Territory of meanings. What is Medvedev allowed to say? Medvedev Dmitry Anatolyevich

Subscribe and stay updated! Also turn on bell reminders! --Yandex Money 4100184553377 --WebMoney R294157239997 --Sberbank card 2202200297360974 - BTC 1N9Ajm93LCevn5JdEttocGLrz7HKG6JY3x The main content of this video: I emphasize - this was not Medvedev’s report, it was a report of the entire government to Duma for 2018. A government whose support Putin has repeatedly declared. Guess 3 times how Medvedev began and ended his speech? What is the most important thing that happened in 2018? Yes, the Kremlin’s political strategists still believe in the power of the Crimean Victoria. It seems to me that this is not even funny. So, what do you imagine should be in this report? Perhaps the biggest event of the year is the failed pension reform? Yes, you are right: And that’s all Medvedev said on the merits of pension issues. Changes in the parameters of the pension system. Not a word about the prospects, about how exactly the issues pointed out by experts will be resolved, about the same shameful indexation, when they promised all pensioners an increase of 1000 rubles, but it turned out to be unclear - all this is not important, the prime minister did not talk about this. But as soon as the pension reform was adopted, people began to live longer! Yes, both Putin’s words and Medvedev’s words mean exactly the same thing. Just over the calendar year, the cost of national projects increased from 8 to 26 trillion rubles. Medvedev did not talk about this either. As well as the fact that according to experts and not just anyone, but even Lyoshka Kudrin, who is in all these circles, there will not be such money in the budget. Very interesting approaches to fighting poverty. I must say right away that what our leadership calls poverty is not poverty at all. 19 million poor people. And there are many more poor people. Through the total lies, information periodically breaks through about what terrifying percentage of the population saves on food or cannot buy new shoes for their children. The usual lies, but something else is interesting - how do they fight poverty? The first thing I will draw your attention to is that Medvedev boasts that he has indexed salaries for public sector employees, although even the May decree did not ask for this. Yeah, it was clearly stated there that state employees should receive the average salary in the regions. This has not been done, they promised to make state employees into the middle class, but they are discussing it when talking about the poor. And not a drop of shame. For such work you should also praise! And secondly, what is Medvedev’s approach to fighting poverty - to give them money. Not jobs, not trade unions, but what am I talking about? This is Russia during Putin’s 4th term. My subscribers know that officials continue to close rural clinics and even hospitals in small towns. But that’s not even the most lethal thing here. You have heard that the doctor must go to the patient. Imagine a system in which a doctor spends 2/3 of his working time on the road? Introduced? So soon you will see with your own eyes! I recently made a video on renovation and talked about my neighborhood. In our small neighborhood, instead of 80 thousand square meters of housing, 315 thousand will be built. 4 times more. A nursery with 120 seats will be built for children and that’s it. There will be no new school. At the same time, the houses will be so dense that there will definitely be no chance of putting a school there in the future. The situation is the same throughout Moscow, and St. Petersburg deputies have already introduced a law on all-Russian renovation to the Duma. Doesn't Medvedev know about this, or what? This is how we care about demographics. In 5 years, the whole country will be listening, but it will be too late. Another hot topic is garbage reform. Dada, Dmitry Anatolich, but here’s the thing - the landfills are closed, and then after a few months it suddenly turns out that they continue to deliver garbage there, can you imagine what’s going on... Well, a little macroeconomics. Already all the experts are shouting with one voice that inflation has slowed down because people have no money, they can’t buy anything anyway, and even so the GDP deflator shows that real inflation was more than 10% over the past year. But the prime minister doesn’t need to know this. Yes, world agencies are shocked by the nonsense that you came up with with Rosstat. This news went unnoticed, but our accountants said that according to the new calculation method, in all recent years, which were considered a crisis, the country has been constantly getting richer, GDP has been growing for 6 years in a row! No one really knows what to do with this information. Either they lied then, or they lie now, but there is no other way. They have been telling us for a solid year that a tax on the self-employed is necessary, because we have millions of citizens working in the shadows. They, apparently, immediately recorded everyone who does not pay taxes as self-employed, and not as unemployed. And being self-employed means rich. So we can consider poverty defeated! But I’m not a stupid hater, I liked one statement from Teddy Bear

