Regulations on the rating system.

"I affirm"

School director: _______ G.M. Khamidullin

Protocol No._____ dated “____”__________ 2011

REGULATIONS on the assessment system, form, procedure and frequency of intermediate and final certification of students in the Municipal budgetary educational institution "Secondary school No. 9 of Aznakaevo" Aznakaevsky municipal district of the Republic of Tatarstan

Considered and adopted by the teachers' council

Protocol No.___ dated “_____”___________2011.

I. GENERAL PROVISIONS

1. This provision establishes the procedure for form assessments, the procedure and frequency of intermediate and final certification of students.
2. The provision is intended:
. ensure at school an objective assessment of each student’s knowledge in accordance with the requirements of the state curriculum standard;
. support democratic principles in the organization of the educational process at school.

II. RATING SYSTEM.

For students in grades 2-11, the school uses a 5-point system for assessing knowledge, skills and abilities (minimum score - 1, maximum score - 5). During teaching, teachers assess students' knowledge. Students' responses during oral and written surveys are assessed using a 5-point system: 5 (excellent), 4 (good), 3 (satisfactory), 2 (unsatisfactory), 1 (bad).

1. When assigning marks to subject teachers, be guided by the assessment standards published in state programs for a specific subject. With regard to pedagogical actions that are perceived by students as control, proceed from the main rule: check everything you ask, evaluate it sufficiently fully, put a mark only on what has been done, give reasons for the mark you set. Primary school teachers have the right to give a grade “for the overall impression of the written work,” which determines the teacher’s attitude to the appearance of the work. This mark is placed as an additional mark in the notebook and diary, but is not entered in the journal.

2. In order to increase the responsibility of schoolchildren for the quality of study, adherence to academic discipline, and elimination of gaps in students’ knowledge, the teacher is obliged to objectively correctly and timely assess their knowledge, skills and abilities. (ZUN)

3. When preparing for a lesson, the teacher should plan the lesson so that during the lesson he can interview at least 4-5 students. The lower limit for grading frequency is 1 grade per student each month for each subject.

It is important that the teacher is able to convincingly justify the grade assigned for the lesson. Simply listing grades at the end of classes has no future-orienting or educational value for students.

4. All students present in the lesson are given grades during written tests, laboratory and practical tests in physics, chemistry, biology for laboratory work, depending on the form of testing (frontal or individual). Essays, presentations, dictations with grammar tasks are assessed with double marks. Only positive grades are given for educational work in primary school.

If a student completes work with a grade of “2,” additional work is carried out with him until he achieves a positive result.

If a student is absent from a test without a good reason, the work is completed individually at the time designated by the teacher. The grade for the work performed is given in accordance with the standards for assessing the students' knowledge of the subject.

5. Educational creative works for students of grades 2-4. and control presentation in 4th grade. is assessed as double.

Grades for written work in grades 5-8 in chemistry, physics, biology, mathematics in grades 5-11 are posted in a journal for the next lesson. Up to 10 days are given to check written tests in literature and the Russian language in grades 9-11.

6. Generalization lessons, seminars, tests, practicing practical skills and abilities involve assessment of up to 60% of students.

7. Non-judgmental lessons are possible only when learning new material in the form of a lecture in high school.

8. In high school, it is possible to use a credit training system on one of the topics studied. During tests, children's knowledge is assessed with marks of 2,3,4,5.

9. In high schools (9-11), it is possible to use a credit or modular learning system (in general in the subject or on the topics studied, or at the end of the semester at the request of the student) in order to increase the grade for the semester. It is more appropriate to conduct tests in high school, using various materials. One of them: organizing individual group work for students. All control lessons (written work and tests) in subjects studied in a given class are planned by the head teacher of the school in order to prevent students from being overloaded.

The school-wide schedule of control activities must be strictly observed. During a subject week at school, one of the subject tests at school is held as a public examination of knowledge.
The school determines the following forms of certification: current, intermediate (by quarters), and final.
1. Current monitoring of progress is carried out by teachers throughout the school year.

1.1. With the current certification, school teaching staff have the right to freedom of choice and use of methods for assessing students' knowledge in their subject.
1.2. The teaching staff is obliged to familiarize students with the current monitoring system in their subject at the beginning of the school year.
1.3. The teaching staff is obliged to promptly communicate the current control mark to students, justifying it in the presence of the entire class, and put the grade in the class journal and student diary.

2. Interim final grades in points are given in grades 2-9 - according to academic quarters , in grades 10-11 - by half-year.

2.1. A student who misses 50 percent or more of classes during a six-month period cannot be given an intermediate final grade, but is recorded as n/a (not certified).
2.2. Responsibility for completing the missed educational material rests with the student, his parents or persons replacing parents.
2.3. At the end of the academic year, final annual grades are issued for all subjects of the curriculum.
2.4. If the student or his parents disagree with the annual assessment, the student is given the opportunity to take an exam in the relevant subject of a commission formed by order of the director.
3. Final certification is carried out for students in grades 9 and 11

3.1. The procedure for final certification is determined by: the Law of the Russian Federation “On Education”, regulations of the Russian Federation, the Ministry of Education of the Russian Federation, the Office of the Aznakaevsky Municipal District for Education, local acts of the Municipal Budgetary Educational Institution “Secondary School No. 9 of Aznakaevo” of the Aznakaevsky Municipal District of the Republic of Tatarstan.
3.2. GIA in the 9th grade is carried out in an independent form 3.3. GIA in the 11th grade is carried out in the form of the Unified State Exam.
3.4. Admission of students to the final certification, the timing of its implementation, and awarding of students is carried out in accordance with the Regulations on the state (final) certification of educational institutions of the Russian Federation.

