Biographies Characteristics Analysis

What literary techniques are used by the color motherland. Listen to the poem by M. Tsvetaeva. Analysis of the poem Rodin Tsvetaeva

"Motherland" Marina Tsvetaeva

Oh, stubborn tongue!
What would be simply - a man,
Understand, he sang before me:
"Russia, my homeland!"

But also from the Kaluga hill
She opened up to me
Far away, distant land!
Foreign land, my homeland!

Distance, born like pain,
So homeland and so -
Rock that is everywhere, through the whole
Dal - I carry it all with me!

That is why the iron broom, which was aimed at the spiritual castration of the entire population, could not avoid it. When he gives Mandelstam the title of "poet of civilization", he fits into this circle. Here are fragments of "Desert in the Desert." There are so few Greeks in Leningrad now.

We destroyed the Greek Church before. On his place concert hall. And where do we think we've gone? Why are we so much more. From Orthodoxy or Hellenism? Aren't we waiting new era now? And what is our common mission? And what should we sacrifice to him? The frequent challenge to ancient realities is tempting to throw Brodsky into a box called classicism. Czesław Miloš in his preface to "82 Poems and Poems" is also mentioned by the poet in Classical or Classical Baroque poetry. In his opinion, poetics can be described as "traditional, with rhymes and division into stanzas" - but also an attitude that opposes nihilism and relativism, probably leading the line between good and evil, truth and falsehood.

The distance that moved me near,
Dal saying "Come back
Home!" From all - to the mountain stars -
Me taking off seats!

Not without reason, doves of water,
I furrowed my forehead.

You! I will lose this hand of mine,
At least two! I'll sign with my lips
On the chopping block: strife of my land -
Pride, my homeland!

Analysis of Tsvetaeva's poem "Motherland"

The fate of Marina Tsvetaeva was such that she spent about a third of her life abroad. First she studied in France, learning the wisdom of literature, and after the revolution she emigrated first to Prague, and later to her beloved Paris, where she settled with her children and her husband Sergei Efront, a former White Guard officer. The poetess, whose childhood and youth were spent in an intelligent family, where high spiritual values ​​were instilled in children literally from the first years of life, was horrified by the revolution with its utopian ideas, which later turned into bloody tragedy for the whole country. Russia in the old and familiar sense ceased to exist for Marina Tsvetaeva, so in 1922, having miraculously obtained permission to emigrate, the poetess was sure that she would forever be able to get rid of nightmares, hunger, unsettled life and fear for her own life.

On the other hand, the position of Adam Pomorski appears, which in the aforementioned essay "Los and Will" resembles the song "Poetry", which, in fact, begins, would seem like a clear statement. And she touched on sarcasm. Only the word "classicism" has the meaning attributed to it by the Soviet literary critics past: "reaching models of pre-modern poetry". Hence, Pomorski argues that this is a misunderstanding because Brodsky can see a number of elements that call into question the connection between his relationship with the classicist movement.

However, along with relative prosperity and calmness came an unbearable longing for the Motherland, which was so exhausting that the poetess literally dreamed of returning to Moscow. Contrary to common sense and reports coming from Russia about the Red Terror, arrests and mass executions of those who were once the flower of the Russian intelligentsia. In 1932, Tsvetaeva wrote a surprisingly poignant and very personal poem "Motherland", which later played an important role in her fate. When the family of the poetess nevertheless decided to return to Moscow and submitted the relevant documents to soviet embassy, it was the poem "Motherland" that was considered as one of the arguments in favor of the officials making a positive decision. They saw in it not only loyalty to the new government, but also sincere patriotism, which at that time was actively cultivated among all segments of the population without exception. It was thanks to patriotic poems that the Soviet authorities turned a blind eye to Yesenin's drunken antics, Blok's unambiguous hints and Mayakovsky's criticism, believing that at this stage of the formation of the state it is much more important for the people to support the opinion that Soviet Union is the best and fairest country in the world.

A few months later, she retracted this initial confession, but it did not matter - Aliya was sentenced to eight years in labor camps, and Sergei Efron was executed by firing squad in a swift and brutal state. The apparatus now took everything from Tsvetaeva except Moore.

