In this case, it is possible. It's not always customary to say "last"

THE PERSON HOLDING THIS POSITION was second only to the Fleet Commander. And let the chiefs of naval staffs and other deputy commanders forgive me, as well as ship commanders - "the main figures in the fleet" and sailors - "the main naval movers", but the fact is the fact: the fleet has always been represented at all levels and two people were responsible for everything . And although the generation of sailors at the beginning of the 21st century does not know about it.

Probably, unfortunately, he no longer knows, although he would need to know in order to understand how their predecessors served and lived for several decades in the history of the Russian Navy - from the time of the Great Patriotic War to the collapse of the USSR. In fact, during a whole era - from the realities of the Soviet coastal fleet to its heyday in the oceanic format. Without the “word and deed” of the PMCs, nothing would have happened and nothing would have happened, because they were an integral part of the state administration system based on the “three pillars” - the CPSU, the KGB and, of course, the Army and Navy.

IN OUR EXCLUSIVELY PERSONALIZED COUNTRY, it is customary to associate specific eras with specific personalities: “under Stalin”, “under Nikita”, “under Ilyich” ... In the same way, naval history is divided into certain segments: “under Sysoev”, “under Khovrin”, “under Kasatonov". But there is a division on a different scale, it is associated with the service of naval commanders of other ranks and fields of activity.

“Under Ivan Semyonovich”, “under Pavel Nikolaevich”, “under Rudolf Nikolaevich” ... The “first persons” who headed the naval political education department differed both in personal qualities and in the style of their work, which was largely determined by the time. And although it makes no sense to compare their activities - people are different - it should still be noted: the role of PMCs was very weighty, significant, and their authority was indisputable.

VLADILEN PETROVICH NEKRASOV headed the Political Directorate of the Black Sea Fleet in December 1985, perestroika. Then they started talking not only about perestroika, but also about acceleration, coupled with the fight against drunkenness. Then there was unbridled glasnost, large-scale democratization, "renewal" of the party, which ultimately transformed into "new thinking for our country and the whole world." Then "our country" was gone... But the Black Sea Fleet remained...

He remained in his historical bases, most of which suddenly ended up on the territory of Ukraine that became independent. Naturally, the Black Sea also remained - admirals and generals, officers, midshipmen and ensigns, members of their families, sailors, "conscripts", workers and employees of naval enterprises, institutions and units, veterans. The realities of the post-Soviet era, along with the fleet division, fell on their heads and other parts of the body, along with the “habitat”. Questions - a lot, problems - darkness ...

Meanwhile, of course, the Black Sea Fleet continued to carry out its responsible tasks in almost full scope. In some ways, however, its activity has decreased, but in some ways it has increased significantly. And the overall success of the Black Sea people was largely determined by the recent subordinates of a member of the Military Council of the Fleet - the head of the Political Directorate of the Black Sea Fleet, Vice Admiral V.P. Nekrasov. The fact that political officers did not eat their bread in vain, many chiefs in the fleet realized in full only after their institute began to "reform" to the state of abolition. The 90s of the last century, as well as subsequent decades, convincingly and unambiguously proved that in our country one cannot do without substantive and constant work with the "human factor" in the Army and Navy. And it is necessary to work in this "niche" substantively and professionally.

THIS IS THE DESTINY ORDERING: Vice Admiral Vladilen Petrovich Nekrasov became the last head of the Military-Political Directorate of the Black Sea Fleet. The latter, as you know, is the hardest. Not physically, mentally. But the last and the last are remembered best of all - Stirlitz spoke about this ...

Vice-Admiral V.P. Nekrasov was remembered by the Chernomorians for his thoughtful, balanced attitude to any business. His unchanging outward calmness and prudence gave a sense of stability, engendered in people faith in their own strength. I judge this on the basis of personal experience.

It is not customary to evaluate superiors by subordinates. Officially public. But all the same, each of us mentally assesses our commanders. Sometimes even "deuces" - where without it, without such categoricalness? I will say about Vladilen Petrovich: communication with him never caused negative emotions in me. I always received from him the approval of plans and support in business, even at the time of the "reform" of everything and everything. I am sure that the overwhelming majority of officers who happened to work with Vladilen Petrovich can say the same thing. I have never seen Nekrasov “throwing lightning”, although he knew how to ask strictly, as they say, at a highly professional level.