III. EVALUATION OF STUDENTS' ORAL RESPONSES

1. The answer is graded “5” if the student:
. fully disclosed the content of the material to the extent provided for by the program and textbook;
. presented the material in literate language in a certain logical sequence, accurately using special terminology and symbols;
. correctly completed the drawings, drawings, and graphs accompanying the answer;
. demonstrated the ability to illustrate theoretical concepts with specific examples and apply them in a new situation when performing a practical task;
. demonstrated the assimilation of previously studied related questions, the formation and stability of the skills and abilities used in answering;
. answered independently without leading questions from the teacher.
There may be one or two inaccuracies in the coverage of secondary issues or in calculations, which the student easily corrected based on the teacher’s remark.
2. The answer is graded “4” if:

It basically satisfies the requirements for the “5” mark, but it has one of the disadvantages:
. there are small gaps in the presentation that do not distort the content of the answer;
. one or two shortcomings were made in covering the main content of the answer, corrected in response to the teacher’s comments;
. an error or more than two shortcomings were made when covering secondary issues or in calculations, which were easily corrected based on the teacher’s remark.
3. Mark “Z” is placed in the following cases:

The content of the material is incompletely or inconsistently disclosed, but a general understanding of the issue is shown and skills sufficient for further mastery of the program material are demonstrated;
. there were difficulties or mistakes were made in defining concepts, using special terminology, drawings, calculations, corrected after several leading questions from the teacher;
. the student failed to apply the theory in a new situation when performing a practical task, but completed tasks of the mandatory level of complexity on this topic;
. knowledge of theoretical material revealed insufficient development of basic skills and abilities.

4. Mark “2” is placed in the following cases:

The main content of the educational material is not disclosed;
. revealed the student’s ignorance or misunderstanding of most or the most important part of the educational material;
. errors were made in the definition of concepts, when using special terminology, in drawings, drawings or graphs, in calculations that were not corrected after several leading questions from the teacher.
5. Mark “1” is placed if:

The student refused to answer without explanation

IV. EVALUATION OF STUDENTS' WRITTEN WORK

Written work is one of the forms of identifying a student’s literacy level. Written work checks the student’s mastery of the material of the topic, section of the program of the subject being studied; basic concepts, rules, the degree of independence of the student, the ability to apply acquired knowledge in practice, using, among other things, previously studied material. When assessing written work, the student’s mastery of the basic norms of modern literary language and spelling literacy is checked. When assessing written work, errors based on rules that are not included in the school curriculum are corrected, but not taken into account; to rules that have not yet been learned. Mistakes are corrected, but errors are not taken into account. Among the errors, minor ones should be distinguished, i.e., those that do not have significant significance for the characteristics of literacy. When counting errors, two minor ones are counted as one error. It is necessary to take into account the repeatability and uniformity of errors. Errors per rule are considered to be of the same type. The first errors of the same type are counted as one, each subsequent similar error is counted as an independent one.

Mark “5” is set if

The student did not make a single mistake in the work, and also if there was 1 minor error in it. The quality of the work, the accuracy of the student, and the absence of spelling errors are taken into account.

Mark “4” is set if

the student made 2 mistakes, as well as 2 minor errors. The design of the work and general literacy are taken into account.

Mark “3” is set if

The student made up to 4 errors, as well as 5 minor errors. Work design is taken into account

Mark “2” is set if

The student made more than 4 mistakes.

When grading written work, the teacher uses the educational standard of his discipline.

When assessing the completion of additional tasks, marks are given as follows: - “5” - if all tasks are completed; - “4” - at least ¾ of the tasks were completed correctly; - “3” - for work in which at least half of the work was completed correctly; - “2” - awarded for work in which more than half of the tasks have not been completed. When assessing a control dictation, the following marks are given for concepts: - “5” - no errors; - “4” - 1-2 errors; - “3” - 3-4 errors; - “2” - up to 7 errors were made.

V. EVALUATION OF CREATIVE WORKS OF STUDENTS

Creative work reveals the maturity of the student’s level of literacy and competence, is the main form of testing the student’s ability to correctly and consistently express thoughts, use additional reference material, draw independent conclusions, and tests the student’s speech preparation. Any creative work includes three parts: introduction, main part, conclusion and is drawn up in accordance with the uniform norms and rules for work of this level. With the help of creative work, the following is tested: the ability to reveal a topic; the ability to use linguistic means, subject concepts, in accordance with the style, topic and task of the statement (work); compliance with language norms and spelling rules; quality of work design, use of illustrative material; breadth of sources and additional literature. The content of creative work is assessed according to the following criteria:

Compliance of the student’s work with the topic and main idea;

Completeness of disclosure of the topic;

Correctness of factual material;

Sequence of presentation.

When assessing speech production, the following are taken into account:

Diversity of vocabulary and grammatical structure of speech;

Stylistic unity and expressiveness of speech;

Number of language errors and stylistic flaws.

When assessing the source base of a creative work, the correct formatting of footnotes is taken into account; compliance with the general norms and rules of the bibliography of used sources and references to them; actual use in work of the literature given in the list of sources; breadth of time and factual coverage of additional literature; the feasibility of using certain sources.

