The development of its relations with the Greek Church, on the one hand, and with the Russian state power, on the other (XIII-XVI centuries) the way

Vladimir Goldshmidt On the one hand on the other hand. Expressions like "on the one hand, ... on the other hand", "at the same time", "at the same time", often disavow what was said before. Soon Israel will celebrate the 60th anniversary of the founding of the state. 60 years old is quite a respectable age. "With age comes wisdom, but it often happens that age comes alone." And sometimes, with age comes insanity. One side , this well-known aphorism does not apply to the state of Israel. A lot has already been written and rewritten about its successes over the 60 years of its existence, including by me. The last year could serve as proof of these successes. In 2007, according to our "Jewish statistics", Israel's economic and social performance is impressive. It is ahead of "almost" all countries in the world in terms of industrial growth, tax revenues to the treasury are constantly increasing, it almost reached a budget surplus, investments in its economy have increased, especially in Hi-Tech, Israeli companies are willingly bought by foreigners, which leads to the creation of new workers jobs, wages have risen, taxes are being reduced, unemployment is falling, the country's population is growing, it is relatively young, life expectancy is increasing, etc. Everything is fine!!!??? But, on the other side If everything is so good, why is everything so bad!!!??? Food, medicines (even basic necessities), medical care, household services (electricity, gas, water, municipal tax) are growing irresistibly and rapidly in the country, there is a sharp shortage of hospital beds, the poverty of the weaker segments of the population is growing, government officials are stealing, the minimum wage and others financial incentives are currently frozen and many children are below the poverty line, while the political elite has increased their salaries too indecently, the most successful "figures" from the country are actively "molting", etc. etc., and this is only what is known, what lies on the surface. In addition, and no less important, with the same sides , shelling of the south of the country continues, their intensity and radius increase, the population of these areas suffers, terrorist attacks do not stop (rather, on the contrary), the basis of Zionism - settlements are being liquidated, construction has been stopped in them, terrorists convicted of serious crimes as part of "goodwill gestures" and "mythical exchanges" are released from prisons, and our soldiers remain in captivity, unpromising negotiations about borders, refugees and Jerusalem loom ahead, and the country's political leadership permanently makes concessions without receiving anything in return, except distrust and contempt from its people, hypocritical approval" progressive humanity", but in fact, the growing neglect on the part of the world community, especially after the "successful" disengagement in Gaza and the even more "successful" second Lebanon war. Faith in the army is being lost, and this is very dangerous in the explosive Middle East region, where only force is recognized. The son of my close relatives, having graduated from the engineering department of the Haifa Technion under the patronage of the army, is currently being trained in officer courses. After completing the first half of the training course, a solemn ceremony was held at one of the country's military bases with the invitation of the cadets' families. The territory of the base, located on a natural hill, resembles an ancient fortress: in the center of the base there are a square of gloomy concrete dark gray buildings (the barracks, it is the barracks) surrounding a large asphalt, marked with white lines, parade ground (rectangular courtyard), on which the ceremony took place . Despite the rather inclement cold weather, there were a lot of guests and the ceremony was held according to an already developed plan: a greeting on behalf of the leadership of the base of the families who arrived at the celebration, the general formation of cadets and officers in full dress (different colors, depending on the type of troops), raising the flag and the anthem of Israel, handing over to cadets signs about the end of the first program of courses attached to the collars of tunics, a speech with congratulations and instructions from the base commander, a solemn march, all accompanied by a military band and, at the end of the ceremony, a loud whistle and throwing headdresses into the air. Let it go, with one side , not everything was smooth, not everyone was "in step", some were "waddle", it was rainy and cool, but, with the other side , Against the backdrop of the all-Israeli farce, laxity and sloppiness, this ceremonial action looked more than worthy. When you are at such a solemn event, when you see young strong, beautiful, literate guys, guys and girls, the future officer corps, the color of the Israeli army, you are covered by conflicting