15 digit number. The largest number in the world
Once I read a tragic story about a Chukchi who was taught to count and write numbers by polar explorers. The magic of numbers impressed him so much that he decided to write down absolutely all the numbers in the world in a row, starting from one, in the notebook donated by the polar explorers. The Chukchi abandons all his affairs, stops communicating even with his own wife, no longer hunts seals and seals, but writes and writes numbers in a notebook .... So a year goes by. In the end, the notebook ends and the Chukchi realizes that he was able to write down only a small part of all the numbers. He weeps bitterly and in despair burns his scribbled notebook in order to start living the simple life of a fisherman again, no longer thinking about the mysterious infinity of numbers...
We will not repeat the feat of this Chukchi and try to find the largest number, since it is enough for any number to just add one to get an even larger number. Let's ask ourselves a similar but different question: which of the numbers that have their own name is the largest?
Obviously, although the numbers themselves are infinite, they do not have very many proper names, since most of them are content with names made up of smaller numbers. So, for example, the numbers 1 and 100 have their own names "one" and "one hundred", and the name of the number 101 is already compound ("one hundred and one"). It is clear that in the final set of numbers that humanity has awarded with its own name, there must be some largest number. But what is it called and what is it equal to? Let's try to figure it out and find, in the end, this is the largest number!
|
"Short" and "long" scale
The history of the modern naming system for large numbers dates back to the middle of the 15th century, when in Italy they began to use the words "million" (literally - a big thousand) for a thousand squared, "bimillion" for a million squared and "trimillion" for a million cubed. We know about this system thanks to the French mathematician Nicolas Chuquet (Nicolas Chuquet, c. 1450 - c. 1500): in his treatise "The Science of Numbers" (Triparty en la science des nombres, 1484), he developed this idea, proposing to further use the Latin cardinal numbers (see table), adding them to the ending "-million". So, Shuke's "bimillion" turned into a billion, "trimillion" into a trillion, and a million to the fourth power became a "quadrillion".
In Schücke's system, the number 10 9 , which was between a million and a billion, did not have its own name and was simply called "a thousand million", similarly, 10 15 was called "a thousand billion", 10 21 - "a thousand trillion", etc. It was not very convenient, and in 1549 the French writer and scientist Jacques Peletier du Mans (1517-1582) proposed to name such "intermediate" numbers using the same Latin prefixes, but the ending "-billion". So, 10 9 became known as "billion", 10 15 - "billiard", 10 21 - "trillion", etc.
The Shuquet-Peletier system gradually became popular and was used throughout Europe. However, in the 17th century, an unexpected problem arose. It turned out that for some reason some scientists began to get confused and call the number 10 9 not “a billion” or “a thousand million”, but “a billion”. Soon this error quickly spread, and a paradoxical situation arose - "billion" became simultaneously a synonym for "billion" (10 9) and "million million" (10 18).
This confusion continued for a long time and led to the fact that in the USA they created their own system for naming large numbers. According to the American system, the names of numbers are built in the same way as in the Schücke system - the Latin prefix and the ending "million". However, these numbers are different. If in the Schuecke system names with the ending "million" received numbers that were powers of a million, then in the American system the ending "-million" received the powers of a thousand. That is, a thousand million (1000 3 \u003d 10 9) began to be called a "billion", 1000 4 (10 12) - "trillion", 1000 5 (10 15) - "quadrillion", etc.
The old system of naming large numbers continued to be used in conservative Great Britain and began to be called "British" all over the world, despite the fact that it was invented by the French Shuquet and Peletier. However, in the 1970s, the UK officially switched to the "American system", which led to the fact that it became somehow strange to call one system American and another British. As a result, the American system is now commonly referred to as the "short scale" and the British or Chuquet-Peletier system as the "long scale".
In order not to get confused, let's sum up the intermediate result:
|
The short naming scale is now used in the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, Ireland, Australia, Brazil and Puerto Rico. Russia, Denmark, Turkey, and Bulgaria also use the short scale, except that the number 109 is not called "billion" but "billion". The long scale continues to be used today in most other countries.
It is curious that in our country the final transition to the short scale took place only in the second half of the 20th century. So, for example, even Yakov Isidorovich Perelman (1882-1942) in his "Entertaining Arithmetic" mentions the parallel existence of two scales in the USSR. The short scale, according to Perelman, was used in everyday life and financial calculations, and the long one was used in scientific books on astronomy and physics. However, now it is wrong to use a long scale in Russia, although the numbers there are large.
But back to finding the largest number. After a decillion, the names of numbers are obtained by combining prefixes. This is how numbers such as undecillion, duodecillion, tredecillion, quattordecillion, quindecillion, sexdecillion, septemdecillion, octodecillion, novemdecillion, etc. are obtained. However, these names are no longer of interest to us, since we agreed to find the largest number with its own non-composite name.
If we turn to Latin grammar, we will find that the Romans had only three non-compound names for numbers greater than ten: viginti - "twenty", centum - "one hundred" and mille - "thousand". For numbers greater than "thousand", the Romans did not have their own names. For example, the Romans called a million (1,000,000) "decies centena milia", that is, "ten times a hundred thousand". According to Schuecke's rule, these three remaining Latin numerals give us such names for numbers as "vigintillion", "centillion" and "milleillion".
