also the real reasons for their death, especially in light of the processes that are happening around the world now.

Meanwhile, a lot of indirect information about these ancient civilizations can be gleaned from myths, tales and legends of various peoples of the Earth. And the “picture” appears something like this...

Millions of years ago, representatives of a highly developed interstellar civilization appeared on our planet, who created their colony in the subpolar region on the Arctic continent, which is known as Daariya-Arctida-Oriana.
At a certain point, a lizard-headed race appeared on Earth, which subsequently entered into a military confrontation with the “white gods” and was defeated by them, although at the cost of enormous efforts, sacrifices and destruction. After this, the non-humanoid civilization took refuge in underground cities and chose not to interfere more openly in the history of mankind.

However, over time, for some reason, the connection with the star metropolis began to weaken, and the consciousness of part of the ancient Arcts - the people of the white race - began to lose their original clarity of awareness of the laws of the Universe and a direct spiritual connection with the Creator. These people, imbued with material interests, wished to go to more southern lands in search of an “easy life” and over time formed a civilization on the Atlantic continent, now known as Atlantis.

For a long time, the civilizations of Atlantis and Oriana lived in peace and harmony, however, the non-humanoid mind, which did not give up trying to take over our planet, did not sit idly by. He managed to quietly persuade the Atlanteans to the technocratic path of development, and also instill in them the idea of ​​​​the benefits of slavery. This is how representatives of the black and red races appeared on the territory of Atlantis, who over time “eroded” the genetic memory of the “white gods” among the indigenous white population. A similar thing is happening now in the USA, which are heirs to the traditions of Atlantis.

The more people's consciousness closed itself off from the original truths, the easier it became to manipulate it with the help of various psychotechniques and psi-weapons. It was in this way that the non-humanoid mind eventually managed to take control of the consciousness of the high priests of Atlantis. Everything else was a matter of technique. The lizardheads needed to destroy humanity in order to free or reformat the planet for themselves, but in the way of achieving their plans stood the highly developed techno-magical civilization of Daaria-Arctida-Oriana, which, moreover, could again request help from the metropolis in the event of aggression from the lizardheads themselves.

And then it was decided to destroy humanity with the hands of humanity itself, or to genetically interbreed with the human race, or to create a hybrid and controlled “own” civilization. In this case, the non-humanoid mind seemed to have nothing to do with it in the eyes of the Creator - it was themselves. For this purpose, the now well-known tactics were used: “divide and conquer.” To begin with, the civilizations of Atlantis and Arctida-Oriana were separated. Then, with the help of seizing control over the consciousness of the high priests of Atlantis, blind and fanatical hatred towards the fraternal people from the Arctic continent was implanted into the consciousness of its inhabitants with the help of lies and falsification.

All this led to a direct military attack on Daaria-Arctida-Oriana, first about 30-40 thousand years ago, and then about 12-13 thousand years ago. Combat operations took place on all continents and continents; destructive weapons were used, which almost destroyed life on our planet and provoked a shift in the Earth’s axis and even the planet’s orbit. All this led to catastrophic climate changes, as well as the death of ancient civilizations.

But humanity still survived. Settlers from the Arctida-Oriana, which was slowly sinking under the waters of the advancing ocean, moved to the northern coast and northern island territories of Eurasia, and then to Siberia. and to the Urals. Later, states of the Aryans arose in these territories, the direct descendants of which are the ancient Rus. From these same peoples came the current peoples of Northern and Eastern Europe - Scandinavians, Gals, Germans, Slavs.

They managed to survive after the death of their continent and part of the Atlanteans, who moved to Western Europe and North Africa. The high priests of Atlantis also partially survived, who, on the orders of their non-humanoid masters, decided to continue the fight against the people from Daaria-Arctida-Oriana. They once again managed to divide once fraternal peoples, for example, the Germans and Slavs, and periodically pit them against each other in internecine wars until the middle of the 20th century. In this way the Slavs themselves were divided.
The further policy is obvious - to divide one race into many peoples, attribute to them their own individual differences, language, culture, invent a history, making everyone very significant, so that it is easier to bring them into conflict, control and manage.

But even earlier, the high priests of the Atlanteans were able to create, to implement the plans of their masters, the dark egregor of Amon-Set-Yahweh-Jehovah-Satan, to which they subordinated very powerful Egyptian magicians and priests, who became conductors of their will. Subsequently, the Egyptian priests of Amun-Set created various orthodox religions, starting from Judaism, and from there to Christianity, Islam, and other branches and sects, which, instead of knowing the laws of the Universe, contributed to the inculcation of blind fanatical faith and philosophy of slaves among the controlled peoples.

And all this was not accidental. Controlled by the high priests of Atlantis, “Western civilization” has been trying for thousands of years to either physically destroy or wage information wars against the direct descendants of Daariya-Arktida-Oriana, who have not completely fallen under the power of the dark egregor Amun-Set-Yahweh-Jehovah-Satan. And this is precisely the main reason for the united campaigns of the West against Rus'-Russia, the falsification of history, lies and “double standards” in relation to our country, its leaders and the people themselves. This is precisely the main reason for the current Western sanctions and the inculcation of hatred towards Russians into the consciousness of Ukrainians and other peoples, as well as the creation of myths about “Russia’s aggressiveness.”

The aggressive policy of the heirs of Atlantis - the Anglo-American Empire - is entirely within the framework of the lizardheads' plan to destroy humanity at the hands of humanity itself. And this explains why the world today finds itself again on the brink of a planetary destructive war. In order to disguise their true plans, the lizardheads proposed to the world “elites” a plan to establish a “new world order” - a global totalitarian police state, in which all material wealth will belong to representatives of these “elites”, and the rest of humanity will eke out a miserable existence as slaves in an electronic concentration camp.

