What was on earth before the appearance of man. Highly developed civilizations on earth before the appearance of people

Question: Please tell us about the events of three hundred years ago. There was a version of a nuclear strike on the ground, which literally bombarded major cities around the world. In particular, it is not clear who and how built St. Petersburg, because it is known that during the time of Peter the Great, the fleet was built with axes, but how could they build such a city? There was a version that this city was simply dug out in the time of Peter, and not built (modern architects have no idea what construction technologies were used), that they simply built on old buildings that are below ground level. They dig up the foundations of modern buildings, and under them a whole floor is found, underground! What actually happened? Why do ancient buildings look like they have grown into the ground? Why do you have to dig up ancient cities that are completely buried under the ground, what happened that they were so covered up? And also nowhere is there a forest older than 250 years, with only rare exceptions, in some parts of the world. It seems that 300 years ago there was no forest on the planet.
I will answer this man. Of course, he is a very attentive, interested in everything person (well, not in everyone, of course), namely in this case: you see how that some city was bombarded earlier, and already a new city was built on the stencil of this city, which is called St. Petersburg or Peter, Petersburg; as well as the forest - no older than two hundred and fifty, or maybe up to three hundred years (with a stretch). And what happened before - was the Earth really bald (and so on)?

You know, this question is not publicistic, that is, not for disclosure. He is what he is, and I (I would say “have no right”) have, of course, any right, but in this case it is too early to start talking about it, too early.

Still, today we need to plant trees and think about the genetics of the Earth, and not about what happened three hundred, or four hundred, or maybe a thousand, maybe years ago: this is exactly a nuclear war, or something like that, or a meteorite came from somewhere - then from heaven and destroyed everything, and so on, or there was a big fire and everything burned down. Well, how then did people survive, and in such numbers? Well, and a lot of other things.

Therefore, one question pulls another and a third, and there will already come out not one question, but dozens, and all of them will eventually turn out to be questions for future answers, that is, more and more questions will come, and many, many, many, and therefore I will end here and I will not talk about it.

Uruslan (8.5 thousand years, Knowledge of the Universe)
————————————————————————
We invite you to ask interesting and pressing questions to people who have gone to Eternity: vk.com/topic-89272372_32051545

One of the versions about what happened 200 years ago
Looked at gygl-maps, a very interesting picture emerges.
First, I looked at the traces of nuclear tests at the test site in the Nevada desert, USA. Satellite photos below.
The diameter of the tracks is from 100 to 400 meters. Tests both underground and air.

And then he walked along the Nile Delta, across the Sahara, Russia and was surprised at what he saw.

1.
Footprint from an event near the Nile, Marawi pyramid area, damage to the pyramids from footprints similar to footprints in the Nevada desert.

In the same area, several tens of kilometers to the southeast.
The diameter of a large funnel is 20 km, and 2 smaller funnels are 10 km

In the same area, a few tens of kilometers to the southeast

More Egypt, diameter 6 km

And also Egypt, diameter 10 km

The site was bombed as if there were many military installations or large cities.
Yes, and traces of 3-10 km in diameter indicate explosions with a capacity of more than 1 megaton. Nevada with its 100-200 meter craters looks pale.

Now Russia:

The same traces as in Egypt. An allusion to the standard charges of the same power, which were used for the bombardment.
In total, 4 funnels can be observed, 2 10 km each, one 3 km and one smaller, as in Nevada. There was also some kind of large military facility or several large cities.

The standard dimensions of funnels are striking: 10, 6, 3 km. Which practically excludes the natural origin of these traces. Conversely, it confirms that these are traces of the use of standard ammunition of the same power.

And now the trace of a very large explosion in the Sahara desert. The diameter of the funnel is 40 km. I even find it difficult to calculate the power of the ammunition that left such a mark.

There are quite a lot of such traces all over the world. If you look at the footprints from Nevada, it is almost impossible to say that the footprints from Egypt, Russia, Western Sahara are several thousand years old. Forests in places where traces of the bombing are visible on the territory of Russia are solid birch. This is another confirmation that this place was a wasteland or field. It is in such places that birch forests appear. That is, after the bombing of the forest, everything burned down, and a birch forest appeared on the site of the conflagration.

Who bombed us so thoroughly and with what?

Here is a satellite photograph of the site of the most powerful explosion of our time - the testing of the Tsar bomb with a capacity of 50 megatons on Novaya Zemlya. Coordinates: 73°51’0.11″N 54°30’1.29″E The height of the explosion is about 4000 meters above the surface.

We see a round mark with a diameter of 18 km. Let's estimate approximately the power of the explosions that left marks: 20 km in size corresponds to about 55 megatons, 10 km - 30 megatons.

Here is another confirmation of the version of a nuclear bombing in Russia:

A few more considerations that came after all this material.
According to the official version of history, in 1941, entire factories were evacuated from the European part of the USSR and transported to Siberia and the Urals. Builders know that it is impossible to put up walls if the foundation has not stood for at least a season. How did you manage to put heavy equipment on a bare place, and then build it around the wall? The only real option is that there were already foundations from factories that were destroyed during a nuclear attack. Then everything becomes clear and there is no need to invent any miracles like the fact that Stalin prepared in advance for the evacuation of industry and ordered the foundations to be laid in advance, although trains with bread went to Germany even on 06/22/1941, when aircraft bombed Soviet cities.