UNLIKE MANY BLACK SEA ADMIRALS, he did not part with Sevastopol, 23 years before "returning to his native harbor" living in the Hero City. This, in my opinion, not only speaks volumes, but is even indicative - the Russians not only do not abandon their own, but also do not betray their shrines, from the outside pretending that they love the city of Russian glory.

On July 17 of this year, Vladilen Petrovich Nekrasov turned 82 years old. The last of them he was seriously ill. And although he no longer left his apartment, he never broke away from naval affairs. And this is natural - for him the fleet became life.

In general, the life path of the admiral, the passage of his service in a good way can be envied by many. A boy from the Yaroslavl hinterland, who went through a harsh post-war school in the village, was drafted into the navy, became a Pacific sailor. A cadet of a political school, an officer who happened to serve in all the fleets of the Soviet Union, a member of the Military Council - the head of the political department of the Caspian Flotilla - Vladilen Petrovich passed these steps of the service ladder in less than three decades. Hundreds of officers-educators became his students - V.P. Nekrasov in 1983-1985 was the head of the Kyiv VVMPU. Then - the leadership of the Political Directorate of the Black Sea Fleet.

Of course no comma

Punctuation Reminder

“Of course”, “of course” - the word of course is not separated by commas at the beginning of the response remark, uttered in a tone of confidence, conviction: Of course it is!
In other cases, a comma is needed.

The expressions “in general”, “in general” are isolated in the meaning of “in short, in a word”, then they are introductory.

“First of all” are isolated as introductory in the meaning of “first of all” (First of all, he is a rather capable person).
These words do not stand out in the sense of "first, first" (First of all, you need to contact a specialist).
A comma after "a", "but", etc. is not needed: "But first of all, I want to say."
When clarifying, the entire turnover is highlighted: “There is hope that these proposals, primarily from the Ministry of Finance, will not be accepted or will be changed.”

"At least", "at least" - are isolated only when inverted: "This issue was discussed twice, at least."

“In turn” - does not stand out with a comma in the meaning of “for its part”, “in response, when the turn has come”. And as introductory are isolated.

“In the literal sense” - not introductory, does not stand out with commas

"Hence". If in the meaning “therefore, thus, it means”, then commas are needed. For example: "So you, therefore, are our neighbors."
BUT! If in the meaning "therefore, because of this, based on the fact that", then the comma is needed only on the left. For example: “I found a job, so we will have more money”; “You are angry, therefore you are wrong”; "You can't bake a cake, so I'll bake it."

"Least". If in the value of "the smallest", then without commas. For example: “At least I will wash the dishes”; "He made at least a dozen mistakes."
BUT! If in the meaning of comparison with something, emotional evaluation, then with a comma. For example: “At a minimum, this approach involves control”, “For this you need, at a minimum, to understand politics.”

“That is, if”, “especially if” - a comma is usually not needed

"That is" is not an introductory word and is not separated by commas on both sides. This is a union, a comma is placed before it (and if in some contexts a comma is placed after it, then for other reasons: for example, to highlight some separate construction or subordinate clause that comes after it).
For example: “It’s still five kilometers to the station, that is, an hour’s walk” (well, a comma is needed), “It’s another five kilometers to the station, that is, if you go slowly, an hour’s walk (a comma after “that is” is placed to highlight the subordinate clause "If you go slowly").

"In any case" are separated by commas as introductory if they are used in the meaning of "at least".

“Besides”, “besides this”, “besides everything (other)”, “besides everything (other)” are separated as introductory.
BUT! "Besides" is a conjunction, a comma is NOT needed. For example: "In addition to the fact that he does nothing, he also makes claims against me."

“Because of this,” “because of that,” “because of that,” and “along with that,” a comma is usually not required. Separation is optional. The presence of a comma is not an error.

"Moreover" - without a comma.
“Especially when”, “especially since”, “especially if”, etc. - a comma is needed before "especially". For example: “Such arguments are hardly needed, especially since this is a false statement”, “especially if it means”, “relax, especially since a lot of work awaits you”, “you shouldn’t sit at home, especially if your partner invites to dance."

"Moreover" - is distinguished by a comma only in the middle of the sentence (on the left).

"Nevertheless" - a comma is placed in the middle of the sentence (on the left). For example: "He decided everything, nevertheless I will try to convince him."
BUT! If “but nevertheless”, “if nevertheless”, etc., then commas are NOT needed.