feelings. One side - pride in a country that has managed to create a fairly strong army, more or less successfully resisting numerous enemies with their constant unceasing provocations and brutal terrorist acts. On the other side - fear for the fate of these guys, declining respect for the army in general in society and, as a result, a decrease in motivation for military service, especially in the light of the unceasing shelling of the south of the country, the latest "achievements" in the second Lebanon war, the fault for which lies not with the soldiers and field officers, but entirely on senior officers, who do not always have the necessary military education and experience, on generals and the general staff, on an inexperienced lieutenant, a former "union" defense minister and who irresponsibly appointed him prime minister. One side , n Without assessing the situation, without checking the readiness of the army and the rear, without setting a specific task, the political leadership, in order to raise its notorious "rating", dragged the country into a military adventure that cost many casualties, both in the army and in the rear among the civilian population. No less blame lies with the former political and military leaders of the state, who failed to foresee the disastrous consequences of their ill-conceived, illogical manipulations-experiments with the fate of the country and its people. The persistent and incessant attempts of the current political leadership to justify themselves for these omissions and mistakes, especially in the last days of the war, when it is not entirely justified (as evidenced by large losses), in pursuit of improving the almost ready UN resolution, ground troops were thrown into battle, unwillingness take responsibility, ignoring the demands of the reservists and relatives of the dead soldiers for the resignation of failed politicians,unforgivable cynical lies, cannot but arouse feelings of bewilderment, dissatisfaction and protest among the citizens of the country. BUT , with the other side , soldiers go.....and leave. As you might say M.Yu.L. :" And you will not return all yourimpudentoh lie Fathers of the dead(in vain) spilled blood". One side , To date, there are several reports analyzing the initiation, management and results second Lebanese war, compiled by various commissions : government (under the leadership of retired judge E. Vinograd, created at the insistence of the Prime Minister, instead of a state commission with much greater powers), several army, as well as unofficial, created by reservistsand the parents of the dead soldiers (report "So the heroes died"). Numerous ppolitical and military leadersand confusion, both directly on the battlefield and in the rear, that accompanied this war, were obvious even before the conclusions of all commissions, and only once again confirmed by them. On the other side , I personally tend to trust most of all the direct participants and eyewitnesses of this war, whose oral and written testimonies were widely covered by the media. And let this be another truism, but you must always remember that the strength of the army is not only and not so much in its combat technical equipment, not only in the number of tanks, missiles and aircraft, but mainly, and mainly, in the strength of the spirit of its soldiers , in the professional training and experience of its officer corps, in the determination, will and ability of the political and military leadership of the country to achieve victory with the least losses. A good example of such a banal postulate was the second Lebanese war, when a more or less equipped professional army, for a long time, could not cope with a bunch of religious fanatics (but with a pronounced terrorist motivation and partisan tactics), could not protect its rear from rocket attacks. One side , it is known that people (however, like horses, let us recall the film by I. Pyryev "The Pig and the Shepherd" - "there are many horses in Moscow and different horses") are different, including good and bad these are completely legitimate generally accepted philosophical concepts, antonyms, like "good" and "evil" ) . One of the great mathematicians recommended to immediately determine the terminology, give a clear definition of the concept (definition), so as not to mislead people, and then most of the questions and misunderstandings will be removed. Good man(for us) is a person whose ideology coincides with ours, who supports us at a given moment in time. Bad person(for us) - is defined in much the same way, but only with the prefix "not". Ideally, there are no absolutely good or bad people, they are either good or bad, depending on the circumstances and the length of time. Or as said famous orator of antiquity Skilef: "All people are good, but sometimes a scoundrel wakes up in everyone." Thus, there can be no abstract concept of "good" or "bad" people, they become such, depending on their attitude towards us, towards specific people. Each person has many faces. "... A man, as if in a mirror, the world has many