So, we found out that on the "short scale" the maximum number that has its own name and is not a composite of smaller numbers is "million" (10 3003). If a “long scale” of naming numbers were adopted in Russia, then the largest number with its own name would be “million” (10 6003).
However, there are names for even larger numbers.
Numbers outside the system
Some numbers have their own name, without any connection with the naming system using Latin prefixes. And there are many such numbers. You can, for example, remember the number e, the number "pi", a dozen, the number of the beast, etc. However, since we are now interested in large numbers, we will consider only those numbers with their own non-compound name that are more than a million.
Until the 17th century, Russia used its own system for naming numbers. Tens of thousands were called "darks," hundreds of thousands were called "legions," millions were called "leodres," tens of millions were called "ravens," and hundreds of millions were called "decks." This account up to hundreds of millions was called the “small account”, and in some manuscripts the authors also considered the “great account”, in which the same names were used for large numbers, but with a different meaning. So, "darkness" meant not ten thousand, but a thousand thousand (10 6), "legion" - the darkness of those (10 12); "leodr" - legion of legions (10 24), "raven" - leodr of leodres (10 48). For some reason, the “deck” in the great Slavic count was not called the “raven of ravens” (10 96), but only ten “ravens”, that is, 10 49 (see table).
|
The number 10100 also has its own name and was invented by a nine-year-old boy. And it was like that. In 1938, the American mathematician Edward Kasner (Edward Kasner, 1878-1955) was walking in the park with his two nephews and discussing large numbers with them. During the conversation, we talked about a number with one hundred zeros, which did not have its own name. One of his nephews, nine-year-old Milton Sirott, suggested calling this number "googol". In 1940, Edward Kasner, together with James Newman, wrote the non-fiction book Mathematics and the Imagination, where he told mathematics lovers about the googol number. Google became even more widely known in the late 1990s, thanks to the Google search engine named after it.
The name for an even larger number than googol arose in 1950 thanks to the father of computer science, Claude Shannon (Claude Elwood Shannon, 1916-2001). In his article Programming a Computer to Play Chess, he tried to estimate the number of possible variations of a chess game. According to him, each game lasts an average of 40 moves, and on each move the player chooses an average of 30 options, which corresponds to 900 40 (approximately equal to 10 118) game options. This work became widely known, and this number became known as the "Shannon number".
In the famous Buddhist treatise Jaina Sutra, dating back to 100 BC, the number "asankheya" is found equal to 10 140. It is believed that this number is equal to the number of cosmic cycles required to gain nirvana.
Nine-year-old Milton Sirotta entered the history of mathematics not only by inventing the number googol, but also by suggesting another number at the same time - “googolplex”, which is equal to 10 to the power of “googol”, that is, one with a googol of zeros.
Two more numbers larger than the googolplex were proposed by the South African mathematician Stanley Skewes (1899-1988) when proving the Riemann hypothesis. The first number, which later came to be called "Skeuse's first number", is equal to e to the extent e to the extent e to the power of 79, that is e e e 79 = 10 10 8.85.10 33 . However, the "second Skewes number" is even larger and is 10 10 10 1000 .
Obviously, the more degrees in the number of degrees, the more difficult it is to write down numbers and understand their meaning when reading. Moreover, it is possible to come up with such numbers (and they, by the way, have already been invented), when the degrees of degrees simply do not fit on the page. Yes, what a page! They won't even fit in a book the size of the entire universe! In this case, the question arises how to write down such numbers. The problem is, fortunately, resolvable, and mathematicians have developed several principles for writing such numbers. True, each mathematician who asked this problem came up with his own way of writing, which led to the existence of several unrelated ways to write large numbers - these are the notations of Knuth, Conway, Steinhaus, etc. We will now have to deal with some of them.
Other notations
In 1938, the same year that nine-year-old Milton Sirotta came up with the googol and googolplex numbers, Hugo Dionizy Steinhaus, 1887-1972, a book about entertaining mathematics, The Mathematical Kaleidoscope, was published in Poland. This book became very popular, went through many editions and was translated into many languages, including English and Russian. In it, Steinhaus, discussing large numbers, offers a simple way to write them using three geometric shapes - a triangle, a square and a circle:
"n in a triangle" means " n n»,
« n square" means " n in n triangles",
« n in a circle" means " n in n squares."
Explaining this way of writing, Steinhaus comes up with the number "mega" equal to 2 in a circle and shows that it is equal to 256 in a "square" or 256 in 256 triangles. To calculate it, you need to raise 256 to the power of 256, raise the resulting number 3.2.10 616 to the power of 3.2.10 616, then raise the resulting number to the power of the resulting number, and so on to raise to the power of 256 times. For example, the calculator in MS Windows cannot calculate due to overflow 256 even in two triangles. Approximately this huge number is 10 10 2.10 619 .
Having determined the number "mega", Steinhaus invites readers to independently evaluate another number - "medzon", equal to 3 in a circle. In another edition of the book, Steinhaus instead of the medzone proposes to estimate an even larger number - “megiston”, equal to 10 in a circle. Following Steinhaus, I will also recommend that readers take a break from this text for a while and try to write these numbers themselves using ordinary powers in order to feel their gigantic magnitude.