If "however" means "but", then the comma on the right side is NOT put. (An exception is if it is an interjection. For example: “However, what a wind!”)

“In the end” - if in the meaning “in the end”, then the comma is NOT put.

“Really” is not separated by commas in the meaning of “really” (that is, if this is a circumstance expressed by an adverb), if it is synonymous with the adjective “real” - “real, genuine”. For example: “Her bark itself is thin, not like that of oak or pine, which are really not afraid of hot sun rays”; "You are really very tired."

"Really" can act as an introductory and stand apart. The introductory word is distinguished by intonational isolation - it expresses the speaker's confidence in the truth of the reported fact. In controversial cases, the issue of punctuation is decided by the author of the text.

“Due to the fact that” - a comma is NOT needed if it is a union, that is, if it can be replaced with “because”. For example: “As a child, he underwent a medical check-up because he fought in Vietnam”, “maybe it’s all because I love it when a person sings” (a comma is needed, because replace “because” with it is forbidden).

"Anyway". A comma is needed if the meaning is "however". Then this is an introduction. For example: "She knew that, one way or another, she would tell Anna everything."
BUT! The adverbial expression "one way or another" (the same as "one way or another" or "in any case") does NOT require punctuation. For example: "War is somehow necessary."

Always without commas:

primarily
at first sight
like
seems to be
for sure
likewise
More or less
literally
in addition
in the (final) end
in the end
last resort
best case scenario
anyway
at the same time
overall
primarily
especially
in some cases
through thick and thin
subsequently
otherwise
as a result
concerning
after all
in this case
in the same time
generally
in this regard
mainly
often
exclusively
as a maximum
meanwhile
just in case
in case of emergency
if possible
as far as possible
still
practically
approximately
with all (with) that
with (all) desire
on occasion
wherein
likewise
the biggest
at least
actually
generally
maybe
as if
in addition
to top it off
probably
by the proposal
by decree
by decision
like
traditionally
supposedly

A comma is not placed at the beginning of a sentence:

“Before… I was…”
"Since…"
"Before as…"
"Despite the fact that…"
"As…"
"In order to…"
"Instead of…"
“Actually…”
"While…"
"Besides..."
"However…"
“Despite the fact that ...” (at the same time - separately); DO NOT put a comma before "what".
"If…"
"After…"
“And…”

“Finally” in the meaning of “finally” - DOES NOT stand out with commas.

“And this despite the fact that ...” - in the middle of the sentence, a comma is ALWAYS put!

“Based on this, ...” - a comma is placed at the beginning of the sentence. BUT: “He did so on the basis of ...” - the comma is NOT put.

“After all, if ..., then ...” - a comma before “if” is NOT put, since the second part of the double union comes next - “then”. If there is no “then”, then a comma before “if” is put!

“Less than two years…” - a comma before “what” is NOT put, because. this is NOT a comparison.

A comma before "HOW" is placed only in case of comparison.

“Politicians such as Ivanov, Petrov, Sidorov ...” - a comma is placed, because is the noun "politics".
BUT: "...politicians such as Ivanov, Petrov, Sidorov ..." - a comma is NOT put before "as".

Commas are NOT included:
“God forbid”, “God forbid”, “for God's sake” - do not stand out with commas, + the word “God” is written with a small letter.

BUT: commas are placed in two directions:
“Glory to God” in the middle of a sentence is highlighted with commas on both sides (the word “God” in this case is written with a capital letter) + at the beginning of the sentence - is highlighted with a comma (on the right side).
“By God” - in these cases, commas are placed on both sides (the word “god” in this case is written with a small letter).
"My God" - separated by commas on both sides; in the middle of the sentence "God" - with a small letter.

If the introductory word can be omitted or rearranged to another place in the sentence without violating its structure (usually this happens with the unions “and” and “but”), then the union is not included in the introductory construction - the comma is NEEDED. For example: "Firstly, it became dark, and, secondly, everyone was tired."

If the introductory word cannot be removed or rearranged, then the comma after the union (usually with the union “a”) is NOT put. For example: “She just forgot about this fact, or maybe she never remembered it”, “..., and therefore ...”, “..., and maybe ...”, “..., which means ...”.