Mark “5” is placed if

the content of the work is fully consistent with the topic; there are no factual errors; the content of what is presented is consistent; the work is distinguished by its richness of vocabulary and accuracy of word usage; semantic unity of text, illustrations, and additional material has been achieved. The work contains 1 flaw in the content; 1-2 speech errors; 1 grammatical error.

Mark “4” is placed if

the content of the work is mainly consistent with the topic (there are minor deviations from the topic); there are isolated factual inaccuracies; there are minor violations of the consistency in the presentation of thoughts; There are some unprincipled errors in the design of the work. No more than 2 defects in content, no more than 3-4 speech defects, and no more than 2 grammatical errors are allowed in the work.

Mark “3” is placed if

The work contains significant deviations from the topic; the work is reliable in the main, but there are some violations of the sequence of presentation; The design of the work is not neat; there are complaints about compliance with the norms and rules of bibliographic and illustrative design. No more than 4 defects in content, 5 speech defects, and 4 grammatical errors are allowed in the work.

Mark “2” is placed if

The work does not correspond to the topic; many factual errors were made; the sequence of presentation in all parts of the work is broken; there is no connection between them; work does not correspond to plan; the vocabulary is extremely poor; the stylistic unity of the text is violated; Serious complaints about the quality of the work were noted. There were up to 7 speech and up to 7 grammatical errors.

When assessing creative work, the independence, originality of the work’s concept, the level of its compositional and stylistic solutions, and speech design are taken into account. Excessive workload does not increase your grade. A positive factor taken into account is the presence of a review of the research work.

VI. PROCEDURE FOR PROVIDING FINAL GRADES.

1. A final mark is given for the academic quarter (grades 10-11, academic half-year) and for the academic year. It is unified and reflects in general terms all aspects of a student’s preparation in the subject. Grade 1 students are not given grades during the school year. The learning activities of these students are assessed verbally.

2. A mark for a quarter or half a year can be given to a student if he has at least three marks for a quarter and five for a half year. A quarter mark cannot be given to a student based on one or two marks, except in cases of long-term illness. A student who has no or only one mark and has missed ¾ of the class time in a subject is considered not certified.

3. The mark for a quarter, half a year, or year should not be displayed mechanically, as the arithmetic average of previous marks. In determining it, the actual preparation of the student in all indicators by the time this mark is issued should be considered decisive. When calculating the final grade for a quarter or half a year, priority is given to grades for: written, test, practical and laboratory work (mathematics, physics, chemistry, etc.). In the case of a controversial grade for the year, the grade for the 3rd quarter in the 2nd quarter is decisive. 9th grade, for the 2nd half of the year in 10-11th grade.

4. If a student leaves for a long time for treatment on a voucher, the grade for the quarter (six months) is assigned on the basis of the report card issued to him at the place of treatment. In the absence of such a document, a school order creates a commission from among the teachers working in the classroom to take credits on the topics studied. The decision of the commission is documented in a protocol.

VII. PROCEDURE FOR ASSESSING GRADING FOR TEST WORKS

An unsatisfactory result of a student's test, test, or final work, reflected in the class progress log, must necessarily result in additional work with the student, including consultation on unmastered material and repeated work, which is reflected in the class grade log with a grade given next to the first unsatisfactory mark. Materials for repeated work are submitted to the educational department. When issuing a quarterly or semi-annual grade for a student, his success throughout the entire period of certification is taken into account. The final test cannot be a reason to reduce the student’s final grade for a quarter or half a year.

VIII. MEASURES TO PREVENT STUDENT OVERLOAD

In order to prevent overload of students, homework on Sunday is prohibited if the next lesson after Saturday is the next one on Monday. Homework is not assigned on vacations and holidays. Tests, tests, tests are not held on Monday and Saturday, with the exception of subjects with a volume of 1-2 hours per week and in the first week after the holidays. Unauthorized transfer of tests, test work in the schedule of tests and tests, independent carrying out tests and tests that are not provided for in the schedule are a gross violation of the rights of students and a reason for disciplinary action against the teacher.

IX. RIGHTS OF PARTICIPANTS IN THE EDUCATIONAL PROCESS TO APPEAL THE RESULTS OF CURRENT, INTERIM, AND FINAL CERTIFICATION.

Participants in the educational process are teachers, parents, and students. In accordance with the Charter of the educational institution, the School-Family Agreement, each participant in the educational process has the right to an objective assessment of his work and defense of his own point of view on the effectiveness of the work of any of the participants in the educational process. In an educational institution, there are the following authorities whose competence is to analyze the objectivity of assessing the performance of participants in the educational process:
1. School administration
2. Commissioner for the protection of interests and rights of students
3. School Council
The appeal is considered within a week from the moment of submission to the director of the educational institution and registration of a written appeal outlining the essence of the conflict. The director of the educational institution gives a written order to one of the above-mentioned bodies to investigate and make proposals on the essence of the conflict. The decision on the objectivity of the assessment is made by the head of the educational institution in the form of an order, instruction and is mandatory communicated to the members of the teaching staff. The parties to the conflict are informed of the results of the investigation by familiarizing themselves with the contents of the order against signature. Participants in the conflict have the right to appeal the administration’s decision to higher authorities.

X. In connection with the transition to the Federal State Educational Standards of the second generation of educational institutions, carry out the following activities to assess the achievement of planned results:

· Assess the personal, meta-subject, and subject-specific educational outcomes of primary school students using an integrated approach.