Just another thought came about the pole shift. According to historical data, grapes grew on the Kola Peninsula, and Greenland was green in its name. Isakievsky Cathedral is not oriented to the cardinal points, as is usually done during the construction of temples, but at an angle. If we assume that before it was oriented strictly to the cardinal points, then the north pole should be on the line before climate change. along which stand St. Isaac's Cathedral and the Bronze Horseman. The line passes through Greenland and continues on to the Great Lakes in Canada. Assuming that the Kola Peninsula had a subtropical climate and Greenland had a temperate climate, then the pole must have been somewhere in the Great Lakes region before the shift. And in those places we find obvious traces of the most powerful glaciers, there is still glacial water in the lakes that occupy half of Canada.
This is what it looks like on the map.

With the help of this version, the presence of freshly frozen mammoths in Siberia is also easily explained, which within a few hours moved from the temperate zone beyond the Arctic Circle.
This version also fits the name of Greenland (green country), which in this case turns out to be approximately at the latitude of Moscow, that is, temperate trees will grow there. And the Kola Peninsula will be in the tropics, where grapes grow well.

And what about the south pole? If we look at the opposite point on the surface of the Earth, we will see the following picture not far from it:

It looks exactly like Canada, there are many narrow fjords - traces of powerful glaciers sliding into the water - and this is at a distance of 4600 km from the current south pole, that is, at the latitude of Volgograd! Where are the glaciers from? Another indirect confirmation of our version.

It also becomes clear where the map of Antarctica without ice cover came from, since Antarctica was 4000 km south of its current location.
Here is a quote from the article:
A little over twenty years later, the director of the National Museum in Istanbul, Khalil Edhem, was sorting through the library of the Byzantine emperors in the old palace of the sultans. Here, on a dusty shelf, he found a map lying around God knows how long, made on the skin of a gazelle and rolled up into a tube. The compiler depicted on it the western coast of Africa, the southern coast of South America and the northern coast of Antarctica. Khalil could not believe his eyes. The coastline of Queen Maud Land south of the 70th parallel was free of ice. The compiler put a mountain range in this place. The name of the compiler Edkhem was well known - the admiral of the navy of the Ottoman Empire and the cartographer Piri Reis, who lived in the first half of the 16th century.
The authenticity of the card was not in doubt. Graphological examination of marginal notes confirmed that they were made by the admiral's hand.
1949 A joint British-Swedish research expedition carried out an intensive seismic survey of the southernmost continent through the thickness of the ice sheet. According to the commander of the 8th technical reconnaissance squadron of the US Air Force Strategic Command (dated 07/06/1960), Lieutenant Colonel Harold Z. Ohlmeyer, “the geographical details depicted in the lower part of the map (the coast of Antarctica - V.A.) are in perfect agreement with the seismic data ... We we have no idea how to reconcile the data of this map with the expected level of geographical science in 1513.
end of quote.

Considering that the area of ice in North America was much larger than the area of the glacier in Antarctica / Greenland, it is clear that the level of the world seas was much lower, and Antarctica and South America were one continent, which is shown on the map. since a lot of water, many times more than now lies in Antarctica, lay in the form of ice in North America
That is, it turns out that the pole shift occurred no earlier than 1513.
The behavior of migratory birds, flying thousands of kilometers every year to places with a cold climate that were previously tropics, is also explainable.
As well as the legends of many peoples about the global flood, which was this very pole shift. And the water just splashed onto the land in the same way as when it splashes out of a bucket, if it is sharply moved to the side.
In general, it makes sense to remember this version for clarification.

Let's try to calculate the exact location of the old north pole. It is located on the line from St. Isaac's Cathedral. But where exactly on this line? There is such a thing as the polar circle. This is the place around the Pole where the Sun does not rise at least one day a year. It is quite natural that glaciers beyond the Arctic Circle should be the most massive and, accordingly, leave the most distinct traces when they slide into the ocean. The radius of this circle is 2580 km. If you look at the coastline of Canada and the United States, a strange distribution of traces from sliding glaciers is striking. If we impose a circle with the diameter of the Arctic Circle on Canada so that the brightest and deepest traces will pass inside this circle, then we get a fairly accurate location of the "old" north pole.

The most interesting thing is that the boundaries of the traces of glaciers on the coastline very accurately fall on this circle. This looks especially strange at points where the coastline is perpendicular to the line of the Arctic Circle. Here, the tracks from the glacier are abruptly interrupted and this is observed at all four such points (see the map, points 1, 2, 3, 4). Another confirmation of our version is that everywhere inside the old Arctic Circle the coastline is dotted with fjords, traces of massive glaciers sliding into the ocean. Even in North Carolina, which is now at a distance of 6000 km from the north pole (point 4).
The strange picture of the extreme north of Canada is also explainable - the continent in the north is simply torn to pieces. When moving the poles, ice a couple of kilometers high plowed this place and dug through such straits. Canada was literally pulled out from under the polar ice cap. This area remained beyond the Arctic Circle even after the movement of the poles, i.e., it was exposed to glaciers for the longest time, which is observed on the map in the form of wide glades.

And if you look at the "old" south pole, then our version is confirmed by the map of 1513, which is mentioned in the article. This map shows Queen Maud land without ice. So it was this side of Antarctica that was the northernmost, that is, the most distant from the "old" south pole. The distance from the pole to the coast of Antarctica is more than 4700 km (the latitude of the Volgograd region, where we currently do not observe glaciers).

Another interesting coincidence is that the found point of the "old" north pole is located exactly in the middle between the tropic and the pole.

