Humanitarians and techies - is it a myth? Does it interfere with your child's development? We study the types of thinking: who is a humanist.

In fact, a humanist is not someone who likes to read good books. Every normal person with imagination should love to read. The great physicist Albert Einstein admired Dostoevsky. The general designer of spaceships, Sergei Pavlovich Korolev, regularly reread War and Peace and knew many of Yesenin's poems by heart. But this did not make them humanitarians.

It happens even worse: in recent years, “humanists” are correctly called those who, after serving 10 years in school, cannot calculate the area of a square and do not remember the multiplication table. As a rule, these are ordinary lazy people. But the word "lazy" is offensive, but "humanist" is not.

Of course, the humanities are different from the exact ones. But not quite the way many people think. The fact is that the natural (exact) sciences tend to build an objective picture of the world. Humanities, on the other hand, deal with human consciousness. And it, firstly, is always non-linear, secondly, it is difficult to formalize, and thirdly, it is very subjective. Psychologists say that any phenomenon has at least seven explanations, and in any situation - seven ways of action. Therefore, the main task of the humanist is to see the ambiguity and complexity of phenomena, their fundamental openness.

For example, a literary text for the humanities is a way of knowing the world. We can know ourselves through text. We can analyze the relationship of the characters. We can consider how and from what the text is made. To study how a person (in this case, the author) creates a model that takes on a life of its own. If a person is interested in looking at this ambiguity and turning it around like a kaleidoscope, then he is a humanist. If you just want to admire - he is a good person. But this has nothing to do with the humanities.

Do you think philologists are those who love literature? Oh no! Philologists study and dissect literature. They can no longer love books with a naive quivering love. And the one who remains in such a pristine state is usually not particularly quoted as a specialist.

"Humanitarians" sometimes call themselves people of art - those who go to VGIK, Shchepkinskoe or Surikov schools. Alas, art and the humanities are two different things. Art appeals to the senses, and the humanities appeal to reason. Yes, in medieval Europe, the humanities were called liberal arts (by the way, arithmetic was one of them), but since the Middle Ages a lot of water has flowed under the bridge.

Anyone who wants to enter a creative university needs to learn to think and analyze. This is where literature research can help. The experience of people just entering adulthood is usually quite limited. And literature gives many models of perception of the mass of spiritual shades and life conflicts. So if a person at the age of 16-17 did not read a certain number of texts and did not let them pass through himself, it means that the work of his soul is almost certainly not adjusted.

Formally, 55-60 points in literature are enough for admission to most creative universities. But in fact, in order to become an artist, director, musician, artist, it is not enough to “study” program works from brief retellings. They must be passed through both the heart and the mind.
So being a humanitarian is not easy. Humanitarians are not born - this must be learned.

Contrasting with the natural and abstract sciences on the basis of the criteria of the subject and method. In the humanities, if accuracy is important, for example, the description of a historical event, then clarity of understanding of this event is even more important. [ ]

Unlike the natural sciences, where subject-object relations predominate, in the humanities we are talking mainly about subject-subject relations (in connection with which the need for intersubjective relations, dialogue, communication with another is postulated).

The humanities include philosophy, cultural studies, religious studies, philology, linguistics, literary criticism, art history, partly (in interaction with the social sciences) history, psychology, anthropology, ethnography, cognitive science, as well as a number of other, non-conventional disciplines, for example, studying the metamorphoses of man and mankind under the influence of the techno-environment (techno-humanistics).

Humanities is a field self-knowledge and self-creation man and humanity. No matter what humanities writings are written about: about the aesthetics of the Italian Renaissance or about the epic tales of ancient India, about the mutual influence of the Romance and Germanic languages, or about the Kantian philosophy of time and space, everywhere we see the image of man in his various incarnations. We compare ourselves with them, find similarities and differences, which means we get to know ourselves deeper and at the same time become more human. [ ]

Humanities teach:

understand and express yourself;

understand other people and communicate with them;

understand other cultures and eras;

understand the goals of mankind and the course of history;

consciously build your personality in creative interaction with other individuals and cultures;

History of occurrence[ | ]

One can also note the transformation of the traditional division of sciences, leading its history from Aristotle along the lines of Kant - Cohen - Bakhtin. Namely, the separation of the logical, ethical, aesthetic and in a very special way the religious experience of responsibility.

