Biographies Characteristics Analysis

Formation of the “Holy Alliance” of the monarchs of Russia, Austria-Hungary and Germany for mutual assistance in the fight against the revolution. Congress of Vienna and the Holy Alliance

THE SACRED ALLIANCE is a reactionary association of European monarchs that arose after the fall of Napoleon's empire. 26. IX 1815, Russian Emperor Alexander I, Austrian Emperor Franz I and Prussian King Frederick William III signed the so-called “Act of the Holy Alliance” in Paris. The real essence of the “Act”, designed in a pompous religious style, boiled down to the fact that the monarchs who signed it pledged “in every case and in every place ... to provide each other with benefits, reinforcements and assistance.” In other words, the Holy Alliance was a kind of mutual assistance agreement between the monarchs of Russia, Austria and Prussia, which was extremely broad in nature.

19.XI 1815 joined the Holy Alliance french king Louis XVIII; Later, most of the monarchs of the European continent joined him. England did not formally join the Holy Alliance, but in practice England often coordinated its behavior with common line Holy Alliance.

The pious formulas of the “Act of Holy Alliance” covered up the very prosaic goals of its creators. There were two of them:

1. Maintain intact the redrawing of European borders that was carried out at the Congress of Vienna in 1815 (...).

2. Conduct an irreconcilable struggle against all manifestations of the “revolutionary spirit.”

In fact, the activities of the Holy Alliance focused almost entirely on the fight against the revolution. The key points of this struggle were the periodically convened congresses three chapters the leading powers of the Holy Alliance, which were also attended by representatives of England and France. Alexander I and K. Metternich usually played the leading role at the congresses. There were four congresses of the Holy Alliance - the Aachen Congress of 1818, the Troppau Congress of 1820, the Laibach Congress of 1821 and the Verona Congress of 1822 (...).

The powers of the Holy Alliance stood entirely on the basis of “legitimism,” i.e., the most complete restoration of the old dynasties and regimes overthrown by the French Revolution and the armies of Napoleon, and proceeded from the recognition absolute monarchy. The Holy Alliance was the European gendarme that kept the European peoples in chains. This was most clearly manifested in the position of the Holy Alliance in relation to the revolutions in Spain (1820-1823), Naples (1820-1821) and Piedmont (1821), as well as the uprising of the Greeks against the Turkish yoke, which began in 1821.

19.XI 1820, shortly after the outbreak of the revolution in Spain and Naples, Russia, Austria and Prussia at the congress in Troppau signed a protocol that openly proclaimed the right of intervention of the three leading powers of the Holy Alliance in the internal affairs of other countries in order to fight the revolution. England and France did not sign this protocol, but did not go beyond verbal protests against it. As a result of the decisions taken in Troppau, Austria received the authority to armedly suppress the Neapolitan revolution and at the end of March 1821 occupied the Kingdom of Naples with its troops, after which the absolutist regime was restored here. In April of the same 1821, Austria forcibly suppressed the revolution in Piedmont.

At the Congress of Verona (October - December 1822), through the efforts of Alexander I and Metternich, a decision was made on armed intervention in Spanish affairs. The authority to actually carry out this intervention was given to France, which on IV 7, 1823 actually invaded Spain with an army of 100,000 under the command of the Duke of Angoulême. Spanish revolutionary government resisted foreign invasion for six months, but in the end the interventionist forces, supported by the Spanish internal counter-revolution, were victorious. In Spain, as before in Naples and Piedmont, absolutism was restored.

No less reactionary was the position of the Holy Alliance on the Greek question. When a delegation of Greek rebels arrived in Verona to ask Christian sovereigns and especially Tsar Alexander I for help against the Sultan, the congress even refused to listen to it. England immediately took advantage of this and, in order to strengthen its influence in Greece, began to support the Greek rebels.

The Congress of Verona in 1822 and the intervention in Spain were essentially the last major acts of the Holy Alliance. After that, he virtually ceased to exist. The collapse of the Holy Alliance was due to two main reasons.

