Krylova M.N. These naughty suffixes: difficult questions of morphemic analysis
this is an affix that is located after the root and serves to form new words and word forms. Therefore, suffixes are divided into formative and word-formative.
S/O suf. serve to form new words with a new lexical meaning:
clean th cleanfrom a
cleanand be
cleanabout
cleanyul I
The last suffix is usually an indication of HR:
cleanfrom a- noun
cleanyul I- noun
cleanabout - adv.
f/o suf. serve to form Gff S, while the identity LZ is preserved.
|
friend - friendj I | ||
|
sonov j me, godfatherov j I | ||
|
skyeu a | ||
|
chital a, carriedl a | ||
|
based on the present |
||
|
carriedand |
led. incl. |
|
|
readØ , broughtØ |
led. inc.; past time |
|
|
all participle suffixes |
chitavsh uy | |
|
all suffixes of adverbs |
read ja | |
|
degrees of comparison |
neweysh uy |
Suffixes are often modified, i.e. have allomorphs.
oakOK / oakto a(k - allomorph to -OK)
giftOK / giftoch ny
oldec / oldh essky
Suffixes can be. tangible and zero.
A NULL MORPHEME IS A SIGNIFICANT ABSENCE OF A MORPHEME.
Zero suf. stands out when compared with other words.
carriedØ /nesl a
earless, legless, armless ( in comparison with the word image. model - Wed . horselessn th)
Null. suf. stands out in verbal nouns:
breakØ tear
transitionØ cross over
Ø in nouns formed from adj.:
drynessØ dry
Origin suf. m.b. native Russian and foreign languages. The vast majority are native Russians.
Borrowed:
hell blockade, clowning
already massage, type, instruction
ant occupier, saboteur, doctoral student
ism historicism, marxism
Postfix
it is an affixal morpheme that serves to form new words and - rarely - to form ff S.
Until recently, the postfix was called the inflectional suffix.
The postfix is attached to the verb stem:
learn learnXia (new LZ), Xia is after the end of the infinitive,
ff- learn-ish-Xia, teachingXia ( f participles )
Postfix included in the basis.
Postfixes include -that, -either, -something (form indefinite pronouns - someone, something, anyone), -ka (attached to verb stems - read ØØ-ka- these are difficult cases of morphemic parsing)
It is difficult to see that the postfix is after the ending in pronouns due to the peculiarity of pronouns:
someone
to someone
to-eat something
w-his something
If we single out the root, then in Im. n. there will be unique endings: someone
The main purpose of the postfix is the formation of new words, but word forms are rarely formed in passive voice verbs:
Newspapers are delivered by the postman ( This is a form of the passive voice, as the object of the action is expressed by Im.p., and the subject is Tv.p. ). Hence - delivered - is the form of the verb deliver, and the transformation is possible: Postman delivering newspapers.
Prefix (prefix)
an affix that is placed before the root and serves to form new words, and rarely word forms. In addition, prefixes can combine S / O and f / O ZZ, i.e. they can be syncretic.
S/O prefixes form new words with new LZ:
right grandfather grandfather
under Group Group
not beautiful beautiful
with write write
f/o prefixes form Gff, they are called grammatical.
with make ( to bring to a reasonable result the work begun )
on build
is bathe
you bathe
What is ZZ syncretism? When prefixes form a new word with a new LZ ( stand up - stand for a while ; tune- correct disharmony), at the same time they change the form of the verb.
Prefixes are placed before the root, but can also be placed before another prefix:
collect on the -collect(collect in large numbers) on collect(a touch of disdain - something worthless).
SUPPLIERS SHALL BE CONNECTED ONLY TO THE SAME CH.
noun + adjective = noun: grandfather great-grandfather
adj. + adj. = adj.: new not new
verb + adjective = verb: sleep sleep
adv. + adj. = adv.: now still
Attachments may have allomorphs, but among prefixes this is less common than among suffixes.
in//in deposit/login
air//air nurture/cultivate
Sun//Sun dig up/sing
But most prefixes are not modified.
By origin prefixes are native Russian and foreign. Most of them are Russian-owned, and date back to the common Slavic and Indo-European periods. They usually correspond with prepositions:
pretext in and prefix in
Some Russian prefixes have developed on the basis of particles:
do not fail, ugly
not nothing, nowhere
somehow, something
There are few foreign prefixes:
|
immoral, illogical |
||
|
antiparticle |
||
|
Z of excess |
archival |
|
|
Z destruction, return |
denationalization |
|
|
disorganization |
||
|
Z destruction, absence |
disqualification, disharmony |
|
|
infrastructure ( internal structure ) |
||
|
intervocalic |
||
|
trendy ( highest quality ) |
||
|
surreal |
||
|
reorganization |
||
|
pseudo, quasi and some. others |
Prefixes can only be materially expressed, ZERO PREFACES DO NOT EXIST.