If the introductory word can be removed or rearranged, then the comma is NEEDED after the union “a”, since it is not associated with the introductory word, i.e. soldered combinations such as “and therefore”, “and by the way”, “and therefore”, “are not formed. maybe,” etc. For example: “She didn’t just not love him, but maybe even despised him.”

If at the beginning of the sentence there is a coordinating union (in an attached meaning) (“and”, “yes” in the meaning of “and”, “too”, “also”, “and then”, “otherwise”, “yes and”, “ and also ", etc.), and then the introductory word, then a comma before it is NOT needed. For example: “And really, you shouldn’t have done this”; “And perhaps it was necessary to do something differently”; “Finally, the action of the play is ordered and divided into acts”; “Besides, other circumstances came to light”; “But of course, everything ended well.”

It happens rarely: if at the beginning of the sentence there is an attaching union, and the introductory construction is distinguished intonation, then commas are NEEDED. For example: "But, to my great annoyance, Shvabrin decisively announced ..."; "And, as usual, they remembered only one good thing."

The main groups of introductory words and phrases
(highlighted by commas + on both sides in the middle of a sentence)

1. Expressing the speaker's feelings (joy, regret, surprise, etc.) in connection with the message:

to annoyance
to amazement
Unfortunately
unfortunately
unfortunately
to joy
unfortunately
to shame
Fortunately
to the surprise
to horror
unfortunately
for joy
for luck
not even hour
nothing to hide
unfortunately
fortunately
strange affair
amazing thing
what good, etc.

2. Expressing the speaker's assessment of the degree of reality of what is being reported (confidence, uncertainty, assumption, possibility, etc.):

without any doubts
undoubtedly
undoubtedly
may be
right
probably
apparently
possibly
Indeed
in fact
should be
think
seems
seemingly
certainly
maybe
may be
maybe
hope
presumably
is not it
no doubt
obviously
apparently
most likely
truly
perhaps
I suppose
in fact
essentially
truth
right
of course
needless to say
tea, etc.

3. Pointing to the source of the reported:

they say
say
transmit
In your
according to…
remember
to my mind
our way
according to legend
according to…
according to…
rumored
by post...
your way
heard
report, etc.

4. Pointing to the connection of thoughts, the sequence of presentation:

all in all
First of all,
second, etc.
however
means
in particular
the main thing
Further
means
for example
besides
by the way
by the way
by the way
by the way
finally
vice versa
For example
against
I repeat
I emphasize
more than that
on the other side
one side
that is
thus etc.
howbeit
whatever it was

5. Pointing to the techniques and ways of formalizing the expressed thoughts:

rather
generally speaking
in other words
if I may say so
if I may say so
in other words
in other words
in short
better to say
to put it mildly
in a word
to put it simply
word
as a matter of fact
let me tell you
so to speak
to clarify
what is called etc.

6. Representing calls to the interlocutor (reader) in order to draw his attention to what is being reported, to inspire a certain attitude to the facts presented:

do you believe
do you believe (do)
see (do)
you see)
imagine(those)
allowable
do you know)
Do you know)
Sorry)
believe (those)
please
understand (those)
do you understand
do you understand
listen (those)
suppose
Imagine
sorry)
say
agree
agree etc.

7. Indicating an assessment of the measure of what is being said:

at least, at least - are isolated only when inverted: "This issue was discussed twice, at least."
the biggest
at least

8. Showing the degree of commonness of the reported:

it happens
used to
as usual
according to custom
happens

9. Expressive statements:

no joke
between us will be said
talking between us
need to say
not in reproach will be said
to tell the truth
according to conscience
in fairness
confess say
tell the truth
funny to say
honestly.

Set expressions with comparison (no commas):