Additional interesting information has emerged:
If St. Isaac's Cathedral in St. Petersburg was oriented to the cardinal points, then, probably, other buildings of that time were also oriented according to the same principle. Let's try to find such buildings and, by crossing the lines from these buildings, get the exact coordinates of the past north pole of the planet. After a short walk around the globe with the help of Google Earth, interesting results were obtained. Pyramids in Sudan near the city of Marawi (Marawi) coordinates 18 ° 32'16.54 "N 31 ° 49'21.45" E indicate the current US territory as "north". A pyramid in China near the city of Shenxi at coordinates 34°14’8.96″ N 109° 7’6.24″ E also indicates the current territory of the United States as “north”. If you extend the line from St. Isaac's Cathedral further, then all three lines will intersect at one point in the state of Nebraska near the city of Lexington at coordinates 40°37'23.34" N 99°44'55.03" W.
To estimate the probability that 3 random lines intersect at a distance of a couple of tens of thousands of kilometers at one point, try drawing such lines by eye in Google Earth. Stop aiming. It cannot happen by chance.

Needless to say, Nebraska obviously has traces of powerful glaciers. Here is a quote from the handbook: “Geologically, Nebraska is divided into two regions: the Dissected Plains and the Great Plains. The eastern part of the state lies in the zone of the Dissected Plains, which formed even before the retreat of the glacier and is an area with characteristic gentle hills.

It turns out that St. Isaac's Cathedral is the same age as the pyramids in Sudan and the pyramids in China. About St. Isaac's Cathedral and about St. Petersburg in general in the following posts, this is a separate and very interesting story. In short, the entire official history of the founding of Peter by Peter is a complete lie. This city was one of the centers of antediluvian civilization.
The position of the north pole, according to new data, was even further south than previously thought. If you look at Greenland now, the glaciers are 3300 km from the pole. That is, the whole of North America from the northern coast of Canada to Nicaragua (a circle with a radius of 3300 km around the found point) was under a 3-kilometer layer of ice, as Antarctica is now. Land area of North America: 9,826,630 km² (USA) + 9,093,507 km² (Canada) + 1,972,550 km² (Mexico) = 20,892,687 km² according to Wikipedia. The area of Antarctica is 14,000,000 km², almost one and a half times less. It turns out that even according to the most rough estimates, the glacier in North America was one and a half times larger in area, and therefore in mass, than the current glacier in Antarctica. The ice that was stored there lowered the level of the world's oceans by 90 m according to modern data, as water from the ocean moved to land in the form of ice. That is, the land area for the glacier was probably even larger, which is remarkably visible on the map of Piri Reis. where the coastline of South America and Antarctica protrudes significantly into the ocean beyond modern boundaries. By the way, the land of Queen Maud in Antarctica was located at a distance of about 6000 km from the past South Pole, that is, it was approximately at the latitude of present-day Greece, which perfectly explains both the riverbeds under the glacier in Antarctica and deposits of coal. And the French Southern Territories were only 1200 km away from the South Pole, beyond the Arctic Circle, so the traces of the glacier on them are quite understandable.

The coast of the Arctic Ocean was located at a distance of 5100 km to 8000 km, i.e. there was a very mild climate, the same as now on the northern coast of France (5100 km from the pole). It was as warm in Taimyr (6800 km from the pole) as in Sharm El-Sheikh (the same 6800 km, only from the new pole). Isn't that why Egypt is so popular among Russians? Karelia, Murmansk were at a distance of 7300-7700 km from the pole, which corresponds to the latitude of the Dominican Republic, northern India, and Taiwan. Historical evidence that pineapples grew on the Kola Peninsula is confirmed, the Dominican Republic is a major producer of pineapples. Here is an excerpt from the description of this country:

“Is it necessary to say that tropical pineapple also grows in the Dominican Republic?)) Surprisingly, pineapple is also a herb. And its fruits ... again, "berries")). The pineapple comes from Latin America. Here it occurs naturally in the wild. It is known that the ancient Indians not only collected wild pineapples for food, but also knew how to grow them. From pineapples, the Indians made wine and medicinal drugs, and fabrics were made from the fibers of the leaves.

Petersburg was at a distance of 7900 km from the old pole - the latitude of today's Philippines and Haiti - summer all year round and no white nights.
Several thousand kilometers of warm coastline is truly a golden age. It is clear why the ancient statues are barely covered with sheets. Clothing in such a climate is needed more for protection from the sun, and not from the cold. And here antiquity and Peter? The whole of St. Petersburg is solid antiquity. Sculpture of Alexander I - in antique style. The Bronze Horseman, which is considered a monument to Peter I, rides a horse in shales, that is, almost barefoot, without pants, in a light cape and with a short Roman sword in a scabbard.

But more on that in future posts.
If anyone has any objections, I will be glad, I would very much like to have a discussion.

update:
There is another pyramid that is oriented to the same place in Nebraska as St. Isaac's Cathedral, Pyramids in Sudan and China - this is Pyramid Mountain in Turkmenistan at which are also located in the direction of the old north pole.

We already have 4 confirmations that the previous north pole was exactly at the indicated point.
The system of pyramids is visible at the same distance from the old north pole. The distance from the old pole to the Sudanese pyramids is 11800 km, to the Chinese pyramid 11200 km, to the Turkmen pyramid 11400 km.
This is how all the found buildings look, oriented to the old north pole.