However, there are names for about higher numbers. So, the Canadian mathematician Leo Moser (Leo Moser, 1921-1970) finalized the Steinhaus notation, which was limited by the fact that if it were necessary to write down numbers much larger than a megiston, then difficulties and inconveniences would arise, since one would have to draw many circles one inside another. Moser suggested drawing not circles after squares, but pentagons, then hexagons, and so on. He also proposed a formal notation for these polygons, so that numbers could be written without drawing complex patterns. Moser notation looks like this:
« n triangle" = n n = n;
« n in a square" = n = « n in n triangles" = nn;
« n in a pentagon" = n = « n in n squares" = nn;
« n in k+ 1-gon" = n[k+1] = " n in n k-gons" = n[k]n.
Thus, according to Moser's notation, the Steinhausian "mega" is written as 2, "medzon" as 3, and "megiston" as 10. In addition, Leo Moser suggested calling a polygon with a number of sides equal to mega - "megagon". And he proposed the number "2 in megagon", that is, 2. This number became known as the Moser number or simply as "moser".
But even "moser" is not the largest number. So, the largest number ever used in a mathematical proof is "Graham's number". This number was first used by the American mathematician Ronald Graham in 1977 when proving one estimate in Ramsey theory, namely when calculating the dimensions of certain n-dimensional bichromatic hypercubes. Graham's number gained fame only after the story about it in Martin Gardner's 1989 book "From Penrose Mosaics to Secure Ciphers".
To explain how large the Graham number is, one has to explain another way of writing large numbers, introduced by Donald Knuth in 1976. American professor Donald Knuth came up with the concept of superdegree, which he proposed to write with arrows pointing up:
I think that everything is clear, so let's get back to Graham's number. Ronald Graham proposed the so-called G-numbers:
Here is the number G 64 and is called the Graham number (it is often denoted simply as G). This number is the largest known number in the world used in a mathematical proof, and is even listed in the Guinness Book of Records.
And finally
Having written this article, I can not resist the temptation and come up with my own number. Let this number be called stasplex» and will be equal to the number G 100 . Memorize it, and when your children ask what is the largest number in the world, tell them that this number is called stasplex.
Partner news
June 17th, 2015
“I see clumps of vague numbers lurking out there in the dark, behind the little spot of light that the mind candle gives. They whisper to each other; talking about who knows what. Perhaps they do not like us very much for capturing their little brothers with our minds. Or maybe they just lead an unambiguous numerical way of life, out there, beyond our understanding.''
Douglas Ray
We continue ours. Today we have numbers...
Sooner or later, everyone is tormented by the question, what is the largest number. A child's question can be answered in a million. What's next? Trillion. And even further? In fact, the answer to the question of what are the largest numbers is simple. It is simply worth adding one to the largest number, as it will no longer be the largest. This procedure can be continued indefinitely.
But if you ask yourself: what is the largest number that exists, and what is its own name?
Now we all know...
There are two systems for naming numbers - American and English.
The American system is built quite simply. All the names of large numbers are built like this: at the beginning there is a Latin ordinal number, and at the end the suffix -million is added to it. The exception is the name "million" which is the name of the number one thousand (lat. mille) and the magnifying suffix -million (see table). So the numbers are obtained - trillion, quadrillion, quintillion, sextillion, septillion, octillion, nonillion and decillion. The American system is used in the USA, Canada, France and Russia. You can find out the number of zeros in a number written in the American system using the simple formula 3 x + 3 (where x is a Latin numeral).
The English naming system is the most common in the world. It is used, for example, in Great Britain and Spain, as well as in most of the former English and Spanish colonies. The names of numbers in this system are built like this: like this: a suffix -million is added to the Latin numeral, the next number (1000 times larger) is built according to the principle - the same Latin numeral, but the suffix is -billion. That is, after a trillion in the English system comes a trillion, and only then a quadrillion, followed by a quadrillion, and so on. Thus, a quadrillion according to the English and American systems are completely different numbers! You can find out the number of zeros in a number written in the English system and ending with the suffix -million using the formula 6 x + 3 (where x is a Latin numeral) and using the formula 6 x + 6 for numbers ending in -billion.
Only the number billion (10 9 ) passed from the English system into the Russian language, which, nevertheless, would be more correct to call it the way the Americans call it - a billion, since we have adopted the American system. But who in our country does something according to the rules! ;-) By the way, sometimes the word trillion is also used in Russian (you can see for yourself by running a search in Google or Yandex) and it means, apparently, 1000 trillion, i.e. quadrillion.
In addition to numbers written using Latin prefixes in the American or English system, the so-called off-system numbers are also known, i.e. numbers that have their own names without any Latin prefixes. There are several such numbers, but I will talk about them in more detail a little later.
Let's go back to writing using Latin numerals. It would seem that they can write numbers to infinity, but this is not entirely true. Now I will explain why. Let's first see how the numbers from 1 to 10 33 are called:
And so, now the question arises, what next. What is a decillion? In principle, it is possible, of course, by combining prefixes to generate such monsters as: andecillion, duodecillion, tredecillion, quattordecillion, quindecillion, sexdecillion, septemdecillion, octodecillion and novemdecillion, but these will already be compound names, and we were interested in our own names numbers. Therefore, according to this system, in addition to those indicated above, you can still get only three - vigintillion (from lat.viginti- twenty), centillion (from lat.percent- one hundred) and a million (from lat.mille- one thousand). The Romans did not have more than a thousand of their own names for numbers (all numbers over a thousand were composite). For example, a million (1,000,000) Romans calledcentena miliai.e. ten hundred thousand. And now, actually, the table:
Thus, according to a similar system, numbers are greater than 10 3003 , which would have its own, non-compound name, it is impossible to get! But nevertheless, numbers greater than a million are known - these are the very non-systemic numbers. Finally, let's talk about them.