Firstly, within the union very soon contradictions between its main participants were revealed. When in December 1823 the Spanish king Ferdinand VII turned to the Holy Alliance for help in bringing his “rebellious” colonies in America to submission, England, interested in the markets of these colonies, not only declared a strong protest against all attempts of this kind, but also defiantly recognized independence American colonies of Spain (XII 31, 1824). This drove a wedge between the Holy Alliance and England. Somewhat later, in 1825 and 1826, on the basis of the Greek question, relations between Russia and Austria began to deteriorate - the two main pillars of the Holy Alliance, Alexander I (towards the end of his reign), and then Nicholas I supported the Greeks, while Metternich continued its previous line regarding the Greek "rebels". 4. IV 1826, the so-called St. Petersburg Protocol on coordination of actions in the Greek issue was even signed between Russia and England, clearly directed against Austria. Contradictions also emerged between other participants in the Holy Alliance.

Secondly, and this was especially important, despite all the efforts of the reaction, the growth of revolutionary forces in Europe continued. In 1830, revolutions took place in France and Belgium, and an uprising against tsarism broke out in Poland. In England, the violent movement of the popular masses forced the Conservatives to accept the electoral reform of 1832. This dealt a heavy blow not only to the principles, but also to the very existence of the Holy Alliance, which actually disintegrated. In 1833, the monarchs of Russia, Austria and Prussia tried to restore the Holy Alliance, but this attempt ended in failure (see Munich Convention).

Diplomatic Dictionary. Ch. ed. A. Ya. Vyshinsky and S. A. Lozovsky. M., 1948.

INTRODUCTION

The system of international relations, called the Vienna one, began with the decisions of the Congress of Vienna in 1814-1815. It became an instrument for maintaining lasting peace in Europe and achieving a balance of power on the continent.

Two aspects stand out in the significance of the Vienna system for history European countries and peoples.

On the one hand, it gave Europe the opportunity to survive until the early 1850s. without deep military upheavals, although it must be borne in mind that within the framework of the Vienna system, contradictions between the great powers grew.

On the other hand, the positive significance of the Vienna system, associated with the possibility of peaceful settlement of military conflicts, was reduced by its extremely reactionary nature, aimed, in many cases, at direct suppression revolutionary movements, which slowed down modernization processes in Western Europe.

The purpose of this work is to explore the role of the Holy Alliance in the history of the development of Europe and Russia.

THE SACRED ALLIANCE IN EUROPEAN HISTORY

The “Final General Act” of the Congress of Vienna on May 28 (June 9), 1815 was not the final stage in the establishment of a new European order. Back in March 1815, Russia, Great Britain, Austria and Prussia concluded the Quadruple Alliance, in words aimed at supporting the Bourbon dynasty restored in France, but in reality, to control the internal and foreign policy defeated France.

By virtue of this agreement, France was occupied allied forces and a huge war indemnity was imposed on her. All this meant the desire of the great powers to weaken France in every possible way and deprive it of the opportunity to pursue an independent foreign policy.

The initiators of the creation of the Quadruple Alliance were England and Austria, who did not want the revival of France. Russian Emperor Alexander I (1801 - 1825) treated France more kindly and took significant measures to return France to the rank of a great power.

Russia's policy after the Congress of Vienna was ambivalent. Not completely trusting his allies, Alexander considered it necessary to continue efforts to stabilize the situation in Europe. Firstly, to carry out possible transformations within one’s own country, and secondly, for future evolutionary changes in European political systems. The third factor that determined his political plans was the desire to maintain stability in the newly acquired Polish lands (Kingdom of Poland). In this regard, Alexander drew up the text of a new agreement with his own hand - “ Act of Holy Alliance ».

The document had religious-mystical character with the obligation of Christian monarchs to provide each other with help and support. At the same time, under the religious cover there was hidden a common political task - supporting the principle of legitimism and maintaining European balance. In comparison with previous treaties (Chaumont and Paris in 1814, on the Quadruple Alliance in 1815), the provisions of the Holy Alliance looked somewhat vague in terms of the motives, means and goals that were stipulated in it.

Meanwhile, the Union, as conceived by its creators, was supposed to play the role of, on the one hand, a deterrent against national liberation movements, and on the other, a unifier of all its participants to protect the existing order. Not for nothing, the text included the provision that the Union members will “give each other a hand and help to preserve peace, faith and truth.”