Sliding down a dead end street. Marina and Moore were evacuated to the city of Yelabuga, where they settled in a creaky old country house in stark contrast to the grand Parisian surroundings of their émigré period. Tsvetaeva was unemployed with no financial means, and she had no idea if her daughter and husband were dead or alive. She has entered a dangerous spiral, as her son Moore described in his journal: Mother lives in a suicidal haze, and she only talks about suicide.

This is best seen when you look at the work of this poet in opposition. Brodsky's independence manifesto is mainly directed at the poet's opposition to tyranny. Subjectivity can be extended according to subjectivity-objectivity: if independence is to be manifested by a subjective set of feelings, its opposite will impose the "objective" truths of tyranny from top to bottom. Objectivism itself is a field of classicism that, with its norms and patterns, wanted to promote one type of thinking.

This leads to another opposition: the chaos of the world versus the orderly philosophical system. In a chaotic world there is a world of poetics in the sense that it is based on the paradox of human will against humanity. Speech on the occasion of the graduation ceremony, in which Brodsky interprets the famous biblical verses about putting the other cheek in a non-passive expression, but, on the contrary, an activity beyond measure, which would lead against us to absurdity.

However, in the poem "Motherland" by Tsvetaeva there was not a single hint of loyalty to the new government, nor was there a single reproach in her direction. This is a work of remembrance, permeated with sadness and nostalgia for the past.. Nevertheless, the poetess was ready to forget everything that she had experienced in post-revolutionary years, because she needs this "distant, distant land", which, being her homeland, nevertheless became a foreign land for her.

The day before Moore made this entry, Tsvetaeva traveled to the nearby town of Chistopol, where several other evacuated writers lived. During this visit, Tsvetaeva expressed a desire to obtain registration and residence in Chistopol and applied for a job as a cleaner in the writers' canteen. She was a woman desperately torn between the desire to fight hard to support her son, and to drag the end of her nearly lifelong suffering.

Tsvetaeva was alone in the house; she wrote three farewell letters. The first was addressed to whoever found her body. She asked them to take Moore to the city near Chistopol, where the poet Nikolai Aseev lived. The second letter was for Aseev and his wife, imploring them to look after their son and asking them to accept a trunk containing notebooks with her poems, as well as bundles of prose writing.

The last important opposition is formed around the abstraction of classicism, the manipulation of ideas and figurines in pure form. Such an alien attitude is Brodsky, whose poems, as Baranchak writes, "with all their metaphysical depth and intellectual complexity, boast of a material, concrete life." Where, therefore, on the axis of tradition is the Brodsky Pomeranian? The researcher most likely considers the poet the heir of the sentimentalists. The most important element heritage of sentimentalism is the assertion and defense of the individual, the individuality of people against the enmity of objective reason - all systems of ideology: whether it be science or religion, despotic state or its doctrinal opposition - writes Pomorski.

This work has quite complex shape and not from the first reading lends itself to understanding. The patriotism of the poem does not lie in praising Russia as such, but in the fact that Tsvetaeva accepts it in any guise, and is ready to share the fate of her country, stating: “I will sign with my lips on the chopping block.” Just for what? By no means for Soviet power, but for pride, which, in spite of everything, Russia still has not lost, remaining, in spite of everyone and everything, great and mighty power. It was this quality that was in tune with Tsvetaeva's character, but even she was able to humble her pride in order to be able to return home. There, where indifference, poverty, ignorance, as well as the arrest and death of her family members, who were recognized as enemies of the people, awaited her. But even such a development of events could not affect the choice of Tsvetaeva, who wanted to see Russia again, not out of idle curiosity, but out of a desire to feel like part of a huge country again, which the poetess could not exchange for personal happiness and well-being contrary to common sense.

In his opinion, the three aspects that define his poetics depend on the Russian belonging to this circle of thought. First of all, irony is the negation of negation, as the Pomeranian describes it. With some attachment to details, to specific things, this is the main weapon of the writer in the fight against tyranny. This is an important note for those who are just starting their adventure with the author of "parts of speech" - to be extremely careful when we are talking about the introduction of various feelings or aphorisms, densely sown in verse, at the mouth of Brodsky himself; There is often irony behind these twists and turns.