Is it possible that at such distances and in completely different cultures, structures were built that are oriented to the same point (a spread of no more than 30 km at a distance of 8-11 thousand kilometers) by chance?
Randomness is already practically excluded, most likely the exact position of the poles before the Flood has been found.
Another curious detail: the Red Sea and the Apennine Peninsula (Italy) are stretched almost exactly from the old north to the old south. Another coincidence?

When the pole moved from the center of America to today's place, the entire coast of the Arctic Ocean moved to the ocean. That is, traces of flooding on the coast and masses of frozen sea water on the land surface that did not have time to flow back into the ocean should be visible. And we find such traces. And exactly where it is most expected - on the northernmost islands, where the temperature drop was maximum.
Such traces of a pole reversal are especially clearly visible on Novaya Zemlya, the New Siberian Islands (Sannikov Land). Here is a livejournal post detailing these footprints. Here are the brightest photos.
Here are photos from the New Siberian Islands: It can be seen that the water stream freezes without having time to drain down from the surface, that is, within seconds. The bottom layer is sea water, the top layer is fresh water.

With the movement of the poles, this is quite possible, when the land moves towards the ocean, ocean water splashes onto the land and moving far north, freezes on the fly in a short time.

But in the photograph, the chernozem on Novaya Zemlya, of course, is now useless for plants, but obviously formed in a completely different climate than the one that is on Novaya Zemlya now.

St. Basil's Cathedral on Red Square (coordinates 55°45'9.26″N 37°37'23.35″E) is also oriented to the old pole, although not as accurately as other buildings, but with a shift of about 250 kilometers at a distance of 8600 km. This corresponds to a deviation of approximately 1.6 degrees. Orientation accuracy is quite high.
Moreover, the so-called frontal place, a round pedestal in front of St. Basil's Cathedral, is located in the old north, and even in alignment with the central dome and two domes located in front and behind. It turns out one line, which is directed to the old north pole, passing through the three domes of the Cathedral and the center of the site, now called the place of execution. This is how it looks on the map.

I have always wondered why this most beautiful cathedral stands as if it was placed quite by accident, paying no attention to either the cardinal directions or the layout of the city. And now it became clear why.
And now let's compare St. Isaac's Cathedral in St. Petersburg and St. Basil's Cathedral in Moscow

We see that St. Isaac's Cathedral also has a so-called "frontal place", where the Bronze Horseman is now located, which is considered a monument to Peter I. And there is no monument at St. Basil's Cathedral on the "frontal place". Although both "frontal places" stand strictly on the line "old north - old south", if you look from the center of both "frontal places" to the middle of the central dome.
Something tells me that in front of St. Basil's Cathedral there used to be some kind of huge monument, statue, or obelisk similar to the Alexandrian Column in St. Petersburg.

Another oddity near St. Isaac's Cathedral: the base of the Bronze Horseman in the form of an oval or ellipse and the monument itself stand along the axes strictly in the direction of the old north - old south, which corresponds to the orientation of St. Isaac's Cathedral. The square around the base of the Bronze Horseman is oriented differently.
This is how it looks on the map:

That is, there are two options: either the Bronze Horseman was placed crookedly, or the square around it was marked crookedly, which seems absurd when you look at the accuracy of how St. Isaac's Cathedral was built. Or this square was deliberately marked along other axes in order to emphasize that the bronze horseman has nothing to do with St. Isaac's Cathedral. Indeed, according to the official version, the Bronze Horseman was built by Catherine II on August 18) 1782. St. Isaac's Cathedral was allegedly built in 1858. Well, the Bronze Horseman himself stands exactly along the same axes as Isaac, so the attempt to hide the connection between the Bronze Horseman and St. Isaac's Cathedral failed. The question arises: why are there so many lies around these two buildings ???

Another interesting coincidence:
If you carefully look at the Piri Reis map of 1513 (see the figure below), we will see two bold straight lines on it, which at first glance do not carry any information. But if you look closely, the angle between the lines is exactly the same as between the meridians before the pole shift and after the pole shift.
The figure below shows the directions to the old and new poles in Google - Planet Earth and on the Piri Reis map.

It is quite obvious that the directions coincide. That is, the Piri Reis map of 1513 shows directions to both poles - the one in Nebraska, USA, and the one in the Arctic Ocean. Another direct indication of the old north pole has been found. The map maker apparently knew both about the pole shift and their exact location both before and after the shift.

It remains an open question whether Piri Reis himself compiled the map that bears his name, or whether he copied the old map and already put his signature on this copy as the author. If the Map was compiled by Piri Reis himself, then the pole shift should have occurred no earlier than 1513, which seems absurd at first glance, but no more than everything that is written above in this post.
Another interesting point: the distance between the old and new poles (5500 km) is almost equal to the distance between the northern and southern tropics (5200 km). Perhaps this could somehow hint at the triggering mechanism for the pole shift.

update:
Another interesting coincidence: the oldest and largest cemetery not only in Paris, but throughout France in the Pantin region, coordinates 48°54'21.92″N 2°24'38.84″E, the original name Cimetière parisien de Pantin, is oriented exactly in the direction of "old south" - "old north".

Continuation of a session of colleagues. Start here:
When reading, please remember that the time frame "300 years ago" is given only for an approximate understanding of the scale. It is impossible to determine the exact time due to the constant merging and separation of branches of reality.

Q. Why do we have the feeling that about 250-300 years ago there was a kind of fusion of several branches of reality? Why do we find mutually exclusive artifacts on Earth?
A. They are not mutually exclusive, we just do not see the overall picture of the world, it is veiled. Trying to “cover our tracks”, we have already been given so many versions of history that do not correspond to reality and do not fit with each other that we simply drowned in all these contradictory facts.

