Article personnel decide everything. Personnel decides everything

Many people have probably heard the phrase “Personnel decides everything” in their lives. Who said it for the first time, what meaning does it have, in what context was it said? And given who spoke this phrase, what was the implementation of the words he spoke? How relevant is this expression in our time and can it be applied now? And who owns the phrase “Personnel decides everything”?

The meaning of the phrase “Personnel decides everything”

The phrase was said to draw attention to the importance of education and professional skills person when approaching the solution of some problems. Correct selection personnel who bring an idea to life has a significant impact on its implementation. That is why various companies and enterprises want to have the most qualified personnel and are ready to carefully select candidates. After all, personnel decides everything. The original of this phrase was said by one very famous person. And now you will find out who said these words.

“Personnel decide everything”: who said these words and when?

Who said the words “personnel decide everything”? Author of the phrase - famous politician times Soviet Union Joseph Vissarionovich Stalin (Dzhugashvili). He said it in 1935 during a report on the state of affairs in the USSR. It should be noted that those years marked the beginning of significant progress. Humanity was entering a period of development, which, unfortunately, was subsequently postponed by the Second World War. It was at this time that the words “Personnel decide everything” were first uttered. Now you know who said this phrase first. But in what context was it mentioned? What preceded it, what statement replaced it, and how was the idea associated with it brought to life?

In what context was the phrase said?

You now know who owns the words “personnel decide everything.” But what were the circumstances in connection with which they were said? At that time, the second five-year plan was actively underway, and the gross domestic product of the Soviet Union was calculated in tens of percent. Therefore, many began to attribute successes in construction and management to individual personnel. They said that this was all their merit. The report made by Stalin contained sharp indignation about this and opposition to attributing everything to individual managers.

At the same time, the slogan “Technology decides everything” was popular at that time. This report by Joseph Vissarionovich also contains statements against him. And instead of the old one, a new motto is put forward - “Personnel decide everything.” Who said these words? A man who knew what he was talking about. As the main argument for changing slogans, the thesis was adopted that the statement about technology is active only for “technical hunger,” but even then the emphasis had to move from machines to qualified personnel who would be able to effectively manage them, and also in the future create new samples.

The main reason for implementation was taken into account the fact that with a sufficient number of professional workers it could be increased three to four times. Except simple requirement to improve their qualifications, there was also a demand for a change in attitude towards the people themselves. As an example of his careless attitude, Stalin told the story of his time spent in exile in Siberia. The essence of this story was that when they lost 1 person, they did not really grieve for him, while more attention was paid to the horse, which needed to be fed.

Implementation

How did this slogan come to life? The approach to implementation was chosen quite competently - it was decided to create educational reserves by freeing people employed in agriculture. The incarnation was the creation vicious circle: the more equipment and qualified personnel is available to agriculture, the more people from it you can send other workers and specialists for retraining and training. And the most successful ones can be trained in engineering or trained as scientists. This is how the slogan “Personnel decides everything” was implemented. Who said these words first, you know, what remains important is that this phrase is picked up modern politicians who now rule the Russian Federation.

Relevance today

Are these words topical these days? Yes. After all, it is now very difficult to skillfully manage enterprises, plan economic development, and create wealth without qualified personnel. What can a manager do during a major crisis if he does not know how to solve a minor problem? How can specialists calculate development plans if they lack knowledge about the patterns in the economy? And can a person without qualifications create good table, chair or computer? Therefore, these words retain their value and importance even now. Moreover, their importance is not only in obtaining qualified personnel, but also in relation to people. After all, if there is no person, then there is no knowledge or skills.

Conclusion

And what can we say in the end? Then, in 1935, considerable attention was paid to the self-education of the working masses and enterprising people who wanted to learn. They were supported. It is worth remembering the great scientists and inventors whose talent was revealed during this period (Kurchatov, Korolev and many others). And it should be noted that for those who think about the importance of the slogan “Personnel decides everything” in their lives, that an essential aspect is not only qualifications, but also attitude towards people along with self-education. Such A complex approach in the field of management and in the approach to training workers will help our country emerge from the severe economic crisis.