faces: He is insignificant, and he is immensely great." (Omar Khayyam). In a broader generalizing sense, there are people who are trying to create, and there are people who are trying to destroy, and there is also a combined type, alternately constructive and destructive. "good ones" or "bad" refer not only to individuals, but also to certain structures, organizations, states, etc. etc. On the other side , after all that's been said above, let's see how these "very scientific" theorizing are applied to our realities. Can it be considered good the prime minister, who, acting like a pre-election period and after the elections, without stint gave and keeps giving voters endless promises (guaranteeing security, improving living standards, raising the minimum wage, increasing benefits for the weak strata and victims of the Holocaust, civil marriages, etc., etc.), most of which, by and large, in the end are not implemented, and this is done with special cynicism. However,, actively carried out what was not included in the election platform: the disengagement, the elimination of outposts, the cessation of construction in settlements, "peace" negotiations with the Palestinians, and much more. Can they be considered goodand the government and parliament, which supports such a prime minister, knowing that the people evaluate his activity extremely low (the rating is a few percent), however, as well as the activity of the government itself, considering it an absolute failure. Can it be considered good former prime minister, current minister of defense, who in the past did a lot of stupidities and absurdities, in particular, the flight from South Lebanon, which led to the strengthening of terrorists on the northern border and, as a result, to the shameful "victory on points" in the second Lebanon war, the transfer of the deposit gas to the Palestinians, after which we buy this gas from them through intermediaries, inability or unwillingness to deal with terrorists in the Gaza Strip and many other things that are no less mediocre and, until recently, did not draw any justified conclusions from their mistakes, despite the promises made. Can it be considered good the current minister of education (yes, and most of the previous ones as well), who lowered the level of education in the country to the lowest bar, even lower than that of third world countries. Can it be considered good the head of the opposition, who until recently was "not seen and not heard" and who permanently declared support for the government's little intelligible (on any problem) policy. Can it be considered good some kind of "friendly" state, for example the United States, which practically did not give in the past and does not give in the present the opportunity for Israel to bring to victory, or some kind of logical conclusion, not a single fateful event (which is already very rare), be it past wars, the final destruction of terrorist organizations, the establishment of trade and industrial mutually beneficial relations with other countries (China, India, etc.) and much, much more, but the weak governments of Israel (which often themselves come up with logically unjustified, destructive initiatives), and especially , his current obsequious-flattering prime minister (whatever you want), do not withstand pressure and follow their lead. However,, there are times when these same bad people or structures can suddenly become good for us, abruptly, but for a short time, changing negative trends to almost positive ones, which is especially practiced and impressive during pre-election periods. The unforgiving electorate temporarily, at the right moment for these people or structures, forgets about the harm and troubles caused and finally gives the result they want. And all the pre-election platforms, programs and promises, figuratively speaking, on the second day after the elections, are forgotten by their authors for a long time, if not forever, turning into irresponsible chatter. Usually the word "good" is associated with the word "good", and "bad" with the word "evil". It would seem that good people should always win, this is the meaning of the word "good", and "good" should always win over "evil". But this happens only in fairy tales and television series. In life, it is often the other way around. And people who don't deserve it are the winners, while the good people, with their honesty and decency, vegetate in obscurity. Such is "ce-la-vie", such, unfortunately, is the truth of life. When you write such notes with elements of criticism, the brain drills someone's heart-rending cry: "Do not defame the country, you live in it!". I don't defame her, I trying to heal wishing her only the best. The Israeli government, despite the rather intricate political system, one way or another, albeit indirectly, but still appointed by the people, is obliged to think, first of all, about its people, about their welfare and security, less looking back at third-party "well-wishers", whose advice, usually lead to disastrous results for the country, from all sides.