Q. Do I understand correctly that this is the result of the destruction of old archives, the juggling of facts?
A. Yes, the result of the destruction and juggling of old archives. There is such information that the global merging of the branches of reality, in fact, very rarely occurs, but the divergence is quite common. But at the same time, petty merging and divergence are constantly occurring.

Q. Was there any global merging of branches of reality in the period 250-300 years ago or close to this time?
A. Depending on what is meant by a global merger ... it really was, but not in the form in which we think.

Q. What form did it take? What merged with what? I am especially interested in the moment when Peter I seemed to have found an old dilapidated city and built Peter in its place. Is that what it was?
A. Here, apparently, the merging of branches happened a little earlier, but, oddly enough, people did not notice this. People are generally not allowed to notice such things, unless there is some special reason for it, unless people have some marks that will show them. And it turns out that our memory is overwritten, it is not clear how, it is not clear by whom, but it is overwritten.

Q. Does this happen when branches are merged?
Oh yeah. And here, at the time of the merging of branches, for many, at first there is a kind of short-term memory of two versions of a single event. Very indicative in this regard. Or another option - . But this is not exactly a malicious process, it is precisely the result of a merger, this information stuffing, overwriting one information with another.

Q. But still, where did this ancient Peter come from, in the form in which Peter I "found" it and began its construction. Let's see this moment, where did it start?

A. Not only did this city "found" then, but so did the cities of Mesoamerica. These are also cities from a different branch of reality. When branches merge, material objects move from one branch to another, but people remain the same, the memory is simply frayed. And suddenly they discover some city that they supposedly leave.

Q. And where did those people who lived in that city, which they "allegedly leave" go?
A. When it was found, it had already been abandoned for a long time. Imagine that you have been living somewhere for a long time, you have already explored the whole area and suddenly you both find something very significant in a place where it seems to have never been and should not have been.
This does not mean that you were in the wrong place and you were never here, it means that you were here, but your memory of this place is erased, you were in a different branch of reality.
The physical plane of reality is just a manifested sphere of perception, ours with you. There are a huge number of such manifested spheres. If we pass into another sphere where our perception is activated, this also becomes a reality for us. We have cities on Earth, the inhabitants of which consciously formed a new reality for themselves and moved into it, leaving the material proof of their existence here, on Earth, safe and sound.
A. Are you talking about anyone in particular right now?
Q. Yes, for example, the Toltecs are an Indian people who lived on the territory of the “medieval” Mesoamerica. They formed a new reality for themselves at their request, and moved into it, leaving us their material objects.

Q. And how did we end up in their old reality? Or were we there in the first place?
A. We were there originally. They are gone from our reality. Now imagine that someone from another world is in our reality. Where do new animal species come from, for example?
Q. Yes, where do they come from in OUR reality, if it is we, with our perception, that form this reality?
A. In fact, yes, in fact, we are not the only ones who form it.
Q. And who else put their hands on our reality?
A. The so-called Teachers, Demiurges… i.e. we here at our own level decide what and how, and at a more global level THEY decide what is more efficient to merge or separate from what. Above them stands a higher Consciousness.

Q. Well, that ancient St. Petersburg and other cities of Mesoamerica, how did they appear here?
A. Peter - this is not a physical branch merge. A merger took place there, but in a different way, through a lowering of consciousness. The memory of that time was reflected in the minds of people as the Renaissance. Those. suddenly everything Greek and everything Roman became fashionable. This is because even though the memory of people was erased during the transition, their own memories of THAT branch were preserved in the minds of people, although they found themselves in a new situation for themselves. And it was connected precisely with this catastrophe.

V.I.E. does it have to do with the purge?
A. Yes, such transitions do not happen anytime, but during major disasters and the cleansing of their consequences. Those. there is an energy rollback to such a massive impact.

Q. Do I understand correctly that there were these beautiful cities and people who already own high technologies, but this catastrophe happened and there was a massive rollback of consciousness, all technologies were destroyed.
A. Yes, and the rollback occurred to another branch of reality, much less developed, where everyone was “inspired” that we are all useless, despicable, dark people here, we don’t know anything, we can’t do anything, we descended from monkeys, etc., Here and Darwin appeared just in time.

All parts of this session:
-
-
-

Visual additions from earlier on the topic:

A very revealing moment with vegetation:

1860s St. Isaac's Cathedral: no plants, no people around

Here you can see that no one is engaged in landscape design, the bushes just grow by themselves, which is absurd for those who erected such a masterpiece.

Here you can already see the minimum care for plants.

For 40 years, lush vegetation has broken through, the streets are filled with people

The similarity in his paintings with the abandoned cities (and garrisons) of Russia is striking. Untidy (unwhitewashed or simply dilapidated) houses, the absence of people on the streets on some plans, the appearance of lush vegetation and mold on the roofs of houses and the Kremlin, a general feeling of devastation and emptiness.

Who builds such masterpieces and then just lets them fall apart while living in the city all the time?
Who erects stone megaliths, and next to them are anthills from dilapidated, rickety wooden shacks?
Or, after all, the city was abandoned for quite a long time, and the new owners differed significantly in level from the old ones?