Creation of the Holy Alliance. The text of the agreement on the creation of the Holy Alliance was signed on September 14 (26), 1815 by three monarchs: Austrian Emperor Francis I of Habsburg (1792-1835), the Prussian king Frederick William III of Hohenzollern (1797-1840) and the Russian Emperor Alexander L Great Britain, represented by Prince George of Wales - in 1811 - 1820. he acted as regent for the mentally ill King George III of Hanover - she refused to sign the document. At the same time, as shown further events, the British leadership took an active part in the policies pursued by the Holy Alliance.

Soon all European powers, except Turkey and the Papal Court, joined the Union.

Despite the vagueness of the established principles, the Union gradually began to gain significant weight and strength. It became a counterweight to the Quadruple Alliance, which was actively advocated by Great Britain and Austria. It helped to the Russian Emperor pursue a policy of counterbalances, strengthening France with all possible ways. Already the accession of France to the “Act of the Holy Alliance” meant its inclusion in the pan-European concert.

In November 1815 between Russia and France officially signed a peace treaty. At the same time, Russian diplomacy watched extremely closely internal state France and did everything possible to maintain Bourbon power. On this basis, already in 1816, the French government turned to the English commander of the occupation forces, Duke A. Wellington, with a petition for the possibility of reducing the occupation army, which was warmly supported by Alexander I. The size of the indemnity was also reduced.

Alexander's demonstrative support for the French government was connected, first of all, with the fact that the European balance in his understanding included France among the great powers as a counterweight to Anglo-Austrian influence in Europe.

THE ROLE OF CONGRESSES OF THE SACRED ALLIANCE IN INTERNATIONAL POLITICS

Aachen Congress. The first congress of the Holy Alliance met in Aachen, Germany on September 18 (30), 1818. The main participants in the negotiations were: from Russia - Alexander I, from Austria - the Minister of Foreign Affairs and the de facto head of government K, Metternich, from Prussia - Chancellor K. Hardenberg, from Great Britain - the minister Foreign Affairs R. Castlereagh, France - minister of the government of Louis XVIII of Bourbon (1814-1815, 1815-1824)L. Richelieu.

The Congress was convened to discuss questions about the situation of France, its relations with its allies and some other international problems(on the mediation of powers in the conflict between Spain and its colonies; on freedom of navigation and the cessation of the slave trade).

Even before the start of the congress Russian government raised the question of terminating the activities of the Quadruple Alliance, which was, however, sharply rejected by its other members.

The Aachen Congress made decisions: on the withdrawal of occupation troops from France by November 30, 1818, on the reduction of indemnities paid by France, and on its admission to the Holy Alliance.

Second in importance was the question of helping Spain in the issue of revolutionary unrest in its Latin American colonies. In the end, condemnation of revolutionary actions in Latin America did not lead to a decision on armed intervention of the powers in favor of Spain.

Regarding the issue of the slave trade, Russia advocated an early end to the trade in blacks and strict monitoring of the implementation of the powers’ decision to end the slave trade.

Despite general declarative statements about the need to combat revolutionary manifestations in various parts Sveta, the Aachen Congress did not take on the character of the reactionary organization that subsequent congresses of the Holy Alliance had.

During the discussion of many issues, harsh confrontation between Russia and England emerged, as well as the latter’s desire to win Austria and Prussia to its side. As Russian Secretary of State I. Kapodistrias noted, “Great Britain lays claim to absolute domination at sea and in trade relations of both hemispheres... She owns Portugal, holds Belgium under her influence and humiliates Spain by trading with the rebels.” Kapodistrias was referring to the rapid spread of British priority on the seas and oceans.

The Russian government was also extremely dissatisfied with the position of Austria, which, in its opinion, sought to regain all the privileges of the crown of the former “Holy Roman Empire of the German nation.”

As a result, the Aachen Congress not only failed to bring the great powers closer together, but also revealed obvious contradictions between them. The Congress in Aachen, which closed on November 9 (21), 1818, did not give the Holy Alliance an exclusively anti-revolutionary orientation, but declared many legitimate and anti-revolutionary postulates.

Troppau-Laibach Congress. The intensification of the revolutionary movement in Europe made it necessary to convene new meeting members of the Holy Alliance. She was appointed to Troppau (Opava, Czech Republic) on the initiative of K. Metternich.