On May 4, 1935, Stalin, at the graduation of the Red commanders, pronounced his famous phrase: Personnel decides everything!

Comrades!

It cannot be denied that Lately we have had great success both in the field of construction and in the field of management. In this regard, we talk too much about the merits of leaders, about the merits of leaders. They are credited with everything, almost all of our achievements. This is, of course, false and incorrect. It's not just the leaders. But that is not what I would like to talk about today. I would like to say a few words about the personnel, about our personnel in general and in particular about the personnel of our Red Army.

You know that we inherited from the old days a technically backward and semi-impoverished, ruined country. Ruined by four years imperialist war, re-bankrupt for three years civil war, a country with a semi-literate population, with low technology, with individual oases of industry drowning among a sea of \u200b\u200bthe smallest peasant farms - this is the kind of country we inherited from the past.

The task was to transfer this country from the tracks of the Middle Ages and darkness to the tracks of modern industry and mechanized agriculture. The task, as you can see, is serious and difficult. The question was: EITHER we will solve this problem in the shortest possible time and strengthen socialism in our country, OR we will not solve it, and then our country - weak technically and dark culturally - will lose its independence and turn into an object of play by the imperialist powers.

Our country was then experiencing a period of severe hunger in the field of technology. There were not enough machines for the industry. There were no machines for agriculture. There were no cars for transport. There was no elementary technical base, without which the industrial transformation of the country is unthinkable. There were only certain prerequisites for creating such a base. It was necessary to create a first-class industry. It was necessary to direct this industry so that it would be able to reorganize technically not only industry, but also agriculture, but also our railway transport. And for this it was necessary to make sacrifices and introduce the most severe savings in everything, it was necessary to save on food, and on schools, and on manufacturing in order to accumulate the necessary funds to create an industry. There was no other way to overcome the hunger in the field of technology. This is what Lenin taught us, and we followed in Lenin’s footsteps in this matter.

It is clear that in such a large and difficult task One could not expect continuous and rapid success. In such a matter, success can only appear after a few years. It was therefore necessary to arm ourselves with strong nerves, Bolshevik endurance and stubborn patience in order to overcome the first setbacks and steadily move forward to great goal, preventing hesitation and uncertainty in its ranks.

You know that we conducted this matter in exactly this way. But not all of our comrades had the nerve, patience and endurance. Among our comrades there were people who, after the first difficulties, began to call for a retreat. They say that “whoever remembers the old, look out.” This is of course true. But a person has a memory, and you involuntarily remember the past when summing up the results of our work. So, we had comrades who were afraid of difficulties and began to call on the party to retreat. They said: “What do we need your industrialization and collectivization, cars, ferrous metallurgy, tractors, combines, cars? It would be better if they gave us more manufacturing, they would better buy more raw materials for the production of consumer goods and they would give the population more of all those little things that make people’s lives beautiful. Creating an industry in our backwardness, and even a first-class industry, is a dangerous dream.”

Of course, we could use 3 billion rubles of currency, obtained through the most severe economy and spent on creating our industry, to import raw materials and strengthen the production of consumer goods. This is also a kind of “plan”. But with such a “plan” we would have no metallurgy, no mechanical engineering, no tractors and cars, no aviation and tanks. We would find ourselves unarmed in front of external enemies. We would undermine the foundations of socialism in our country. We would be captured by the bourgeoisie, internal and external.

Obviously, it was necessary to choose between two plans: between the retreat plan, which led and could not but lead to the defeat of socialism, and the offensive plan, which led and, as you know, has already led to the victory of socialism in our country.

We chose a plan of attack and went forward along the Leninist path, brushing aside these comrades as people who saw something just under their noses, but turned a blind eye to the immediate future of our country, to the future of socialism in our country.