Ruins of European cities

Note the contrast between the megalithic high-tech buildings and the small people who live in them, whose development is far from being able to build something like this. They actually FOUND these remnants of the former glory. In some places, clear traces of cataclysms and cleaning after them are visible.
For some reason, our art critics call all this "architectural fantasy", although it is clear that dozens of world-famous artists could not fantasize so hard. The pictures clearly show how little people have recently discovered and are just beginning to inhabit the remains of unknown technologies.
On many "frames" of that era there is no hint that they are trying to ennoble the ruins. They just brought some rubbish and live as they have to, sleeping next to the cattle in the mud. Many simply sit on the ruins in confusion or look around, but do not show any more activity.
What is it, a retreat after a deep suspended animation?

Hubert Robert:

Castles turned into barns

public pool

Alberto Carlieri:

Charles Louis Clerisseau:

Gennaro Greco

Giovanni Paolo Panini

And there are dozens or even hundreds of such paintings by each mentioned artist ...

A question for the supporters of the official version:

Did these little people, or even their ancestors, build such gigantic structures and then just let them fall into disrepair, as the official story tells us?

Or were they built for themselves by these guys, whose legacy we just found and restored?

When I say that in Russia there is Jewish power, I have every reason to do so. "Such incomes and such profits that could be earned in Russia could not be earned anywhere ... Most of the capital there, 50 percent, belongs to Jewish business" (Malkin) The "Russian mafia" is actually Jewish. David Duke Understood? The national group is rigidly structured...

Russian secret society: Russian portal. (5)

So, the article will not be about a secret society, but about an open society. And it is directed to any party. Or groups of Russian people. I explain the technology. You create an Internet portal. By groups. Ten's manager - 10 people Centurion's manager - 100 people Thousand's manager - 1000 people Each group meets once a week and writes from...

Wild Matrix: How to conduct real elections.

After Starikov's party was not allowed to vote. THERE ARE NO ELECTIONS IN RUSSIA. And what is there? There is Judaism (the system of power), in which the Russian people do not have the RIGHT to create their own parties and nominate them to the Duma.

Russian secret society: Technological sect. (4)

So ... In order to unite the awakened Russians and the World and Kremlin Jewry, nothing could be done with this association. Could not behead the leaders. He could not recognize the organization as an extremist and imprison everyone, as he does with Russian national associations, but at the same time he supports national associations of other nationalities and even builds schools for them ....

Wild matrix: Juvenile on the march: The population is vegetables, they want their children taken away from them. 18+

Yes, yes, dear Tatars, Jews, Russians, Chechens and others. You are vegetables. And the Fedya who reads my libel is also a vegetable. I'm talking to you cormorant, you're either a radish or a cucumber, maybe a kobachek, but in any case, a lazy vegetable. And your children are being taken away from you and will continue to be taken away, you are incapable of anything, useless for anything, behind the Putensky farm, where Vovka takes ...

bucket 2008 - Debriefing.

Party Program 2008.2.1. The development of Russia as a unique civilizationThe main reserves for building a great Russia lie not only in the economy, but also in the spiritual and moral potential of the multinational Russian people. We will achieve a significant increase in state support for culture as a whole, support for every talented person whose talent is up to ...

Wild Matrix: pure neighing.

2004 never came. 2005 - never came Money to the people? lol??? 2006 - The distribution after the university was never returned. 2008 - Never Came 2009 - Never Came In 2015, more than 60,000 tourists visited the Chechen Republic. It's at 10...

Wild Matrix: The Inquisition already exists in Russia.

A question to the administration of KONT and users regarding extremist material - I read this something today. The author of this article is funny and very remarkable, he was noted on Kont by cheating several articles on whitewashing juvenile justice in Russia. I wound it up through a bot network, which was subscribed to a parishioner (hello ROC), Alexander Sergeevich and ...

Olympics: where are the Russians?

I don't like writing about sports. But it became somehow offensive for the Russians. Several days of the Olympics have already passed and what do I see? Out of 4 ex gold medals. Russians own 1 piece. Here she is a beauty. But the rest of the medals were earned by our brothers from the Caucasus. Yagoryan, judging by the surname Armenian. The rest are visible. For Caucasians in...

Wild Matrix: Why Gussky peace is not needed by anyone for free.

Poor Vova, for 15 years he has been trying and puffing up to drive the former republics of the USSR into his Gussky world. But Vova understands. That his Hussky world is there, in general, no one needs it. There, their Husskys are at all posts and the Russians and other nationalities are milked day and night. Putin is working hard! Called Armenia! And she keeps kicking, the people are dissatisfied. That Serge Azatovich appointed by Putin ...

A radical method of combating Yuyu and the artificial stupefaction of children.

Just came to mind. If there is a community Vedic or some other and she wants to raise her children herself. She doesn’t need a kindergarten and a school. Then you can make a knight’s move. And why should the state show that you have children at all? We give birth at home and bring up without documents. :) And then we come and talk. Here we have a citizen, we hid him from you. :P Get it...

How 4 Jews killed Stalin.