Why, in your opinion, did Yermolai Lopakhin get the garden?

In what works of Russian literature are heroes incapable of work shown and in what way can they be compared with Gaev Leonid Andreevich?

"Motherland" M.I. Tsvetaeva

Oh, stubborn tongue!

What would be simply - a man,

Understand, he sang before me:

"Russia, my homeland!"

The fact that Brodsky's work can be discussed from the point of view of the opposition proves that the poet is faced with different ideas, but generally emphasizes his own position. Third, the elegance of his poetry. The elegy allows him not only to reflect on human destiny, but also to portray oneself - as if the poem were an act of self-exaltation and embodiment in reality.

Brodsky is sent to a labor camp for five years. The conversation that this text opens is a recording of one of the dialogues that survived this incident. Hence the motive of time and space. The cosmos, the poet says, belongs to power, tyranny. Strength often suffers in space - they convince us of "Lykomed on Skyros" or "Publish atheatem nostra". Time, in turn, is the realm of song, it is strictly dependent on language in the sense that language renews time by recalling memories, which is a "temporal ledge".

But also from the Kaluga hill

She opened up to me

Far away, distant land!

Foreign land, my homeland!

Distance, born like pain,

So homeland and so -

Rock that is everywhere, through the whole

Dal - I carry it all with me!

The distance that moved me near,

Dal saying "Come back

Home!" From all - to the mountain stars -

Me taking off seats!

In the essay "Take pleasure from the shadows", Brodsky returns to the moment when he first read the poems of his master Auden. Time is an element that does not endure. To a beautiful human form -. Can we talk about time and space in the already known categories of opposition? No, Brodsky thinks, because time is "older and larger than space." In this very statement, intertwined time with poetry, it is, as it were, the superiority of poetry in relation to anything else.

In the above text, the word "tyranny" appeared repeatedly. It should be noted that Brodsky did not identify it exclusively with the Soviet Union or with any other political form of enslavement of the population. No wonder one of the poems "The End of a Beautiful Era." To live in an age of fulfillment, when the heart is poetic.

Not without reason, doves of water,

I furrowed my forehead.

You! I will lose this hand of mine,

At least two! I'll sign with my lips

On the chopping block: strife of my land -

Pride, my homeland!

10. To what thematic variety lyrics refers to this poem?

11.Specify artistic medium, which assumes the same beginning of adjacent lines of the poem.

This is, unfortunately, difficult. It's just that the world shrinks until we reach. And one of the essays, "In Praise of Boredom," thus clashes with the universal vision of life as a constant pursuit of opportunity and pursuit. Boredom is to say, a window in time, for those traits that we usually ignore, most often due to mental imbalances. In short, this is a window to the infinity of time, that is, to our inferiority, we read in this excellent text.

For many years, Brodsky must have been aware of his insecurity and bad physical condition. He has been battling heart problems since the end of the year. Rather hit the drum by saying you have. These scissors on which it depends. fate of life. Death will take more than you.

12. What is the name stylistic device, enhancing the sound expressiveness of the verse and associated with the use of the same vowels (on the square a heh a save my lands I")?

13. There are many contrasts in the poem that are characteristic of the poetics of M. I. Tsvetaeva (foreign land - homeland; far - near). Indicate the term that denotes this technique.

The more you agree with God. Drum in the drum until you let go of the sticks. Marina Tsvetaeva was fiercely individualistic, aloof in her own country and beyond. Her life was one of shocks and tragedies that eventually engulfed the poet himself.

Poet Marina Tsvetaeva in France. She was born from a culturally conscious and intellectual family - her father founded the famous Museum fine arts them. Pushkin - and was figurative child who began writing poetry at the age of six. But by the age of 27, she had lost her child to starvation, and barely five years later she was forced to leave Russia, a country she loved very much. The idea of ​​personality was paramount for the poet, and there was no place for this in the new regime. Tsvetaeva's introverted nature and reluctance to make connections in emigre society were not the only reasons she and her family were suspicious of the Russian community in France, where the family had moved.