The smallest such number is a myriad (it is even in Dahl's dictionary), which means a hundred hundreds, that is, 10,000. True, this word is outdated and practically not used, but it is curious that the word "myriad" is widely used, which does not mean a certain number at all, but an uncountable, uncountable set of something. It is believed that the word myriad (English myriad) came to European languages from ancient Egypt.
There are different opinions about the origin of this number. Some believe that it originated in Egypt, while others believe that it was born only in ancient Greece. Be that as it may, in fact, the myriad gained fame precisely thanks to the Greeks. Myriad was the name for 10,000, and there were no names for numbers over ten thousand. However, in the note "Psammit" (i.e., the calculus of sand), Archimedes showed how one can systematically build and name arbitrarily large numbers. In particular, placing 10,000 (myriad) grains of sand in a poppy seed, he finds that in the Universe (a ball with a diameter of a myriad of Earth diameters) would fit (in our notation) no more than 10 63
grains of sand. It is curious that modern calculations of the number of atoms in the visible universe lead to the number 10 67
(only a myriad of times more). The names of the numbers Archimedes suggested are as follows:
1 myriad = 10 4 .
1 di-myriad = myriad myriad = 10 8
.
1 tri-myriad = di-myriad di-myriad = 10 16
.
1 tetra-myriad = three-myriad three-myriad = 10 32
.
etc.
Googol (from the English googol) is the number ten to the hundredth power, that is, one with one hundred zeros. The "googol" was first written about in 1938 in the article "New Names in Mathematics" in the January issue of the journal Scripta Mathematica by the American mathematician Edward Kasner. According to him, his nine-year-old nephew Milton Sirotta suggested calling a large number "googol". This number became well-known thanks to the search engine named after him. Google. Note that "Google" is a trademark and googol is a number.
Edward Kasner.
On the Internet, you can often find mention that - but this is not so ...
In the well-known Buddhist treatise Jaina Sutra, dating back to 100 BC, the number Asankheya (from the Chinese. asentzi- incalculable), equal to 10 140. It is believed that this number is equal to the number of cosmic cycles required to gain nirvana.
Googolplex (English) googolplex) - a number also invented by Kasner with his nephew and meaning one with a googol of zeros, that is, 10 10100 . Here is how Kasner himself describes this "discovery":
Words of wisdom are spoken by children at least as often as by scientists. The name "googol" was invented by a child (Dr. Kasner"s nine-year-old nephew) who was asked to think up a name for a very big number, namely, 1 with a hundred zeros after it. He was very certain that this number was not infinite, and therefore equally certain that it had to have a name. a googol, but is still finite, as the inventor of the name was quick to point out.
Mathematics and the Imagination(1940) by Kasner and James R. Newman.
Even larger than the googolplex number, Skewes' number was proposed by Skewes in 1933 (Skewes. J. London Math. soc. 8, 277-283, 1933.) in proving the Riemann conjecture concerning primes. It means e to the extent e to the extent e to the power of 79, i.e. ee e 79 . Later, Riele (te Riele, H. J. J. "On the Sign of the Difference P(x)-Li(x)." Math. Comput. 48, 323-328, 1987) reduced Skuse's number to ee 27/4 , which is approximately equal to 8.185 10 370 . It is clear that since the value of the Skewes number depends on the number e, then it is not an integer, so we will not consider it, otherwise we would have to recall other non-natural numbers - the number pi, the number e, etc.
But it should be noted that there is a second Skewes number, which in mathematics is denoted as Sk2 , which is even larger than the first Skewes number (Sk1 ). Skuse's second number, was introduced by J. Skuse in the same article to denote a number for which the Riemann hypothesis is not valid. Sk2 is 1010 10103 , i.e. 1010 101000 .
As you understand, the more degrees there are, the more difficult it is to understand which of the numbers is greater. For example, looking at the Skewes numbers, without special calculations, it is almost impossible to understand which of these two numbers is larger. Thus, for superlarge numbers, it becomes inconvenient to use powers. Moreover, you can come up with such numbers (and they have already been invented) when the degrees of degrees simply do not fit on the page. Yes, what a page! They won't even fit into a book the size of the entire universe! In this case, the question arises how to write them down. The problem, as you understand, is solvable, and mathematicians have developed several principles for writing such numbers. True, every mathematician who asked this problem came up with his own way of writing, which led to the existence of several, unrelated, ways to write numbers - these are the notations of Knuth, Conway, Steinhaus, etc.
Consider the notation of Hugo Stenhaus (H. Steinhaus. Mathematical Snapshots, 3rd edn. 1983), which is quite simple. Steinhouse suggested writing large numbers inside geometric shapes - a triangle, a square and a circle:
Steinhouse came up with two new super-large numbers. He called the number - Mega, and the number - Megiston.
The mathematician Leo Moser refined Stenhouse's notation, which was limited by the fact that if it was necessary to write numbers much larger than a megiston, difficulties and inconveniences arose, since many circles had to be drawn one inside the other. Moser suggested drawing not circles after squares, but pentagons, then hexagons, and so on. He also proposed a formal notation for these polygons, so that numbers could be written without drawing complex patterns. Moser notation looks like this:
Thus, according to Moser's notation, Steinhouse's mega is written as 2, and megiston as 10. In addition, Leo Moser suggested calling a polygon with the number of sides equal to mega - megagon. And he proposed the number "2 in Megagon", that is, 2. This number became known as Moser's number or simply as moser.