One of the important points in establishing this “new world order” is to reduce the world population to 1 billion or even 500 million people. This is a very important point that allows you to discover the true goals of the non-humanoid mind. After all, the remaining humanity will be doomed to inevitable death, including the faithful servants of the lizard-heads themselves. And it is possible that some of the very “top” of the “elite” of the Earth already guess about this. Therefore, we can now see many “leaks” of secret and confidential information about these plans that are criminal against humanity.
.

The civilization of the Gods returns to Earth. This civilization created the continents of the Earth and their landscape. In particular, according to the researcher, many mountains on our planet are of artificial origin, as evidenced by layers of sedimentary rocks (sand and clay mixed with stones) that can be found at a fairly high altitude. Also at the bottom of the seas and oceans (and some lakes, such as Titicaca) you can find traces of giant equipment left during excavation.

And if part of humanity is developing science and striving into space, then another part of it is still running with spears through the savannahs and jungles in search of lunch. It’s the same with alien civilizations. They are also at different levels of development. And if some create planets, ecosystems and new races, others simply rob them and ruin them...

But what is all this for? Why this game of “cat and mouse” and “hide and seek”? Are they really hiding or are we “stupid” and don’t want to accept the obvious?
For example, “crop circles”, pyramids, megalithic buildings with unfamiliar methods of processing and moving stone, traces on the bottom of seas and oceans, and more. It looks more like we ourselves are ignoring the obvious. More precisely, we are persistently dumbed down through specially developed scientific concepts, leading us away from the facts that were described by people in various parts of the planet: stories about “gods” who flew to Earth and the “traces” they left on the landscapes of the planet...

It is very likely that these “guys” are able to work with the energy of time over large spaces, which leads to the rapid recrystallization of loose sedimentary deposits into solid rocks. After this, only archaeologists can talk about which pharaohs of which dynasty built the great pyramids or carried 100-ton blocks. Well, that's exactly what they get paid for.
In reality, the more important question is who destroyed them and covered them with dirt along with the cities and temples and other buildings. Somehow they don’t look very much like those who built it all. Well, at least there would be no need for them to destroy or cover up monitoring and control systems in the form of pyramids, etc. It feels like the planet was attacked by some kind of space gang. And her robbery still continues. Otherwise, why hide the traces of ancient civilizations with such care and persistence, impose stupid theories of the origin of man, the construction of megalithic objects, destroy libraries, and now - seize the countries of the Middle East, plunder their museums and destroy ancient artifacts, and in general - hold the peoples of the planet for " flock of sheep"?…

It turns out that in different parts of the planet there are man-made traces left by machines, a civilization much superior to humanity in development. This civilization was engaged in terraforming the planet, creating new land areas or, conversely, sinking them to the bottom of the ocean. Apparently, with the aim of creating conditions for the development of terrestrial civilizations based on new races and different ecosystems. At the same time, gigantic volumes of soil were moved. On the other hand, someone was engaged in the extraction of raw materials on planet Earth. And at the same time - the destruction of these same civilizations in large areas of the planet, covering them with soil and mud flows...

For those who recognize only traditional scientific views, I propose to explain, at least to themselves, the appearance of the Venezuelan Basin, traces in the Red Sea and on the bottom of the Arctic Ocean, and the formation of the Nazca Plateau from the standpoint of traditional science. It turns out that there are forces in space that create universes, galaxies, planetary systems, planets, oceans, continents and various forms of life, including you and me.

By the way, these “builders of forms” are mentioned everywhere; this is obviously the “civilization of the gods” and our creators, to whom we owe our appearance. But after this and many other civilizations disappeared or flew away to continue their work in other systems, our planet was occupied by another civilization - “pseudo-gods” (presumably reptilian), which was able to destroy the ancient highly developed civilizations of the Earth with deception and cunning.

It was thanks to these “pseudo-gods” that the vicious Pyramid of Power was imposed on Earth, based on the worship of material cults, the thirst for power and physical pleasures. They, through their human servants in the form of a caste of dark priests, made “adjustments” to religious cults and scientific knowledge in order to keep the bulk of people at a semi-animal level of consciousness. But times are changing and now it looks very much like the civilization of the “creator gods” is returning to our planet for some reason. And it is precisely because of the fear of retribution for the evil committed on the planet that the civilization of “predators” in recent centuries has been trying not to show its presence, hiding in underground cities.

But in order for humanity to survive and prevent another attempt at nuclear or environmental self-destruction, it is necessary to return to the original wisdom of the ancient Vedic solar Tradition and get rid of the technomagical influence of the dark egregor. Therefore, a very important task for people and, especially, for the peoples of our country is the dissemination and popularization of information about the ancient highly developed civilizations of the Earth, the reasons for their death and our true history, about the worldview and knowledge of our ancestors - immigrants from the ancient Arctic continent, whose civilization did not opposed herself to nature, but harmoniously fit into it.

All those who contribute to hiding “forbidden knowledge” from humanity and try to lead people away from the truth are not only traitors to the interests of all Mankind, but also thereby hasten their own death in full accordance with the plans of their non-humanoid masters.

Previously, 30-50 years ago there was very little information, but today there is too much of it. It’s not at all easy to understand this sea of ​​information alone, because everywhere you can see a cunning plan to slip people various “interesting” information with a dead-end outcome, where the beginning sounds like the truth, and then leads to the “wrong” place.
Therefore, the appeal sounds to all of us - people, let's get together and discuss, reflect, and not argue about serious and global things, about the creation of the world and where we are going, what is happening to us now!

We have an internal mechanism for identifying truth; in the process of communication, we can all together restore our history (not in detail, but in essence) and develop new life priorities, let's remember who we really are!

Do you want to wake up and fully use your capabilities and talents of the Creator, or will you continue to live a false and conditioned life of others?

To believe or not to believe, what to feel and how to perceive is up to you!

ADDITIONALLY see:

Send your good work in the knowledge base is simple. Use the form below

Students, graduate students, young scientists who use the knowledge base in their studies and work will be very grateful to you.