14. What size is the poem written by M. I. Tsvetaeva?

How do you understand the meaning of the final stanza of the poem?

Which of the Russian poets turned to the theme of the motherland and in what ways are their works consonant with the poem of M. I. Tsvetaeva?

17.1. Why did the modest daughter of Captain Mironov take such a significant place in the plot of the novel? (Based on the novel by A. S. Pushkin "The Captain's Daughter")

In fact, there are rumors that Sergei was a Soviet Spy. Rumors that were absolutely true as it happened. During his years in Europe, Sergei often claimed that he was too ill to work. His inability to find a stable job left Marina as the sole winner of bread, which greatly affected their relationship. However, despite constant arguments and mutual betrayals, her loyalty to her husband was unshakable. Efron actually led double life. He was active in society and began to gravitate toward Soviet ideas, eventually becoming an agent of the Soviet secret police.

17.2. What explains the caricature in the image of the landowners? (Based on the poem by N. A. Nekrasov "Who should live well in Russia")

17.3. Why Chekhov's The Cherry Orchard often called a warning play?

Analysis of Tsvetaeva's poem "Motherland"

The fate of Marina Tsvetaeva was such that she spent about a third of her life abroad. First she studied in France, learning the wisdom of literature, and after the revolution she emigrated first to Prague, and later to her beloved Paris, where she settled with her children and her husband Sergei Efront, a former White Guard officer. The poetess, whose childhood and youth were spent in an intelligent family, where high spiritual values ​​were instilled in children literally from the first years of life, was horrified by the revolution with its utopian ideas, which later turned into a bloody tragedy for the whole country. Russia in the old and familiar sense ceased to exist for Marina Tsvetaeva, so in 1922, having miraculously obtained permission to emigrate, the poetess was sure that she would forever be able to get rid of nightmares, hunger, unsettled life and fear for her own life.

Marina Tsvetaeva with her husband and children in Prague. Against this background, Tsvetaeva's relationship with her eldest daughter Ariadna reached the limit. Already exhausted family life Tsvetaeva. Marina was left alone with her son George, nicknamed Mur, in a very delicate situation.

Worse, Moore, who was 14 at the time, was desperate to reunite with his sister and father and see his homeland for the first time. Now, returning to home country she just traveled to more misery. It is not surprising that in paranoid Russia at that time in Russia, this did not mean the beginning of happy times. Aliya was arrested for espionage and followed a few months later: Aliya was tortured at the Lubyanka until she signed a statement admitting that she and her father worked for the French secret service.

However, along with relative prosperity and calmness came an unbearable longing for the Motherland, which was so exhausting that the poetess literally dreamed of returning to Moscow. Contrary to common sense and reports coming from Russia about the Red Terror, arrests and mass executions of those who were once the color of the Russian intelligentsia. In 1932, Tsvetaeva wrote a surprisingly poignant and very personal poem "Motherland", which later played an important role in her fate. When the poet's family nevertheless decided to return to Moscow and submitted the relevant documents to the Soviet embassy, ​​it was the poem "Motherland" that was considered as one of the arguments in favor of the officials making a positive decision. They saw in it not only loyalty to the new government, but also sincere patriotism, which at that time was actively cultivated among all segments of the population without exception. It was thanks to patriotic poems that the Soviet authorities turned a blind eye to Yesenin's drunken antics, Blok's unambiguous hints and Mayakovsky's criticism, believing that at this stage of the formation of the state it is much more important for the people to maintain the opinion that the Soviet Union is the best and fairest country in the world.

A few months later, she retracted this initial confession, but it did not matter - Aliya was sentenced to eight years in labor camps, and Sergei Efron was executed by firing squad in a swift and brutal state. The apparatus now took everything from Tsvetaeva except Moore.

Sliding down a dead end street. Marina and Moore were evacuated to the city of Yelabuga, where they settled in a creaky old country house in stark contrast to the grand Parisian surroundings of their émigré period. Tsvetaeva was unemployed with no financial means, and she had no idea if her daughter and husband were dead or alive. She has entered a dangerous spiral, as her son Moore described in his journal: Mother lives in a suicidal haze, and she only talks about suicide.