But these comrades did not always limit themselves to criticism and passive resistance. They threatened us with raising an uprising in the party against the Central Committee. Moreover, they threatened some of us with bullets. Apparently, they hoped to intimidate us and force us to deviate from the Leninist path. These people obviously forgot that we Bolsheviks are a special breed of people. They forgot that the Bolsheviks cannot be intimidated either by difficulties or threats. They forgot that we were forged by the great Lenin, our leader, our teacher, our father, who did not know and did not recognize fear in the struggle. They forgot that the more the enemies rage and the more the opponents within the party become hysterical, the more the Bolsheviks become tense for new struggle and the more rapidly they move forward.
It is clear that we did not even think of turning away from Lenin’s path. Moreover, having strengthened ourselves on this path, we moved forward even more rapidly, sweeping away any and all obstacles from the road. True, we had to crush the sides of some of these comrades along the way. But there's nothing you can do about it. I must admit that I also had a hand in this matter.

Yes, comrades, we have confidently and rapidly followed the path of industrialization and collectivization of our country. And now this path can be considered already passed.
Now everyone recognizes that we have achieved enormous success along this path. Now everyone recognizes that we already have a powerful and first-class industry, powerful and mechanized agriculture, expanding and expanding transport, an organized and well-equipped Red Army.
This means that we have already largely overcome the period of famine in the field of technology.

But having overcome the period of hunger in the field of technology, we entered into new period, during a period, I would say, of hunger in the field of people, in the field of personnel, in the field of workers who know how to ride technology and move it forward. The fact is that we have factories, factories, collective farms, state farms, an army, we have the equipment for all this work, but there are not enough people with sufficient experience necessary to squeeze out of the technology the maximum that can be squeezed out of it . We used to say that “technique is everything.” This slogan has helped us in that we have eliminated the hunger in the field of technology and created the broadest technical base in all sectors of activity to equip our people with first-class technology. This is very good. But this is far and away not enough.
To set technology in motion and use it to its fullest, we need people who have mastered the technology, we need personnel capable of mastering and using this technology according to all the rules of art.

Technology without people who have mastered technology is dead. Technology, led by people who have mastered technology, can and should produce miracles. If our first-class plants and factories, our collective and state farms, and our Red Army had a sufficient number of personnel capable of mastering this technology, our country would receive three and four times more effect than it now has.

That is why the emphasis must now be placed on people, on personnel, on workers who have mastered technology.
That is why the old slogan “technology decides everything,” which is a reflection of the past period when we had a hunger in the field of technology, must now be replaced by a new slogan, the slogan that “personnel decide everything.”
This is the main thing now.

Can we say that our people have understood and fully realized the great significance of this new slogan? I wouldn't say that.
Otherwise, we would not have that ugly attitude towards people, towards personnel, towards workers, which we often observe in our practice.
The slogan “personnel decides everything” requires that our leaders show the most caring attitude to our employees, to the “small” and “big”, in whatever field they work, raised them with care, helped them when they need support, encouraged them when they show their first successes, pushed them forward, etc. .

Meanwhile, in fact, in a number of cases we have evidence of a soulless, bureaucratic and downright ugly attitude towards employees.
This, in fact, explains that instead of studying people and only after studying placing them in positions, people are often thrown around like pawns. We have learned to value cars and report on how much equipment we have in factories. But I don’t know of a single case where they would report with the same eagerness how many people we raised over such and such a period and how we helped people to grow and harden in work. What explains this? This is explained by the fact that we have not yet learned to value people, value workers, value personnel.

I remember an incident in Siberia, where I was in exile at one time. It was in the spring, during the flood. About thirty people went to the river to catch timber, carried away by the raging huge river. By evening they returned to the village, but without one comrade. When asked where the thirtieth was, they indifferently replied that the thirtieth “stayed there.” To my question: “How come, did you stay?” - they answered with the same indifference: “What else is there to ask, he drowned, therefore.” And then one of them began to hurry somewhere, declaring that “we should go and water the mare.”

To my reproach that they feel sorry for cattle more than people, one of them replied, with the general approval of the others: “Why should we feel sorry for them, people? We can always make people, but a mare... try making a mare ". Here's a touch, perhaps insignificant, but very characteristic. I think that indifferent attitude some of our leaders towards people, towards personnel and the inability to value people is a relic of that strange attitude of people towards people, which was reflected in the episode just told in distant Siberia.