In logic, the cause-and-effect relations of the objective are considered in the sense of natural-scientific rationality, in this respect the world is considered from the position of the subject, which objectifies and arranges the objects of the world of existence. In a way, this is a certain scale of the attitude towards the world of phenomena as a universal and absolute substance.
In ethics, the attitude to the other as to oneself, in this area significant moral maxims and references to authority are formulated.
In aesthetics, we are talking about the relationship between the author and the hero, the viewer and the work. In this regard, two consciousnesses that do not coincide with each other always collide, where one completes the other in all moments transgredient (background, image, decoration, etc.) to it.
The area of religion correlates with the ethical, but goes beyond this division, since it is about communication with God (including reading religious literature, the form of this communication, etc.).

Here, first of all, we are dealing with Cohen's idea of predetermined research in a chosen way and attitude to description, or, in the words of G. Cohen, "the methodology of the approach constitutes the subject of research."

Subject and method [ | ]

In Martin Heidegger's article "The Time of the Picture of the World" we read that in the humanities the criticism of sources (their discovery, selection, verification, use, preservation and interpretation) corresponds to the experimental study of nature in the natural sciences.

But the main task of humanitarian research, according to Bakhtin, lies in the problem of understanding speech and text as objectifications of a productive culture. In the humanities, understanding passes through the text - through questioning the text in order to hear what can only be said: intentions, reasons, reasons for the goal, intentions of the author. This understanding of the meaning of the utterance moves in the mode of analyzing a speech or text, the life event of which, “that is, its true essence, always develops at the boundary of two consciousnesses, two subjects” (this is a meeting of two authors).

Thus, the primary given of all disciplines of the humanities is speech and text, and the main method is the reconstruction of meaning and hermeneutic research.
The key problem in the humanities is the problem of understanding.

Humanities and Humanitarian Technologies[ | ]

The goal of humanistics is self-consciousness and self-transformation of a person, not only an individual, but the whole of humanity. The humanities, not limited to a purely research approach, are called upon to change what they study Hence one of the most acute methodological questions: about the practical, constructive potential of the humanities, about their impact on the consciousness of society, on ethics, on culture, literature, art, language . If the natural sciences transform nature through technology, and the social sciences transform society through politics, then the humanities are still in the process of developing methods for their practical impact on culture. .

0 When your child grows up, it is time to think about his future profession. One of the arguments used in this case is that the student belongs to the type "techies" or "humanists". As a rule, when talking with a teacher, you can hear the following phrase: " Your daughter is a typical humanist, why should she go to MEPhI?" or " Your son is a born techie, computer science and mathematics are easily given to him". These tips help parents decide between the liberal arts and technical professions. Read a few more articles on various topics that decipher youth jargon, such as Signa, Riley, Pff, etc.
However, another question arises here, for example, will it be easy for "humanities" to follow the financial path? Can a "techie" master the specialty of a biologist? It is worth understanding what qualities make a person an adherent of a humanitarian or technical education.

What does humanitarian mean? What does techie mean?

Let's figure out what is hidden behind these two definitions, and what is actually subject to people with one or another clearly defined type.

As a rule, what techie or humanist child show his character traits, combined with interests and success in their respective disciplines. Of course, over several generations, certain stereotypes techies and humanitarians, but the specific individuality of a person sometimes cannot always fit into the framework allotted to it.

It is generally accepted that trained humanist is able to get very high marks in physics and mathematics, although according to his "status", as it were, he should have no more than "4" marks in these subjects. However, even a lower assessment of the humanities will be excusable, since there is a well-established opinion that the humanities have no aptitude for mathematics.
They absorb history, literature and foreign languages like fish in water. People with this personality type love cinema or theatre, and can often speak in public because they have a great "hung tongue". For this reason, they are able to strongly empathize, this sensitivity helps them to engage in creative activities and immerse themselves in the worlds of classical literature. Humanitarians are prone to a romantic perception of the surrounding reality, they seem to walk around in rose-colored glasses all their lives, they are emotional and vulnerable, they have a "thin" soul. This type of personality has a well-developed imaginative thinking and imagination. There are rumors, so far unconfirmed, that the left hemisphere of the brain dominates among techies, and the left hemisphere of the humanities.