· Organize work on the cumulative assessment system within the framework of the Portfolio of Achievements of students in grades 1-4 in three areas:

Systematized observation materials (score sheets, observation materials, etc.)

A selection of children's creative works, initial diagnostics, intermediate and final standardized works in the Russian language, mathematics, and the surrounding world;

Materials characterizing the achievements of students in extracurricular and leisure activities (results of participation in olympiads, competitions, exhibitions, shows, competitions, sporting events, etc.)

· The final grade of a primary school graduate is formed on the basis of accumulated grades in all academic subjects and grades for completing three final papers (in the Russian language, mathematics and complex work on an interdisciplinary basis).

XI. VALIDITY OF THIS PROVISION IS UNTIL THE RELEVANT CHANGES ARE MADE

How are final grades for the year determined? This issue worries not only the schoolchildren themselves, but also their parents. Let's talk about the regulatory documents that Russian teachers use in their work.

Local acts

Each educational institution adopts its own Regulations, according to which final grades are set for the year and quarter. It contains detailed instructions that teachers use in their work.

In addition to the general Regulations, there are also special additions and explanations according to which final grades for the year are assigned in primary school, middle school, and at the senior level of education.

The instructions are mandatory for all teachers who teach a particular academic discipline.

Marks are given for the quarter from the second half of the year in grade 2 to grade 9 inclusive. Assessment of schoolchildren at the senior level (grades 10-11) is carried out only by half-year.

Current assessment

How are grades assigned for the year by half-year? Let us consider in detail the algorithm of the teacher’s actions.

In the process of conducting a training session, the teacher checks the knowledge and skills of his students and puts current grades in the electronic journal.

For each type of work: oral history, written test, practical experiments, defense of abstracts, a separate column is provided in the electronic diary. Weekly monitoring of current grades is carried out by the class teacher and parents of students. The final grades for the year should not be affected by the behavior of children during classes and extracurricular activities.

Half-year assessment

The grades that a teacher gives to high school students in their subject must be reasonable and timely. During the reporting period, the child must receive at least three grades for disciplines taught once a week, and at least five for subjects where the teaching load is 2 hours a week.

Approximately two weeks before the end of the semester, the teacher brings information about preliminary grades to the class teacher. Marks are given according to the deadlines specified in the school order drawn up by the head of the educational institution.

After introducing an electronic diary, the teacher no longer needs to look for the arithmetic average by summing up all the student’s grades and then dividing the resulting figure by the number of grades. Russian schools have begun to use an electronic journal in which these actions are performed automatically. Depending on which answer option was marked, it has a different effect on the total score. For example, if you receive an unsatisfactory grade on the final test, the weighted average score for the half-year is automatically reduced. And the student will not be able to count on getting an “excellent” rating.

How is a grade given for the year if a controversial grade is obtained based on the results of two half-years? This issue is explained in detail in the new educational standards.

If after carrying out mathematical operations the mark is “3.4”, then in this case the teacher gives “satisfactory”. Upon receiving a score of “3.6” the child receives a “good” mark. The Federal State Educational Standard indicates that grades are rounded towards the student, regardless of the level of education.

Year marks

Let's try to find out how the school grade is given for the year. For primary and secondary schoolchildren, quarter marks are used, which are taken into account when calculating the annual mark. In high school, grades for half a year are taken into account, and on their basis, the final result is obtained by calculating the arithmetic average.

If the result is a non-integer number, then the grade for the year is given in favor of the student. If controversial situations arise, all control and verification work is taken into account. Parents have the right to express their disagreement in writing with the mark given to their child. In this case, in an educational institution, by order of the director, a special commission is created that verifies the correctness of the teacher’s actions.

If the teacher has complied with all the requirements of the instructions adopted in this educational institution, parents receive a motivated written response, and the finished grade does not change. If the commission identifies violations when assigning a grade, it is adjusted, and the student’s parents or legal representatives are also notified.

Final grades

In addition to quarterly and semi-annual grades, final grades are also given in graduating classes. What should you consider? If a child does not choose a final assessment in the ninth grade in the 11th grade) in a given academic discipline, the final mark duplicates the annual assessment.

When displaying the final result for the children who took the exam in the subject, the score obtained is summed up with the annual score, and the arithmetic average is displayed. How are grades for the year, as well as marks in the certificate, correctly assigned?

If the resulting number is not a whole number, rounding is carried out in favor of the student.

In controversial situations, an oral or written test of the quality of the student’s knowledge in the subject that has become the subject of conflict is assigned. The decision of the educational commission is drawn up in the form of a special protocol and is final.

Grading system

Many parents struggle to understand how grades are assigned throughout the year. Grade 2 involves assessment only from the second half of the year. Mastering academic disciplines is accompanied by intermediate control and final certifications.

The intermediate test of knowledge is a separate element of assessing the achievements of schoolchildren; it is not related to current academic performance.

Current control is a systematic check of schoolchildren's educational achievements. The teacher uses it in the course of educational activities according to thematic planning.

The main purpose of such a knowledge test is to monitor the level of educational achievements of schoolchildren, which are provided for by the program for a given academic discipline, to analyze the compliance of the results with the norms of educational standards, and to carry out self-assessment by students. Based on the results obtained, the teacher plans to adjust knowledge and skills and builds individual development trajectories for each student.