This is best seen when you look at the work of this poet in opposition. Brodsky's independence manifesto is mainly directed at the poet's opposition to tyranny. Subjectivity can be extended according to subjectivity-objectivity: if independence is to be manifested by a subjective set of feelings, its opposite will impose the "objective" truths of tyranny from top to bottom. Objectivism itself is a field of classicism that, with its norms and patterns, wanted to promote one type of thinking.

This leads to another opposition: the chaos of the world versus the orderly philosophical system. In a chaotic world there is a world of poetics in the sense that it is based on the paradox of human will against humanity. Speech on the occasion of the graduation ceremony, in which Brodsky interprets the famous biblical verses about putting the other cheek in a non-passive expression, but, on the contrary, an activity beyond measure, which would lead against us to absurdity.

However, in the poem "Motherland" by Tsvetaeva there was not a single hint of loyalty to the new government, nor was there a single reproach in her direction. This is a work of remembrance, permeated with sadness and nostalgia for the past.. Nevertheless, the poetess was ready to forget everything that she had experienced in the post-revolutionary years, since she needed this “distant, distant land”, which, being her homeland, nevertheless became a foreign land for her.

The day before Moore made this entry, Tsvetaeva traveled to the nearby town of Chistopol, where several other evacuated writers lived. During this visit, Tsvetaeva expressed a desire to obtain registration and residence in Chistopol and applied for a job as a cleaner in the writers' canteen. She was a woman desperately torn between the desire to fight hard to support her son, and to drag the end of her nearly lifelong suffering.

Tsvetaeva was alone in the house; she wrote three farewell letters. The first was addressed to whoever found her body. She asked them to take Moore to the city near Chistopol, where the poet Nikolai Aseev lived. The second letter was for Aseev and his wife, imploring them to look after their son and asking them to accept a trunk containing notebooks with her poems, as well as bundles of prose writing.

The last important opposition is formed around the abstraction of classicism, the manipulation of ideas and figurines in its purest form. Such an alien attitude is Brodsky, whose poems, as Baranchak writes, "with all their metaphysical depth and intellectual complexity, boast of a material, concrete life." Where, therefore, on the axis of tradition is the Brodsky Pomeranian? The researcher most likely considers the poet the heir of the sentimentalists. The most important element of the legacy of sentimentalism is the assertion and defense of the individual, the individuality of people against the enmity of objective reason - all systems of ideology: whether it be science or religion, a despotic state or its doctrinal opposition, writes Pomorski.

This work has a rather complex form and is not easy to understand from the first reading. The patriotism of the poem does not lie in praising Russia as such, but in the fact that Tsvetaeva accepts it in any guise, and is ready to share the fate of her country, stating: “I will sign with my lips on the chopping block.” Just for what? Not at all for Soviet power, but for pride, which, in spite of everything, Russia still has not lost, remaining, in spite of everyone and everything, a great and powerful power. It was this quality that was in tune with Tsvetaeva's character, but even she was able to humble her pride in order to be able to return home. There, where indifference, poverty, ignorance, as well as the arrest and death of her family members, who were recognized as enemies of the people, awaited her. But even such a development of events could not affect the choice of Tsvetaeva, who wanted to see Russia again, not out of idle curiosity, but out of a desire to feel like part of a huge country again, which the poetess could not exchange for personal happiness and well-being contrary to common sense.

In his opinion, the three aspects that define his poetics depend on the Russian belonging to this circle of thought. First of all, irony is the negation of negation, as the Pomeranian describes it. With some attachment to details, to specific things, this is the main weapon of the writer in the fight against tyranny. This is an important note for those who are just beginning their adventure with the author of "parts of speech" - to be extremely careful when it comes to introducing various feelings or aphorisms, densely sown in poetry, into the mouth of Brodsky himself; There is often irony behind these twists and turns.

©2015-2017 site
All rights belong to their authors. This site does not claim authorship, but provides free use.