Assassins: 1. Lazar Moiseevich Kaganovich (Jew) 2. Roza Moiseevna Kaganovich (Jewish) (I was not at the scene of the crime. But I had to mix poison into her husband's medicines.)3. Molotov, Vyacheslav Mikhailovich (Skryabin) (Jew or Shabesgoy (Jewish wife, Jewish children))4. Bulganin, Nikolai Alexandrovich (Jew or Shabesgoy (Jewish wife, Jewish children))5. Voroshilov, Kliment...

http://zarubezhom.com/kaganovich.htm- Returning to Moscow, Lazar plunged headlong into new problems. A fierce struggle continued with the many-headed Trotskyist hydra in the form of the now “Left Opposition”, headed by Trotsky, that is, the struggle with the next Trotskyist putsch. In October 1926, Trotsky was removed from the Politburo of the Central Committee, and a year later - from the Central Committee of the CPSU (b). AT...

http://zarubezhom.com/kaganovich.htm - The old Russian calendar was changed to the Western style, and the letters from the original Russian alphabet were thrown out. Noble titles were thrown out of circulation, instead of them the words "citizen", and even more often - "comrade" began to be used. Innovations also affected religion. Churches were destroyed, priests were killed, church lands were taken away. Walked stubborn with...

wakeuphuman in The geography of the global world before nuclear war on the example of ancient architecture and bastion stars

Gradually, the time frame for the nuclear war of the past began to take shape. The peak came in 1780-1816. In 1816, nuclear winter had already begun.
A year without summer
For three years in the Northern Hemisphere, even in summer, there was frost.
I want to show in the article that the world was already global before the start of this war, using the example of an engineering and architectural school that was the same for the entire planet. At the moment, you can absolutely take into account two facts:
Fact 1:
Before the start of the war of 1780-1816, most of the cities on the planet were built in a single antique style. I mean residential real estate. Buildings that are now classified as temple buildings and buildings of unknown purpose, such as the Giza Pyramids, the Mayan Pyramids, etc., are different. In Western Europe, ancient architecture is the best preserved. In the rest of the world, most of the cities were completely destroyed. Some were partially damaged, so the ancient buildings have survived to this day and are presented under the guise of "colonial" architecture. This is, of course, nonsense. Those who reformatted the world had no time for the construction of buildings according to beautiful projects during regular uprisings and hostilities.
Fact 2:
All ancient cities on the planet were surrounded by giant, cyclopean structures in the form of stars, which are now called bastion fortifications. The construction volume of one such star around a large city is often equal to the construction volume of the city itself. Millions of cubic meters of earthworks and millions of cubic meters of building stone. Moreover, a stone, filigree processed by a machine industrial method. The fortification functions of the stars can be called into question, because there are many markers that make these functions meaningless. But more on that later.
Using google maps and google images, you can verify the truth of the above two facts, and also find out that by implementing the principle - "Divide and Conquer", the current helmsmen who won this war have been diligently erasing ancient-style cities from the face of the earth for two hundred years and especially the stars. This is done in order to break the unified architectural field of the planet, so that the modern population would not guess that the world used to be global.

Checking fact number one -
Here is the "construction" of the Anglo-French troops of the palace in the colonial style in China.
link

Here was a palace in China - Yuanmingyuan.

After visiting the Anglo-French troops, he became like that.

England fought over 200 wars in the middle and late 19th century. If she did not participate in the war directly, then indirectly her interest was always present. And everywhere she won and became an empire over which the sun never sets. All these wars are more like a punitive cleansing of the remnants of the armed forces in the territories destroyed by a nuclear war and the creation of occupation administrations there. Obviously, without total military-technical superiority, it would be impossible to implement such a large-scale redistribution of the world.

Tokyo

Yokohama

Yokohama

Photo of Japan from here

Arita Japan

Buenos Aires, Argentina

Buenos Aires, Argentina

Buenos Aires photo from here

Buenos Aires, Argentina

Santiago, Chile

Chicago 19th century. Can you believe that such a complex could be designed and built in marble by the descendants of the conquistadors, who, suffering from scurvy, sailed on wooden vessels for 6 months to America?

Chicago, USA

I highly recommend this article, where the author analyzes the details of the facades of buildings in the antique style.
http://mishawalk.blogspot.com/2014/12/2.html

Seattle, USA

Sevastopol until 1853

Sevastopol until 1853. Another angle. The picture is clickable:

Moscow, Russia

Omsk, Russia

Perm, Russia

Kerch, Russia

Vladivostok, Russia. American troops in Vladivostok in 1922

Simferopol, Russia

Saratov, Russia

Taganrog, Russia

Kyiv, Ukraine

Odessa, Ukraine

Tehran, Iran

Hanoi, Vietnam

Saigon, Vietnam

Padang, Indonesia

Bogota, Colombia

Manila, Philippines

Karachi, Pakistan

Shanghai, China

Managua, Nicaragua

Kolkata, India. The Prince of Wales entered with an army. The palace in the "colonial" style is already standing

Kolkata, India

Calcutta 1813, India

Cape Town, South Africa

Seoul, Korea

Melbourne, Australia

Brisbane, Australia

Oaxaca, Mexico

Mexico City, Mexico

Toronto, Canada

Montreal, Canada

Phuket, Thailand

In this list, you must also add all the destroyed cities, which the manipulator assigned the status of ancient Greek and ancient Roman. It's all nonsense. They were destroyed 200-300 years ago. Just because of the desertification of the territory, life on the ruins of such cities, basically, did not resume.

Compare - Lebanon, Baalbek:

And Sevastopol. The sizes are just different. The design and functionality are identical.