→ → → one side in the punctuation dictionary

on the one hand it is

one side

introductory expression and sentence members

1. Introductory expression. Indicates the order in which ideas are presented. It is separated by punctuation marks, usually commas. For details on punctuation for introductory words, see Appendix 2. (^Appendix 2)

On the one hand, he was delighted that he worked with such brilliance, on the other ... he was very suddenly disturbed by the ease with which the woman's heart was won. V. Shukshin, Cherednichenko and the circus. This did not prevent his wife Marya, still a young and beautiful woman, on the one hand, to respect her husband as a sedate and non-drinking person, and on the other hand, to twirl him, for all his heaviness, with such ease and strength, which only weak women are capable of. . L. Andreev, Bargamot and Garaska.

2. Members of the proposal. Do not require punctuation marks.

Above it rose a greenish sky, on one side merging with the earth in a smoky haze. L. Andreev, What the jackdaw saw. Romashka LLC, hereinafter referred to as the Customer, on the one hand, and Fedor Fedorovich Kuznetsov, hereinafter referred to as the Contractor, on the other hand, have entered into this agreement as follows…

Dictionary-reference book on punctuation. - M.: Reference and information Internet portal GRAMOTA.RU.

V. V. Svintsov, V. M. Pakhomov, I. V. Filatova.

Page Links

• Direct link: http://site/punktuaciya/632/;
• Link HTML code: What does it mean on the one hand in the punctuation dictionary;
• BB-code of the link: Definition of the concept on the one hand in the punctuation dictionary.

The following words and combinations can act both as introductory and as members of a sentence: certainly, indisputably, more / more than that, in general, in principle, in fact, in turn, most likely, beyond (any) doubt, in any case, truly, in general, a sinful thing, really, there is nothing to do, it must be , for example, in other / in other words, another matter, in other words / to say, by the way, maybe, maybe, you might think, unfortunately / misfortune, it turns out, according to words, according to the message / messages, in fact, just think, I remember , imagine, I confess / I confess, of course, more than that, to tell the truth / conscience / honor, most likely, thank God, by chance, to hear, strictly speaking, in this way, one way or another, is it a joke.

introductory word "and the truth"(at the beginning of a sentence or part of a compound sentence) is usually separated from the rest of the sentence. And the truth , a lot, almost everything had to be relearned anew. A. Kuprin, Juncker. When used not at the beginning of a sentence (or part of a complex sentence), the words "and the truth" are not introductory and are not isolated.But he and truth honest and faithful - he believes that Tsar Nicholas is alive, writes all the papers in the old way and swears that he will die with the letter "yat". M. Prishvin, World Cup.

Word "definitely":

• Adverb. The same as "clearly, clearly, clearly, clearly." Does not require punctuation marks. In a bunch of witnesses, he tried to find the answer definitely and sharply - the voice was female - but all the women seemed the same and looked at him with the same respect and readiness. L. Andreev, Christians.
• Introductory word. The same as "certainly, indeed, of course." It is separated by punctuation marks, usually commas. Definitely I treat humanity better than it treats me. V. Tokareva, Ruble sixty is not money. Definitely, his imagination was sharply at odds with ours. V. Aksenov, Negative of a positive hero.
• Particle (in response). Same as "yes, of course". It is issued as a separate proposal or separated by commas. "Do you think she likes me?" - " Definitely!»

The words "from where / out of nowhere"are distinguished by punctuation marks inconsistently (separation is optional).So crowds of onlookers followed the Elephant. // Wherever you take, towards Moska them.I. Krylov, Elephant and Pug.All of a sudden, wherever you go, towards him a sleigh, a black stallion in a harness, wheezes and rushes about to gnaw a nag.I. Lazhechnikov, Ice House.Here he rides along the road, with his faithful servants, through loose sands, through dense forests, and out of nowhere thieves attacked him...S. Aksakov, Scarlet flower.All of a sudden out of nowhere well done, such a handsome man.N. Leskov, Warrior.

Words and combinations of words can play different roles happened, right, mostly, however, by the way, finally, on the contrary, in the end, thus, really, maybe, at least, in essence, at least in terms of, on the one hand, on the other hand, on the other hand, means, of course, in fact and others. Compare: May be , and Polina also looked at the same column from the cockpit(Hall.). - She walked very quietly, there was as much calmness in her as hemay be in true and living beauty(Hall.); Will comeused to and start talking . – with antennaused to he has a lot of trouble(Sol.); Let me make sureat least what's good for you now(Leon.); In Moscow, Mitya's last happy day was the ninth of March. So,at least seemed to him(Boon.). - From time to time, pale zigzags of lightning cut through to the ground. It was clear that on this day we would disperseat least (L. T.); Ivan Matveyevich was not in too much of a hurry, and,thus , made a mistake(Leon.). - Thus and it was necessary to do;Must be went to visit mother(Shol.). - Scheduleshould be stable, cf .: introductory combination should be at the beginning of a separate turnover: Someone knocked hardmust be a fist in the wall (Paust.); One starsmay be know how holy human grief is!(Boon.). - Whatmay be more important than cancer drugs?(Gran.); By the way , Vikhrov rather absently accepted the good news(Leon.). - Your arrival wasby the way ; Gonnameans , leave? – Clouds gather in the skymeans it will be raining (means- union); Understand the personmeans forgive (means- a link in the predicate); He,eventually boss - it's up to him . – Childish instability and the pursuit of external brillianceeventually ruined him(Paust.); on a hike,mainly , you need to take only the necessary things . – He readsmainly thick magazines;Certainly , he wanted to reward for the years of work, first of all, himself(Boon.) - Youof course read this book("required", gain value); What you,Indeed , still invented! – Do you think that heIndeed smart man?