Great French revolution end of the 18th century and the era of the Napoleonic wars caused serious changes not only in social composition and position various groups population of the European continent, but also in the self-awareness of the peoples of Europe. Despite some positive results The Vienna Congress and the creation of the “system of 1815”, the main thing remained that the peoples of European states refused to put up with the restoration of the old orders and dynasties. The restoration of the rule of the Bourbon dynasty in the Italian lands and on the Iberian Peninsula was especially hated.

By the beginning of the 1820s. in Spain, Italian and German states Numerous secret societies were formed, the program of which included the demand for the introduction of constitutional orders. In the “small” German states, the revolutionary movement was led by students, in the Italian lands the middle strata of society rose up to fight, in Spain the ferment affected the army.

The situation was also difficult in France, in which the ministry of A. Richelieu was replaced by the rule of E. Decaze, an ardent supporter of an unlimited monarchy.

In January 1820, a revolution broke out in Spain under the leadership of Captain R. Riego, which ended the despotism of Ferdinand VII of Bourbon (1808, 1814-1833). In the summer of the same year, the Cortes (parliament) met in Madrid, effectively depriving the king of power.

In June 1820, several regiments in the Kingdom of Naples rebelled. They were supported by the broad masses of the people, which forced the King of the Two Sicilies, Ferdinand I of Bourbon (1816-1825") to turn to Austria for help. K. Metternich was clearly aware that Austria's sole intervention in Italian affairs would be viewed with hostility by other European states. In connection with This is why he proposed convening a new congress of the Holy Alliance.

To understand Russia’s position at the future congress, it is necessary to note the transformation of the views of Alexander I towards a significant improvement. If before 1820 he oscillated like a pendulum between the remnants of liberal views and his reactionary sentiments, then the revolutionary events of the 1820s. throughout Europe, strengthened his reactionary views. This was reflected in the change of managers of the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs: from 1815/1816. There were two secretaries of state - the liberal I. Kapodistrias and an adherent of the ideas of Metternich K.V. Nesselrode, but in 1822 Kapodistrias was dismissed. This made it possible to the Austrian Chancellor more and more influence the position of both Alexander and Russia. In his memoirs, Metternich reveled in the possibility of this influence, although he clearly exaggerated it in many ways.

This was the international situation on the eve of the opening congress in Troppau, which began its work on October 11 (23), 1820.

Already at the beginning of the congress, news arrived about the performance of the Semenovsky regiment in St. Petersburg, which further strengthened Alexander’s reactionary sentiments.

The main issue on the agenda of the congress was the development of measures to suppress revolutionary uprisings. In this regard, the participants heatedly discussed the question of the right to intervene in the affairs of other states, without waiting for such a request from them.

As a result, three of the five great powers - Russia, Austria and Prussia - signed a protocol on the right of armed intervention in the internal affairs of other states (the principle of intervention) and a special protocol concerning measures to suppress the Neapolitan revolution. This protocol authorized Austria's military occupation of the Kingdom of Naples. In addition, Ferdinand I was invited to the congress, whom it was important for the heads of the powers to isolate from the rebellious people in order to prevent him from fulfilling his earlier promise of introducing constitutional government in Naples.

In January 1821, the meetings of the Congress were moved to Laibach(Ljubljana, Slovenia). The elderly Ferdinand also arrived here.

Without waiting for the completion of the congress, Austrian troops moved against revolutionary Naples in February 1821, and in March 1821 the power of the Bourbon dynasty was restored there.

In March 1821, a revolution broke out in Piedmont (north of the Apennine Peninsula). The representatives of the great powers remaining in Laibach immediately authorized Austria to suppress this revolution as well, which it carried out in April 1821, after which Austria, Prussia and Russia signed a declaration extending Austria’s occupation of Naples and Piedmont.

Great Britain and France occupied a special position at the congress meetings. They did not support the principle of intervention, did not sign the protocol on the suppression of the Neapolitan revolution, but did not oppose these decisions.

Troppau-Laibach Congress and the decisions he made demonstrated that the Holy Alliance had turned into an organization of a reactionary political nature, designed to suppress any revolutionary uprisings aimed at the political modernization of Europe. Congress showed that this issue There were no serious disagreements among the five great powers, although political differences remained in full force on other international issues.