The results of current monitoring are recorded on a five-point scale. Some educational institutions decide to assess current knowledge in the form of “pass” or “fail”.

Individual training

Recently, the number of schoolchildren who study under individual programs has increased. The recording of their universal learning skills is carried out in full accordance with the curriculum developed for a particular child. If a student has serious health problems, inclusive education is organized for him. For example, using Skype, a teacher communicates with a child, conducts training sessions for him, and checks his homework.

The teacher has the right to think over his own version of assessments for ongoing control, but final grades are set according to the same rules as for other schoolchildren. In case of disputed grades for a quarter, half-year or year, it is determined between all grades, and the final grade is set in favor of the child.

Important points

In the first grades of Russian schools, according to the new federal standards, grade-free education is used.

When conducting optional and elective courses at the middle and senior levels, a credit system is chosen.

The assessment option is indicated in the course program and brought to the attention of schoolchildren and their parents. It is also pre-approved by the pedagogical council.

If an academic discipline does not have a special manual, then the teacher can offer creative tasks to the children as a test. This system is suitable for subjects and courses where it is difficult to express the result of learning using a classic five-point scale.

Finally

Despite the innovative transformations that have affected Russian education in recent years, the assessment system is still an effective tool in the work of teachers. During the lesson, the teacher conducts a frontal, individual survey, and puts marks in an electronic journal.

In the case of an assessment test, all students are initially informed of the criteria by which the “credit” will be awarded. In addition, students may be given test questions, the correct answers to which will entitle them to receive “credit” for the course being assessed.

Currently, there is a heated debate between supporters and opponents of the five-point system for assessing the educational achievements of schoolchildren. Some teachers propose completely abandoning the assessment system in high school, replacing it with test tasks. Despite such tempting offers, Russian education still uses a five-point option for assessing the educational achievements of schoolchildren.

This Regulation has been developed in accordance with the Law of the Russian Federation “On Education”, the Model Regulations on a General Educational Institution, the Charter of the MBOU Secondary School No. 98, and other local acts of the MBOU Secondary School No. 98 regulates the system for issuing final grades.

I. General provisions

1.1. Final grades for the quarter are given from the third to the ninth grade; in grades 10-11, assessment is carried out half-yearly.
1.2. Subject marking must be timely and uniform throughout the trimester (quarter) and half-year.
1.3. The final grades of students for a trimester (half-year) and year must be justified, that is, correspond to the student’s performance during the assessment period. For objective certification of students, at least 3 marks are required (with a one-to-two hour weekly study load in the subject) and at least 5-7 (with a study load of more than two hours per week) per trimester or at least 5 marks (with a one-two hour weekly course load). study load in the subject) and at least 7 (study load more than two hours per week) for six months.
1.4. Not certified (“n/a”) can only be issued if the required number of grades is missing and the student misses more than 50% of the class time. Non-certification for an unexcused reason is equivalent to failure in the subject.

P. Issuing quarterly (semi-annual) and annual grades
2.1. Two weeks before the end of the trimester (half-year), the teacher informs the class teacher about the preliminary grades.
2.2. All quarter (semi-annual) and annual grades must be submitted no later than the last day of classes.
2.3. Trimester (semi-annual) and annual grades are set by finding the arithmetic average, with priority given to tests and written work. In controversial cases (average score - from *.5 to *.7), the test results are taken into account, as well as the last grades received in the final lessons.
2.4. When issuing an annual grade, the grade for the trimesters (half-years) and the results of the intermediate certification are taken into account.
In controversial cases, preference is given to grades for the II and III trimesters and the results of intermediate certification.
2.5. If students and their parents disagree with the final grade given in the subject, it may be revised. Based on a written application from parents to revise the final grade, the school’s conflict commission, in the form of an exam or interview in the presence of the student’s parents, determines whether the grade given in the subject corresponds to the actual level of knowledge.
The decision of the commission is documented in a protocol and is final. The protocol is stored in the student’s personal file.

III. Issuing final grades during the final certification of graduates.
3.1. All annual grades in graduating classes must be posted in the journal the day before the teachers' council on the admission of students to the exams. 3.2. Examination and final grades are posted in the class journal in the summary sheet.
3.3. Grades for the certificate of secondary (complete) general education are assigned in accordance with the list of subjects of the educational institution curriculum:
a) For each general education subject of the invariant part of the basic curriculum;
b) For each general education subject of the variable part of the curriculum, if at least 64 hours were allocated for its study according to the curriculum
two academic years.
c) Final grades are determined as the arithmetic mean of the graduate’s annual grades for grades X, XI and are entered into the certificate as whole numbers in accordance with the rules of mathematical rounding.
3.4. Final grades in certificates of basic general education are awarded to graduates of the 9th grade in all subjects of the school curriculum studied at the 2nd stage.
3.5. The final mark for subjects taken in the traditional form (on tickets) is set by the examination commission. The final grade for subjects taken in the new form is issued by a commission determined by order of the director of the educational institution, within the established time frame, no later than one working day after receiving the results of the exam, appeal or retake of the exam.
3.6. The final grade in a subject for which the graduate did not pass the state final certification exam is given taking into account quarter (semi-annual) grades.
marks and is defined as the arithmetic mean of all listed marks. If the result obtained is a fractional number, then it is rounded to a whole number (according to the rounding rules).
3.7. The final grade in the Russian language, mathematics and subjects for which state (final) certification was carried out in the new form is given to the graduate taking into account the annual and certification marks.
. If the difference in the listed marks is 1 point, then a larger one is added to the certificate of basic general education.
. If the difference is 2 points, then a mark is placed on the certificate, which is the arithmetic average of the annual and certification marks.