Posted on http://www.allbest.ru/

FALSIFIATION OF WORLD HISTORY AS AN ATTEMPT TO CHANGE THE MODERN WORLD ORDER

“It is important to note that the term “falsification” carries an additional semantic load: when speaking about falsification, we most often mean a conscious refusal to strive for a true description of the past. For the falsifier, the main goals are non-scientific: instilling in the reader some ideological or political ideas, promoting a certain attitude towards past events, or generally destroying historical memory, and not at all the search for truth and objectivity.

Methods of falsification include the introduction of new concepts without proper scientific justification. For example, in modern Russian historical literature there is a gradual adoption of the term “Battle of Rzhev” to refer to the battles of 1942 - 1943, which were fought by troops of the Western and Kalinin fronts against the German army group “Center”. Actually, from an artistic point of view, a clash between two platoons can be figuratively called a battle. However, recently, through the efforts of a number of authors, independent significance has been attributed to the battles in the area of ​​the Rzhev salient; attempts have been made to separate the “Battle of Rzhev” from the Moscow and Stalingrad and put it on a par with them. The introduction of the term “Battle of Rzhev” occurs without controversy at the military-theoretical level, where the concepts of “battle”, “battle”, “combat” have a very definite meaning, and it seems to solve exclusively ideological problems: to impose on the public consciousness the image of the “Rzhev meat grinder” "as a symbol of the mediocrity of the Soviet command and its disregard for saving the lives of soldiers, the only battle of the Great Patriotic War in which the Red Army allegedly could not win a decisive victory.

In addition, one of the ways of falsification is manipulation around the historical significance of individual events or personalities. An example is the modern historiographical fate of General Vlasov, who, despite his real role as a puppet of the intelligence services of the Third Reich, through the efforts of a number of publicists and historians, from a third-rate figure today has almost been turned into one of the leading figures in Russian history of the twentieth century. At the same time, it is characteristic that the history of Vlasov and his “army” is presented by falsifiers in line with modern revisionist ideas: considering “Stalinism as the most terrible thing that has happened in the entire Russian history,” Vlasov “decided to use the Germans” in the fight against this yoke.

Finally, in the same series we should consider the ongoing war since the late 1980s. a campaign to “demythologize” history, the purpose of which is to undermine symbols of social memory. An example is an attempt to question the reliability of a number of textbook facts, primarily related to the exploits of N. Gastello, Z. Kosmodemyanskaya, 28 Panfilov heroes, A. Matrosov and others. Thus, during the search for the place of the alleged death of the crew of N. F. Gastello suggested that the well-known feat was accomplished by the crew of another bomber under the command of Captain Maslov, whose grave was discovered at the site of the famous “fire ram.” From the point of view of a historian, this cannot serve as a basis for questioning the canonical version. But this is not the main thing. History exists, as it were, in two dimensions: on the one hand, as a kind of objective knowledge about the past, the acquisition of which is carried out by professional historians, and on the other hand, as the memory of the people, a collective myth in which popular ideals and ideas about the high and low are embodied, beautiful and ugly, heroic and tragic. The existence of such a myth does not in any way contradict what can be called “the truth of history.” From the point of view of national memory, it does not seriously matter whose plane crashed on the highway near Minsk on June 26, 1941. Keeping in our memory the feat of Gastello and his crew, we honor in his person dozens, hundreds of genuine war heroes, whose names we, perhaps unknown. From this point of view, the myth about Gastello’s feat is a truth of a higher level than the truth of a single fact.

Thus, speculating on the difficulties of historical knowledge, modern falsifiers seek to distort or even completely destroy the historical memory of the people. All of them are driven by either selfish or political motives. Of course, all these fakes have a short lifespan and will soon be forgotten. However, they are capable of causing irreparable harm to the consciousness of young people, destroying the connection between generations, and sowing enmity and distrust of their fathers and grandfathers in the souls of people.”

The events of World War II are becoming increasingly distant in time. However, millions of people do not stop thinking about the reasons that gave rise to this war, its results and lessons; Many of these lessons are still relevant today.

The Great Patriotic War is one of the most tragic pages in the history of our country. The Soviet people and their Armed Forces had to experience many difficulties and hardships. But the four-year fierce struggle against the fascist invaders culminated in our complete victory over the Wehrmacht forces. The experience and lessons of this war are of great importance for the current generation.

1. One of the main lessons is that the fight against military danger must be waged while the war has not yet begun. Moreover, it will be carried out by the collective efforts of peace-loving states, peoples, everyone who cherishes peace and freedom.

The Second World War was not fatally inevitable. It could have been prevented if the Western countries had not made fatal political mistakes and strategic miscalculations.

Of course, the direct culprit of the war is German fascism. It is he who bears full responsibility for unleashing it. However, Western countries, with their short-sighted policy of appeasement, their desire to isolate the Soviet Union and direct expansion to the East, created the conditions under which war became a reality.

The Soviet Union, for its part, in the troubled pre-war years, made a lot of efforts to consolidate the forces opposing aggression. However, the proposals put forward by the USSR constantly ran into obstacles from the Western powers and their stubborn unwillingness to cooperate. In addition, Western countries sought to stay away from the military confrontation between Nazi Germany and the USSR.

Only after the aggressor captured almost all of Western Europe did Soviet diplomacy manage to prevent the formation of a single bloc of states hostile to the USSR and avoid a war on two fronts. This was one of the prerequisites for the emergence of the anti-Hitler coalition and, ultimately, the defeat of the aggressor.

2. Another important lesson of the Great Patriotic War is that military cooperation should be carried out not only taking into account the economic capabilities of the country, but also a real assessment of existing military threats. The solution to the question of what kind of war the Armed Forces should be preparing for and what defense tasks they will have to solve depends on this.

When planning military development, it is important to take into account all factors that ensure the country's security: political-diplomatic, economic, ideological, information and defense.

In the pre-war years, many military theoretical developments remained unrealized. But our country is the birthplace of operational military art, and it was in those years that the development of the theory of deep operations was completed. The same can be said about weapons; There were many new developments, but the troops did not have them in the required quantity.