But the moser is not the largest number. The largest number ever used in a mathematical proof is the limiting value known as Graham's number, first used in 1977 in the proof of one estimate in Ramsey theory. It is associated with bichromatic hypercubes and cannot be expressed without the special 64-level system of special mathematical symbols introduced by Knuth in 1976.
Unfortunately, the number written in the Knuth notation cannot be translated into the Moser notation. Therefore, this system will also have to be explained. In principle, there is nothing complicated in it either. Donald Knuth (yes, yes, this is the same Knuth who wrote The Art of Programming and created the TeX editor) came up with the concept of superpower, which he proposed to write with arrows pointing up:
In general, it looks like this:
I think that everything is clear, so let's get back to Graham's number. Graham proposed the so-called G-numbers:
- G1 = 3..3, where the number of superdegree arrows is 33.
- G2 = ..3, where the number of superdegree arrows is equal to G1 .
- G3 = ..3, where the number of superdegree arrows is equal to G2 .
- G63 = ..3, where the number of superpower arrows is G62 .
The number G63 became known as the Graham number (it is often denoted simply as G). This number is the largest known number in the world and is even listed in the Guinness Book of Records. And here
In everyday life, most people operate with fairly small numbers. Tens, hundreds, thousands, very rarely - millions, almost never - billions. Approximately such numbers are limited to the usual idea of \u200b\u200ba person about quantity or magnitude. Almost everyone has heard about trillions, but few have ever used them in any calculations.
What are giant numbers?
Meanwhile, the numbers denoting the powers of a thousand have been known to people for a long time. In Russia and many other countries, a simple and logical notation system is used:
One thousand;
Million;
Billion;
Trillion;
quadrillion;
Quintillion;
Sextillion;
Septillion;
Octillion;
Quintillion;
Decillion.
In this system, each next number is obtained by multiplying the previous one by a thousand. A billion is commonly referred to as a billion.
Many adults can accurately write such numbers as a million - 1,000,000 and a billion - 1,000,000,000. It’s already more difficult with a trillion, but almost everyone can handle it - 1,000,000,000,000. And then the territory unknown to many begins.
Getting to know the big numbers
However, there is nothing complicated, the main thing is to understand the system for the formation of large numbers and the principle of naming. As already mentioned, each next number exceeds the previous one by a thousand times. This means that in order to correctly write the next number in ascending order, you need to add three more zeros to the previous one. That is, a million has 6 zeros, a billion has 9, a trillion has 12, a quadrillion has 15, and a quintillion has 18.
You can also deal with the names if you wish. The word "million" comes from the Latin "mille", which means "more than a thousand". The following numbers were formed by adding the Latin words "bi" (two), "three" (three), "quadro" (four), etc.
Now let's try to imagine these numbers visually. Most people have a pretty good idea of the difference between a thousand and a million. Everyone understands that a million rubles is good, but a billion is more. Much more. Also, everyone has an idea that a trillion is something absolutely immense. But how much is a trillion more than a billion? How huge is it?
For many, beyond a billion, the concept of "the mind is incomprehensible" begins. Indeed, a billion kilometers or a trillion - the difference is not very big in the sense that such a distance still cannot be covered in a lifetime. A billion rubles or a trillion is also not very different, because you still can’t earn that kind of money in a lifetime. But let's count a little, connecting the fantasy.
Housing stock in Russia and four football fields as examples
For every person on earth, there is a land area measuring 100x200 meters. That's about four football fields. But if there are not 7 billion people, but seven trillion, then everyone will get only a piece of land 4x5 meters. Four football fields against the area of the front garden in front of the entrance - this is the ratio of a billion to a trillion.
In absolute terms, the picture is also impressive.
If you take a trillion bricks, you can build more than 30 million one-story houses with an area of 100 square meters. That is about 3 billion square meters of private development. This is comparable to the total housing stock of the Russian Federation.
If you build ten-story houses, you will get about 2.5 million houses, that is, 100 million two-three-room apartments, about 7 billion square meters of housing. This is 2.5 times more than the entire housing stock in Russia.
In a word, there will not be a trillion bricks in all of Russia.
One quadrillion student notebooks will cover the entire territory of Russia with a double layer. And one quintillion of the same notebooks will cover the entire land with a layer 40 centimeters thick. If you manage to get a sextillion notebooks, then the entire planet, including the oceans, will be under a layer 100 meters thick.
Count to a decillion
Let's count some more. For example, a matchbox magnified a thousand times would be the size of a sixteen-story building. An increase of a million times will give a "box", which is larger than St. Petersburg in area. Magnified a billion times, the boxes won't fit on our planet. On the contrary, the Earth will fit in such a "box" 25 times!
An increase in the box gives an increase in its volume. It will be almost impossible to imagine such volumes with a further increase. For ease of perception, let's try to increase not the object itself, but its quantity, and arrange the matchboxes in space. This will make it easier to navigate. A quintillion of boxes laid out in one row would stretch beyond the star α Centauri by 9 trillion kilometers.