IV. Rights of participants in the educational process during final certification.
4.1. The student has the right to promptly find out the number and name of academic subjects for which the final certification will be carried out, the form and timing of the certification.
4.2. In accordance with the Charter of the educational institution, each participant in the educational process has the right to an objective assessment of his work and defense of his own point of view on the effectiveness of the work of any of the participants in the educational process. An educational institution organizes a conflict commission whose competence includes analyzing the objectivity of assessing the results of the work of participants in the educational process.
4.3. The appeal is considered within 3 days from the date of submission to the school director and registration of a written appeal outlining the essence of the conflict. The director gives written orders to investigate and make proposals regarding the substance of the conflict. The decision on the objectivity of the assessment is made by the director in the form of an order, instruction and is mandatory communicated to the members of the teaching staff. The parties to the conflict are informed of the results of the investigation through familiarization with the contents of the order against signature. Participants in the conflict have the right to appeal the administration’s decision to higher authorities.

Hello, Ekaterina!

If you are planning to appeal a grade that you consider unreasonable, first of all, read the school’s local regulations that define the requirements for grading (it can be called differently: “regulations on the assessment system” or “Regulations on the procedure, forms and frequency of ongoing monitoring academic performance").

The legislation does not regulate issues related to student assessment, leaving the conditions and procedure for introducing this procedure to the discretion of the educational institution. In accordance with the recommendations of the Ministry of Education of the Russian Federation, the student is assessed for mastering knowledge of the curriculum. However, the educational institution independently adopts regulations on the assessment system.

As a rule, the regulations on the system for assessing student knowledge prescribe the criteria for assigning grades from two to five for written and creative work and oral answers. The procedure for assigning grades for tests, classification of rough, non-rough grades and shortcomings. Conditions for assessment in case of missed classes, deadlines for challenging the assessment from the moment the mark is reported.

If a student does not agree with the issuance of final grades for the semester or for the year, in this case, one should focus on the provision on intermediate certification. The regulations, as a rule, establish the principles for issuing final grades based on annual, examination, taking into account quarterly and semi-annual grades. It may also indicate the procedure for revising assessments, for example:

“If students and their parents disagree with the final grade given in a subject, it may be revised. For review, based on a written statement from parents, a school order creates a commission of three people, which, in the presence of the student’s parents, determines the correspondence of the grade given in the subject to the actual level of knowledge. The decision of the commission is documented in a protocol and is final. The protocol is kept in the student’s personal file.”

The school administration, pedagogical council or conflict resolution commission, when assessing the actions of a teacher, must be guided by the local regulations of the school.

To summarize the above, if you do not agree with the rating given, you should do the following:

Step 1. Familiarize yourself with the school’s local regulations on the grading system - and evaluate whether the teacher’s actions meet the requirements accepted at the school?

If the local regulations of the school specify the procedure for reviewing grades, use the procedure that is provided in your school.

If the teacher’s actions do not meet the school’s requirements for grading, or if local regulations do not provide for your case, but you are convinced that the teacher was wrong, proceed to step 2.

Step 2: Submit your complaint in writing to the school principal or dispute resolution committee. In your complaint, ask for the rating to be reconsidered.

Source - website of the Support Service for Participants in the Educational Process, https://usperm.ru

Teacher lowers grades

What to rely on when deciding whether to give a particular rating or not?

The legislation does not regulate issues related to student assessment, leaving the conditions and procedure for introducing this procedure to the discretion of the educational organization. In accordance with the recommendations of the Ministry of Education of the Russian Federation, the student is assessed for mastering knowledge of the curriculum.

Each educational organization independently adopts a regulation on the assessment system (it can be called differently, for example, “Regulation on the assessment system” or “Regulation on the procedure, forms and frequency of ongoing monitoring of academic performance”).

As a rule, the regulations on the system for assessing student knowledge prescribe the criteria for assigning grades from two to five for written and creative work and oral answers; the procedure for grading tests; classification of gross, non-blank errors and shortcomings; assessment conditions in case of missed classes; deadlines for challenging a grade from the moment the mark is reported.

If a student does not agree with the issuance of final grades for the semester or for the year, in this case, one should focus on the provision on intermediate certification. The regulations, as a rule, establish the principles for issuing final grades based on annual, examination, taking into account quarterly and semi-annual grades. It may also indicate how grades will be reviewed.

“If students and their parents disagree with the final grade given in a subject, it may be revised. For review, based on a written statement from parents, a school order creates a commission of three people, which, in the presence of the student’s parents, determines the correspondence of the grade given in the subject to the actual level of knowledge. The decision of the commission is documented in a protocol and is final. The protocol is kept in the student’s personal file.”

(From the Regulations on intermediate certification)

What can students and their parents do if they think the grade is too low?

It is necessary to determine whether the teacher’s actions correspond to the requirements accepted at the school.

If the local regulations of the school stipulate the procedure for revising grades, it is worth using the procedure provided by the school.