So, comrades, if we want to successfully overcome the famine in the field of people and ensure that our country has a sufficient number of personnel capable of moving technology forward and putting it into operation, we must first of all learn to value people, value personnel, value everyone employee who can benefit our common cause. We must finally understand that of all the valuable capital available in the world, the most valuable and most decisive capital is people, personnel.

N We must understand that under our current conditions, “personnel decide everything.”
We will have good and numerous personnel in industry, agriculture, transport, and the army, our country will be invincible.
If we don’t have such personnel, we will limp on both legs.

Concluding my speech, allow me to propose a toast to the health and success of our academic graduates from the Red Army! I wish them success in organizing and leading the defense of our country!

Comrades! you graduated high school and received the first hardening there. But school is only a preparatory stage. Real training of personnel comes from live work, outside of school, from struggling with difficulties, from overcoming difficulties. Remember, comrades, that only those cadres are good who are not afraid of difficulties, who do not hide from difficulties, but, on the contrary, go towards difficulties in order to overcome and eliminate them.
Only in the fight against difficulties are real cadres forged. And if our army has enough real, seasoned personnel, it will be invincible.

To your health, comrades!

(Stalin’s speech to graduates of military academies in 1935)

Comrades!

It cannot be denied that we have made great strides in recent times both in the field of construction and in the field of management. In this regard, we talk too much about the merits of leaders, about the merits of leaders. They are credited with everything, almost all of our achievements. This is, of course, false and incorrect. It's not just the leaders. But that is not what I would like to talk about today. I would like to say a few words about the personnel, about our personnel in general and in particular about the personnel of our Red Army.

You know that we inherited from the old days a technically backward and semi-impoverished, ruined country. Devastated by four years of imperialist war, devastated again by three years of civil war, a country with a semi-literate population, with low technology, with isolated oases of industry drowning among a sea of tiny peasant farms - this is the kind of country we inherited from the past.

Our country was then experiencing a period of severe hunger in the field of technology. There were not enough machines for the industry. There were no machines for agriculture. There were no cars for transport. There was no elementary technical base, without which the industrial transformation of the country is unthinkable. There were only certain prerequisites for creating such a base. It was necessary to create a first-class industry. It was necessary to direct this industry so that it would be able to technically reorganize not only industry, but also agriculture, but also our railway transport. And for this it was necessary to make sacrifices and introduce the most severe savings in everything, it was necessary to save on food, and on schools, and on manufacturing in order to accumulate the necessary funds to create an industry. There was no other way to overcome the hunger in the field of technology. This is what Lenin taught us, and we followed in Lenin’s footsteps in this matter.

It is clear that in such a large and difficult matter one could not expect continuous and rapid success. In such a matter, success can only appear after a few years. It was therefore necessary to arm oneself with strong nerves, Bolshevik endurance and stubborn patience in order to overcome the first failures and steadily move forward towards the great goal, not allowing hesitation and uncertainty in one’s ranks.

Of course, we could use 3 billion rubles of currency, obtained through the most severe economy and spent on creating our industry, to import raw materials and strengthen the production of consumer goods. This is also a kind of “plan”. But with such a “plan” we would have no metallurgy, no mechanical engineering, no tractors and cars, no aviation and tanks. We would find ourselves unarmed in the face of external enemies. We would undermine the foundations of socialism in our country. We would be captured by the bourgeoisie, internal and external.

It is clear that we did not even think of turning away from Lenin’s path. Moreover, having strengthened ourselves on this path, we moved forward even more rapidly, sweeping away any and all obstacles from the road. True, we had to crush the sides of some of these comrades along the way. But there's nothing you can do about it. I must admit that I also had a hand in this matter.

Yes, comrades, we have confidently and rapidly followed the path of industrialization and collectivization of our country. And now this path can be considered already passed.