You can continue indefinitely. The reader can verify this for himself, for this it is enough to google the name of any more or less large city in English plus the keyword old buildings or city + old photos or city + 19 century photos and click "show pictures". Residential real estate will be very similar. Identical arches, pilasters, turrets, columns, balustrades.
For example, look at the pictures for the following keywords
sidney old buildings
calcutta old buildings
boston old buildings
rangoon old buildings
old manila buildings
melbourne old photos

What should you pay attention to. The official story lies that all these buildings were built in the mid-late 19th century. At this time, the camera was already in full use. So, you will not find photos of the construction of a more or less serious object anywhere, although they were built in large numbers at that time. There was a real building boom. The whole world fought in the 19th century (list of wars of the 19th century) and at the same time the whole world was massively built up with antique buildings, many of which cannot be built even now. Theaters and operas are not built during wartime turbulent times. In almost all photographs of the 19th century, bearded people in worn out clothes, in shapeless old boots, mainly carry out earthworks, carry earth on wheelbarrows, use rather primitive cranes made of logs, sometimes steam engines for earthworks. But there are no photographs in which a half-built building like the Vienna Opera would be clearly visible.
Feed Google and look at photos and pictures -
19 century construction,
19 century town building,
19 century opera building,
19 century museum building
And you will see that these ancient buildings were not built in the 19th century.

Let's move on to fact number two - star cities.
They are found on every continent except Australia. In Australia, completely destroyed. Surprisingly, few people know about them. To date, about one thousand have been discovered. Here in this VKontakte group you can look at satellite images of several hundred of these objects, as well as city plans made in the 17th-18th centuries.
http://vk.com/albums-55242135
It is necessary to look at satellite images and old city plans in order to understand the scale of stone construction in the past and to realize the unity of standards in the engineering and architectural industry of that time. I can’t post 500 photos here, it will overload the article too much.
From this link you can download the kmz file with star labels for Google Earth
http://peshkints.livejournal.com/7944.html
So, the most famous star-shaped object in Russia is the Peter and Paul Fortress:

It is the only one that has been perfectly preserved. Hundreds, maybe thousands, have been destroyed over the past 200 years.
Very often, the outer slope of such a star is lined with high-quality masonry. The weight of blocks can reach a ton or more. Sometimes the slope is earthen. Entrance gates to star forts are often made of stone with very high quality milling. Almost all triumphal arches in the world are entrance gates through the wall into the former stars. Inside and outside there is a stone infrastructure similar to the Peter and Paul Fortress.

In Europe, small star cities are perfectly preserved, they look like this:

Neuf-Brisach fortress

Palmanova fortress

And on the territory of the former USSR like this:

Brest Fortress

The diameter of this star is 2 km. Inside, it was built up with the same houses as in the two pictures above, but now everything has been erased into dust. And this is a general trend for almost all cities in the world. The stars, together with the residential infrastructure, are best preserved in Western and, to a lesser extent, in Eastern Europe. Looking through modern cities through Google Earth, the pathological craving of the heads of the Manipulator for the destruction of star systems is striking. In Europe, they dismantled carefully, preserving the surrounding infrastructure. For example, I will show three European cities Turin, Strasbourg and Antwerp. But this rule works for ANY city.

Plan of Turin in 1799

Turin in 1682
The picture is clickable

Turin now

You will not find traces of this giant star-shaped wall and canal. A lot of dismantling work has been done in order to hide the very type of such structures.

Plan of Strasbourg

Strasbourg in 1644

Strasbourg now. The basilica with the spire is in place, the canals are in place, there are no walls with bastions.

Strasbourg from the satellite. The wall with bastions was carefully dismantled.

Antwerp.
Plan from 1642, it is tilted 90 degrees.
The length of the horizontal segment from the left edge of this stellar wall to the right is 5.7 km. The object is huge!

The second plan of Antwerp.

See below and to the right are 8 forts, indicated by diamonds? Now we will look at the satellite photo. On it we will see that only the channel remained from the wall. From the forts, too, only earthen embankments remained, 8 pieces, I circled them in red. The width of each fort is 600 meters.
The picture is clickable

And how are things on the territory of Russia, Ukraine, Belarus, Kazakhstan, etc.? Worse. Much worse. Everything was leveled to the ground. There are almost no authentic ancient buildings left. All these stalins, Khrushchevs are prefabricated barracks, in fact, quickly built according to standard designs, so that the surviving population can change over and demographically support the labor force.

Moscow, 17th century. I think inside the ring at that time the architecture was much larger than Turin and Paris.

Kyiv

Kyiv, a fragment has been preserved. The houses are already a wretched new building.

Orenburg

Superimposed the plan of Orenburg on a satellite image

Ochakov. Do you remember Griboyedov's "Times of Ochakov and the Conquest of Crimea"?

Ochakov. Superimposed the plan on the picture

Ishmael

Ishmael from the satellite

Ishmael. Superimposed the plan on the picture

Kherson

Kherson, satellite. The manipulator loves to build stadiums on the site of star strongholds. the same in Odessa.

Kherson. Superimposed the plan on the picture

Ukraine. Dachas are located on the site of the ancient city with a star. Coast of the Sea of Azov, near Berdyansk.

Russia. near Rostov.

There was a city near Rostov with a star for 6 bastions. Here, for comparison, is the same in Croatia, with 6 bastions. The city is called Karlovac.
Plan

Karlovac in our time.

And here is a star that speaks for itself in northern Kazakhstan, with the surrounding infrastructure demolished by three nuclear explosions. Later, the village of Stanovoye arose on the ashes. Click to enlarge

The search template for old city plans is simple. In different languages, feed Google the phrase -
"city old plan"
"city old map"
"city antique map".
Try it in Latin, French, Spanish, German. And click show pictures. If the plan is drawn up before the end of the 18th century, then the city will be framed by a star wall.