If the assessment is biased and underestimated, the student or his parents have the right to appeal the actions of the teacher in accordance with Article 45 of the Federal Law “On Education in the Russian Federation”. To do this, you need to contact the school principal or the dispute resolution commission with a written statement. The application (complaint) must state the circumstances of the assessment, the actions with which the student does not agree, and ask to evaluate the teacher’s actions for compliance with the curriculum and generally accepted teaching principles. For example, “assess the validity of the following actions:...”. Parents can ask to reconsider a grade they disagree with.

In connection with the complaint, an inspection must be carried out, the complaint must be considered collegiately in the manner prescribed by the school.

The school administration, pedagogical council or dispute resolution commission, when assessing the actions of a teacher, must be guided by the local regulations of the school.

In case of inaction of the school administration, parents have the right to file a written complaint with the education management body or appeal the inaction of the school director to the state inspectorate for control of education (branch of Rosobrnadzor).

What to do in the event of a massive underestimation of grades, for example, for writing a test or test (for the whole class, a group of students)?

The issue should be referred to the school's teaching council. To do this, an appeal is sent describing the situation and indicating specific students in respect of whom these actions were taken, with a request to consider the issue at a meeting of the teachers' council. In your appeal, you can ask to invite students and their parents to the meeting.

Freedom to teach

Not every action of a teacher can be appealed, and filing a complaint does not guarantee that the grade will be corrected.

In accordance with Article 47 of the Federal Law “On Education in the Russian Federation,” a teacher has academic rights and freedoms, such as:

1. freedom of teaching, free expression of one’s opinion, freedom from interference in professional activities;
2. freedom of choice and use of pedagogically sound forms, means, methods of teaching and education;
3. the right to creative initiative, development and application of original programs and methods of teaching and upbringing within the framework of the educational program being implemented, a separate academic subject, course, discipline (module);
4. the right to choose textbooks, teaching aids, materials and other means of teaching and education in accordance with the educational program and in the manner established by the legislation on education;
5. the right to protection of professional honor and dignity, to a fair and objective investigation of violations of professional ethics of teaching staff.

The specified academic rights and freedoms must be exercised in compliance with the rights of other participants in educational relations, legal requirements and standards of professional ethics of teaching staff, enshrined in the local regulations of the school.

What to do if you get a bad mark for behavior and not for knowledge?

Giving grades for behavior is not provided for by law, but can be provided for at the school level, in local regulations. Regardless of whether there is an accepted procedure for assigning marks for behavior, an F for behavior cannot be given as a grade in the subject. Such actions of the teacher can be appealed. To do this, you must submit a statement to the school principal with a request to conduct a disciplinary investigation into this fact.

Can a student be given a “F” for behavior for a student’s actions outside of school during non-school hours?

Assessment of student behavior is carried out on the basis of internal regulations, which are determined by local acts of the educational organization. As a rule, these documents limit the scope of their distribution only to the educational organization itself and the territory assigned to it. Interference in a student’s extracurricular life is not provided for by law.

The responsibility to control the student’s behavior outside the educational organization lies with parents and law enforcement agencies represented by the Commission on Minors’ Affairs. However, in some cases, a student’s behavior outside of school may be the basis for registration within the school, “working through” prevention at the council and carrying out “individual educational work,” since the tasks of the school and the teacher include not only teaching, but also the upbringing of students.

What should parents do if they do not agree with the teacher’s teaching methods in general?

Parents can compose a free-form letter with a mandatory description of specific situations and pedagogical approaches with which they do not agree, as well as the grounds for disagreement with this assessment and the requirement for re-certification. If you disagree with the teaching method, it is necessary to describe the teaching method itself and the reasons why it does not contribute to the satisfactory development of the material by students.

At the end of the appeal there should be a request to replace the teacher or re-certify him. The request must be specific and indicate a specific method of satisfying it (dismiss, replace or recertify). The appeal can be sent to the school director, the school's governing council or the educational authority of the municipality.

Can a teacher give bad marks for work that was assigned during illness?

Education legislation does not exempt a student from mastering the curriculum even during illness. However, if a student objectively could not complete the assignment for the lesson immediately after illness, then this may also serve as a basis for revising the grade.

Interim certification

Does the school’s pedagogical council have the right to postpone the intermediate certification of a 10th grade student to the summer due to a long-term illness?

Maybe, but with the consent of the student himself.

In accordance with Article 58 of the Federal Law “On Education in the Russian Federation”, students with academic debt have the right to undergo intermediate certification no more than two times within the time frame determined by the school, within one year from the date of formation of academic debt. The specified period does not include the time of illness of the student.

In accordance with Article 43 of the Federal Law “On Education in the Russian Federation,” the application of disciplinary measures to students during their illness, vacation, academic leave, maternity leave or parental leave is not allowed. This means that the student will not be considered to have evaded his responsibilities for passing the intermediate certification.

If a 9th grade student is not admitted to the state final certification due to academic debt, what should be done with him in the future: leave him for repeated studies, expel him from school, or something else?

In this situation, you need to be guided by Articles 58 and 66 of the Federal Law “On Education in the Russian Federation”. If a 9th grade student is not admitted to the GIA, in fact, the choice of options for further action should be given to the student’s parents.

Release with a certificate of completion of school in the manner prescribed by Article 60 of the Federal Law “On Education in the Russian Federation” for persons who have not passed the final certification is possible only with the consent of the parents, the commission for minors and the protection of their rights and the local government body in charge of the administration. in the field of education (in accordance with paragraph 6 of Article 66 of the Federal Law “On Education in the Russian Federation”), since the student did not receive basic general education.