Against, technicians are considered more active, energetic, but at the same time down to earth. They have remarkable perseverance and purposefulness. Often they are considered people more confident in themselves and their actions. Their mind works with high speed, consistency and clarity. At school, they gravitate more towards physics, mathematics and computer science, to "you" with any device, from a smartphone to a computer. However, despite the fact that techies feel more confident, they do not like live communication, which they successfully replace with intra-group chats and forums.

Techies VS Humanists

One person can write good prose, poetry, draw beautifully, but understanding the device of even a relatively simple device is a difficult task for him. And the other, with all the desire, will not rhyme a couple of lines, but with the “on you” technique. This is understandable and natural, because one of them is a “humanitarian”, and the other is a “techie”.

A person of a humanitarian mindset, when considering some issue, phenomenon, mainly pays attention to the most memorable, conspicuous signs. He is capable of logical thinking, but only to a certain limit. When memorizing some new information, a humanist uses such signs as a partial match for several of the most significant characteristics, and sometimes only for one of the most characteristic signs. Secondary signs of the humanities, as a rule, are classified as insignificant trifles, and therefore do not pay due attention to them.

That is why it is difficult for a pronounced humanist to succeed in such purely technical disciplines, for example, such as physics, mathematics, chemistry, etc. After all, it is necessary to carefully consider absolutely all known information, down to the most insignificant.

How a techie thinks

For a pronounced "techie", the very idea that you can neglect some information, simply because it is not very significant, is almost impossible. Of course, a person with a technical mindset is also able to distinguish the main from the secondary, but he considers and takes into account absolutely everything, down to the smallest detail. Trying to figure out something new or remember some information, a "techie" cannot confine himself to the formal coincidence of some of the most significant signs, as a humanist would do. He will definitely check whether the secondary signs also coincide, and only after that will he remember the information or draw a conclusion. One single fact, a sign that stands out from the general series, will force the techie to check and think everything over again.

A techie may seem too meticulous, slow (especially from the point of view of the humanities). But this is just a natural consequence of the peculiarities of his thinking and behavior.

Therefore, the eternal dispute, who is more important - "physicists" or "lyricists" (that is, techies and humanists) does not make sense. Both are equally important in life.

Since the beginning of time, people have been divided into different groups. It all started with tribes and tribal communities, and then it went and went: Freemasons, Mormons, hippies and punks, emo and goths, metalheads, hipsters and so on. Moreover, the more people, the more these same groups.

Among other things, there is an opinion that all people can be divided into two large categories. Humanitarians and techies. Moreover, holiwars on the topic "techies against the humanities" often flare up on the Internet.

Let's say right away that we are not inclined to hang templates and labels. Indeed, in order to be a humanist, it is not necessary to love reading and writing poetry, and knowledge of the laws of physics does not yet make a person a techie. Everything is much more complicated. In addition, the world is arranged in such a way that both are needed.

Answering the question "who is cooler, techies or humanitarians" is about the same as deciding "who is cooler, Arnold Schwarzenegger or Sylvester Stallone."

For example, Albert Einstein, in addition to creating the Special Theory of Relativity, also played the violin. Or, remember, as in Solzhenitsyn, Junior Lieutenant Nadelashin admired the fact that prisoners (mostly all engineers) freely discuss world works of art, instead of complaining about fate .. But why are we? Actually, to the fact that a talented person is talented in everything, and the division of people into humanitarians and techies is a rather arbitrary undertaking. Which, nevertheless, has a place to be. After all, people think differently, and this is a fact. .

What is the difference between a humanist and a techie?

Humanitarians- Diplomats and good communicators, they easily make contact and prefer to choose a profession related to communication and interaction with other people. While techies, due to the peculiarities of their thinking, are focused on solving a specific problem, it is much more comfortable for them to sit in their office and write code than to crowd at a press conference.
By the way! For our readers there is now a 10% discount on
In a pure, refined form, humanitarian and technical types are very rare. As we have already said, it is too rude to classify people according to the type of thinking into humanitarians and techies. However, you need to know your inclinations and type of thinking. We suggest you take a test to determine your type of thinking, if you do not know it yet. Whether you are a humanist or a techie, the test will help you find out your type of thinking more precisely. And if you already know, check if the test is lying. Results in the comments are welcome!

And, finally, we remind you that if suddenly you are a 100% techie, and you need to write an essay on history, which, well, you simply don’t have any strength, you can always ask for help from those who are always ready to help you. Techies, humanitarians - we are all people, and people should help each other.