This deficiency is partly manifested at present in the Russian army. So, if seven previously unknown types of weapons were used in the Second World War, twenty-five in the Korean War (1950 - 1953), thirty in four Arab-Israeli military conflicts, then in the Persian Gulf War - about a hundred. Therefore, the need to improve the products of the state’s military-industrial complex is obvious.

3. The following lesson has not lost its relevance - the Armed Forces can count on success if they skillfully master all forms of military action. It must be admitted that in the pre-war period mistakes were made in the theoretical development of a number of important problems, which negatively affected the practice of combat training of troops. Thus, in the military theory of that period, the main method of action of the Armed Forces in a future war was considered to be a strategic offensive, and the role of defense remained downplayed. As a result, the unfounded desire of the Soviet military command to conduct military operations “primarily by offensive and on foreign territory” was manifested; our troops were trained accordingly.

After the war, in the conditions of global confrontation, there was no other alternative but to prepare for a world war using all available forces and means. Now, with the end of the Cold War, the priority task is to prepare for local wars and armed conflicts, to master the methods of conducting combat operations, taking into account their characteristics based on the experience of Afghanistan, Chechnya, the war in the Persian Gulf, etc., as well as the fight against terrorism.

At the same time, according to some military leaders, it would be a big mistake to exclude the possibility of a large-scale war in Russia, which could break out as a result of the growth of small conflicts and regional war. Taking this into account, it is necessary not to weaken attention to the mobilization, operational and combat training of troops, and to comprehensively train army and navy personnel. Events in various regions of the world confirm that the main emphasis in combat training must be placed on training in combat operations in the context of the use of conventional, long-range, high-precision weapons, but with the continuing threat of the use of nuclear weapons. The latter is becoming the property of an increasing number of states, including countries with extremist political regimes.

4. The most important lesson from the outbreak of war is a thorough analysis of various options for the actions of a potential enemy and flexible planning for the use of forces and means, and most importantly, the adoption of all necessary measures to maintain the Armed Forces at a sufficient degree of combat readiness.

As you know, during the last war, measures to transfer troops to martial law were carried out very late. As a result, our troops found themselves in a state of “relative combat readiness” with a personnel shortage of up to 40 - 60 percent, which did not allow us to complete not only the strategic, but also the operational deployment of groups in the composition envisaged by the mob plan.

Despite the availability of information about the threat of war from Nazi Germany, the Soviet leadership did not take appropriate measures to bring the troops of the western districts into combat readiness.

The strategic deployment of German strike forces was significantly ahead of the deployment of Red Army troops in the border districts. The balance of forces and means, as well as the number of formations in the first echelons of the opposing sides, gave a more than twofold advantage in favor of Germany, which allowed it to deliver the first powerful blow.

5. The lesson of the last war is that the winner is not the side that struck first and achieved decisive successes at the very beginning of hostilities, but the one that has more moral and material forces, which skillfully uses them and is able to turn a potential opportunity victories into reality. Our victory was not historically determined, as has been emphasized in the past. It was won in a stubborn struggle, at the cost of enormous effort of all the forces of the state, its people and army.

Not a single state of the anti-Hitler coalition carried out such a mobilization of human and material resources as the Soviet Union did during the war, no one endured such trials as befell the Soviet people and their Armed Forces.

In the first 8 months of the war alone, about 11 million people were mobilized, of which more than 9 million were sent to staff both newly created and existing combat units. The war consumed so many reserves that in a year and a half, the rifle troops in the active army renewed their composition three times.

Over the four years of the war, 29,575 thousand people were mobilized (minus 2,237.3 thousand people who were re-conscripted), and in total, together with the personnel who were in the Red Army and Navy on June 22, 1941, they entered the army system ( during the war years) 34,476 thousand people, which amounted to 17.5% of the total population of the country.

6. The most difficult trials that befell the peoples of the Soviet Union during the war years allow us to draw another extremely important lesson: when the people and the army are united, the army is invincible. During these harsh years, the country's Armed Forces were connected by thousands of invisible threads with the people, who helped them with both the necessary material means and spiritual forces, maintaining high morale and confidence in victory among the soldiers. This is confirmed by mass heroism, courage, and the unbending will to defeat the enemy.

The heroic traditions of the great historical past of our people have become an example of high patriotism and national self-awareness of our citizens. In the first three days of the war in Moscow alone, more than 70 thousand applications were received from them with a request to be sent to the front. In the summer and autumn of 1941, about 60 divisions and 200 separate militia regiments were created. Their number was about 2 million people. The whole country, in a single patriotic impulse, stood up to defend its independence.

The defense of the Brest Fortress in the first days of the war is a symbol of the perseverance, inflexibility, courage and heroism of the soldiers. Entire formations and units, companies and battalions covered themselves with unfading glory.

Even our opponents recognized the courage and heroism of Soviet soldiers. Thus, the former Nazi general Blumentritt, who fought against Russia with the rank of lieutenant back in the First World War, said in an interview with the English military historian Hart: “Already the battles of June 1941 showed us what the new Soviet army was like. We lost up to 50% of our personnel in battles. The Fuhrer and most of our command had no idea about this. It caused a lot of trouble." Another German general, Chief of the General Staff of the Wehrmacht Ground Forces, Halder, wrote in his diary on the eighth day of the war: “Information from the front confirms that the Russians are fighting everywhere to the last man...”

Love for the Motherland and hatred for its enemies cemented the front and rear, made the country a powerful fortress, and became the most important factor in achieving victory.

During the Second World War, a fierce struggle was waged not only on the battlefields, but also in the spiritual sphere, for the minds and hearts of millions of people all over the planet. The ideological struggle was waged on a variety of issues of politics, international relations, the course and outcome of the war, while pursuing fundamentally different goals.

If the fascist leadership openly called on its people to enslave other peoples, to world domination, then the Soviet leadership always advocated a just liberation struggle and defense of the Fatherland.

Already during the war, politicians and historians appeared who propagated myths about the “preventive nature” of the war of Nazi Germany against the USSR, about the “accidentality of defeat” of the Nazi troops in major battles on the Soviet-German front, etc.

