World War III - myth or reality? Not World War III, but also nothing good. World War III what will happen to people.
What so frightened gullible hamsters Kolya Starikov in 2014 because of the Donbass, slowly becomes a real threat four years later, because of the sacred Siriyanyash.
Not that I would believe in the reality of such a scenario, but since this is not excluded, it means that it is possible, all the more so that the West began to put pressure on Russia simply at a Stakhanovite pace, and in the most painful form. Only for the last days:
New sanctions have been introduced against Russian (non-existent according to Peskov) oligarchs. In simple terms, 12 billion dollars were taken from them, a number of companies were put on the verge of bankruptcy. Not that I feel sorry for the people who supplied the APU with spare parts, but these people determine the course of the Russian Federation.
Russia (together with Syria) has already been directly accused of a chemical attack. Personally, my opinion is nonsense, chlorine as a military agent was abandoned a hundred years ago, plus there is zero real evidence, but as the Skripal case showed, and before that the Iraqi chemical weapons, and even before that the "genocide" of Albanians in Kosovo - there are no barriers to people who keep in the hands of the world media.
Israel launched an airstrike on a Russian base in Syria, officially #lose, unofficially - unclear
The United States, through the mouth of a new schmuck (former nyash), threatens to bury Assad, and those Russians who will interfere with them.
Well, our Armed Forces of Ukraine are building up shock fists, so far in the "scare and pressure" format.
The situation is clearly not the one where you can express concern, or shoot a new video about the benefits of non-introduction, or release a trololo with stories about "our boys." And the answers were given:
Part of Israeli missiles intercepted by Russian air defense systems
"The Russian Armed Forces are on full alert
According to available information, a sudden alarm has been declared for all units of the Ground Forces, the Military Space Forces and the Air Defense Forces of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation.
something that hasn't happened since the Cold War. The West still drove Russia into a corner and forced it to give an answer, it was not possible to sit behind the backs of women and children.
1. The parties make a series of threatening gestures and everything turns into Cold War 2.0 in earnest and for a long time. Corporations receive huge orders, thousands of units of iron are being built for the next decades, fools argue until they are hoarse - who has longer, and everyone is happy, well, almost happy, someone will have to pay for the banquet, and they, and we, have an opinion that it will be the people.
2. The West, with the help of forceful pressure, and blackmailing the oligarchs, is trying to overthrow Himself, and imprison someone like Leshka Kirovlesovsky, with a further drink of nuclear weapons, and the complete surrender of everything and everyone. It will hardly come out, but there will be noise ... and blood.
3. Putin and his team eventually merge, and "themselves, all by themselves", see the previous paragraph. People will serve it as a paramogu, according to the recipe of the already mentioned Starikov.
4. On one of the fronts, a small war turns out, with no matter what the result, propaganda will interpret as it should. It could be Syria, it could be Donbass, in the first case, Russian propagandists will talk about lazy Alawites who did not stand up like that, in the second case, the government of Ukraine in exile will appear in the United States, and a heading in the media about the "atrocities of the occupiers."
5. A complete arctic fox, the same one that has been used to scare four generations, and which again becomes probable. There is actually nothing to discuss, no matter what supporters / opponents of the authorities write, no one will leave offended. The fact that they will not give an order is also stupidity - there are cases when guns (and missiles) fire on their own, according to the logic of events. But, I repeat, this option is the least likely, there are very few psychos in this world, to our great happiness.
These are the scenarios caused by Russia’s unwillingness to go to the end, first in Yugoslavia, then in Libya, then in Syria, then in Ukraine, then in the Donbass, as a result, boys who did not want to fight for friends got a chance to burn out, along with caring mothers (those then they shouted something to do with it and their children should not, and alas, a bunch of normal people) in a nuclear fire, or roll back to an era that makes the 90s seem like paradise. However, there are also positive options - like sitting in a besieged fortress. On the other hand, you didn’t have to feed the lazy kaklov, and this is the main thing, it’s better to spend money on Arab, Somali, African brothers, and mountains of weapons.
Below I will present scary information that may horrify someone. However, I think it's better to warn the unsuspecting people than to remain silent about the fact that any day now a terrible crime against humanity can happen - a world war can begin.
There are forces on earth that have been trying to plunge the world into chaos and new planetary bloodshed since the late 90s of the twentieth century. Many probably understand this, but, obviously, not everyone knows that in recent years this has been done under the guise of religious propaganda. For the customers of the war and its provocateurs, this is the most convenient way to evade responsibility in the event of a showdown. They say that the majority of those who believe in God are fanatics, and they should not take seriously what is written in religious literature.
Not everything is so simple, however.
If religious fanatics incite national and religious hatred, sow panic and try to cause fear and horror in millions of people, even on religious grounds, then any state authority is obliged to first carefully check these people for sanity, and then either isolate them from society by placing them in special hospitals , or judge them as dangerous intruders, then placing them in prison.
If the state power itself is hostile to the subject people, if it itself commits genocide, then, of course, none of this will happen, and it will imprison people like me who want to prevent a crime or make sure that it does not become who was a complete surprise.
The word "genocide", I hope, is familiar to everyone. I want to remind once again the meaning of this word. Genocide (from Greek γένος - clan, tribe and Latin caedo - I kill) - actions committed with the intent to destroy, in whole or in part, any national, ethnic, racial or religious group as such by:
- killings of members of this group;
- causing serious harm to their health;
- measures designed to prevent childbearing in such a group;
- forced transfer of children;
- deliberate creation of living conditions calculated for the complete or partial physical destruction of this group.
In Russia, genocide has long been carried out against the Russian population, precisely as a result of "the deliberate creation of living conditions designed for the complete or partial physical destruction of this group." Evidence of this is the rapid decline in the population of Russia due to the rapid extinction of the state-forming Russian people. The last census of 2010, one must think, has not yet been made public for one reason - the counting commission received deadly numbers of losses of Russian citizens ...
In addition to physical genocide, as is known, there is also spiritual genocide. This is when the state media from morning to evening broadcast to the subject people either obscene Jewish humor, which can only be considered humor by degenerates, or they broadcast one continuous negative: information about disasters, crimes, as well as murderers, alcoholics, drug addicts, facts of corruption in the highest echelons of power, and so on, causing psycho-trauma to millions of honest people who do not understand why evil flourishes more and more, as if the authorities are consciously cultivating it.
Since 1997, I began to notice that this kind of genocide is carried out in Russia on a special scale.
After the collapse of the USSR and the formation of the Russian Federation, the territory of our Fatherland was literally flooded with religious sects and preachers who were trained in special schools in the West. The largest and most socially dangerous of all these sects was and remains the Jehovah's Witnesses organization. Missionaries from this sect have a very annoying nature, go in pairs to all houses and apartments and distribute free brochures with color pictures to all citizens: “Watchtower proclaims the kingdom of Jehovah” and “Awake!”.