THESE NAUGHTY SUFFIXES: DIFFICULT QUESTIONS OF MORPHEMIC ANALYSIS
Krylova Maria Nikolaevna
Azov-Black Sea State Agroengineering Academy
PhD in Philological Science, Assistant Professor of the Professional Pedagogy and Foreign Languages Department
Abstract
The article is dedicated to the review of difficult questions of morphemic analysis associated with the allocation of suffixes in the word. This article discusses ways to allocate a zero suffixes, variants of suffixes, irregular suffixes, status in the infinitive, suffixoides, postfixes and interfixes and processes of simplification and applications associated with the suffixes. The conclusion about the necessity of a creative, research approach to the morphemic analysis.
Morpheme analysis, or parsing a word by composition, is difficult for many high school students, for philology students, and even for teachers. As N.A. Isaeva, “today there are real problems of professional and methodological readiness of bachelor students and teachers in the field of analysis and interpretation of morphemic and word-forming concepts presented in school textbooks, and, accordingly, formalism in teaching schoolchildren these important, system-forming concepts that form the basis for the development of various meta-subject skills ".
The issues of morphemic analysis and teaching it were considered by M.T. Baranov, E.A. Zemskoy, N.A. Isaeva, M.R. Lvov, T.G. Ramzaeva, A.V. Tekuchev, N.M. Shansky and other scientists and methodologists, however, problems still remain difficult to solve due to the presence of different interpretations of certain phenomena of the language.
It is especially difficult to single out a suffix (suffixes) in a word, to distinguish it from other morphemes. This is due, first of all, to the fact that it is possible to single out a suffix only with the ability to isolate the ending and the root in the word.
Morpheme is the smallest meaningful unit of a language. According to the role in the word, morphemes are divided into: root, or roots - basic morphemes and affixal , or affixes - additional (from lat.affixus– ‘attached’). Types of affixes: prefix (prefix), suffix, interfix, postfix. Other languages also have affixes such as confix, infix, transfix, etc.
A suffix is a service morpheme (affix) that is located after the root and serves to form words and their non-syntactic forms.
By function, affixes are divided into word-forming ones - they express lexical meaning, form different words and are less regular, less standard, for example, without -house- n th, and formative - have the highest degree of regularity and standardity, have grammatical meaning, form grammatical forms, for example, on the -piss-a- nn-and I . The ending is always a formative affix, suffixes can be both word- and formative. Information about form-building suffixes comes to students gradually when studying morphology, and high school students should already be well versed in form-building and know all the form-building suffixes of the Russian language:
1. Suffixes of degrees of comparison of adjectives and adverbs: -her, -her, -e, -she, -eysh-, -aysh-, -eysh, -aysh . For example: good- her(good- her), tone- she, vys- e, good- eysh-y, thin- aish -y, deep- aisha, submissively Yeshe .
2. Suffixes of participles and participles: -usch-, (-yusch-), -ash- (-yash-), -vsh- (-sh-), - enn-, -nn-, -t-, om-, -em-, -im- , -v, -lice, - a, -z . For example: run- yi-y, gon- them th, mouth- vsh-y, offended- enn-y, offended- in, disassemble- I .
3. Past tense suffix - l -, with the help of which the form of the past tense is formed from the stem of the infinitive: offence- l, carried(null).
4. Imperative suffix - and -, with the help of which the form of the imperative mood is formed from the basis of the present (future simple) tense. For example: select- and, non- and- those, drop it and erase(null).
5. Suffixes of nouns, with the help of which are formed:
a) plural and indirect cases (syntactic forms): -es-, -er-, -en-, - j -, -yat-, -ov j - . For example: miracle eu-a, mat- ep-i, plem- en-a, take- j -I'm a cat- yat-a, son- ov j -I;
b) singular form:- in -. For example: citizens- in .
6. Suffix of the present (future simple) tense of the verb in the indicative mood: -j -. For example: read- j -yu, read-j -eat. The question of this suffix is controversial, not all scientists distinguish it.