Victory in the war promoted the Soviet Union to the ranks of the world's leading powers and contributed to the growth of its authority and prestige in the international arena. This was in no way part of the plans of the reactionary international forces; it aroused in them outright anger and hatred, which led to the Cold War and violent ideological attacks against the USSR.

Throughout the entire post-war period, the events of the Great Patriotic War were one of the main areas of intense ideological confrontation between Western ideological centers and the Soviet Union.

The main objects of attack were the most important problems of the war - the history of the pre-war period, the military art of the command of the Red Army, the role and significance of various fronts, Soviet losses in the war, the price of victory, etc.

Falsified concepts and views on these and other problems were disseminated in millions of copies of books and articles, reflected in television and radio programs, and in works of cinema. The purpose of all this is to hide the real reasons that the Second World War was generated by the capitalist system itself; present the Soviet Union, along with Germany, as responsible for starting the war; to belittle the contribution of the USSR and its Armed Forces to the defeat of the fascist bloc and at the same time exalt the role of the Western allies in the anti-Hitler coalition in achieving victory.

Here are some of the techniques used by falsifiers of the history of the Great Patriotic War.

1. Throughout the entire post-war period, including the last decade, some Western historians (F. Fabry, D. Irving) have been disseminating versions that the USSR in 1941 wanted to be the first to start a war against Germany. The myth about Moscow’s readiness to unleash a preventive war against Germany is also present in the books of Russian-speaking historians V. Suvorov (Rezun), B. Sokolov and others. They even refer to the resolution that the then First Deputy Chief of the General Staff N.F. Vatutin allegedly imposed on the plan strategic deployment in the West, adopted in March 1941: “Offensive to begin 12.6.” However, it is known that decisions of this kind are made by the political leadership of the state, and not by the General Staff.

These authors do not provide convincing documents and facts about the Soviet Union’s preparation of an attack on Germany, because they do not exist in reality. As a result, speculative schemes are being written and conversations are being held about the USSR’s readiness to launch a “pre-emptive strike” and other fabrications in the same spirit.

2. Another technique by which Western falsifiers also try to justify the USSR’s preparations for an “offensive preventive war” against Germany is an arbitrary interpretation of Stalin’s speech to graduates of the military academies of the Red Army on May 5, 1941, which is called “aggressive”, “calling for war” with Germany." This version is actively promoted by a number of Russian historians. falsification manipulation historical war

The peremptory and far-fetched nature of these conclusions is obvious. Facts indicate that in 1941, neither Hitler nor the Wehrmacht command had any reason to think that the USSR could attack Germany. No information was received in Berlin about the aggressive plans of the Soviet Union. On the contrary, German diplomats and German intelligence constantly reported on the USSR’s desire to maintain peace with Germany, to prevent the emergence of serious conflict situations in relations with this country, and on the readiness of our state to make certain economic concessions for this purpose. Until the very last moment, the USSR sent industrial and agricultural goods to Germany.

3. Falsifiers are making a lot of efforts to downplay the losses of the German side and exaggerate the losses of the Red Army in some major battles, thereby trying to downplay the importance of the latter. Thus, the German historian K. G. Friser, citing data from German archives, claims that during the tank battle near Prokhorovka on July 12, 1943, the losses of the German side were reduced to only 5 tanks. Another 38 tanks and 12 assault guns were damaged.

However, according to Russian military archives, it follows that the German side lost from 300 to 400 tanks and assault guns permanently. At the same time, the Soviet 5th Guards TA, which took the main part in the Battle of Prokhorov, suffered heavy losses - about 350 tanks and self-propelled guns. It turned out that the German historian provided data on the losses of only the 2nd SS Panzer Corps, keeping silent about the losses of the 48th and 3rd German Panzer Corps, which also took part in the battle.

Not only individual researchers, but also serious government organizations act in this way. For example, in 1991, the National Committee to Commemorate the 50th Anniversary of Victory in World War II was created in the United States. Soon this organization published a colorful anniversary booklet in a huge edition, prepared with the participation of historians. It opens with “A Chronicle of the Most Important Events of the Second World War.” And in this very detailed list, not a single one of the major battles is named, not a single one of the operations won or carried out by Soviet troops against the Nazi invaders. It’s as if there were no Moscow, Stalingrad, Kursk and other battles, after which Hitler’s army suffered irreparable losses and finally lost its strategic initiative.

4. In the post-war years, under the conditions of the Cold War, a huge amount of historical literature was published in the West, which distorted the true events of the Second World War and in every possible way belittled the role of the USSR in the defeat of the fascist aggressors. This falsification technique is still used today, although during the war our Western allies more objectively assessed the leading role of the USSR in the fight against the common enemy.

The Patriotic War was Great both in its scope and in the forces and means involved in the Soviet-German front. The total number of personnel on both sides in the active army alone reached 12 million people.

At the same time, in different periods, from 800 to 900 contingent divisions operated on a front from 3 to 6.2 thousand km, which riveted the vast majority of the armed forces of Germany, its allies and the Soviet Union, thereby exerting a decisive influence on the situation on other fronts of the Second World War .

US President F. Roosevelt noted that “... the Russians kill more enemy soldiers and destroy more of their weapons than all the other 25 states of the United Nations combined.”

From the rostrum of the House of Commons, W. Churchill declared on August 2, 1944 that “it was the Russian army that let the guts out of the German war machine.”

There were many similar assessments in those years. And this is not surprising. It was very difficult not to see the obvious truth: the decisive contribution of the Soviet Union to the Victory, its outstanding role in saving world civilization from the Hitlerite plague seemed indisputable. But soon after the defeat of fascism, the recent allies of the USSR began to speak differently, high assessments of our country’s role in the war were forgotten and judgments of a completely different kind appeared.