Another thousandfold magnification (sextillion) will allow matchboxes lined up to block our entire Milky Way galaxy in the transverse direction. A septillion matchboxes would span 50 quintillion kilometers. Light can travel this distance in 5,260,000 years. And the boxes laid out in two rows would stretch to the Andromeda galaxy.
There are only three numbers left: octillion, nonillion and decillion. You have to exercise your imagination. An octillion of boxes forms a continuous line of 50 sextillion kilometers. That's over five billion light years. Not every telescope mounted on one edge of such an object would be able to see its opposite edge.
Do we count further? A nonillion matchboxes would fill the entire space of the part of the Universe known to mankind with an average density of 6 pieces per cubic meter. By earthly standards, it seems to be not very much - 36 matchboxes in the back of a standard Gazelle. But a nonillion matchboxes will have a mass billions of times greater than the mass of all material objects in the known universe combined.
Decillion. The magnitude, and rather even the majesty of this giant from the world of numbers, is hard to imagine. Just one example - six decillion boxes would no longer fit in the entire part of the universe accessible to mankind for observation.
Even more strikingly, the majesty of this number is visible if you do not multiply the number of boxes, but increase the object itself. A matchbox enlarged by a factor of a decillion would contain the entire known part of the universe 20 trillion times. It is impossible to even imagine such a thing.
Small calculations showed how huge the numbers known to mankind for several centuries are. In modern mathematics, numbers many times greater than a decillion are known, but they are used only in complex mathematical calculations. Only professional mathematicians have to deal with such numbers.
The most famous (and smallest) of these numbers is the googol, denoted by one followed by one hundred zeros. A googol is greater than the total number of elementary particles in the visible part of the Universe. This makes the googol an abstract number that has little practical use.
Many are interested in questions about how large numbers are called and what number is the largest in the world. These interesting questions will be dealt with in this article.
Story
The southern and eastern Slavic peoples used alphabetic numbering to write numbers, and only those letters that are in the Greek alphabet. Above the letter, which denoted the number, they put a special “titlo” icon. The numerical values of the letters increased in the same order in which the letters followed in the Greek alphabet (in the Slavic alphabet, the order of the letters was slightly different). In Russia, Slavic numbering was preserved until the end of the 17th century, and under Peter I they switched to “Arabic numbering”, which we still use today.
The names of the numbers also changed. So, until the 15th century, the number “twenty” was designated as “two ten” (two tens), and then it was reduced for faster pronunciation. The number 40 until the 15th century was called “fourty”, then it was replaced by the word “forty”, which originally denoted a bag containing 40 squirrel or sable skins. The name "million" appeared in Italy in 1500. It was formed by adding an augmentative suffix to the number "mille" (thousand). Later, this name came to Russian.
In the old (XVIII century) "Arithmetic" of Magnitsky, there is a table of names of numbers, brought to the "quadrillion" (10 ^ 24, according to the system through 6 digits). Perelman Ya.I. in the book "Entertaining Arithmetic" the names of large numbers of that time are given, somewhat different from today: septillion (10 ^ 42), octalion (10 ^ 48), nonalion (10 ^ 54), decalion (10 ^ 60), endecalion (10 ^ 66), dodecalion (10 ^ 72) and it is written that "there are no further names."
Ways to build names of large numbers
There are 2 main ways to name large numbers:
- American system, which is used in the USA, Russia, France, Canada, Italy, Turkey, Greece, Brazil. The names of large numbers are built quite simply: at the beginning there is a Latin ordinal number, and the suffix “-million” is added to it at the end. The exception is the number "million", which is the name of the number one thousand (mille) and the magnifying suffix "-million". The number of zeros in a number that is written in the American system can be found by the formula: 3x + 3, where x is a Latin ordinal number
- English system most common in the world, it is used in Germany, Spain, Hungary, Poland, Czech Republic, Denmark, Sweden, Finland, Portugal. The names of numbers according to this system are built as follows: the suffix “-million” is added to the Latin numeral, the next number (1000 times larger) is the same Latin numeral, but the suffix “-billion” is added. The number of zeros in a number that is written in the English system and ends with the suffix “-million” can be found by the formula: 6x + 3, where x is a Latin ordinal number. The number of zeros in numbers ending in the suffix “-billion” can be found by the formula: 6x + 6, where x is a Latin ordinal number.
From the English system, only the word billion passed into the Russian language, which is still more correct to call it the way the Americans call it - billion (since the American system for naming numbers is used in Russian).
In addition to numbers that are written in the American or English system using Latin prefixes, non-systemic numbers are known that have their own names without Latin prefixes.
Proper names for large numbers
| Number | Latin numeral | Name | Practical value | |
| 10 1 | 10 | ten | Number of fingers on 2 hands | |
| 10 2 | 100 | hundred | Approximately half the number of all states on Earth | |
| 10 3 | 1000 | one thousand | Approximate number of days in 3 years | |
| 10 6 | 1000 000 | unus (I) | million | 5 times more than the number of drops in a 10-litre. bucket of water |
| 10 9 | 1000 000 000 | duo(II) | billion (billion) | Approximate population of India |
| 10 12 | 1000 000 000 000 | tres(III) | trillion | |
| 10 15 | 1000 000 000 000 000 | quattor(IV) | quadrillion | 1/30 of the length of a parsec in meters |
| 10 18 | quinque (V) | quintillion | 1/18 of the number of grains from the legendary award to the inventor of chess | |
| 10 21 | sex (VI) | sextillion | 1/6 of the mass of the planet Earth in tons | |
| 10 24 | septem(VII) | septillion | Number of molecules in 37.2 liters of air | |
| 10 27 | octo(VIII) | octillion | Half the mass of Jupiter in kilograms | |
| 10 30 | novem(IX) | quintillion | 1/5 of all microorganisms on the planet | |
| 10 33 | decem(X) | decillion | Half the mass of the Sun in grams | |
- Vigintillion (from lat. viginti - twenty) - 10 63
- Centillion (from Latin centum - one hundred) - 10 303
- Milleillion (from Latin mille - thousand) - 10 3003
For numbers greater than a thousand, the Romans did not have their own names (all the names of numbers below were composite).