Morpheme analysis is the selection of all morphemes in a word. Producing it, one must remember that “a truly scientific analysis of the structure of a word, and not a mechanical division of a word into morphemes (sometimes non-existent) is possible only when the word is considered, firstly, against the background of related and single-structured words at the moment , and secondly, in the totality of all its inherent grammatical forms. This is the basic principle of word-formation analysis (as well as morphemic analysis).
It is impossible to describe all the difficult issues of morphemic analysis within the framework of the article. Let us consider the most complex problems of morphemic analysis of the end of a word. We will present the information in a question-answer form, which should facilitate perception.
Are there special ways to highlight a suffix?
Before highlighting a suffix or suffixes, it is necessary to carry out preparatory work: determine what part of speech the word is, since each part of speech has its own set of suffixes; highlight the root (if possible) and the ending (required). And only after that apply the following methods, and preferably not just one, but all together:
1. Correlation of the word with the same-root words and grammatical forms of the word. For example, matching the word fox with words a fox and fox- j -Iand remembering the fluent vowels, we can easily single out the suffix in it -uy .
2. Comparison of a word with words of the same composition, of the same derivational type. After all, we correlate the word with single-root words in order to highlight the root, why not correlate it with “single-suffix” words in order to highlight the suffix. For example, glad- awn, sweet- awn, go- awn and under.
3. The principle of "matryoshka" (the termN.M. Shansky) necessary when there are several suffixes in a word. They are distinguished with the help of form analysis and word-formation analysis, step-by-step "undressing" of the word. For example, derivational suffixes in the word wateriness become clear after building a word-formation chain: water → water- yang-oh → water- ist-th → watery- awn . In the word read we first, having analyzed the grammatical form, select the formative postfix - Xia , the ending - and I - and formative participle suffix - vsh -, and then select the verbal suffix - yva -.
In any case, when deciding the question of the morphemic composition of a word, it is necessary to simultaneously analyze the word form (isolate the ending and formative suffixes) and word-formation analysis. As N.A. Isaeva, “word-formation analysis should not go after morphemic analysis, but precede it and at certain stages organically “weave” into the fabric of morphemic analysis - this is a simple and understandable law of a competent analysis of the structure of a word” .
Otherwise, mistakes are inevitable.
Should formative suffixes be included in the stem?
Difficulties arise when highlighting the stem of a word, since formative affixes are not included in the stem, but word-forming ones are included. We are used to not including the ending in the stem, and we forget to cut off the formative suffixes from the stem. It seems that the truth is somewhere in the middle: elementary school students should not be explained that some suffixes may not be included in the basis, and starting from the 5th grade, this new information should be gradually introduced, which will help mastering the morphology of the Russian language, ways of inflection .
Is it necessary to highlight zero suffixes?
To solve this question for yourself, you must first find such a suffix in the word. Everyone knows that zero (not materially expressed) endings can be. Examples:house□ , families□ , fox□, fun□, stop□. Highlighting the zero ending with an empty square is mandatory, not highlighting it is a serious mistake. The situation is different with zero suffixes, since many do not even know about their existence.
Zero can be two formative suffixes: 1) past tense suffix -l- in the masculine form of some verbs, for example, died- Æ , un-Æ ; compare: died- l-a, carried; 2) imperative suffix -and-, For example, drop- Æ ; compare: carried and . After the zero formative suffix, there is always a zero ending.
The zero suffix of the past tense of the verb and the zero ending after it arose as a result of the loss of weak reduced ones and the dropping out of -l- after consonants at the end of a word (compare Old Russian dry-l-b).
In addition, the zero suffix appears as a result of zero suffixation, in this case it is word-forming, and after it there can be not only a zero, but also a materially expressed ending. For example, transition-Æ ¬ cross over, blue-Æ ¬ blue, stutterÆ -a-¬ stutter, pyat-Æ th¬ five, physicistÆ ¬ physics and under. According to T.Yu. Gavrilkin, word-formation types with zero suffixes in the modern language have a high derivational potential.
In the practice of teaching the Russian language, it is not customary to single out zero suffixes; there is no special sign for them. To enter it or not (one of the options is given above) is a difficult question, most teachers will say that it is not worth it. Nevertheless, the concept of a zero suffix must be introduced, showing its existence by comparing a number of word forms. According to N.A. Isaeva, it is necessary to introduce the concept of a zero suffix into the conceptual apparatus of students: “Although it is not mandatory in school teaching, by the nature of its meaning and in relation to other words, it fits perfectly into the group of “zeros” studied at school - zero ending and zero connective » .
How not to call variants of a suffix different suffixes?