With particular persistence in post-war historiography, the idea was pursued that the most important battles of the Second World War did not take place on the Soviet-German front and the outcome of the armed confrontation of the two coalitions was decided not on land, but mainly at sea and in the airspace, where the armed forces of the United States and England carried out intense fighting. The authors of these publications claim that the leading force in the anti-Hitler coalition was the United States, since it had the most powerful armed forces among the capitalist countries.

Similar views on the role of the countries of the anti-Hitler coalition in achieving victory over fascism can be traced, for example, in the 85-volume “History of the Second World War”, prepared by the historical section of the British Cabinet of Ministers, the 25-volume American “Illustrated Encyclopedia of the Second World War” and many other publications .

Our people appreciate the great contribution to the victory over fascism of the people of the USA, Great Britain, France, China and other countries of the anti-Hitler coalition. But it was on the Soviet-German front that the main battles of the Second World War took place; the main forces of Hitler’s Wehrmacht were concentrated here. Thus, from June 1941 until the opening of the second front on June 6, 1944, 92–95% of the ground forces of Nazi Germany and its satellites fought on the Soviet-German front, and then from 74 to 65%.

The Soviet Armed Forces defeated 507 Nazi divisions and 100 divisions of its allies, almost 3.5 times more than on all other fronts of World War II.

On the Soviet-German front, the enemy suffered three-quarters of its casualties. The damage to the personnel of the fascist armies inflicted by the Red Army was 4 times greater than in the Western European and Mediterranean theaters of military operations combined, and in terms of the number of killed and wounded - 6 times. Here the bulk of the Wehrmacht's military equipment was destroyed: over 70 thousand (more than 75%) aircraft, about 50 thousand (up to 75%) tanks and assault guns, 167 thousand (74%) artillery pieces, more than 2.5 thousand ... warships, transports and auxiliary vessels.

The opening of a second front also did not change the importance of the Soviet-German front as the main one in the war. Thus, in June 1944, 181.5 German and 58 German allied divisions operated against the Red Army. The American and British troops were opposed by 81.5 German divisions. So all objective facts indicate that the Soviet Union made a decisive contribution to the defeat of Nazi Germany and its allies.

5. When assessing the results of the Great Patriotic War, Western historians pay especially close attention to the issue of the cost of victory, about our sacrifices during the war. Due to our large losses, the overall significance of the achieved victory is called into question.

It is known that the total losses of the USSR in the war amounted to 26.5 million people, of which 18 million were civilians who died as a result of fascist atrocities in the occupied territory. The total irretrievable losses (killed, missing, captured and not returned from it, died from wounds, illnesses and as a result of accidents) of the Soviet Armed Forces, together with border and internal troops, amounted to 8 million 668 thousand 400 people.

The losses of the fascist bloc amounted to 9.3 million people. (fascist Germany lost 7.4 million people, 1.2 million - its satellites in Europe, 0.7 million - Japan in the Manchurian operation), not counting the losses of auxiliary units from among the foreign formations that fought on the side of the fascists (according to according to some data - up to 500 - 600 thousand people).

In total, the irretrievable losses of the Soviet Armed Forces amounted to 1 - 1.5 million people. exceed the corresponding German losses. But this is due to the fact that there were 4.5 million Soviet prisoners of war in fascist captivity, and only 2 million people returned to the USSR after the war. The rest died as a result of fascist atrocities. Of the 3.8 million German prisoners of war, 450 thousand died in Soviet captivity.

Attempts to present the aggressor's losses as less than they actually were distort the historical truth and indicate the bias of those who seek to deliberately belittle the feat of the Soviet people in the Great Patriotic War.

Posted on Allbest.ru

Similar documents

Key lessons from World War II. Exposing the falsification. Losses of the Soviet Armed Forces during the war. Strategic deployment of German strike forces. Mobilization of human and material resources. Traditions of the historical past.

abstract, added 02/09/2010


Results of the First World War 1914-1918. Anglo-French-Soviet negotiations 1939. International situation on the eve of the Second World War. Prerequisites for the outbreak of the Second World War of 1939-1941. Non-aggression pact "Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact".

presentation, added 05/16/2011


Could the world have avoided World War II? What did the citizens of the country of the Soviets defend? Sources of the victory of the Soviet people and the peoples of the anti-Hitler coalition. The price of victory and could it have been different. Results of the Great Patriotic War, World War II and their lessons.

abstract, added 12/18/2011


Falsification of the history of the Second World War - as an ideological weapon of the West against modern Russia. Falsification of the role and significance of the liberation mission of the Soviet Armed Forces in the liberation of Europe from Nazi occupation (1944-1945).

scientific work, added 09.29.2015


The development of the foreign policy process in the first half of the twentieth century as the formation of the prerequisites for its development after the Second World War. The results of the Second World War and the change in the status of Great Britain on the world stage. Formation of the British Commonwealth.

course work, added 11/23/2008


International situation on the eve of the Second World War. Participation of the USSR in international events preceding the Second World War. The USSR's struggle to prevent war. Development of relations with leading capitalist countries.

course work, added 05/05/2004


Historical dates of the Second World War, which became the largest war in human history. Prerequisites for war in Europe and Asia. Battles in Africa, the Mediterranean and the Balkans. Changes in the composition of warring coalitions. Creation of the Anti-Hitler Coalition.

abstract, added 10/10/2011


Analysis of the background, causes and nature of the Second World War. Study of the military actions that marked its beginning. Stages of German aggression in the West. The German attack on the USSR and the development of events until 1944. A radical turning point during the Second World War.

test, added 03/25/2010


Total losses of the warring parties in World War II. The largest air battle is the Battle of Britain. The influence of the outcome of the Battle of Moscow on the course of events of the war. Attack on Pearl Harbor. Battle of El Alamein. The Battle of Stalingrad and the Kursk Bulge.

presentation, added 02/06/2015


Study of the political and economic situation in Latin American countries on the eve of World War II. Determining the influence of military events in Europe on the positions and views of the leadership of Latin American countries. The importance of the Resistance Movement in the region.