Compound names for large numbers
In addition to their own names, for numbers greater than 10 33 you can get compound names by combining prefixes.
Compound names for large numbers
| Number | Latin numeral | Name | Practical value |
| 10 36 | undecim (XI) | andecillion | |
| 10 39 | duodecim(XII) | duodecillion | |
| 10 42 | tredecim(XIII) | tredecillion | 1/100 of the number of air molecules on Earth |
| 10 45 | quattuordecim (XIV) | quattordecillion | |
| 10 48 | quindecim (XV) | quindecillion | |
| 10 51 | sedecim (XVI) | sexdecillion | |
| 10 54 | septendecim (XVII) | septemdecillion | |
| 10 57 | octodecillion | So many elementary particles in the sun | |
| 10 60 | novemdecillion | ||
| 10 63 | viginti (XX) | vigintillion | |
| 10 66 | unus et viginti (XXI) | anvigintillion | |
| 10 69 | duo et viginti (XXII) | duovigintillion | |
| 10 72 | tres et viginti (XXIII) | trevigintillion | |
| 10 75 | quattorvigintillion | ||
| 10 78 | quinvigintillion | ||
| 10 81 | sexvigintillion | So many elementary particles in the universe | |
| 10 84 | septemvigintillion | ||
| 10 87 | octovigintillion | ||
| 10 90 | novemvigintillion | ||
| 10 93 | triginta (XXX) | trigintillion | |
| 10 96 | antirigintillion |
- 10 123 - quadragintillion
- 10 153 - quinquagintillion
- 10 183 - sexagintillion
- 10 213 - septuagintillion
- 10 243 - octogintillion
- 10 273 - nonagintillion
- 10 303 - centillion
Further names can be obtained by direct or reverse order of Latin numerals (it is not known how to correctly):
- 10 306 - ancentillion or centunillion
- 10 309 - duocentillion or centduollion
- 10 312 - trecentillion or centtrillion
- 10 315 - quattorcentillion or centquadrillion
- 10 402 - tretrigintacentillion or centtretrigintillion
The second spelling is more in line with the construction of numerals in Latin and avoids ambiguities (for example, in the number trecentillion, which in the first spelling is both 10903 and 10312).
- 10 603 - decentillion
- 10 903 - trecentillion
- 10 1203 - quadringentillion
- 10 1503 - quingentillion
- 10 1803 - sescentillion
- 10 2103 - septingentillion
- 10 2403 - octingentillion
- 10 2703 - nongentillion
- 10 3003 - million
- 10 6003 - duomillion
- 10 9003 - tremillion
- 10 15003 - quinquemillion
- 10 308760 -ion
- 10 3000003 - miamimiliaillion
- 10 6000003 - duomyamimiliaillion
myriad– 10,000. The name is obsolete and practically never used. However, the word “myriad” is widely used, which means not a certain number, but an uncountable, uncountable set of something.
googol ( English . googol) — 10 100 . The American mathematician Edward Kasner first wrote about this number in 1938 in the journal Scripta Mathematica in the article “New Names in Mathematics”. According to him, his 9-year-old nephew Milton Sirotta suggested calling the number this way. This number became public knowledge thanks to the Google search engine, named after him.
Asankheyya(from Chinese asentzi - innumerable) - 10 1 4 0. This number is found in the famous Buddhist treatise Jaina Sutra (100 BC). It is believed that this number is equal to the number of cosmic cycles required to gain nirvana.
Googolplex ( English . Googolplex) — 10^10^100. This number was also invented by Edward Kasner and his nephew, it means one with a googol of zeros.
Skewes number (Skewes' number Sk 1) means e to the power of e to the power of e to the power of 79, i.e. e^e^e^79. This number was proposed by Skewes in 1933 (Skewes. J. London Math. Soc. 8, 277-283, 1933.) in proving the Riemann conjecture concerning prime numbers. Later, Riele (te Riele, H. J. J. "On the Sign of the Difference P(x)-Li(x"). Math. Comput. 48, 323-328, 1987) reduced Skuse's number to e^e^27/4, which is approximately equal to 8.185 10^370. However, this number is not an integer, so it is not included in the table of large numbers.
Second Skewes Number (Sk2) equals 10^10^10^10^3, which is 10^10^10^1000. This number was introduced by J. Skuse in the same article to denote the number up to which the Riemann hypothesis is valid.
For super-large numbers, it is inconvenient to use powers, so there are several ways to write numbers - the notations of Knuth, Conway, Steinhouse, etc.
Hugo Steinhaus suggested writing large numbers inside geometric shapes (triangle, square and circle).