Morphemes are realized in speech in morphs, or allomorphs. Some suffixes do not have morphs: -tel, -awn, -nicha- . For example: teach- Tel, zl- awn, rival- nothing-th. There are no difficulties with them.
But most often, depending on the position in the word, the same suffix can have several variants with different sound and spelling:
-to - and - OK -: memory- to-a - memory- OK ,
-ec - and - c -: cheese- ec- cheese- c-a,
-n - and - en - in the short form of adjectives: memory- en- memory- n-a,
-ova - and - at j - in verb forms: feast- ova-l, feast- at j -Yu,
- j (a) and - uy : jumper- j -I'm a jumper- uy .
If suffixes change during the formation of word forms, then these are variants of the same suffix, and not different suffixes. Their changes are associated with the phonetic processes that have taken place in the language, with many alternations existing in the language. Comparison of word forms and knowledge of possible alternations will help us to understand that variants are different forms of the same suffix: love- ec- love- h-hic, son- OK- son- och-yeah, doggy-j -me, dog- uy .
The suffix or ending is - be (-ti) in the indefinite form of the verb?
Definitely the final -be (-ti) - this is a formative suffix, since it forms the form of the infinitive: read- be, carry- ti . The infinitive (the indefinite form of the verb) is an invariable form, so it simply cannot have an ending, because the ending is the inflected part of the word. clipping - be (-ti ) we get the stem of the infinitive, from which many verb forms are formed: build- be– build- l, build- vsh-th.
In the school textbook, according to tradition - be (-ti ) is highlighted as endings. In the new benefits, there is a twofold option when - be (-ti ) stands out as both an ending and a suffix. Apparently, the most reasonable solution for the teacher would be to teach to isolate this morpheme as recommended in the textbook, while explaining its nature. Students should know that this is a formative suffix.
And here - whose at the end of the infinitive is not a separate morpheme at all, it is included in the root. Compare: pitch -u, oven- you eat, bake .
Is it necessary to highlight suffixes that are not indicated by a separate letter?
This question can be answered in different ways. For example, the word line up orthographically divided into two morphemes ( building), and phonetically (that is, in fact) - into three ( stro- j -Yu) , - j - is a suffix. Should it be singled out? Undoubtedly, it is necessary, since, firstly, it is in the word, and secondly, in the imperative mood of the verb it will be expressed by the letter th (stro- th ), and its selection will allow us to correlate with each other the forms of the verb formed from one stem - the stem of the present tense, thirdly, it will be completely harmless to repeat the graphics and those positions in which the letter Yu stands for two sounds. Systematic work in this direction will help students to easily find the “hidden” suffix in the word. By the way, not only the whole suffix can be hidden, but also part of it, for example, -j - in suffixes -e n and j- -neitherj- (repetition, desire). In this case, do not notice -j - not so scary, because the morpheme will still be highlighted, albeit in a truncated form, but it’s still better to “notice” the hidden part of the suffix, then it will be easier to explain why in words desires, efforts, doubts and under. - uy - this is not the end.
How to find an irregular suffix in a word?
Regular suffixes are often found in words, for example, -ik-: table- ik, house- ik, pillar- ik etc. The most regular morphemes are endings and formative suffixes: lamps- a, run- ug-th. Irregular (unique, rare) suffixes rarely found in words. For example: paste- wow, small- yutk-a. Some suffixes are observed in just one word. By definition, E.A. Zemskaya, "parts of the word, similar to suffixes and prefixes in their role in the composition of the word, but single, not repeating, are called unifixes" . For example: hit- j -i, mail- amt, glass- tier, cartridge- tash, bush- arnica, goat- ate, proletarian uy. In the morphemic analysis of such words, it is impossible to correlate the word with other words of the same word-formation type, but it is possible to correlate with cognate words and select a suffix based on this comparison, for example: glass – glass- tier .
Is it possible to single out the suffix fused with the root?
The language is constantly evolving, one of the processes of its development is simplification - the loss of word articulation into morphemes. In particular, a suffix may coalesce with a previous morpheme, usually a root, for example: ne rotten, well zn, Yes R, pi R (compare pe-be, live-be, yes-be, pi-be). According to E.A. Zemskaya, "most often this is due to a change in the meaning of the word, which usually leads to forgetting its composition" .
Since in morpheme analysis we single out in the word those morphemes that exist in it at a given stage in the development of the language, then, of course, it is not necessary to single out such “former” suffixes. ON THE. Isaeva writes: “When studying the morphemic composition of a word at school, it is necessary to clearly distinguish between the facts of synchrony and diachrony and consider the phenomena of the word-formation system only on a synchronous cut” . But we should not forget that there is also an etymological analysis, in which it is necessary to consider the suffixes that have merged with the root and ceased to be suffixes.