Several of these pamphlets once fell into my hands. Imagine my surprise when I saw on the title page of one of them a question written in Russian: “Is it true that these are the last days?” There, on the cover, the answer was given: “Really! Only those who are selflessly devoted to Jehovah God will survive!”
It was the issue of April 1, 1997, which was published in Germany in 125 languages with a circulation of more than 20 million copies. Inside the magazine, I read the following explanation. “In 1914, the “last days” of the present world began. We are now living in the year 83 of this period, and the denouement is nearing, when the following will happen: "There will be a great tribulation, such as has not been from the beginning of the world until now, and will not be." Yes, this grief will be harder even than the Second World War, in which 50 million people died. The time of global significance is fast approaching! The great tribulation will break out with stunning unexpectedness, in one hour. It will begin with the execution of all false religions. A whole community of people who ignore Jehovah will be destroyed.”
The date "April 1" was chosen for this publication, presumably maliciously, with mocking overtones, because in Russia this day is considered the day of laughter.
Having sifted religious nonsense through my filter, I realized from the published information that the religious and political leadership of the Jews (Jehovah, aka Yahweh is the god of the Jews) is up to something terrible against humanity, and the emphasis that the victims are expected to be incomparably more than they were during the Second World War, was made in a brochure for a reason.
Six months later, another signal of the threat of war caught my eye. This time, the most read newspaper in Russia, AiF (Arguments and Facts), No. 31 for 1997, in the same way, right from its title page, announced in huge letters: “The Third World War will begin in December.” Inside the newspaper itself, an article was placed - an interview with the president of the Academy named after Nicholas Roerich, Vladimir Sobolev, who carried frank nonsense that he compared all the ancient and modern prophecies and came to the unexpected conclusion that "the third world war is inevitable, and it will break out in 1997 or 1998".
As I understand it, Sobolev's nonsense was calculated on the fact that people who do not understand anything about religion and politics, after reading this article, will express a couple of obscenities to the academician and calm down, but for those who were in the know, this publication is obviously , served as a prearranged signal "be on the lookout, we will soon begin the operation."
It must be assumed that at that time the worshipers of the devil, who found refuge in the United States, had the guts to unleash a world war. They simply soberly assessed the geopolitical situation in the world and decided to postpone the start of the war "against everyone." In addition, Russia was still strong enough at that time, and could still somehow respond to aggression.
Since then, 15 years have passed. Due to the genocide carried out by the authorities, the people of Russia managed to decrease by 25-30 million people during this time - about the same number of people the Soviet Union lost in World War II.
Obviously, now the enemy of the human race does not consider our people a dangerous enemy. Now he decided through his heralds to sound the Israelis, the inhabitants of the whole earth, a signal of readiness: "It's time to start a world war!"
Of course, to mask the intentions, this is done under the guise of religious propaganda.
Here is a fragment of such an appeal to the Jews, which comes today from Israel, from a man who considers himself an expert in influencing the subconscious and calls himself an interpreter of the Bible.
“…Why did God give an earthquake and tsunami to Japan, a country that is less than other states in sins? This is an important question that provides a lot of valuable information. Consider all aspects of this event:
- Since 2011 is the year of warnings, God does not yet destroy, but only warns;
- God showed that earthquakes and tsunamis - the instrument of punishment for the sinful earth and mankind - are one of the main instruments of destruction;
- God showed this example on a strong economic state, which is easier to cope with this difficult situation. For the God of destruction of thousands, this is not a punishment, this is a warning;
- God destroyed nuclear power plants in Japan, which is separated from the rest of the world, to show what will happen in densely populated Europe, which is filled with such and even older and more outdated nuclear power plants. What awaits Europe? - These are dozens of eruptions with earthquakes and dozens of destroyed nuclear power plants at the same time !!! Here is what the event in Japan shows. God gives time to stop all nuclear power plants.
One year of warnings has passed in vain, no one on earth believes and does not prepare. The government of my state for a year has never responded to an offer of assistance, and this is the death of hundreds of thousands of inhabitants, perhaps millions in the near future. Therefore, their unbelief will lead to these numerous victims and it will be on their conscience, if they have it ... Israel is the only state where the authorities because of political games do not see the approaching global catastrophe, which is thousands of times more dangerous than all Muslim conflicts. Israel should already open the first wave of God's warnings - to start a war, so that God will check how the nations will react in order to decide who will be sacrificed for sin, and who will be forgiven and cleansed? Whoever is against the State of Israel is against God. War is the first wave, preparation for the second wave of global catastrophes. If Israel breaks the script, it will pay with the lives of its people…”
This case of an Israeli addressing his compatriots, “inhabitants of the whole earth”, which contains an open call to “start a war!”, Could be considered the delusions of a sick religious fanatic, if another egregious fact was not known that the fans of the “golden gold” living in the USA Taurus, the richest people on the planet, are indeed hatching plans to reduce the world's population, neither more nor less, by 2/3, or by 4 billion souls. This became known to the public due to the fact that some members of the world's elite suffer, like many ordinary mortals, from the vice of incontinence of the tongue. Perhaps this also happens under the influence of alcohol, because it is known that a sober person has on his mind, then a drunk person has it on his tongue. Be that as it may, but, like an air bubble on the surface of the world information space, the news has surfaced that the elite, which owns the real power in the world, is seriously thinking about how to significantly reduce the number of people on earth so that there are fewer emissions of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. gas.
In Russia, within the walls of the State Duma of the Russian Federation, this news was announced by the leading inspector of the Accounts Chamber of the Russian Federation, Doctor of Philosophy, Professor Yury Vasilyevich Kurnosov.
He said that in Manhattan, in the house of the president of Rockefeller University, curator of closed projects in the field of genetic engineering, Paul Nurse, a meeting of the so-called US elite took place, where the world-famous sharks of capitalism were present: David Rockefeller, Bill Gates, Warren Buffett, George Soros, Michael Bloomberg (mayor of New York), media mogul Ted Turner and several others. These richest people in America (who, according to a number of foreign newspapers, are some kind of alternative government of the world), gathered to discuss problems, among which two were priority: the problem of "overpopulation of the earth" and the problem of "global warming". According to the latest statements of one of the participants in this meeting, media mogul Ted Turner, the cause of global warming is too large a population of the planet (“too much material”), which must be reduced by 2/3, bringing it to 2 billion people, which will ensure high standard of living for the rest.
Professor Yu. V. Kurnosov's report, which contains this damning information, has been published on the Internet.
Performers are needed to fulfill this monstrous "order". Lots of performers. It is not David Rockefeller, Bill Gates, Warren Buffett, George Soros, Michael Bloomberg and Ted Turner themselves who will reduce the world's population.
Obviously, the "God's chosen" Jewish people are the most suitable candidate for the role of the killer of billions of people. That is why his religious-psychic processing is going on today.
Here is an interview with the famous teacher of the Jewish people and popularizer of Kabbalah Michael Laitman, who also inspires the Jews that the whole world has finally taken up arms against them, that they are standing at the last line, and now the Jews have no choice but to rise in a holy war "against all ".