1

The article examines the current stage of the West's information war against Russia in the context of the approaching 70th anniversary of Victory in the Great Patriotic War. The reasons for the surge in information confrontation between Russia and the West at the present time are highlighted. It is proven that one of the effective methods of information warfare is falsification of history. The reasons for the occurrence of falsifications are considered. The emphasis is placed on the fact that most of the falsifications of Russian history concern the Second World War. Examples of modern attempts to falsify history at the state level are given. The danger of falsifying history through the public education system is assessed. It is concluded that to effectively counter the falsification of history, a combination of government policy measures and raising the cultural and educational level of Russian citizens through familiarization with reading scientific literature and the formation of critical thinking is necessary.

falsification of history

information war

The Second World War

1. Beckman J. Geopolitics in the falsification of the history of the Second World War // Observer. – 2010. – No. 4. – P. 42-56.

2. Vyazemsky E.E. The problem of falsification of Russian history and general historical education: theoretical and practical aspects // Problems of modern education. – 2012. – No. 1. – P. 28-43.

3. Dozhdikov A.V. Falsification of Russian history in the context of identity: a new plane of confrontation // Values ​​and meanings. – 2012. – No. 5. – P. 177-183.

4. Report on the number of military personnel according to socio-demographic characteristics of the 60th Army of the 1st Ukrainian Front as of January 1, 1945. Script. Typescript [Electronic resource] // Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation: website. – Access mode: http://function.mil.ru /news_page/ country/ more.htm?id= 12006359@egNews (date of access: 03/12/2015).

5. Evtushenko A.G. Anniversary as a reason for falsifying history // Bulletin of MGUKI. – 2011. – No. 4. – P. 122-125.

6. Kapto A.S. Falsification as a weapon of antihistory // Conflictology. – 2012. – No. 3. – P. 38-52.

7. Karabuschenko P.L. Political history: truth and falsification of the political past // Caspian region: politics, economics, culture. – 2010. – No. 2. – P. 93-100.

8. Karabuschenko P.L. Falsification of political history as a conflict of scientific and ideological authenticity // Humanitarian Research. – 2012. – No. 4. – P. 244-251.

9. Kozyrev M.F., Dvegubsky Yu.P. Geopolitics in the context of the history of the Second World War // Scientific problems of humanitarian research. – 2012. – No. 1. – P. 54-59.

10. Kuznetsov A.M., Lukin A.L., Yachin S.E., Shestak O.I. Scientific and methodological seminar “Cross-border relations in North-East Asia in political, economic and socio-cultural dimensions” // Oikumena. Regional studies. – 2010. – No. 4. – P. 122-143.

11. Lukin Yu. War and the information world // Megalopolis management. – 2008. – No. 4-5. – pp. 138-169.

12. Ovchinnikova E.S., Tsareva N.A. Culture as the basis for the analysis of international relations // Vologda readings. – 2001. – No. 17. – P. 110-111.

13. Polish media: GrzegorzhSkhetyna “got hit on the ears” for proposing to move the parade from Moscow [Electronic resource] // RussiaToday in Russian: website. February 3, 2015. Access mode: http://russian.rt.com/article/72208 (access date: 02/17/2015).

14. Schetyna: According to documents, the army that liberated Auschwitz consisted of 51% Ukrainians [Electronic resource] // Business newspaper “Vzglyad”: website. January 29, 2015. Access mode: http://vz.ru/news/2015/1/29/726882.html (access date: 02/18/2015).

15. Trubina M., Baltacheva M. Exceeded all expectations and myself [Electronic resource] // Business newspaper “Vzglyad”: website. January 12, 2015. Access mode: http://vz.ru/politics/2015/1/12/723832.html (access date: 02/18/2015).

16. Frolov D.B. Information war: evolution of forms, means and methods // Sociology of power. – 2005. – No. 5. – P. 121-143.

17. Khanin S.V. Falsification of history as a tool to undermine national security // Bulletin of the Nizhny Novgorod Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. – 2013. – No. 23. – P. 33-36.

In 2015, our country marks a memorable date - 70 years since the end of the Great Patriotic War. The contribution and decisive role of the USSR in the victory over Nazi Germany is undeniable, however, recently statements from a number of high-ranking officials of Western countries have appeared in the media (hereinafter referred to as the media), in which attempts can be traced to revise assessments of the outcome of the war. In principle, this cannot be considered strange, since the revisionist position has long existed both in science and in the mass consciousness, but in the conditions of economic and political difficulties, the unstable international situation in which Russia finds itself, such statements have the character of a battle front - informational war. In this context, comparing the information war with the real one is not accidental, because it historically arose as an integral part of the armed struggle. There are many examples when an aggressive information attack preceded a real war, since the purpose of such an attack is to weaken and demoralize the enemy even before a direct confrontation. Doesn't this mean that the current situation in the information space around our country is also preparation for a big invasion?

The information war between Russia and the West has been going on throughout the 20th century, but in different periods of the century it was characterized by unequal intensity. Now we are seeing another surge in this confrontation, and it is especially important to note that our neighbors, states that were once part of the USSR - Ukraine, Georgia, Estonia, Latvia, were also involved in this war. The activity of external forces in creating a demonic image of Russia right now can also be explained by the fact that the anniversary always causes a wide public response and attempts to rethink history.

Why does the West continue to fight our country, despite the fact that the Cold War has long ended? The answer to this question is given by domestic researcher Yu. Lukin, who notes that Russians are “different”; they think and live differently than Europeans. Consequently, Western civilization will not accept and understand us as long as we are different from them, as long as Russia is a rich country with enormous cultural, natural, and economic potential. Another explanation for the activity of the West is expressed by M.F. Kozyrev and Yu.P. Dvegubsky, according to whom the redivision of the geopolitical map of the world is currently being completed, and Russia should not remain on it as the heir of the USSR. The chairman of the Finnish Anti-Fascist Committee, Johan Beckman, has a similar point of view.