poor as a church mouse
white as a harrier
white as a sheet
white as snow
beat like a fish on ice
pale as death
shines like a mirror
sickness vanished
fear like fire
wandering like a restless
rushed like crazy
mumbling like a sexton
ran like crazy
lucky, as a drowned man
spinning like a squirrel in a wheel
seen as day
squeals like a pig
lying like a gray gelding
everything goes like clockwork
all as a choice
jumped up like crazy
jumped up like crazy
stupid as hell
looked like a wolf
naked as a falcon
hungry as wolf
as far as heaven from earth
shaking like a fever
trembled like an aspen leaf
he's like water off a duck's back
wait like manna from heaven
wait like a holiday
lead a cat and dog life
live like a bird of the sky
fell asleep like the dead
frozen like a statue
lost like a needle in a haystack
sounds like music
healthy as an ox
know how flaky
have at one's fingertips
rides like a cow saddle
goes along like a sewn
how to sink into the water
ride like cheese in butter
swinging like a drunk
swayed (swayed) like a jelly
handsome as god
red like a tomato
red as a lobster
strong (strong) like oak
screaming like crazy
light as a feather
flies like an arrow
bald as a knee
like a shower
waving his arms like a windmill
thrashing around like crazy
wet as a mouse
gloomy as a cloud
dropping like flies
hope like a stone wall
people like herring in a barrel
dress up like a doll
not see how their ears
mute like a grave
dumb like a fish
rush (rush) like crazy
rush (rush) like crazy
worn like a fool with a written sack
runs like a chicken and an egg
needed like air
needed like last year's snow
needed like the fifth spoke in a chariot
needed like a dog's fifth leg
peel like sticky
one as a finger
left like a stranded cancer
stopped dead in his tracks
razor sharp
as different as day from night
as different as heaven from earth
bake like pancakes
pale as a sheet
pale as death
repeated like crazy
you go like a little
remember your name
remember like a dream
get into cabbage soup like chickens
hit like a butt on the head
fall like a cornucopia
look like two drops of water
went down like a stone
appear as if on cue
loyal like a dog
stuck like a bath leaf
fall through the ground
use (use) as from a goat's milk
disappeared into the water
just like a knife to the heart
blazed like fire
works like an ox
understands like a pig in oranges
vanished like smoke
play like clockwork
grow like mushrooms after the rain
grow by leaps and bounds
drop from the clouds
fresh as blood and milk
fresh as a cucumber
sat as if chained
sit on pins and needles
sit on the coals
listened spellbound
looked spellbound
slept like the dead
hurry like fire
stands like a statue
slender as a Lebanese cedar
melts like a candle
rock hard
dark as night
as accurate as a clock
skinny as a skeleton
cowardly as a rabbit
died like a hero
fell down like a wreck
stuck like a sheep
lean like a bull
mulish
tired as a dog
cunning like a fox
cunning as a fox
gushing like a bucket
walked as if plunged into water
walked like a birthday
walk like a thread
cold as ice
thin as a sliver
black as coal
black as hell
feel at home
feel like behind a stone wall
feel like a fish in water
staggered like a drunk
she's like a punishment
clear as twice two four
clear as day, etc.

Do not confuse with homogeneous members.

1. The following stable expressions are NOT homogeneous and therefore are NOT separated by a comma:

neither this nor that;
neither fish nor fowl;
neither stand nor sit down;
no end no edge;
neither light nor dawn;
neither hearing nor spirit;
neither to himself nor to people;
neither sleep nor spirit;
neither here nor there;
for nothing;
neither give nor take;
no answer, no greeting;
neither yours nor ours;
neither subtract nor add;
and so and so;
and day and night;
and laughter and grief;
and cold and hunger;
both old and young;
about this and that;
both;
in both.

(General rule: a comma is not placed inside integral expressions of a phraseological nature, formed by two words with opposite meanings, connected by a repeating conjunction “and” or “neither”)

2. NOT separated by a comma:

1) Verbs in the same form, indicating the movement and its purpose.
I'll go for a walk.
Sit down and rest.
Go take a look.

2) Forming semantic unity.
Can't wait.
Let's sit and talk.

3) Pair combinations of a synonymous, antonymous or associative character.
Search for truth-truth.
There is no end.
Honor to all.
Let's go.
Everything is covered.
It's expensive to see.
Purchase and sale questions.
Meet with bread and salt.
Tie hand and foot.

4) Compound words (interrogative-relative pronouns, adverbs, which are opposed to something).
Someone else, but you can't.
Already somewhere, where, and everything is there.

Hello! Please, I need an answer to the question: "He and his team are reconstructing / reconstructing old weapons with high quality" - no or no? Thanks for the answer! Konstantin

In this case, it is correct to use the predicate in the form of units. h.


	Question No. 300139

Hello, please tell me in which case the topic of the lesson when writing a lesson summary should be written in quotation marks. For example, is it necessary to put quotes in this case: the topic of the lesson is "Hand drill", or the lesson on the topic "Hand drill".