Against this background, the information voiced by the deputy of the Murmansk Regional Duma V.V. Kalaida (I quote the regional newspaper "Kola Mayak" No. 17 (182) of October 2010. The article "The collapse of Russia"). "... This year, the admission of applicants to higher military educational institutions was unexpectedly stopped. Involuntarily, everyone has questions: who will form the Russian army, and how to command it without officers? And then it suddenly turns out that admission to our military part of several tens of thousands of officers ... from the Israeli army. They will be granted citizenship and a full social package. Our defense minister met with the Israeli minister to sign a long-term agreement on military cooperation between Russia and Israel, which Leonid Ivashov called a geopolitical betrayal of the Kremlin. And none of the Russians people, presumably, does not know this, but everyone knows (although attention is not focused on this) that in the conflict between Georgia and Abkhazia, the attack was prepared by Israeli officers - specialists, and the Georgian troops were only executors. Israel fought against our peacekeepers, but they forgave everything, "didn't notice". Moreover, we signed an agreement on a visa-free regime and we are discussing the issue of military-technical cooperation ... ".
It is quite possible that the third world evil will begin with aggression against Iran. The assassination of the leader of this country is another goal of the "world government" after the assassination of Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi. The famous American fighter against evil David Duke tells about this in his video message:
Who wants to unleash a new world war is already clear today. Any war is someone's order, wars are not spontaneous, like a street riot, for example. They prepare for wars in advance, and propaganda precedes them. Therefore, you can also understand and see the customer of the war in advance. I, the author of the Fiery Bible, say that the last world war is doomed to have a religious character. This war will fulfill the gospel prophecy about the HARVEST. All the customers of this war, the organizers, propagandists and provocateurs, will ultimately face a sad end. The forces of evil, of course, will do everything to start this war, but they will lose it. Then the righteous people will burn these reptiles alive, as described in the gospel parable of the HARVEST. And this sacred anger and this holocaust will be justified. In addition, this is the wish of millions of righteous people killed by villains over the centuries. The book “Mahabharata”, an ancient Indo-Aryan epic, speaks about this: “According to the precepts that the world is ancient, evil snakes will be put on fire ...”.
Have you read the article to the end? Please take part in the discussion, express your point of view, or simply rate the article.
In the event that Russia sends its troops to the territory of Ukraine, it requires an answer. Our answer is that there is no possibility of World War III. In fact, the threat of the Third World War is the result of our inadequate perception of the surrounding reality.
This threat comes from ourselves, from our Anglo-Saxon cultural-historical type of national self-consciousness, mutilated by the inoculation of folk principles. Self-intimidation of this kind is rooted in our habit of living under the pressure of propaganda about our own insignificance, scolding everything that is Russian, rewarding it with vile epithets, and looking up from this "lowland" to which we have lowered ourselves, at the advantages of Western civilization, which , in fact, for us practically none. In the end, we live, make decisions and put them into practice in the conditions of European inoculation in the most dangerous form for Russian civilization: in the habit of looking at our problems through the prism of the interests of Western civilization, constantly yielding to it in its increasingly arrogant demands, like this revealed today in Ukraine.
There will be no third world war in the “hot” form that our intelligentsia frightens us with, since Western civilization has already resolved all those internal contradictions that could be resolved by military means during the Second World War.
All the so-called world wars - both the First and the Second - began as wars for the redistribution of influences within Western civilization itself, that is, in essence, they were civil wars, wars between kindred peoples of one civilization. All other countries were just involved in the whirlpool of events with one single goal - to reduce their own losses and "rake up the heat with the wrong hands." Both (1914 and 1939) world wars are based on contradictions between Germany on the one hand, and Great Britain and France on the other. The British involved Russia in this war on their side. Russia did not need this war at all. The German Emperor Wilhelm II, as you know, did not want war with Russia. Only the habit of looking at their affairs through the prism of European interests involved Russia in this disastrous war for her.
Historiosophy N.Ya. Danilevsky points to the main reason for this war. The historical movement of peoples of the Western cultural-historical type is determined by one law: the law of balance of all its constituent parts, and this balance was violated by the claims of Germany. These nations do not tolerate claims of hegemony. Germany, having united into one political entity only in the second half of the 19th century, made such a demand and was suppressed by the combined forces of the entire Western civilization, which, moreover, managed to involve Russia in this massacre and along the way solve the problem of weakening it as a real one, from their point of view. sight, his enemy. Historiosophy N.Ya. Danilevsky argues that the West is a danger to Russia only when the political system of Western states reaches an equilibrium in the relations of all its members among themselves. And it does not pose any danger at all when some country appears within Western civilization itself, which tries to claim hegemony in relations with its “relatives”. In this case, Russia's position should be neutral. It was this “Danilevsky geopolitical law” that was violated by Russia in 1914 - it acted on one of the sides, namely Great Britain, and itself became a party to the conflict (the Serbs, allegedly because of which Russia got involved in the war, could have waited for other more favorable circumstances , which would certainly have developed in the case of a policy of neutrality). Here we will put in advance in the "notes" of our study one important circumstance: all the peoples of Western civilization in the period under review were ready to make human sacrifices to achieve their national interests. And these victims were estimated in the First World War in the millions.
The same story repeated itself in World War II, but the USSR simply had no choice. Great Britain and the USA literally raised German fascism, solving two main tasks for themselves. The first is to finally suppress the passionarity of the Germans so that they can never again claim leadership positions in the world, and by doing this at the expense of Russia, and the second is to establish world hegemony. Both tasks were quite successful, only the United States, not Great Britain, came forward in the first place (although, perhaps, the British play a much larger role in world politics today than is commonly thought).
The German attack on the USSR on June 22, 1941 is a mystery to historians. Germany did not need this war, under it was the whole of Europe, including the Slavic countries. The expediency spoke of the need to stop and begin a long period of Germanization of the conquered peoples of already conquered Europe, and the Germans have such experience, it is worth remembering the fate of the Polabian Slavs, who were all either destroyed or assimilated.
The only acceptable explanation of what happened is given by the historiosophy of N.Ya. Danilevsky: the fascism of the people's principles of Western civilization - the natural historical right to ensure the benefit of their peoples at the expense of other peoples, prevailed over practical expediency. Nazi Germany, with its belly stuffed to capacity, climbed onto the USSR and choked. Of course, an additional role was played by the transformation of Hitler into a mystic, as a result of which he ceased to see the real interests of his people and to distinguish the possible from the impossible.
And, both in the First World War and in the Second, Germany was defeated by the combined efforts of the entire Western civilization, but with the decisive role of Russia in the legal form of the USSR. The so-called World War II showed that the popular beginnings of Western civilization by that time had already largely lost their passionarity, the internal driving force it needed for its historical development, and the peoples of this civilization, unlike the times of the First World War, were completely unprepared for big sacrifices. This statement, of course, does not apply to the Germans of this period of history. This people, having united into one political entity only in the second half of the 19th century, twice in the history of the 20th century made an attempt to establish hegemony among the peoples of their cultural and historical type and lost both times because of the role of Russia in these wars.