How to isolate suffixoids?
Affixoids are root morphemes that act as affixes. They are divided into prefixoids ( semi-) and suffixoids (- ved, -water and etc.). Suffixoids have a high degree of standardity, like suffixes, for example: glass- var, language- Vedas, color- waters, forest- WHO, wine- cases, earth- cop, tele- graph, steam image-n- th. While playing the role of suffixes, suffixoids, at the same time, have not ceased to be recognized as root morphemes, they are on the way of transition from roots to suffixes, thus demonstrating one of the examples of living development, language change. According to N.M. Shansky, "affixoids, being used as affixes, nevertheless continue to remain and are clearly perceived as root morphemes, or bases that preserve semantic and genetic connections with the corresponding roots" . Therefore, it is necessary to single them out, apparently, nevertheless, as the second parts of a compound word, that is, divide them into roots, in the presence of suffixes and endings ( steam image-n-th ).
How to highlight suffixes when applying?
The application of the root and the suffix is the imposition of morphemes, the combination of the end of one and the beginning of another morpheme. For example, in the word lilac root lilac- and suffix - ovate -, in the word Minsk- root Minsk- and suffix - sk - and under. It seems that overlap is not disappearance, and it is necessary to single out both morphemes, explaining along the way that our language is very beautiful, melodic and thus gets rid of dissonant words like lilac, Minsk.
How to distinguish a suffix from a postfix?
In words that have an ending, the suffix usually comes before the ending. But the suffix can also be after the end. It's called a postfix.
Postfixes are observed in verbs and in separate categories of pronouns: wash- camping, which formed- Xia, eat- ka, to whom- then, what- someday, came- still . They can be written with a word both together (the first two examples), and through a hyphen (the rest of the examples).
By origin, all postfixes are independent words.
To distinguish a postfix from a suffix, you just need to remember all the postfixes. There are few of them, in the examples above, they are all named.
What sign to select postfixes?
There are several options for highlighting: 1) as a suffix, 2) in no way, 3) as a “prefix on the contrary” (in the other direction).
The most logical, in our opinion, is the allocation of a postfix with a suffix sign, since, according to the definition, a postfix is a suffix that comes after the end. But in words it is necessary to explain that this is a special morpheme and call it correctly.
Are postfixes included in the stem of a word?
The verb has postfixes both word- and form-forming, pronouns have only word-forming ones. Formative postfixes are not included in the stem of the word, word-forming ones are included.
Verb postfix -Xia (-camping) requires special attention. It can be both word- and formative. It is formative if it forms a form of pledge: pour- Xia, annoy- Xia, quit- Xia . In some cases, the affix Xia acquires the meaning of a word-forming morpheme and enters the stem, which in this case becomes intermittent (it is interrupted by the ending and / or the formative suffix): weeping -t-sya, read -l-sya, revelry - vsh-y-sya. It is not difficult to distinguish such verbs: they are not used without - Xia .
How to distinguish a suffix from an interfix?
Interfixes are connecting morphemes, insertions between other morphemes. First of all, these are connecting vowels about and e, which stand out between parts of compound words: earth- e-mer, steam- about-move. Such interfixes cannot be confused with suffixes, the difficulties in their selection are associated with the presence of similar phenomena ( weather report below) by the absence of a special icon for them.
Difficulties arise when interfixes are insertions between the root and the suffix. Sometimes they are also called gaskets. Consider examples: highway → highway- th-ny, there → there- osh-ny, today → today- w-ny, cinema → cinema- w-nick, eagle → eagle- ov-sky, Sochi → op- in-sky. In these words, interfixes are very similar to suffixes in terms of position in the word, but they do not participate in word formation, have no meaning, but are only inserted between morphemes to avoid dissonance (imagine the above words without interfixes).
To distinguish an interfix from a suffix, you need to accurately imagine how the process of word formation went, to see the word-formation model. For example, the formation of possessive adjectives from the name of a city using the suffix - sk -: Rostov → Rostov- sk-y, Tula → tul- sk-th and under. Then it will become clear for us to insert an interfix: Sochi → op- in-sky, and the application phenomenon: Kursk → kursk.
In addition, the arsenal of interfixes is small, and they just need to be memorized.