The congress participants did not specifically discuss the issue of measures to suppress the revolution in Spain and Portugal, however, in a declarative form, Russia, Austria and France expressed the idea of ​​​​the need to intervene in the internal affairs of the Iberian Peninsula. At the congress, the reactionary role of Russia and Alexander I personally became obvious.

The official closing of the congress meetings took place on February 14 (26), 1821, but in fact its participants remained in Laibach until the end of April, monitoring the actions of the Austrian troops in Piedmont.

Verona Congress . The third congress of the Holy Alliance took place on October 20 (November 1) - December 14 (26), 1822 in Verona, Italy. It was mainly devoted to the issue of events in Spain.

The Congress was extremely representative. Its participants: from Russia - Emperor Alexander I, from Austria - Emperor Franz /, from Prussia - King Frederick William III, from Great Britain and France - foreign ministers, as well as Italian monarchs, diplomats and prominent military leaders of other European countries.

In addition to the Spanish problem, attention was paid to the flaring Greek uprising against the rule of the Ottoman Empire and the fate of the Latin American colonies seeking independence from Spain. The last question was of particular urgency, since Paraguay, in essence, became independent since 1811, Chile - after the popular struggle in 1810-1823, New Granada - since 1819, Venezuela - since 1821, as a result of victories, won by S. Bolivar over the Spanish troops.

Of great importance for the decision-making of the Congress was the fact that after the death of the British Foreign Minister R. Castlereagh, he was replaced by D. Canning, who took more liberal positions than his predecessor. In addition, England, fearing the strengthening of the role of France on the European continent, was a principled opponent of interference in relations between Spain and its colonies. British policy was determined by the desire to ensure, in its own interests, the independence of the southern Latin American colonies and their separation from Spain.

However, Alexander I and K. Metternich were staunch supporters of the decisive suppression of the revolution in Spain by forces French troops. On November 19 (December 1), 1822, Russia, Austria, Prussia and France signed a protocol in which the circumstances were formulated that determined the French intervention in Spain to restore its completeness royalty. The powers broke off diplomatic relations with Spain and expressed their readiness to provide France with moral and material support. Great Britain did not sign the protocol, not wanting to interfere in Spanish affairs, although Field Marshal A. Wellington, a representative of the British Foreign Office, in a private conversation with the Russian representative (H.A. Lieven) expressed support for the decisions of the congress. In April 1823 french army under the command of Prince Louis of Angouleme crossed the Pyrenees and by the autumn suppressed the Spanish revolution.

The coordinated position of Russia, Austria and Prussia was also reflected in their common declaration condemning any revolutionary uprisings, including the national liberation struggle of the Greek people.

CONCLUSION

So, Holy Alliance The 1815 Congress was a conservative political alliance between Austria, Prussia and Russia designed to maintain the system of international order established at the Congress of Vienna in 1815. Practical functions The Holy Alliance was reflected in the resolutions of a series of congresses (Aachen, Troppaus, Laibach and Verona), which formed the principles and conditions for intervention in the internal affairs of other sovereign states with the aim of preventive violent suppression of all revolutionary movements and maintaining existing political system with its absolutist and clerical-aristocratic values.

At the Verona Congress, the reactionary essence of the Holy Alliance was clearly revealed. If the Vienna system played a dual role: on the one hand, supporting the legitimate sentiments of European monarchs, on the other, it contributed to the balance of power in Europe and the solution conflict situations peaceful means, the Holy Alliance was a conservative organization that for a long time slowed down the creation of independent European states and their bourgeois modernization.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Alekseev, I. S. The art of diplomacy: not to win, but to convince [ Electronic resource] / I. S. Alekseev. - 4th ed. - M.: Publishing and trading corporation "Dashkov and Co", 2013.

General history of diplomacy. - M.: Eksmo, 2009.

History of Russia: Textbook / Sh.M. Munchaev, V.M. Ustinov. - 6th ed., revised. and additional - M.: Norma: SIC INFRA-M, 2015

Story: Tutorial/ P.S. Samygin, S.I. Samygin, V.N. Shevelev, E.V. Sheveleva. - M.: NIC Infra-M, 2013.