In 1940, the French and their allies, the British, were generally unable to resist the Germans on their own without the participation of Russia, in contrast to 1914. France was defeated in less than a month. The German offensive began on May 10, 1940, and already in late May - early June, the Allies were evacuated from the port of Dunkirk, which went down in history under the name "Dunkirk miracle", since Hitler, for reasons that are incomprehensible and for modern historians, on May 24 gave the order to his tank divisions to stop the offensive (apparently, he took pity on the peoples of his kindred civilization). The Germans defeated the combined forces of the French, British, Belgians and Dutch in three weeks. The main reason lies in the low morale. After Dunkirk, the French surrendered, and on June 22, 1940, the Armistice of Compiègne was signed, essentially an act of surrender. That is, the French decided to sit out and preferred to put up with the costs of maintaining the occupying German army than to bring millions of victims, as in the First World War. Therefore, as a result of the Second World War, the losses of France, as well as Great Britain, were already in the hundreds of thousands, and not millions, which indicates the unwillingness of Western civilization to solve its internal problems at its own expense. The same applies to the United States: the Americans were also not ready to take “unacceptable losses”, having behind them the experience of a bloody civil war of 1861-1865, in which their casualties were greater than their total losses in two world wars.
All the previous internal contradictions of Western civilization, which could be resolved by military means, were resolved in 1945, there are no more reasons for internecine wars within itself (in fact, civil wars, since they go on within one civilization), and after all, only these internal wars of Western civilization and can be the source of world wars, as was the case twice in the 20th century.
Indeed, Germany has become a de facto protectorate of the United States, has gone through the “denazification” procedure, does not have, there is an insanely large (547) number of American military bases in Europe, all the states of the Western Slavs have been broken, most have joined the EU and NATO.
But most importantly, after the Second World War, the United States managed to turn its national currency into world money. By the mid-40s of the XX century, the United States concentrated 70% of the world's gold reserves. Apparently, supplies, food, etc. played a decisive role in this. allied countries, including the USSR, for which payment was made in gold. Please note: in the midst of the landing of the Allied troops in Normandy (the operation took place from June 6 to August 31, 1944) - July 1 in Bretton Woods (USA) a conference is going to determine the entire post-war system of organizing monetary relations and trade settlements. As a result of the adopted agreements, the "gold dollar standard" was approved: the dollar was firmly pegged to gold ($35 per troy ounce), and the currencies of 44 countries were pegged to the US dollar. The International Monetary Fund and the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, formed in 1944, became the instruments of this system.
This gold-dollar monetary system, replacing the monetary system based on the gold standard (when each national currency is pegged to gold and freely exchanged), was only an intermediate step towards the complete refusal of the United States of obligations to freely exchange the dollar for gold, which was finally fixed in 1973 year at the Jamaica International Conference, which subordinated exchange rates to the laws of the market. This system operates to this day. The system of fixed exchange rates has ceased to exist.
Thus, the Americans proved the correctness of our Russian scientist Sergey Fedorovich Sharapov, who developed a coherent monetary system based on paper money, not tied to gold, but tied only to the level of development of the productive forces of a particular country (we recommend reading Valentin Katasonov’s book “Theory of Slavophiles and Modern Russia, S. Sharapov's Paper Ruble). This system was successfully introduced by the Bolsheviks, which, in fact, we owe industrialization in the first place - only this system allows us to mobilize all the internal resources of the people (this is exactly what should be done in Novorossia).
But the whole trick turned out to be that the dollar, which was no longer backed by anything, having received inertia since 1944, continued to continue to perform the function of world money. It is this status of the dollar that is the main gain of the United States, it is this instrument that gives the Americans a gigantic advantage over other nations in the development of their economy. The possibility of such an advantage is connected with the function of paper and non-cash money in the conditions of a developed commodity-money circulation, which politicians carefully hide from the people.
To carry out a free exchange of produced goods, the mere presence of consumer demand for these goods is not enough; this exchange will be possible only if there is also effective demand for goods. And the satisfaction of this second condition ultimately depends only on the saturation of the economy with money in an amount equivalent to the entire potentially produced mass of goods that the population and industry need. If there is less money in the economy than is necessary for the productive forces (Sharapov used the concept of "the industriousness of the people"), production stops, death occurs. If more - then inflation, which, first of all, means a uniform increase in prices in all sectors and is not something fatal for the economy. But this is only if the state issues its banknotes primarily in strict accordance with the needs of its economy, perhaps with some reserve in the direction of excess.
In the United States, as you know, the function of the Central Bank is performed by the Federal Reserve System, an organization owned by several private banks. The issue of the “unsecured dollar” is produced in quantities that obviously exceed the needs of the US economy and is carried out not only to finance its economy, but also to fulfill the function of the dollar as world money.
There is no hyperinflation in the US because other countries are forced to conduct their foreign trade in dollars, especially when it comes to trading in hydrocarbons. Further - you cannot spend all your foreign exchange earnings, but must store it in gold reserves (gold and foreign exchange reserves). But the most interesting thing is that you cannot print your banknotes in an amount corresponding to the needs of your economy, but you are allowed to do this only in an amount proportional to your dollar savings in gold reserves. In this trap is not only Russia, but also China, which are entangled in various international agreements with structures such as the IMF.
This is how the modern neo-colonial system works. All countries that are part of this system pay a huge tax, which is expressed in the freezing of their dollar assets in "dollar reserves", while the Americans still manage to keep the gold of other countries, supposedly in storage. Even assuming that you manage to someday get your money out of these financial refrigerators, you will still lose on inflation. But the whole foreign policy of the United States is aimed at (and this is the whole point) so that you never receive this money, at least the main part of it, so that you never leave the dollar zone, so that you cannot fully develop your economy because for artificial compression of their own money supply.
The United States has established a world order in which they seek to artificially restrain the development of other national economies that are not included in the concept of the "golden billion". To do this, they need a powerful army and navy, they need more than 700 military bases around the world. Therefore, one must understand that the real backing of the dollar is the aggressive foreign policy of the United States, pursued by them with the help of a powerful military machine, which, moreover, countries -Potential victims also support at their own expense through the above mechanism of dollar dependence.
The burning of extra dollars is carried out precisely through the inspiring and organization of local conflicts, as a result of which not only funds of objectionable persons, but also the very same gold reserves of entire states themselves are under arrest (freezing assets). At the same time, Americans seem to be able to separate from their economy not only extra non-cash money, but also cash. It is not for nothing that dollar bills of a new type appeared in Ukraine today: they were tritely printed to finance the revolution, which means that it is possible to control those persons who have too many of them.
What conclusions can be drawn from this analysis?