More than 60 thousand signatures have been collected for the resignation of the Prime Minister. The public was outraged by Dmitry Anatolyevich’s speech at the “Territory of Meanings” forum. He advised teachers to become businessmen

Dmitry Medvedev. Photo: Wu Hong/Reuters

The petition for the resignation of the head of the Russian government has already gained more than 60 thousand signatures in 10 hours. Runet users could not forgive the prime minister for his advice to teachers dissatisfied with their salaries. Medvedev, we recall, citing his personal experience as an example, said that an energetic teacher can earn extra money. And he added that those for whom bringing knowledge to the masses is not a mission can go into business.

Resonant words were heard at the forum “Territory of Meanings” - this is the current analogue of Seliger. And Dmitry Anatolyevich, in his characteristic manner, tried to find a common language with his interlocutors. Why did another such attempt only lead to a new round of talk about the possible resignation of the prime minister?

The beginning of Dmitry Anatolyevich’s speech at the youth forum “Territory of Meanings” differed from the classic stand up only in that he was holding a radio microphone rather than a cord one. Otherwise, everything is as in the textbook: a stage, a chair, a bottle of mineral water and a comedian, imposingly pacing from side to side:

"- Hello! Hello! Hello! I think you've done well here.

The main question I have is: “Have you found any meaning here?”

Well, then we can disagree, since the meaning is clear.”

And then there are serious questions and quite serious answers. Sometimes even meaningful. And most often sincere. Essentially, Medvedev is telling the truth. As in the case of the scandalous: “There is no money.” They really don't exist. But what words the prime minister chooses and how he presents what he is thinking about is sometimes simply perplexing. It’s elementary: when asked about teachers’ salaries, presidential press secretary Dmitry Peskov replied that no one has canceled the president’s decrees, we are working to ensure that salaries become higher. Vladimir Putin, without a doubt, would immediately come up with something similar and would remain his own for any audience. But the prime minister is not succeeding.

Political scientist “Dmitry Anatolyevich is trying to explain some things, as he puts it, “honest policy,” realistic policy, in not very skillful language. Therefore, such blunders occur that lead to a very violent reaction. I can quote one of my colleagues who said that Dmitry Anatolyevich is trying to communicate with the people in simple language, but it turns out to be the language of Marie Antoinette, who said: “If there is no bread, eat cakes.” In our country, unfortunately, the government has become divorced from reality in many ways. She stopped feeling the nerve of the lives of millions of people.”

Among the experts there are those who believe that Dmitry Medvedev is doing what he does not want. In particular, journalist Nikolai Svanidze is sure of this.

TV journalist, historian“Medvedev makes an impression on me, and we know each other, I wrote a book about him. He was always nice to me as a person. It always seemed to me and now it seems that he is a decent and decent person who, in accordance with the rules of the game he plays, is forced to play a certain role that is not typical for him.”

The petition for Medvedev's resignation gains tens of thousands of votes in a matter of hours. Sergei Mironov, who back in February saddled with the theme: “good president, bad government,” became more active. Then, in the wake of citizens’ dissatisfaction with fees for major repairs, the head of A Just Russia promised to collect 10 million signatures under an ultimatum of no confidence in the Cabinet. Now he reports that he has collected almost half. The Financial Times writes that after the parliamentary elections in Russia the structure of power will change and that Dmitry Medvedev will lose his post.

The incident with the statement about teachers is another illustration. Dmitry Medvedev spoke at a youth forum on Tuesday. And no one wrote anything about it. And only on Wednesday, when one of the media found a phrase about teachers, the news went to the masses, and then journalists and bloggers began to review the prime minister’s speech with only one goal - to find some other mistake. Spending an hour of time to seriously listen to what the second person in the state is talking about - this only happened until 2012.

1. I am often asked the question whether this is a lot or a little. Don't know. But there is no such thing in any country in the world! (About maternity capital).

2. The amount of fish consumed is a sign of the civilization of the state! We all came from fish, which comes from fish fish!

3. In Soviet times, we didn’t always see everything on the shelves, but there was a gradation between whole milk and milk reconstituted from powder! (About the quality of products).