New Historical Bulletin, 2014, No. 2 (40)

Chapter 13. 1815–1825 The Holy Alliance and the end of the reform impulse

Beginning in 1815, the policies of Alexander I became increasingly ambiguous, and his actions increasingly diverged from previously declared intentions. In foreign policy, the high principles that formed the basis of the Holy Alliance are giving way to more mundane interests, primarily national, which is expressed, in particular, in a change in Russia’s position on the Greek and Balkan issues. Domestically, the granting of a constitution to Poland, which was perceived as a harbinger of future reforms, is not continued, except for some confidential projects.

Despite all this, Alexander fails to achieve complete acceptance of his policies by conservatives, who are shocked religious views the emperor and a certain touch of “cosmopolitanism” in all his activities. However, measures indicating a turn towards reaction are being taken more and more often and are associated with the name of A. A. Arakcheev, whose despotism reached its limit in the early 20s: this is the tightening of censorship, purges at universities, the dispersal of Masonic lodges and stubborn, despite numerous cases of disobedience, continuation of the disastrous experiment with military settlements.

As for the opposition to this tsar, who sent Alexander Pushkin into exile, it is in the form secret societies develops only in very narrow circles, among noble and officer youth, as a rule, under the influence of Western liberalism and finds outlet in the Decembrist uprising of 1825.

From the book History. New complete guide schoolchildren to prepare for the Unified State Exam author Nikolaev Igor Mikhailovich

From the book History of Russia [Tutorial] author Team of authors

6.5. Domestic policy Alexander I in 1815–1825 Strengthening the reactionAfter the creation of the Holy Alliance and return to Russia in 1815, Alexander I showed more and more doubts about the need for constitutional reform. The documents of the Congress of Vienna contained a resolution

From book The World History. Volume 4. Recent history by Yeager Oscar

From book Full story Islam and Arab conquests in one book author Popov Alexander

“Holy Alliance” In 1656, the post of Grand Vizier of the Ottoman Empire was seized by Mehmet Koprulu. He managed to carry out reforms in the army and inflicted several sensitive defeats on his enemies. Seven years after the start of his reign, Austria signed an unfavorable peace for it in Vasvara, in

author Froyanov Igor Yakovlevich

Domestic policy of Alexander I in 1815–1825 The period of the reign of Alexander I, which came after the war of 1812 and the defeat Napoleonic France, was traditionally considered by both contemporaries and scientific literature as a period of muted reaction. He was opposed to the first

From the book History of Russia from ancient times to the beginning of the 20th century author Froyanov Igor Yakovlevich

Foreign policy of Alexander I in 1815–1825 The victory over Napoleon enormously strengthened Russia's international position. Alexander I was the most powerful monarch in Europe, and Russia's influence on the affairs of the continent was greater than ever. Protective tendencies are clearly

From the book The Thousand Year Battle for Constantinople author Shirokorad Alexander Borisovich

Chapter 1 THE CAUCASUS, THE GREEKS AND THE SACRED UNION After the Treaty of Bucharest, peace between Russia and Turkey lasted 16 years. As previously said, we must understand peace as a truce, since the main problem of relations between the two countries - the Straits - has not been resolved, plus

author Dvornichenko Andrey Yurievich

§ 8. Domestic policy of Alexander I in 1815–1825. The period of the reign of Alexander I, which began after the War of 1812 and the defeat of Napoleonic France, was traditionally considered both by contemporaries and in scientific literature as a period of mute reaction. He was opposed

From book National history(until 1917) author Dvornichenko Andrey Yurievich

§ 9. Foreign policy of Alexander I in 1815–1825. The victory over Napoleon greatly strengthened Russia's international position. Alexander I was the most powerful monarch in Europe, and Russia’s influence on the affairs of the continent was greater than ever. Protective tendencies are clearly

From the book History of Russia from ancient times to the end of the 20th century author Nikolaev Igor Mikhailovich

Foreign policy (1815–1825) The defeat of Napoleon led to the restoration of the Bourbons and the return of France to the borders of 1792. The final settlement of issues of the post-war world took place at the Congress of Vienna, where sharp disagreements arose between the victorious powers.