The mathematician Leo Moser finalized Steinhaus's notation, suggesting that after the squares, draw not circles, but pentagons, then hexagons, and so on. Moser also proposed a formal notation for these polygons, so that the numbers could be written without drawing complex patterns.
Steinhouse came up with two new super-large numbers: Mega and Megiston. In Moser notation, they are written as follows: Mega – 2, Megiston– 10. Leo Moser suggested also calling a polygon with the number of sides equal to mega – megagon, and also suggested the number "2 in Megagon" - 2. The last number is known as Moser's number or just like Moser.
There are numbers bigger than Moser. The largest number that has been used in a mathematical proof is number Graham(Graham's number). It was first used in 1977 in the proof of one estimate in the Ramsey theory. This number is associated with bichromatic hypercubes and cannot be expressed without a special 64-level system of special mathematical symbols introduced by Knuth in 1976. Donald Knuth (who wrote The Art of Programming and created the TeX editor) came up with the concept of superpower, which he proposed to write with arrows pointing up:
In general
Graham suggested G-numbers:
The number G 63 is called the Graham number, often simply referred to as G. This number is the largest known number in the world and is listed in the Guinness Book of Records.
Once in childhood, we learned to count to ten, then to a hundred, then to a thousand. So what is the biggest number you know? A thousand, a million, a billion, a trillion ... And then? Petallion, someone will say, will be wrong, because he confuses the SI prefix with a completely different concept.
In fact, the question is not as simple as it seems at first glance. First, we are talking about naming the names of the powers of a thousand. And here, the first nuance that many people know from American films is that they call our billion a billion.
Further more, there are two types of scales - long and short. In our country, a short scale is used. In this scale, at each step, the mantis increases by three orders of magnitude, i.e. multiply by a thousand - a thousand 10 3, a million 10 6, a billion / billion 10 9, a trillion (10 12). In the long scale, after a billion 10 9 comes a billion 10 12, and in the future the mantisa already increases by six orders of magnitude, and the next number, which is called a trillion, already stands for 10 18.
But back to our native scale. Want to know what comes after a trillion? Please:
10 3 thousand
10 6 million
10 9 billion
10 12 trillion
10 15 quadrillion
10 18 quintillion
10 21 sextillion
10 24 septillion
10 27 octillion
10 30 nonillion
10 33 decillion
10 36 undecillion
10 39 dodecillion
10 42 tredecillion
10 45 quattuordecillion
10 48 quindecillion
10 51 sedecillion
10 54 septdecillion
10 57 duodevigintillion
10 60 undevigintillion
10 63 vigintillion
10 66 anvigintillion
10 69 duovigintillion
10 72 trevigintillion
10 75 quattorvigintillion
10 78 quinvintillion
10 81 sexwigintillion
10 84 septemvigintillion
10 87 octovigintillion
10 90 novemvigintillion
10 93 trigintillion
10 96 antirigintillion
On this number, our short scale does not stand up, and in the future, the mantissa increases progressively.
10 100 googol
10 123 quadragintillion
10 153 quinquagintillion
10,183 sexagintillion
10 213 septuagintillion
10,243 octogintillion
10,273 nonagintillion
10 303 centillion
10 306 centunillion
10 309 centduollion
10 312 centtrillion
10 315 centquadrillion
10 402 centtretrigintillion
10,603 decentillion
10 903 trecentillion
10 1203 quadringentillion
10 1503 quingentillion
10 1803 sescentillion
10 2103 septingentillion
10 2403 octingentillion
10 2703 nongentillion
10 3003 million
10 6003 duomillion
10 9003 tremillion
10 3000003 miamimiliaillion
10 6000003 duomyamimiliaillion
10 10 100 googolplex
10 3×n+3 zillion
googol(from the English googol) - a number, in the decimal number system, represented by a unit with 100 zeros:
10 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000
In 1938, the American mathematician Edward Kasner (Edward Kasner, 1878-1955) was walking in the park with his two nephews and discussing large numbers with them. During the conversation, we talked about a number with one hundred zeros, which did not have its own name. One of his nephews, nine-year-old Milton Sirotta, suggested calling this number "googol". In 1940, Edward Kasner, together with James Newman, wrote the popular science book "Mathematics and Imagination" ("New Names in Mathematics"), where he taught mathematics lovers about the googol number.
The term "googol" has no serious theoretical and practical significance. Kasner proposed it to illustrate the difference between an unimaginably large number and infinity, and for this purpose the term is sometimes used in the teaching of mathematics.
Googolplex(from the English googolplex) - a number represented by a unit with a googol of zeros. Like googol, the term googolplex was coined by American mathematician Edward Kasner and his nephew Milton Sirotta.
The number of googols is greater than the number of all particles in the part of the universe known to us, which ranges from 1079 to 1081. Thus, the number of googolplexes, consisting of (googol + 1) digits, cannot be written in the classical “decimal” form, even if all matter in the known turn parts of the universe into paper and ink or into computer disk space.
Zillion(eng. zillion) is a common name for very large numbers.
This term does not have a strict mathematical definition. In 1996, Conway (English J. H. Conway) and Guy (English R. K. Guy) in their book English. The Book of Numbers defined a zillion of the nth power as 10 3×n+3 for the short scale number naming system.
Two heads and six legs; four walk, and two lie still
Self-esteem - what is it: concept, structure, types and levels
Cassandra's Path, or Pasta Adventures War on Earth and Underground