4. Rudeness or dissatisfaction on the part of patients with the actions of doctors should lead to a decrease in the money doctors receive!

5. Indeed, this is not yet familiar to our citizens, but sometimes you listen to a grandmother who has mastered credit terminology, and your soul feels good! (About loans for rural residents).

6. If you don’t take care of your health, almost no body can withstand modern stress. We must try to maintain a calm atmosphere and drink a lot of Chinese tea!

7. When they try to reproach us for increasing the state’s share in the economy, this is a consequence of a misunderstanding that Russia is a huge state.

9. Being part of the European economy, and, accordingly, the world economy, we must accept the rules that have developed in Europe. This means that there will be no more free gas for anyone!

10. The waiting time for an ambulance is now 25 minutes. This is 10 minutes less than a year ago. I think that this is not the limit.

11. The most important thing is that next year we do not fall into any internal squabbles - this, unfortunately, happens in our country - and do not create any problems that will have to be fought for a long time and tediously!

12. You can give birth without money, but it’s better with money!

13. The transition to a new pricing system will eliminate those misunderstandings that are present in any economic dialogue: who lives at the expense of whom, who underpaid whom, who took more bites from whom. (About gas prices for Belarus).

14. Of course, sad faces with gold chains and crimson jackets are a thing of the past, but you can squeeze a stranger out of the local market using measures that are quite legal at first glance! (About the housing market).

15.The parade of lack of will must be interrupted! (On work on regulations in the government of the Russian Federation).

16. The state of affairs in the pharmaceutical industry is disgusting! Some swindlers produce medicines, other swindlers sell these medicines, and still others are engaged in mediation, using funds from the state program!

17. Our citizens must get used to the fact that power begins not in Moscow, in the Kremlin, but below.

18. I won’t do it myself, but there is a specialist in the presidential administration, I’ll ask him. (Responding to the request of cultural figures to write a normal text for Glucose).

19.If I tell the governor that we need to take care of libraries, he will answer that he does not have money, for example, for railways. And there will be nothing to object to. (Responding to requests from writers to pay attention to the fate of libraries, thick magazines and elderly writers).

20. When a policeman in a developed country stands on the road and someone offers him a bribe, he will not accept it. And not because everything is great in the material sphere, but because he can lose more.

I am often asked the question whether this is a lot or a little. Don't know. But there is no such thing in any country in the world! (About maternity capital).

The amount of fish consumed is a sign of the civilization of the state! We all came from fish, which comes from fish fish!

Not always in Soviet times we saw everything on the shelves, but there was a gradation between whole milk and milk reconstituted from powder! (About the quality of products).

Rudeness or dissatisfaction on the part of patients with the actions of doctors should lead to a decrease in the money doctors receive!

Indeed, this is not yet familiar to our citizens, but sometimes you listen to a grandmother who has mastered credit terminology, and your soul feels good! (About loans for rural residents).

If you don’t take care of your health, almost no body can withstand modern stress. We must try to maintain a calm atmosphere and drink a lot of Chinese tea!

When they try to reproach us for increasing the state’s share in the economy, this is a consequence of a misunderstanding that Russia is a huge state.

Being part of the European economy, and, accordingly, the world economy, we must accept the rules that have developed in Europe. This means that there will be no more free gas for anyone!

The waiting time for an ambulance is now 25 minutes. This is 10 minutes less than a year ago. I think that this is not the limit.

The most important thing is that next year we do not fall into any internal squabbles - this, unfortunately, happens in our country - and do not create any problems that we will have to fight for a long time and tediously!

You can give birth without money, but it’s better with money!

The transition to a new pricing system will eliminate those misunderstandings that are present in any economic dialogue: who lives at the expense of whom, who underpaid whom, who took more bites from whom. (About gas prices for Belarus).

Of course, sad faces with gold chains and crimson jackets are a thing of the past, but you can squeeze a stranger out of the local market using measures that are quite legal at first glance! (About the housing market).

The parade of lack of will must be stopped! (On work on regulations in the government of the Russian Federation).

The state of affairs in the pharmaceutical industry is disgusting! Some swindlers produce medicines, other swindlers sell these medicines, and still others are engaged in mediation, using funds from the state program!

Our citizens must get used to the fact that power begins not in Moscow, in the Kremlin, but below.