Now everyone recognizes that we have achieved enormous success along this path. Now everyone recognizes that we already have a powerful and first-class industry, powerful and mechanized agriculture, expanding and expanding transport, an organized and well-equipped Red Army.

This means that we have already largely overcome the period of famine in the field of technology.

But having overcome the period of hunger in the field of technology, we have entered a new period, a period, I would say, of hunger in the field of people, in the field of personnel, in the field of workers who know how to ride technology and move it forward. The fact is that we have factories, factories, collective farms, state farms, an army, we have the equipment for all this work, but there are not enough people with sufficient experience necessary to squeeze out of the technology the maximum that can be squeezed out of it . We used to say that “technique is everything.” This slogan has helped us in that we have eliminated the hunger in the field of technology and created the broadest technical base in all sectors of activity to equip our people with first-class technology. This is very good. But this is far and away not enough.

To set technology in motion and use it to its fullest, we need people who have mastered the technology, we need personnel capable of mastering and using this technology according to all the rules of art.

That is why the emphasis must now be placed on people, on personnel, on workers who have mastered technology.

That is why the old slogan “technology decides everything,” which is a reflection of a period that has already passed when we had a hunger in the field of technology, must now be replaced by a new slogan, the slogan that “personnel decide everything.”

This is the main thing now.

Can we say that our people have understood and fully realized the great significance of this new slogan? I wouldn't say that.

Otherwise, we would not have that ugly attitude towards people, towards personnel, towards workers, which we often observe in our practice.

The slogan “personnel decides everything” requires that our leaders show the most caring attitude towards our employees, “small” and “big”, in whatever field they work, raise them with care, help them when they need support, encourage when they showed their first successes, they were pushed forward, etc.

Meanwhile, in fact, in a number of cases we have evidence of a soulless, bureaucratic and downright ugly attitude towards employees.

This, in fact, explains that instead of studying people and only after studying placing them in positions, people are often thrown around like pawns. We have learned to value cars and report on how much equipment we have in factories. But I don’t know of a single case where they would report with the same eagerness how many people we raised over such and such a period and how we helped people to grow and harden in work. What explains this? This is explained by the fact that we have not yet learned to value people, value workers, value personnel.

To my reproach that they feel sorry for cattle more than people, one of them replied, with the general approval of the others: “Why should we feel sorry for them, people? We can always make people, but a mare... try making a mare ". Here's a touch, perhaps insignificant, but very characteristic. It seems to me that the indifferent attitude of some of our leaders towards people, towards personnel and the inability to value people is a relic of that strange attitude of people towards people, which was reflected in the episode just told in distant Siberia.

So, comrades, if we want to successfully overcome the famine in the field of people and ensure that our country has a sufficient number of personnel capable of moving technology forward and putting it into operation, we must first of all learn to value people, value personnel, value everyone an employee who can benefit our common cause. We must finally understand that of all the valuable capital available in the world, the most valuable and most decisive capital is people, personnel.

We must understand that under our current conditions, “personnel decide everything.”

We will have good and numerous personnel in industry, agriculture, transport, and the army, our country will be invincible.

If we don’t have such personnel, we will limp on both legs.

Concluding my speech, allow me to propose a toast to the health and success of our academic graduates from the Red Army! I wish them success in organizing and leading the defense of our country!

Comrades! You graduated from high school and received your first training there. But school is only a preparatory stage. Real training of personnel comes from live work, outside of school, from struggling with difficulties, from overcoming difficulties. Remember, comrades, that only those cadres are good who are not afraid of difficulties, who do not hide from difficulties, but, on the contrary, go towards difficulties in order to overcome and eliminate them.

Only in the fight against difficulties are real cadres forged. And if our army has enough real, seasoned personnel, it will be invincible.

Personnel decides everything

Personnel decides everything
From speech Secretary General All-Union Communist Party (Bolsheviks) of I.V. Stalin (1878-1953), with which he spoke on May 4, 1935 in the Kremlin Palace in front of graduates of military academies. There he said his other famous phrase: The most valuable capital is people.
Allegorically: about the role of the “human factor” in any matter.

encyclopedic Dictionary winged words and expressions. - M.: “Locked-Press”. Vadim Serov. 2003.