First. The third world war (in the sense that we put into this phrase) is impossible due to Russia's military intervention on the territory of Ukraine. It is impossible because it will definitely lead to the collapse of the dollar as a world currency, which will mean the loss of an external source of income for the United States as a result of a process similar to how in the Middle Ages, subject peoples suddenly refused to pay natural tribute in gold, furs, etc. to their enslavers. The Americans would tolerate these actions on our part just as they tolerated the annexation of Crimea, and would now pass in Congress the same bill against Russia No. we would not leave the dollar zone.
What appears to us in our imagination when we ask ourselves the question of the consequences of the entry of Russian troops into the entire territory of Ukraine?
We think that the United States, for its part, will also definitely bring in its troops and a war between Russia and the United States will begin directly, which, naturally, we think with our Western-philic consciousness, will lead to our complete defeat.
It is this inadequate understanding of the realities of the modern world order that is the key to our defeat in the future, and we will definitely lose if we do not sober up. The Americans are well aware that a conventional war with a country that has nuclear weapons, which can destroy you more than once, is fraught with the risk of this war spilling over into a nuclear one. And the American layman is completely unprepared for this. Moreover, those puppeteers invisible to the world who actually rule America are absolutely not ready for this: for them, not a single scenario of the development of events is unacceptable, fraught with even the slightest probability of damage to their property and position.
The best example is the unwillingness of the United States to strike North Korea, which possesses, and Iran, which may possess a "dirty" atomic bomb. The unacceptable damage that Russia's nuclear deterrence forces can inflict on US territory is incomparable with the capabilities of North Korea and Iran, which have nothing to reach the United States, and only American aircraft carriers off their coasts can suffer. And, apparently, this is enough for the Americans not to get into the war.
Oddly enough, but our ally in the current situation of a hypothetical conflict with the United States is Hollywood and the entire long-term system of American propaganda against Russia, which instilled in the consciousness of Americans the belief that it is Russia that is the empire of evil, that there are no more terrible Russian bears in the world, that we ruthless, we enslave all peoples, destroy them, etc., up to eating babies. Remember how until recently Western propaganda tried to discredit our Olympics: they showed fabricated videos on their television about how wolves walk around hotels in Sochi. And what a simple American thinks, it is not difficult to assume that this Russian “subhuman”, a beast, in fact, without hesitation, will use nuclear weapons in the event of a direct clash with American soldiers.
This is the only reason why a direct war with Russia has no chance of taking place. And note that nowhere, not a single US TV channel, not a single newspaper draws for them the prospect of such a military clash. Why? Because they are well aware that panic can begin in their society, which can have unpredictable consequences.
US public figures watch what they say, not to mention government officials. But our intelligentsia does not follow and, speaking about the possibility of World War III, actually joins the ranks of the propaganda army of the Pentagon. In fact, we should find American dissidents and pay them so that what our provocateurs say, they sound inside the United States itself. The benefits for us would be enormous: the United States would be covered by a wave of anti-war demonstrations.
The fulfillment by the dollar of the function of world money allows the United States to provide its citizens with an undeservedly high standard of living due to a hidden form of exploitation of other peoples. But it is precisely this circumstance that is at the same time a factor keeping America from starting a large-scale war with a nuclear power. Only the very idea of such a possibility, having captured public opinion in one or another country of the world, is capable of forcing other countries to begin preparing for defense against the United States. One of the measures of this preparation will inevitably be the transition to the direct issue of their national currencies, that is, the withdrawal from the dollar zone.
This will lead first to the weakening of the dollar as a world currency, and in the event of a real war - to its complete collapse. The entire system of exploitation, built on the results of World War II, will collapse. What does this mean for the US? The undeservedly high standard of living of US citizens that they now have will collapse, and the violent foundations of the Anglo-Saxon national character will finally begin to “nightmare” their own government, as a result of which the peoples of the world will have to send humanitarian aid to the USA.
Second. To support the modern world neo-colonial system, the United States is enough to constantly arrange local crises and wars, in which, if possible, they try not to participate with their troops because of the low morale of the army, but try to use their hirelings, which they grow in advance all over the world. And where the United States decides to take part with its soldiers, they are forced to strictly monitor the level of losses in manpower so that it does not exceed the psychologically unacceptable by society. Wars immediately end as soon as this bar rolls over. At the same time, we must see that this level has been constantly and sharply decreasing since the civil war of 1861-1865, in which, according to various estimates, from 500 to 600 thousand people died, which exceeds the losses of the United States in two world wars combined. In Vietnam, this threshold has dropped to 50,000 people. In Iraq, Afghanistan, up to three, two, one thousand people. In Libya, the United States limited itself to supporting militants from the air, and in Syria only military-technical assistance to militants, seeing Bashar al-Assad's ability to resist in a ground war. Proof of the importance for America of an acceptable threshold of losses are the US relations with North Korea and Iran, which the US did not dare to fight, since the peoples of these countries are ready for their Patriotic Wars.
It follows from this that in the current situation in Ukraine, it is in the interests of the United States and not in the interests of Russia that a protracted conflict along the front "the army of Novorossiya - the army of Ukraine", in which both countries will support each side.
Therefore, our newspaper constantly wrote about the need to send Russian troops to the entire territory of Ukraine in order to stop NATO advances into the zone of Russian vital interests at once, which, due to our inadequacy, shrank to the size of historical Russia (in fact, the zone of vital interests of Russia is the territory of all border countries, especially the Slavic and Baltic countries, which should not be part of NATO, but at least be neutral).
Third. There will be no “Third World War” in the sense that we put into this phrase (i.e., in the sense of the Western military offensive against Russia), because - although for the first time in our history we are confronting a united Western civilization - there is an objective factor, essentially weakening this united West. The weakness of the united Western civilization lies in the fact that its unification took place on the basis of US hegemony, and not on the basis of the balance of all nation-states that make up the Western cultural and historical type. It is natural to attribute the USA to the Western cultural and historical type, which N.Ya. Danilevsky at one time called Romano-Germanic or Anglo-Saxon. No new civilization has developed in the United States, this is the same Western civilization, transferred to another continent from the Old World by the method of colonization, only the Anglo-Saxon principle won in it.
When we say that the West united for the first time, we mean not only that supranational political institutions (NATO, EU) were created in it for the first time, but also that for the first time the West sets the task of total destruction of Russia. We somehow forgot that it was precisely this task that Hitler tried to realize, and since 1945, the Americans.
But in our history there is still an example of the role of balance: Europe united against Russia in the Crimean War of 1853 and won, and lost under Napoleon in 1812. Here is what N.Ya. writes about this. Danilevsky in his book “Russia and Europe”: “A campaign against Russia during a disturbed balance, under the leadership of one of the greatest military geniuses (red-Napoleon), who held the forces and destinies of Europe in his hands, ends with the complete defeat of the enemies. The campaign against Russia (ed - 1853) during the equilibrium, led by the most notorious mediocrities, ends in their complete success, despite the fact that Russia has become (materially, at least) twice as strong as in 1812 ".... “It is precisely the balance of the political forces of Europe that is harmful, even disastrous for Russia, and the violation of it on any side is beneficial and beneficial.”