I won’t do it myself, but there is a specialist in the presidential administration, I’ll ask him. (Responding to the request of cultural figures to write a normal text for Glucose).

If I tell the governor that we need to take care of libraries, he will answer that he does not have money, for example, for railways. And there will be nothing to object to. (Responding to requests from writers to pay attention to the fate of libraries, thick magazines and elderly writers).

When a policeman in a developed country stands on the road and someone offers him a bribe, he will not accept it. And not because everything is great in the material sphere, but because he can lose more.

The fact that our leaders handle facts very loosely in their public speeches has long been no secret. But if earlier this was more common, now, it seems, Medvedev has decided to join him. In any case, in the interview with the prime minister of the CNN television company published on January 27, one can find a very impressive set of such liberties.

Refutation to the contrary

“Correspondent: We have heard about the Sergei Magnitsky case, and what strikes us most is that it appears that the money was stolen from the Russian Government. And the Hermitage Fund demonstrated documentary evidence that about a billion dollars were fraudulently stolen from the Russian tax authorities. But no one seems to be able to cope with the situation. How should we perceive this?

D. Medvedev: ... If we talk about the activities of the late Mr. Magnitsky, then ... he was never a person who fought against corruption, he was an ordinary corporate accountant or lawyer who served his boss ... Therefore, contrary to the opinion that, thanks to certain political forces ( of course, partly thanks to journalists) formed in a number of countries, this was not an activity to return any stolen funds to Russia.”

Judging by the fact that Medvedev never answered the question about the stolen billion, he sincerely believes that only professional anti-corruption fighters have the right to uncover fraudulent schemes. And if it was done by an “ordinary lawyer,” then there would be no fraud at all.

Purely prime ministerial logic

“Correspondent: But he was not allowed to return. Mr Browder was suddenly denied a visa when he tried to return.

Dmitry Medvedev: Because Russian justice is prosecuting him as a criminal. Russian justice, Russian investigative authorities, in any case, assume that he committed a crime on Russian territory.”

Well, yes, everyone is well aware that if Russian justice persecutes someone as a criminal, then the investigative authorities do everything to ensure that this person never appears in Russia. And the regular demands for the extradition of our fugitive oligarchs, and especially the story with Razvozzhaev, are all rare (or simply unknown to the prime minister) exceptions.

Rambling

“This document (Dima Yakovlev’s law. - Openspace), without a doubt, was adopted on an emotional wave associated with the relevant decisions of the American Congress, but it is neither legally nor factually connected with the Magnitsky Act.”

There may be two options here. Or Medvedev is simply not aware that symmetrical prohibitions for American officials (which he himself in the same interview calls precisely “response actions”) and the ban on the adoption of Russian orphans by Americans (that is, the “Dima Yakovlev law” itself) are contained in one and the same the same legislative act. Or the prime minister, to put it simply, lied. And it’s hard to say which of these options is worse for Medvedev.

Proof from non-existence

“Unfortunately, in our country there are a large number of cases where children adopted by American parents died, were tortured, lost their health... Unfortunately, for such crimes, American adoptive parents suffered a disproportionately insignificant punishment: it was, in fact, about public censure or very insignificant punishment for the death of a child.”

This mantra is repeated by all defenders of the anti-orphan law without exception, although the media have more than once published information and allegations about the impunity of American adoptive parents. And you can ignore these denials only if lawyer Medvedev really considers imprisonment for a term of up to 22 years to be a “minor punishment.”

You see, Yura...

“Correspondent: Was it your decision or his? (we are talking about Medvedev’s refusal to run for a second term and Putin’s nomination for president. - Openspace)

Dmitry Medvedev: Can you imagine such a battle unfolding within one political force? It is pointless. It's counterproductive. In this case, you can lose everything. I believe that we acted responsibly during this period...”

A conversation in the style of the legendary dialogue from “His Excellency’s Adjutant”: “Pal Andreich, are you a spy? “You see, Yura...” Although in the case of castling 2011, such evasion of the answer is perhaps justified. After all, any attempt to speak out on the merits inevitably drives Medvedev into a cruel zugzwang: whichever of the two answers you choose will still have a bad impact on his prospects as a political player.