See what “Personnel decides everything” in other dictionaries:

personnel- , ov, pl. The main trained composition of employees of an enterprise, institution, organization. * Party (Soviet) cadres. Workers of the party (state) apparatus. ◘ During 1946-1952 she underwent retraining most of… … Dictionary language of the Council of Deputies

frame- I. FRAME I a, m. cadre m. 1. outdated Essential essay of what l. works. Michelson 1866. Rosenkampf for a long time refused the assignment of drawing up a constitution, but then agreed to draw up a frame, i.e., the framework or basis of the constitution. Frame...

frame Historical Dictionary Gallicisms of the Russian language

kydra- I. I. FRAME I a, m. cadre m. 1. outdated Essential essay of what l. works. Michelson 1866. Rosenkampf for a long time refused the assignment of drawing up a constitution, but then agreed to draw up a frame, i.e. the framework or basis of the constitution.… … Historical Dictionary of Gallicisms of the Russian Language

This term has other meanings, see New people. Contents 1 History of creation 2 Areas of activity ... Wikipedia

Lyceum Founded 1966 Director Nina Anatolyevna Tarasova Type Lyceum Students ... Wikipedia

Artyom Anufriev Artyom Anufriev during the first court hearing in 2011. Birth name: Artyom Aleksandrovich Anufriev Nickname “Academovsk ... Wikipedia

Ildar Yagafarov Birth name: Ildar Rashitovich Yagafarov Date of birth: January 26, 1971 (1971 01 26) (41 years old) Citizenship ... Wikipedia

Average comprehensive school No. 6 ... Wikipedia

Artyom Anufriev ... Wikipedia

Books

Personnel decides everything! , Beshanov Vladimir Vasilievich. Why was the regular Red Army defeated in a matter of weeks in the summer of 1941? Whose fault was it that we failed to defeat the enemy “with little blood, with a mighty blow”? Why, until the very end of the war, our...

It turns out that Isaac Deutscher is the author of the famous phrase (attributed to Churchill) from the article on Stalin in the Encyclopedia Britannica:

“The bizarre cult was based on undoubted Stalinist achievements. He was the creator of a planned economy; he received Russia, plowing with wooden plows, and left it equipped nuclear reactors; and he was the "father of victory."

Isaac Deutscher - German Laughter)). Just kidding, just kidding... Re-star the star, re-star the stars.
However, this did not make Sir Winston Churchill any more stupid: a person capable of appreciating someone else’s phrase must have the same intelligence as the one who uttered it.

April 3, 1907 famous historian and publicist, author of numerous books on history and sociology, famous biographer of Leon Trotsky and Joseph Stalin, Isaac Deutscher was born into a religious middle-class Jewish family in the city of Chrzanów near Krakow in Western Galicia. As a child, he studied with a Hasidic rabbi, but then became an atheist. Initially gained fame as a promising young poet; from the age of 16 he published his poems in Polish literary publications.

It may seem strange, but people who write poetry sense the essence of what is happening better than others. Someday people will pay attention to this and even write about it. By the way, Joseph Vissarionovich was also fond of writing poetry in his youth.

In 1926 he joined the ranks of the Polish Communist Party. Thanks to his penchant for studying history, philosophy, and sociology, Deutscher quickly rose to the ranks of party ideologists and became an expert on the problems of the Soviet Union and the CPSU(b). In 1932, he resolutely opposed Stalin’s policies in the leadership of the Comintern and especially against the theory and practice of “social fascism,” in adherence to which he rightly saw one of the most important reasons which led to the defeat of the German Communist Party in the fight against Hitler. Deutscher joined the ranks of the Trotskyists, for which he was immediately expelled from the Communist Party of Poland. In April 1939, shortly before the German occupation of Poland, Deutscher emigrated to London.