So, we have considered the complex issues of morphemic analysis of the word, related to the selection of suffixes and morphemes similar to them. I would like to note that the most important thing in the work of both the student and, moreover, the teacher should be a creative, research approach to morphemic analysis. In a situation of a formal approach, if memorization of postulates and rules becomes the main thing, and not research, even if it is only a modest study of the composition of a single word, it is impossible to achieve high results in teaching morphemic analysis and form the basis for further growth of the student, for the development of his linguistic competence.
If you find a violation of copyright or related rights, please notify us immediately by
Is the postfix "s" included in the basis of the word "remembered"?
- word-forming it is considered only in those words that do not have a paired verb without it, this is due to the voice of the verb of a category that is not studied at school, apparently, therefore, no subspecies of the postfix -СЯ (-СЬ) are considered at school. For example, in verbs to encroach, burst into tears, be afraid of a word-forming postfix;
- shaping the postfix stands out in those reflexive verbs that are formed from non-reflexive ones with the help of this postfix; it is in the verbs to wash, dress, decide, and in this case this postfix is not included in the stem of the word.
The basis of this word does not include only the past tense suffix -Л- and the ending -О.
The suffix of the indefinite form of the verb -I- is included in the stem of the word.
The return suffix (postfix) -СЯ / СЬ in the school curriculum is part of the stem.
Therefore, the basis of the word will be intermittent: remember.
If the question is for the school curriculum, then there is only one answer: the postfix CL is included in the basis of any reflexive verb, because with its help we get not a new verb form, but a new word, that is, the reflexive postfix turns out to be a derivational morpheme. Any such morpheme is necessarily included in the stem, because it will be preserved in any verb form.
So in the verb I remember we have the prefix FOR-, the root POMN-, the suffix of the verb -I, the past tense suffix -L-, the ending of the middle gender -O- and the postfix -СЬ. the basis of the word REMEMBER.
Let's check the presence of this postfix in other forms: in the infinitive Remember, in the future tense: I'll remember-I'll remember. In Communion Remembered. Everywhere this morpheme is present, which means it is included in the stem.
For many years I considered morpheme -СЯ (-СЬ) word-forming, for it was the only way it was presented and is still being presented in our school textbooks. I haven’t looked at the universities for a long time, and what many, many years ago was studied at the institute has already been forgotten. As far as I remember, only a general concept was given about postfixes in the course of the basics of linguistics, which were studied in the first semester in the first year.
Again, based on the school curriculum, I used to postfix -СЯ think word-forming, necessarily included in the stem of the word, because recurrence is a constant feature of the verb. The stem of the reflexive verb in school is always considered as discontinuous.
Now, in retirement, I repeat what I learned earlier, I am replenishing my knowledge, so I came across the fact that in modern linguistics postfix -СЯ (-СЫ) also belong to word-forming, and to formative. And even in some places I found material on how to distinguish the word-forming postfix -СЯ from the formative one (the article is not anonymous, so I give a link to not, but in general there is a lot of similar material on the Internet):
Frankly speaking, it is difficult for me to agree with this, especially considering that the lexical meaning of the word does not change during the form change, but to wash and wash, return and return, look and look are verbs with such different meanings that I simply cannot consider them word forms .
At the same time, I cannot ignore the new trends in linguistics either.
In the visual dictionary of our largest connoisseur of morphemics A.N. Tikhonov (Morphemic-spelling), the postfix -СЯ will in any case remain outside the framework (the school setting is completely opposite to this ALWAYS include -СЯ in the basis):
Now let's deal with your verb: it is formed exactly as pair to the irretrievable remember (remembered) by adding a postfix be remembered (remembered), hence the postfix not included in base(the basis Remember-). For high school, this is the norm.
But, according to school practice, it (postfix) will be attributed to the basis, and the basis is called discontinuous: remember.
This second analysis is closer to me, it’s clear for what reasons: for 37 years I taught to parse reflexive verbs in this way, and I was taught this way at the institute, in classes on the methodology of teaching the Russian language, this is how reflexive verbs are considered in all our school textbooks.
As you can see, not all questions can be answered unambiguously. Therefore, I would like to see an additional explanation in them: what analysis is required school go university.
In the school curriculum, postfixes are always included in the basis of the word.
The basis of the word - -remember s-.
That is, it included: prefix, root, derivational suffix -i-, postyix -s-.
Not included: ending -o-, formative suffix -l-.
Although in the lower grades the suffix -l- can be added to the basis of the word, but that's another story.
Two heads and six legs; four walk, and two lie still
Self-esteem - what is it: concept, structure, types and levels
Cassandra's Path, or Pasta Adventures War on Earth and Underground