Both world wars, as mentioned above, were, in fact, civil wars within one Western civilization. Political balance has not been achieved.
In order to determine our foreign policy course today, we must know the "geopolitical law of Danilevsky" described above. Only then will we be able to formulate the main question and answer it: has Western civilization reached that political balance that will allow it to bring down all its forces on us? The answer is obvious: no, it hasn't. And this is our chance and the chance of all other peoples to live still, preserving their original folk principles, to live up to new geopolitical realities, which Russia can already form if it frees itself from the shackles of Western culture in the organization of all spheres of life.
The political system of the peoples of Western civilization today is built on the basis of the principle of US hegemony and therefore is not in balance. We see that it is the United States that arranges all local crises in different countries, sometimes attracting NATO allies for decoration. The position of European countries on the Ukrainian crisis is another example of the contradictions between the United States with the United Kingdom and Europe that joined them.
On the other hand, there are insoluble contradictions within Europe itself: between the Germans, who still retain their passionarity, and the French, on the one hand, and other peoples, on the other. Voting in the European Union is built as in a joint-stock company. The founding fathers (primarily Germany and France) tied voting to the population of the participating countries so that they always had a majority and therefore they could “legally” dictate their will to unfortunate foreigners: Greeks, Romanians, Slavs, who are all today on learn from their own experience the authenticity of the Russian proverb that warns that free cheese can only be found in a mousetrap. European integration is based on the principle of "woe to the vanquished." It is impossible not to see this today, if we proceed from the priority of preserving the diversity of God-created peoples.
So, let us repeat our conclusion: Russia is opposed by Western civilization, which has not managed to achieve a political balance of its parts. Therefore, from this point of view, we have a chance for the Russian Renaissance!
Fourth. The Third World War has already been going on since 1945, and Western civilization, united under the hegemony of the United States, is waging it against the whole world very successfully, and there is no need for them to unleash a full-scale hot world war: its consequences are beyond forecasts and can “accidentally” cause a new strengthening of Russia or China, for example. In all our previous articles, our newspaper constantly focuses on this.
You just need to learn to see that only the forms of this war have changed: firstly, the United States has secured superiority in military potential due to the possession of nuclear weapons, which generally excludes the possibility of an attack on the United States by anyone; secondly, the tactics of sneaking up with their military bases to potentially dangerous (according to the Americans) countries are actively used; thirdly, the advantages of the American-Western civilization, such as “democracy”, “human rights”, are actively imposed on other countries, which ends with the introduction of their agents of influence into the ruling elites of other nation-states, such as Gorbachev, with a subsequent change of the entire legislation of these states towards complete capitulation.
An obstacle to the world domination of Western civilization was the Russian-Slavic civilization, one of the states of which not only retained its political independence, but reached unprecedented power in its history. This is our state with you - Russia, and it does not matter that at the time when this power was achieved, we existed in the legal form of the USSR.
They say we lost the Cold War. Nothing like this. Russia was able to single-handedly resist the West in this war and prevent it from developing into a hot nuclear phase: it was the Americans who were the first to develop plans to strike 50 cities of the USSR with atomic bombs, today this is known. It is by this criterion that the outcome of the war must be judged. The collapse of our statehood in the format of the USSR is not associated with the costs of the Cold War, but with the rejection of Kosygin's economic reforms of the 1960s, which is the starting point of the crisis of the 1980s-90s (we will develop this topic in future articles).
Following the results of the Second World War, the Western elite made an important conclusion for themselves: in open confrontation we cannot be defeated, because, falling into a period of fierce trials, the Russian peasant wakes up from hibernation and discovers gigantic strength and readiness “not to stand up for the price”, as is sung in the famous song. Therefore, they adopted a strategy of corrupting us from within by planting their civilizational values, built solely on the enslavement of a person to carnal needs, from which it is very difficult for non-church people to break out (this topic, apparently, also needs to be developed in the future).
But in Ukraine, the Americans made a mistake, or they are acting very risky for themselves. Instead of corrupting the citizens of Ukraine with their values for another generation, they attacked us today, when not only the older generation is alive, but also the middle one is able to adequately assess the situation. And this attack is done through an intermediary in the form of the Kyiv junta (they can’t do otherwise), which uses the neo-Nazi ideology of “Ukrainianism”, and which has finally shown itself openly as the personification of total Russophobia, which is exactly what was laid even the Austro-Hungarians into the very idea of creating a special Ukrainian identity, different from the Russian one. This policy of the US-Kyiv junta has already led to the mass death of several thousand people. Before our eyes, the genocide of the Russian people of the “former Ukraine” is unfolding at the hands of those who only yesterday were talking about the “Holodomor”. We have every reason for decisive action and we have enough support from the population in Ukraine itself for this, due to the unfinished process of both Ukrainization and Europeanization (Americanization) of its inhabitants.
If we had lived all these years with awareness of our vital interests, we would have been able to see that the Americans, who staged the February revolution in Kyiv, made a mistake by giving us both a pretext and a reason at the same time to send the army to the entire territory of Ukraine. They cannot answer with anything at the present time, their strength is only in the weakness of our national self-consciousness and in its split.
If we got rid of the habit of looking at our affairs through the prism of the interests of Western civilization, we would see that the Providence gives us a chance, with minimal losses for ourselves, to resolve the issue of reunification of the divided Russian people. To do this, we must decide to send troops to the entire territory of Ukraine and start from its Central part (Kyiv) and the Western regions (Lviv-Rivne-Volyn-Uzhgorod). At the same time, Russia should consider as belonging to the divided Russian people not only the Russian inhabitants of Novorossia, but also the Russian Ukrainians of Little Russia (Central Ukraine), Russian Ukrainians of Galician Rus, Rusyns of Transcarpathian Rus (I apologize if I forgot anyone, I confess that I considered the Galician Ukrainians to be separate ethnic group, they are Russian, Russian!). And it should not matter to us at all that part of the population of Ukraine today is negatively opposed to Russia. We must understand that not everyone is able to endure the propaganda of lies that pours on the heads of our compatriots in Ukraine. We must proceed from responsibility not only to ourselves and our descendants, whose lives will be subjected to physical destruction as a result of NATO approaching our borders, but also to the Russians of Little Russia and Galicia, who are only a hundred years old or so Western political technologists (to one of the groups which should be attributed to both the Bolsheviks and all the presidents of Ukraine over the past 23 years) have been hammered into their heads that they are not Russian. Our propaganda can be built on the bare truth, unlike the one that is pouring out of Kyiv today. On our website, we post a story about the disastrous situation in Bulgaria, in which it found itself as a result of joining the EU (now they do not eat bell peppers and tomatoes, but Dutch ones, and then, if there is enough money after paying utility bills).