The student, in accordance with clause 4.5 of Art. 58 of the Federal Law “On Education in the Russian Federation”, has the right to eliminate the resulting academic debt, and the school, along with parents, is obliged to create conditions for this. In accordance with paragraph 9 of Art. 58 and paragraphs. 1 paragraph 3 art. 44 of the Federal Law “On Education in the Russian Federation”, transfer to the second year or to another form of education is carried out at the discretion of the parents.

Two at the end of the academic year

Grades for the academic year are the results of the interim assessment. Each school independently determines the form and procedure for conducting intermediate certification for different classes, so it can decide that intermediate certification is carried out at the end of each quarter or only at the end of the semester.

If a student receives a bad grade at the end of the academic year (in some cases, at the end of a half-year or quarter, if this is specified in the local regulations of the school (see the website of his school)), he has incurred academic debt.

What consequences may occur if you receive a bad grade during the academic year?

Consequences of receiving one or more bad marks during the academic year (having academic debt):

• the student can be transferred to the next grade, but with the condition of retaking (eliminating academic debt) during the academic year;
• a student in grade 9/11 will not be allowed to take the State Exam and the Unified State Exam.

What rights do students with academic debt and their parents have?

A bad grade in one or more subjects during the academic year is not grounds for expulsion from school.

Even if the school administration insists that a student must leave school or switch to another form of education, because “there is no place for poor students in our school,” it cannot force anyone to do this. The decision to leave can only come from the parents and the student himself.

A student with academic debt has the right:

• move to the next class conditionally until grades are corrected;
• pass the intermediate assessment twice (try to correct the grade) within the time frame established by the school, within one year (the specified period does not include the student’s illness, subject to the availability of supporting documents);
• if there are doubts about the objectivity of grading, demand the inclusion of teachers from another school in the commission that conducts the intermediate certification.

The student is given two attempts to pass the academic debt in each subject. For the first time, the subject is handed over to the teacher. A commission is being created for the second time. The retake deadlines must be determined in the relevant regulations available on the school website.

The school administration is obliged to create conditions for the student to eliminate academic debt and ensure control over the timeliness of its elimination.

The responsibility to organize the repayment of debt lies with the school administration. This means that before the administration presents parents with a choice: transfer the student to another school or leave for a second year, it must provide the opportunity to retake, organize additional consultations if necessary, and set retake deadlines.

If necessary, the student’s parents can initiate a retake themselves by sending a corresponding application with a request to ensure the possibility of passing the intermediate certification.

If the grades cannot be corrected, the student’s parents have the right to choose one of several options:

• stay for a second year;
• transfer to training according to adapted programs, for example, to a correctional school in accordance with the recommendations of the psychological, medical and pedagogical commission, or transfer to evening school;
• switch to training according to an individual curriculum (that is, remain on an individual form of training at your school, if it provides such an opportunity, or move to another school that has the appropriate provision).

Quote from the Federal Law “On Education in the Russian Federation”:

1. Mastering the educational program (except for the educational program of preschool education), including a separate part or the entire volume of an academic subject, course, discipline (module) of the educational program, is accompanied by intermediate certification of students, carried out in the forms determined by the curriculum, and in the manner established by the educational organization.

2. Unsatisfactory results of the intermediate certification in one or more academic subjects, courses, disciplines (modules) of the educational program or failure to pass the intermediate certification in the absence of valid reasons are recognized as academic debt.

3. Students are required to eliminate academic debt.

4. Educational organizations, parents (legal representatives) of a minor student, providing students with general education in the form of family education, are obliged to create conditions for the student to eliminate academic debt and ensure control over the timeliness of its elimination.

5. Students with academic debt have the right to undergo intermediate certification in the relevant academic subject, course, discipline (module) no more than twice within the time frame determined by the organization carrying out educational activities, within one year from the date of formation of academic debt. This period does not include the student’s illness, academic leave or maternity leave.

6. To conduct intermediate certification for the second time, the educational organization creates a commission.

7. It is not allowed to charge students for passing intermediate certification.

8. Students who have not passed the intermediate certification for valid reasons or who have academic debt are conditionally transferred to the next grade or to the next course.

9. Students studying in an educational organization in educational programs of primary general, basic general and secondary general education, who have not eliminated academic debt within the established time frame from the moment of its formation, at the discretion of their parents (legal representatives) are left for repeated training, transferred to training in adapted educational programs programs in accordance with the recommendations of the psychological, medical and pedagogical commission or for training according to an individual curriculum.

10. Students in educational programs of primary general, basic general and secondary general education in the form of family education, who have not eliminated their academic debt within the established time frame, continue to receive education in an educational organization.

11. Students in basic professional educational programs who have not eliminated their academic debt within the established time frame are expelled from this organization as having failed to fulfill their obligations to conscientiously master the educational program and implement the curriculum.

(Article 58 of the Federal Law “On Education in the Russian Federation”)

Can they be expelled for failing grades?

The legislation does not contain grounds for expulsion from a general education organization due to unsatisfactory certification (final, intermediate) at any stage of mastering the general education program.

A bad grade for a quarter, half a year, a year, or for a final assessment in one or more subjects is not grounds for expulsion from school.

Even if the school administration insists that a student should leave school because he received a bad grade for the school year, such a formulation of the question is incorrect. Without parental consent, the school does not have the right to make a decision on expulsion or transfer to another form of education.