Clever man always sees danger in advance, which undoubtedly saved his life.
Apparently he perfectly understood the pros and cons of the “socialism” project, but did not care at all about how his ideas were treated in the USSR. In general, he was focused on himself, stubborn, and did not accept other people’s opinions. This always irritates others.

As a member of the Polish Socialist Party, in exile he was for some time a member of the Trotskyist Revolutionary Workers League. In 1940, in Scotland, he volunteered to join the Polish army, but was soon interned as a dangerous subversive element. Released in 1942, he returned to the Economist as an expert on the Soviet Union and European politics, and began writing for The Observer. After the war, he broke with political Trotskyism (while remaining a supporter of Trotsky) and took up scientific activity.

I think that this should hardly be surprising: for some interesting ideas Trotsky's Trotskyism as a doctrine turned out to be a dead end. Isaac did not “fly in the clouds” at all.
IN ideological struggle the Trotskyists simply had no chance against Stalin. When Stalin proposed to Trotsky in 1927 to hold an all-party discussion, the results of the final all-party referendum were stunning for the Trotskyists. Of the 854 thousand party members, 730 thousand voted, of which 724 thousand voted for Stalin’s position and 6 thousand for Trotsky.

Deutscher's main work was basic research about Leon Trotsky, consisting of three volumes - “The Armed Prophet” (1954), “The Disarmed Prophet” (1959) and “The Exiled Prophet” (1963). The trilogy, published in London in 1954-1963, is based on a detailed study of Trotsky’s archive under Harvard University, as well as on materials from secret sections of the archive given to Deutscher by Trotsky’s widow N.I. Sedova (1882-1962).

An abridged Russian translation of parts of the second and third volumes, carried out by American historian N. N. Yakovlev, was published in Moscow in 1991 under the title “Trotsky in Exile.” Full translation all three volumes appeared in 2006 in the Russian publishing house Tsentrpoligraf.

After writing the biographies of Stalin and Trotsky, Deutscher expected to begin work on a study on Lenin, but did not have time to do this. He died in the Italian capital on August 19, 1967.

You can talk about Stalin in different ways, but I think that you should always draw conclusions based on the facts.
It is unlikely that Trotsky could have been an equal rival to Stalin.

Stalin's usual rate of reading literature was about 300 pages a day. He constantly educated himself. For example, while undergoing treatment in the Caucasus, in 1931, in a letter to Nadezhda Aliluyeva, having forgotten to inform about his health, he asks to send him textbooks on electrical engineering and ferrous metallurgy.

His knowledge was not mere erudition, which was repeatedly confirmed by many specialists in various fields of activity.
IN Battle of Kursk Stalin found a way out hopeless situation: the Germans were going to use " technical novelty" - the Tiger and Panther tanks, against which our artillery was powerless. Stalin remembered his support for the development of the A-IX-2 explosive and the new experimental PTAB bombs, and gave the task: by May 15, i.e. by the time , when the roads are dry, 150 factories of the Soviet Union rushed to fulfill this order and fulfilled it. As a result, the German army was deprived of it near Kursk. impact force Stalin's tactical novelty is the PTAB-2.5-1.5 bomb.

But besides this, the main thing for Stalin was the creation of a highly qualified elite of society to govern the country.
The people he trained (both technically and morally) were so outstanding that neither Khrushchev’s foolishness nor Brezhnev’s apathy could waste this resource.

Stalin said his famous phrase “personnel decide everything” in 1935 at a reception in honor of graduates of military academies: “We talk too much about the merits of leaders, about the merits of leaders. They are credited with everything, almost all of our achievements. This, of course, is wrong and it’s wrong. It’s not just about the leaders... To set the technology in motion and use it to its fullest, we need people who have mastered the technology, we need personnel capable of mastering and using this technology according to all the rules of art...”

And Stalin’s enemies - the current liberals, having taken his phrase out of context, distort it in their own way, allegedly for personal gain in political struggle..., knowing full well that too few people will want to check for themselves the meaning of what Stalin said.
They measure by themselves.
During the first 10 years of being in the first echelons of power in the USSR, Stalin submitted his resignation three times.