The same will happen in the territories of Western Ukraine: there are no historical examples that would even allow us to assume that, for example, those black soils that ordinary workers in Western Ukraine own today will remain their property. Everything will be taken away “according to the law”: through high taxes, for example, and given to Western agricultural corporations. Information has already flashed that Poroshenko is undertaking to reduce sugar beet crops in favor of genetically modified crops from American companies like Monsanto.
And if today the working people of Western Ukraine are fed from their land by subsistence farming, and get clothes and housing from seasonal crafts in Russia and Poland, then after the final loss of political independence, all families will have to go corny to seasonal crafts, as is the case in Bulgaria (it came to light there). to the fact that children leave the old people in the villages to live in poverty and leave for other countries). By this we want to say that in our campaign baggage there is only the truth, which we are obliged to convey to all residents of Ukraine.
We need to finally understand that the United States, like all its predecessors, does not need any pretexts for war against us at all.
We need to see that they have been waging war against us for a long time in the manner described above.
We need to understand that those unfriendly actions that they can commit against us, they will commit in any case, if there is a collaborationist government in Kyiv, controlled by an American Gauleiter in the form of the US ambassador.
We need to understand that US Law (BILL) No. 2277 "Russian Aggression Prevention Act of 2014" (Russian Aggression Prevention Act of 2014), which has already passed two readings, the Americans would have passed even without the fait accompli of the annexation of Crimea to us. The accusation of persecution of gays, Pussy Riot, Navalny, etc. would be used as a pretext. This is clearly seen only from the title of this document, and the text itself is much more eloquent... It has already become commonplace to assert that the aggressor, in fact, is the United States, which after 1945 only does what it constantly fights, considering it a zone of its vital interests of the entire globe.
We need to understand that all our guilt in the eyes of the West (and this is clearly seen from US law No. 2277) lies only in the fact that we are, that we exist and want to live an independent life in the political, economic, religious, cultural spheres .
Events are unfolding in such a way that you can already hear from many opponents regret that we did not dare to send troops to the whole of Ukraine in March, when the Crimean events unfolded. But we must see that the events unfolding today in Ukraine cry for themselves: the Americans will not leave us alone. The only adequate solution is to send troops now. Yes, there will already be victims, but still incomparable even with the tragedy that is being played out in Novorossia today, and even more so, incomparable with the future sacrifices that Russia will have to make if the United States settles on the former borders of the former Ukraine (the former because Ukraine is already cannot be considered an independent subject of international law, it is a US colony). There is even a very definite possibility for this: legitimate presidential elections in Ukraine should take place in March 1915. At the same time, the May 25 elections should not be recognized.
Unfortunately, events are developing in such a way that the scenario that our newspaper is talking about is not being considered. In this case, we can only join the opinions already expressed (in particular by Kurginyan, Prokhanov, Bagdasarov) that Russia should provide military-technical assistance to the army of Novorossia by sending volunteers there, even if they are registered in private armies, as Kurginyan suggests, so that the soldiers' families are protected. But with only one caveat. This assistance should be so large-scale that the tasks mentioned above could be solved by the army of Novorossiya.
Due to tense Russian- American relations and the abundance of regional conflicts are increasingly heard about the imminent start of World War III. But is this war really that likely? And will NATO, led by the United States, decide on direct aggression against the Russian Federation? Common sense still says no. And it's not just the presence of nuclear weapons.
"There will be no third world war over Ukraine"
In the article "US-NATO: Military Superiority" published by Pravda, Ru last year, I wrote that the US and its European and Asian allies have much more military equipment and assets than Russia and China combined.
Does this mean that America and its allies will win the world war? The answer is no. If we do the unimaginable and let another world war break out, there will be no winners, everyone on the planet will lose. And that's why.
Let me remind you that NATO is better armed than Russia. The combined population of the 28 states that make up the Alliance is three times that of Russia, plus their budgets are many times greater than the budget of the country they consider their enemy.
With a roughly 10 to 1 superiority in military courts and roughly 3 to 1 in the air, Mr. Putin may have no choice but to resort to nuclear weapons. The third world war will not be a repetition of previous world wars - it will turn into fast and dirty in a short time.
Russia can quickly land a deadly or near-death blow on NATO's European allies. Even if the Americans support them, they will not be troops on the borders. Whereas the armed forces of Russia, despite the fact that in general it is inferior in military equipment and means, are well-equipped in order to quickly mobilize and defend their country.
Russia's allies should also be remembered, including Iran, Syria and, last but not least, China. Yes, Israel will side with NATO to try to destroy Iran, Hezbollah and Syria. China will support Russia...
But wait, we are forgetting a number of important factors that must be considered in this scenario before any such war begins.
The situation in the world economy is different from that which was on the eve of World War II. In fact, it is almost the opposite . At the beginning of that war, the debts of the United States and Europe were small, they increased significantly by its end. If a world war breaks out, it will quickly lead to worldwide bankruptcy and send the global economy into depression.
Many people seem to think that America can fight another war with impunity, in addition to the other two. But these two wars have already contributed significantly to increasing the national debt to $18.1 trillion.
The wars with Iraq and Afghanistan were insignificant compared to the possible scenario of the Third World War. The cost of fully mobilizing US military forces abroad will send the federal budget deficit skyrocketing. The United States is already being followed on the heels of the debtor countries of Europe, whose public debt to GDP in 2014 reached 106 percent.
One has to ask, how would the US government pay the huge Pentagon bills? It is worth remembering here that China, which US politicians publicly view as an enemy, is helping to finance the US debt. He does this by buying up Treasuries and maintaining a positive trade balance with America.
Will China continue to accumulate US debt in the event of a world war? No. Do Americans think that the Chinese are so stupid and gullible? This funding will immediately stop. Given this harsh reality, how will America finance its participation in World War III? Oh yes, I forgot to mention that Russia also bought US Treasury bonds, albeit on a smaller scale.
In the event of a full-scale war, Congress will face cuts in social security and other programs to protect the underprivileged, social programs, as well as tax increases.
And in America, there are already 50 million people on food stamps, many of them in low-paying or part-time jobs; a demographic crisis is unfolding, the nightmare of the baby boomers. Over the next 15 years, the number of employees who finance social insurance programs will decline, while the number of recipients will increase.
The Fed and the Japanese and European central banks have proven they can print money but not stimulate their economies. After six years of uninterrupted money printing, the global economy is plunging into recession.
And at this moment in history there is the sudden prospect of a world war. Isn't it obvious that a world war would only temporarily increase production and, in turn, inflation? But this would not lead to the creation of material wealth, but to massive destruction and death. Already overheated printing presses would continue to work. The world would be drowning in dollars, yen and euros, literally drowning. But isn't it already flooded? Yes, of course, the military-industrial complex would have profited, as usual.
But it would all be over because the world's currencies would be destroyed; confidence in world trade is lost; there would be no reserve currency to replace the dollar and whoever survived would have to start from scratch.