Word but is introductory if it is inside or at the end of a sentence: Tannin,but never been too generous with praise(Tendr.). In the meaning of the opposite union but can connect homogeneous members of a sentence or parts of a complex sentence: Father promised to come from the city early,but delayed; The fog thickened noticeablybut the roofs of the houses were still visible; Just as easily, carefree, he returned to the hotel.However something has already changed(Boon.).

Introductory combinationson the one hand on the other handstand out (or separate)commas : ... The general did not want to allow his division to cease to exist.On the other side , he knew that he would fulfill his duty to the end(Fad.); One side you are right, buton the other side , you must take into account my point of view(gas.). When a word is skippedsides put dash : One side , the student's knowledge was deep,with another - they were very one-sided. Wed cases whenone side and on the other side- members of the proposal:A strong wind blew, the children were called to the old man's rooms, and they sat with him on a warm couch - Vanyaone side , Lubawith another (M. G.); Now they looked at him from all sides - and not only looked.One side the hostess approached him with a long stick in her hand,with another - gentleman with sideburns(Pelev.).

Word finally is introductory if it sums up any enumeration - explicit ( Firstly Secondly and finally) or hidden (as a result of some events): The child was quite tired by the evening:First of all , lessons at school;Secondly , amateur circle and,finally , evening reading; Here the fingers have already identified the subject<…>. Here in the handfinally , a leaf sparkles, and I want to quickly run to people as soon as possible, as soon as possible to announce to them the existence of miracles on earth(Prishv.).

As an introductory word finally can emphasize a sharp form of expression of will: You will finally leave!

Finally as an adverb in the role of an adverbial member of the sentence, it means “at the end”, “finally” (after some time, as a result of the efforts spent): We have been waiting for him for a long time, and hefinally came;Finally she is[cat] drank everything, licked her lips, opened her mouth wide with sharp white teeth and began to wash herself(Sol.); Finally heard the procurator and the long-awaited footsteps and slapping on the stairs leading to the upper platform of the garden in front of the balcony(Bulg.). Such a value is sometimes difficult to distinguish from the value of the final completion of something ( firstly, secondly, finally). The particle can serve as an indicator of the adverbial value −that:Finally procurator heard... Wed impossibility of substitution −that when listing.

The word has a dual function. So: it is used both as a circumstance of the manner of action and as an introductory word in the meaning of "for example". Wed: So he worked - he came up with phrases on the go, then wrote them down, then invented them again(Paust.). - The members of the proposal are different.So , it can be circumstances, additions, definitions .

The word can perform different functions generally. Wed: I'm talking about peoplegenerally (generally- adverb); They were waiting for him, and hegenerally did not come (generally– particle); He,generally , an eccentric, but it's interesting with him (generally- introductory word). Word actually is introductory: He,actually , wrong, but speaks confidently.

Word "hence" can be both introductory and union:

• Introductory word. Indicates the connection of thoughts, the sequence of their presentation; the same as "became". It is separated by punctuation marks, usually commas.To solve this problem, you first need to find out which of them contributed the most, and for this you need to subtract all three numbers from one another, and we get, hence that the third merchant paid the most...A. Chekhov, Vacation work of Nadenka N.
• Union. The same as "and therefore, therefore." Syntactic constructions with the union "therefore" are distinguished by punctuation marks, usually commas.It was necessary to see and hear how he knew how to finish, sometimes not sparing himself, hence with the risk, almost with heroism, of one of his patrons, who had already utterly pissed him off.F. Dostoevsky, Polzunkov.I am Russian, hence I have the right to say it.S. Nadson, Diaries.

Union "so" with connects sentences or parts of a complex sentence. Approaching in meaning with the introductory words “therefore”, “thus”, the union “so” is separated by a comma (less often a dash) from the next part of the sentence.Yesterday at the theater I announced that you fell ill with a nervous fever and that you were probably no longer in the world - so, enjoy life, while you have not risen yet.A. Pushkin, A novel in letters.