One of the main methods of information warfare is falsification of history. In this study, by falsification we mean the deliberate distortion of historical events for certain purposes, most often political. The emergence of falsifications is explained by the fact that science and politics pursue different goals. If the main task of the first is to cover events reliably, then political elites use history to achieve their pragmatic goals, for example, to show in a favorable light the actions of their predecessors or to denigrate the image of their opponents. And if we take into account the fact that history is a very subjective science, then the appearance of falsifications does not seem at all surprising.

Among the priority topics of falsification of national history, identified by E.E. Vyazemsky, more than half falls on the history of the Second World War and the interpretation of its results. It was in the mid-40s. last century, a new world order emerged, led by two superpowers - the USSR and the USA. The West believes that the Russian leadership is seeking to return to a bipolar system, which means their goal is to reduce the role of our country on the world stage. This can be achieved, among other things, through a reassessment of the results of the war according to the principle: less role in victory means less rights to sovereign status.

A purposeful European campaign to revise the results of the war was launched back in 1986, when the article “The Past Should Not Be Forgotten” by historian Ernst Nolte was published in Germany, in which he tries to justify the crimes of the Nazis. Since that time, the prevailing tendency has been to rehabilitate Nazism and exaggerate the “sins” of communism-Bolshevism. It is realized by comparing the USSR during the times of Stalin and the Third Reich. Reaching the point of absurdity, Nolte argues that Stalin became a role model for Hitler, the Gulag is a prototype of Auschwitz, and the Holocaust pales in comparison with the victims of Stalin's repressions. In fact, such analogies, if they are included in the official ideology and historical science, can lead to the projection of the current Ukrainian scenario onto the entire continent, i.e. the transformation of neo-Nazism into a leading force in European politics.

Among recent examples of falsifications directed against Russia, one cannot fail to note the statement by the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Poland G. Schetyna at the celebration of the 70th anniversary of the liberation of the Auschwitz concentration camp that its liberators were Ukrainian soldiers. The Polish Press Agency quotes Schetyna as saying: “Documents confirm that the army that liberated Auschwitz included 51% Ukrainians.” From historical documents that were released following this statement by the Russian Ministry of Defense, it is clear that this was by no means the case, and the front that liberated Auschwitz was multinational, with a predominance of Russians and Ukrainians. By the way, this is not the first attempt by Poles to look at the history of World War II differently: historian Wieczorkovich openly regrets that his country did not act as a united front with Germany against the USSR. Poland is not the only state where politicians and scientists are trying to distort historical truth. Even US President Barack Obama, at an event dedicated to the 65th anniversary of the opening of the second front, noted the key importance of the landing of Allied troops in Normandy, which predetermined the further development and outcome of the war. But, as you know, the second front, the opening of which Britain and the United States constantly postponed, would not have taken place at all if it had not been for the successes of Soviet soldiers on the eastern front of combat operations against the Wehrmacht. The apogee of this series of falsifications, in our opinion, is the statement of the Prime Minister of Ukraine A. Yatsenyuk about the “USSR invasion of Germany and Ukraine” during the Second World War. In his speech in English, the “diplomat” used the word “occupy” - “occupation”: “Everyone remembers the Soviet occupation of Ukraine, Poland, Hungary, Czechoslovakia, East Germany and the Baltic countries, which took place after World War II.”

The information war against Russia is also carried out through the school education system in the countries of the post-Soviet space. A.S. Kapto gives numerous examples of how in Ukrainian, Georgian, and Latvian textbooks, authors deliberately distort facts, trying to downplay the role of Russia in the history of these peoples, or eliminate it altogether. This trend seems alarming, since the political circles of neighboring countries are purposefully raising a new generation of their fellow citizens on the basis of Russophobia. It could be argued that in this way they implement the patriotic education of young people in the spirit of love for their nation, but the negative results of such “education” are now being observed in Ukraine, where militant nationalists of the Right Sector are destroying the population of their own country. Moreover, as noted by P.L. Karabuschenko, “the more falsification in the history of a nation, the more authoritarianism it has and the more illusory its democracy looks.” Indeed, history should be the property of the people, but not of the ruling elites. Another thing is that politicians are unlikely to give up such a powerful tool of propaganda and formation of public consciousness.

All of the above examples make it clear that there is an aggressive information struggle against Russia, the purpose of which is to downplay and, ultimately, erase from the memory of peoples the memories of the merits and exploits of Russian soldiers during the Second World War. Falsification of the history of the Great Patriotic War, according to V.V. Putin threatens that the key principles of the world order may change. And if this happens, then the likelihood of a direct military clash with the West will inevitably increase, which has so far been avoided. How can we counteract the falsification of historical facts? The answer to this question was given in 2009, when a Commission was created under the President to counter attempts to falsify history to the detriment of the interests of Russia, which meant the beginning of the fight against falsification at the state level. However, after some time, experts were forced to admit that government policy in this area did not bring effective results. Consequently, it is impossible to prevent falsifications through the efforts of public authorities alone; it is necessary to involve the whole society to achieve this goal. But this also requires raising the general cultural and educational level of our fellow citizens, who must learn to draw knowledge about the history of their country not from the media and popular science publications (most often more popular than scientific), but from historical sources and serious scientific literature. At the same time, we should not forget about the critical perception of information, because to doubt means to think.

Reviewers:

Tushkov A.A., Doctor of History, Professor of the Department of State and Municipal Administration and Law, Vladivostok State University of Economics and Service, Vladivostok;

Medvedeva L.M., Doctor of History, Professor of the Department of State and Municipal Administration and Law, Vladivostok State University of Economics and Service, Vladivostok.

Bibliographic link

Tkachenko E.A., Tkachenko L.E. ON THE QUESTION OF FALSIFIATION OF RUSSIAN HISTORY IN THE CONDITIONS OF ACHIEVEMENT OF THE INTERNATIONAL POLITICAL SITUATION // Modern problems of science and education. – 2015. – No. 1-1.;
URL: http://science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=19473 (access date: 02/01/2020). We bring to your attention magazines published by the publishing house "Academy of Natural Sciences"