With a qualified elite, there were much fewer officials under Stalin than in present-day Russia.
The director of a furniture factory could not count on the post of Minister of Defense even thanks to his father-in-law.
September 30, 2010 at the training ground of the Ryazan Higher command school Airborne Forces "Seltsy" experienced one of the loudest scandals in history modern history Russia. Defense Minister Anatoly Serdyukov, flying around training ground by helicopter, noticed the unfinished buildings of the barracks and canteen, he also noticed the Orthodox Church of Elijah the Prophet, built nearby. Coming out of the helicopter, Serdyukov immediately swore at the head of the Ryazan Airborne School, the hero of Russia, the guard, Colonel Andrei Krasov, and the officers next to him: “The barracks is not completed, the canteen is not completed, and they destroyed the church for 180 million!”

Andrei Krasov tried to explain to the minister that not a penny of budget money was spent on the construction of the temple, and it was entirely built with funds from the Ryazan diocese, various sponsors and airborne veterans. Krasov also said that from 2011, the Church of Elijah the Prophet will begin training army chaplains, who will then be sent to military units throughout the country. He also noted that the nearest temple is located 15 km from the training ground on the other bank of the Oka River, and getting to it for officers, their family members, cadets and soldiers is, to put it mildly, problematic.

However, all this only angered Serdyukov, who in a fit of rage shouted: “You live in shit here, and you’ll die in shit!” Don’t give money for this Airborne Forces center! This school needs to be downsized altogether. Remove this impudent colonel and join the troops!”
Information taken from the book “The Kremlin’s Dirty Laundry”, “Yauza-press”, Moscow, March 2011.

We must pay tribute to the fact that after this story, the union of Russian paratroopers turned to President Medvedev and Patriarch Kirill with a request not to leave this situation unattended and to intercede for Colonel Andrei Krasov.
The representative did not stand aside either Synodal Department for interaction with the Armed Forces, Archpriest Alexander Ilyashenko, who demanded that the Minister of Defense apologize to the commander Ryazan School Airborne Forces, and, regardless of whether he does this or not, stated that Serdyukov should resign: this situation “from the worst side” characterizes Serdyukov himself as “a person who has nothing to do with the army” and “ does not have any credibility not only with the Armed Forces, but also with civilians."

BUT in today's Russia, ministries are headed by officials who do not even have a specialized education. The result is disastrous.

According to the head of the Federal Antimonopoly Service of Russia, Igor Artemyev, there are now more officials in Russia than in the Soviet Union, in all the republics combined. Number of officials modern Russia about 1.65 million. There are 1,153 officials per 100,000 Russians. Of every 1,000 working Russians, 25 are officials.

This fact may indicate that officials are placing their growing children into “feeding” jobs.

If the Stalinist planning system had been preserved and further rationally improved, and I.V. Stalin understood the need to improve the socialist economy (after all, it was not without reason that his work appeared in 1952 " Economic problems socialism in the USSR"), if the task of further increasing the standard of living of the people had been put in first place (and in 1953 there were no obstacles to this), by 1970 we would have been in the top three countries with the most high level life.

After the war, Stalin gradually reduced the role of the Politburo to a body for the leadership of the party. And on XIX Congress All-Union Communist Party (Bolsheviks) this abolition of the Politburo was recorded in the new charter.

Stalin said that he saw the party as an order of sword-bearers, numbering 50 thousand people.

Stalin wanted to remove the party from power altogether, leaving only two matters in the party’s care: agitation and propaganda and participation in the selection of personnel. This main reason why he was poisoned: party functionaries did not want to lose power. And subsequently they could not resist the revenge of the 20th Congress, where, secretly from the people, Khrushchev read out a report filled beyond measure with nonsense that there was no one to refute.
And yet it has not yet been published in Russia, although its contents are known in the USA.

In 1943, Stalin said: “I know that after my death a heap of rubbish will be placed on my grave, but the winds of history will mercilessly scatter it!”
__________But I will note that nothing happens by itself.