From the book History of State and Law foreign countries: Cheat sheet author author unknown

59. confederation of the Rhine 1806 GERMAN confederation 1815 In 1806, under the influence of Napoleonic France, which actively influenced European politics using its military power, 16 German states entered the “Rhine Confederation”. Thus it was finally destroyed

From the book Volume 3. Time of reaction and constitutional monarchies. 1815-1847. Part one by Lavisse Ernest

CHAPTER II. HOLY ALLIANCE AND CONGRESSES. 1815-1823 Peaceful politics and congresses. In one memoir about the Congress of Vienna, Gentz, a correspondent for the rulers of Wallachia, wrote: “Lush phrases about the “restoration of social order”, “renewal of European political system", "durable

From the book History of Russian Culture. 19th century author Yakovkina Natalya Ivanovna

§ 6. LITERARY LIFE OF 1815–1825 The work of the founder of Russian romanticism V. A. Zhukovsky ideologically transformed new page in the history of Russian literature, which was largely determined by the social situation of the post-war

From the book Theory of Wars author Kvasha Grigory Semenovich

Chapter 4 THE SACRED UNION After great war must come Big world. This reasoning is quite banal and stems from simple premises: peoples are tired of fighting, economies are tired of fighting, rulers are tired of fighting. All foreign policy issues were resolved by the military

From the book Alexander I author Hartley Janet M.

CHAPTER 7 LORD OF EUROPE: 1815–1825

From the book Alexander I author Hartley Janet M.

CHAPTER 8 THE KEEPER OF THE HOUSE: 1815–1825

Question 30.Napoleonic Wars 1805 – 1814

In 1805, Napoleon defeated the third anti-French coalition, which was created by Great Britain with the participation of Russia, Austria, the Kingdom of Naples and Sweden. The Austrians surrendered Vienna without a fight, and after the defeat of the combined Russian-Austrian troops in the Battle of Austerlitz December 2, 1805. signed peace with Napoleon. Napoleon's joy was overshadowed only by the disaster that befell the French at sea. October 21, 1805 the combined Franco-Spanish fleet was almost completely destroyed by the British squadron under the command of Admiral Nelson in naval battle off Cape Trafalgar off the coast of Spain. IN 1806. A fourth anti-French coalition arose, in which Prussia took the place of Austria, which had dropped out of the war. However, the French completely defeated the Prussian army in the battles of Jena and Auerstedt.

At the end of October 1806, Napoleon, at the head of the “grand army,” entered Berlin. Here he accepted important decision, designed to equalize the chances of victory with Great Britain after the defeat in the Battle of Trafalgar. November 21, 1806. Napoleon signed a decree on the continental blockade. According to this decree, trade with Great Britain was prohibited on the territory of France and its dependent countries. Napoleon hoped that a continental blockade would undermine Britain's economic power. The accession of new European countries to the continental blockade became the goal of his foreign policy for the coming years.

In East Prussia, after a series of fierce battles ( crucial was the French victory at Friedland on June 14, 1807). France and Russia concluded a truce in 1807. A July 7, 1807. The French and Russian emperors signed an alliance treaty in Tilsit. In exchange for joining the continental blockade, Alexander 1 enlisted the support of Napoleon in the wars against Sweden and the Ottoman Empire. Here, in Tilsit, a Franco-Prussian treaty was signed, according to which Prussia also joined the continental blockade. In addition, she was losing her Polish lands, captured as a result of the divisions of Poland in 1793 and 1795. On these lands, the Grand Duchy of Warsaw, friendly to France, was formed.

In 1807, Napoleon, in the form of an ultimatum, demanded that Portugal join the continental blockade. The French army invaded this country. A long-term war began, during which British troops arrived to help the Portuguese. In 1808, war engulfed the entire Iberian Peninsula. Trying to finally subjugate Spain, Napoleon placed his brother Joseph Bonaparte on the Spanish throne. But the Spaniards rebelled and launched a guerrilla war against the invaders - Guerrilla. Austria decided to take advantage of the French failures on the Iberian Peninsula. IN 1809. it formed together with Great Britain fifth coalition. However, at the Battle of Wagram, Napoleon defeated the Austrians and forced them to sign peace in October 1809. Austria lost a number of territories, including access to the Adriatic Sea, reduced its army, paid large indemnities and joined the continental blockade.