This is not a chess game, not finding out "who is cooler" - this is life and death on a global scale. NATO and its anti-Russian patrons must understand that if a world war breaks out, the Strait of Hormuz, whose northern coast belongs to Iran, will be closed. Enjoy your cheap oil and shut up! Remember that Russia is actually the world's largest oil producer, and if a war breaks out, oil prices will skyrocket... So be careful what you wish for.
Read the original article at
This article may seem intimidating. But we all live in such a time that the start of a new global war is becoming a real prospect. In the article we will answer the question of whether the date of the beginning of the Third World War is predicted or not.
modern warfare
In the view of most people who grew up on filmography based on the Great Patriotic War, the standard of military operations looks like a clipping from a movie. Reasoning logically, we understand that just as a saber from 1917 would look ridiculous in the hands of a Soviet soldier in 1941, it will be strange to observe a picture of barbed wire being cut at night by partisans in our time.
Yes, and you must admit, having weapons of mass destruction in the form of nuclear charges, bacteriological crops and climate control, it is paradoxical to expect a repetition of the classics in the form of a bayonet-knife and a dugout.
Quiet panic, gradually undermining the Internet users and skillfully fueled by the media, is felt in the thousands of requests received every hour. People are so convinced of the inevitability of trouble that they almost never ask questions - will it happen? Much more relevant is the clumsy wording: when is the exact date for the start of World War III set?
And now this is scary.
Battle for resources
The era when forests, fields, rivers and the defeated people were the main contribution to the winner has passed irrevocably. Today, the greatness of the country is dictated not by population and not by a rich history of victories, but by the possession of underground treasures: oil sources, natural gas deposits, coal seams, uranium deposits.
The date of the beginning of the Third World War is not hushed up. She just passed so long ago that her exact number is hardly preserved in the minds. The dream of the engines of trade policy has come true - the economy and the struggle for first place in the leadership elite have become the main values of life.
Here it is useful to recall the main method of trade relations, which works everywhere and at all times. The most selective piece was never given to those who bargained and fought for it - there was always someone third, standing aside and sympathetically watching the fight.
Based on events: how can it be
Many will intervene, one will get it. It is no secret that the main threat to Russia is attributed to the United States, but the events unfolding around the world's largest leaders suggest that the general tension creates only the appearance of a real threat. The flow of information masterfully maintains the highest bar on the scale of mass hysteria, while the war unleashed by a mighty power (read - the United States) began a long time ago.
Events in Ukraine, Iraq, and Syria speak not of spontaneous, but of carefully thought-out actions, on which not a single hundred analysts with such rich strategic experience have worked, which simply does not exist in any of these countries. After all, we are not talking about random clashes, reminiscent of the previous yard-to-yard fights - we are talking about a war that draws in the masses. And here all sorts of peacekeeping missions with the introduction of friendly troops at the ready with friendly weapons only fuel the hostile mood.
The EU readily accepts information in the form in which it is presented by the United States - the EU apparently has neither the time nor the initiative to investigate. Like a bull on a red rag, the leaders of the European Union will react to the slightest move by the United States towards military action against Russia.
This will give a reason to talk for a long time to the restraining Chinese government. The stagnation of American troops in the Pacific region has long poisoned the existence of the patient Chinese, whose hand is already tired of trembling over the nuclear button. Israel's reaction is also predictable - the long-awaited consensual nod from the United States will allow them to fall on Tehran, but how long Israel itself will last after that is a big question. The last volleys in Iraq will hardly have time to die down, as Libyan, Omani, Yemeni and (where without them) Egyptian bombs will simply sweep away the unlucky aggressor.
Anyone else interested in the start date of World War III? Then we discuss further.
Side view - how it will be
It is useful to hear what he thinks about the events, scary to say - the future, retired Colonel General Anatoliy Lopata, former Chief of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine and First Deputy Minister of Defense of Ukraine. Looking ahead, we note that the remark of the former Minister of Defense about the location of the future battlefield completely coincides with the opinion of British Air Force Colonel Ian Shields.
When asked by journalists what, in fact, the Third World War is and when it will begin, Anatoly Lopata calmly explained that the war is in full swing and the aggressor country is called in it - who would you think? - of course, Russia. And even in relation to America, at least in the fact that it responds with sympathy to the Assad regime in Syria (!). At the same time, the colonel general admits that the United States is forced to reckon with the Russian Federation and this will remain unchanged, due to the huge economic and military potential of the latter.
The date of the start of the Third World War, according to the specialist, thus belongs to the distant past, but its development to the scale of epic battles is in the future, which still needs to be lived up to. Anatoly Lopata even shared a mysterious figure - 50. In his opinion, it is after this number of years that the warring powers will clash in the wide expanses of space.
Analyst forecasts
Joachim Hagopian, who has been known since 2015, warned that the recruitment of "friends" by the US and Russia is not accidental. China and India will follow Russia in any case, and the EU countries have no choice but to accept America's policy. In Korea, Hagopian predicted military neutrality with respect to both powers, but a rather stormy internecine war with the possibility of activating nuclear charges. It can be assumed that the day when the powerful weapon is put into action is the date of the beginning of the Third World War.
Alexander Richard Schiffer, an interesting personality and former head of NATO, in his book: "2017: War with Russia", predicted the defeat of the United States due to financial collapse, followed by the collapse of the American army.
Vladimir Zhirinovsky, as always, is unambiguous and says what the majority is delicately silent about. He is confident that America will not start any open action until all the countries involved in the military conflict squabble among themselves in collapse, and, exhausted, lay down what remains of their weapons. Then the US will generously gather up the dejected losers and emerge as the sole winner.
Sergei Glazyev, Advisor to the President of the Russian Federation, proposes to create a coalition that fundamentally does not support a military policy against Russia. The set of countries that are officially ready to speak out in favor of renunciation of armed conflict, according to him, will be such that America will simply be forced to moderate its appetites.
According to Vanga
The date of the beginning of the Third World War Vanga, the most famous Bulgarian seer, either could not or did not want to predict. In order not to confuse the minds with specifics, the clairvoyant said only that she sees religious strife around the world as the cause of the war. Drawing a parallel with current events, it can be assumed that the date of the start of the Third World War, which Vanga did not predict, falls on the period of terrorist acts of the ISIS group disguised as offended religious feelings.
Operating with exact dates
How not to mention the world-famous American Horatio Villegas, whose vision of fiery spheres hitting the earth from heaven in 2015 became a sensation. Adjusting quite materialistic tasks to the act of clairvoyance, Horatio hastened to announce that he knew the date of the start of the Third World War - 05/13/2017. With regret or great joy, we note that no one had to observe the fireballs on May 13.
It remains to be hoped that people who expected big events in March 2017 were not very upset when they lost confirmation of the words of astrologer Vlad Ross. Recall that this person also named the date of the start of the Third World War - 03/26/2017, which did not find a response in reality.
A selection of didactic material "entertaining tasks in the Russian language"
Children's fairy tales online Read fairy tale White duck
About space and astronautics