Napoleon, at his own discretion, redrew the political map of Europe, changed governments, and placed monarchs on thrones. The “daughter” republics were partially abolished and annexed to France. As a result of these annexations, the “Great Empire” arose, the population of which by 1811 reached 44 million people. Along the perimeter of its borders. Napoleon formed a continuous strip of states subject to himself. In them for the most part A monarchical system of government was established, and the people appointed by Napoleon ruled, as a rule, his relatives - brothers, sisters, nephews, etc., or local dynasties or officials (at the same time N.B. assumed the powers of protector). Napoleon primarily sought from dependent countries support for his foreign policy, including participation in campaigns of conquest. In addition, as a man of educational culture, he sought to reform the subject countries “following the French model.” For example, the Napoleonic Code was in effect in all territories annexed by France.

In 1812, having not completely defeated the peoples of the Iberian Peninsula, Napoleon began new war with Russia. He was prompted to this by the exorbitant ambition and increasingly independent policy of Alexander I, who neglected his allied obligations - he did not support France in the war against Austria (in 1809), and encouraged smuggling trade with Great Britain.

Napoleon's Grand Army invaded Russia June 12 (24), 1812 It numbered over half a million people, significantly outnumbering the Russian army. Two-thirds of the army consisted of soldiers from countries allied or dependent on France - Germans, Poles, Italians, Spaniards - most of whom went to war without much enthusiasm

The largest battle of this campaign took place August, 26th(September 11) 1812 near the village of Borodino, when the French approached Moscow to a distance of only a few tens of kilometers. By that time, due to the heavy losses suffered by the Napoleonic army, the forces of the opponents were almost equal. However battle of Borodino did not give a significant advantage to either side. The commander-in-chief of the Russian army, M.I. Kutuzov, decided to retreat and surrender Moscow to the enemy without a fight. Most Muscovites left the city following the army.

Fires began in the city soon after the arrival of the French, in which two-thirds of all feed burned. The army was threatened by famine. After waiting a month in indecision, Napoleon withdrew the army from Moscow on October 7 (19) and tried to break through to Kaluga, where the food warehouses of the Russian army were located. But having received a rebuff, he was forced to retreat.

The defeat of the Grand Army in Russia served as a signal for the creation of a new anti-French coalition. Along with Russia and Great Britain, it included Prussia, Sweden and Austria. The start of the 1813 campaign was unsuccessful for the Allies. In May, the French achieved victory in the battles of Lützen and Bautzen in Saxony. But already in August, prominent Napoleonic military leaders MacDonald and Oudinot were defeated separately, and in September Ney. And in "Battle of the Nations" near Leipzig October 16-19 The main forces of Napoleonic army were also defeated.

The defeat at Leipzig marked the decline of the political and military power of Napoleonic France. The last allies left her. The peoples of Europe, one after another, shook off foreign domination. Twenty years of almost continuous wars since 1792 have bled France dry. Its direct irreversible losses amounted to about one million people. The country is tired of war. The youth avoided military service. The 350,000-strong Allied army, which entered French territory in December 1813. Napoleon was able to oppose her with only about 70 thousand soldiers.

During the campaign of 1814, Napoleon showed off his talent as a commander for the last time. Mid-February was especially successful for him, when he scored seven victories in eight days. But these victories were local significance and could not change the general course of the war. On March 1, in the city of Chaumont, located halfway from the Rhine to Paris, Great Britain, Russia, Austria and Prussia signed an alliance treaty providing for war with France until complete victory.

On March 30, Allied troops approached the walls of Paris. On the same day, its defenders, fearing the fate of Moscow, laid down their arms. The next day, Emperor Alexander I and the Prussian King Frederick William III, at the head of their armies, entered the French capital.

Napoleon, whom these events found at the castle of Fontainebleau, did not lose hope of maintaining power. He was still surrounded by 60 thousand loyal soldiers. But marshals Ney, Berthier, Lefevre lost faith in victory and advised the emperor to abdicate in favor of his son, the King of Rome. Napoleon hesitated for several days; on April 6, he finally signed the abdication. But on April 1, at the suggestion of Talleyrand, the Senate formed a provisional government, and on April 3 announced the deposition of Napoleon, guilty “of violating the oath and an attempt on the rights of the people, since he recruited into the army and levied taxes in circumvention of the provisions of the constitution.” On April 6, the Senate offered the crown to Louis XVII. April 11, 1814 The allies concluded a treaty at Fontainebleau, which gave the island of Elba in the Mediterranean Sea to Napoleon for life.

"One Hundred Days of Napoleon" Waterloo. Historical results of the Napoleonic wars.

10 months of Bourbon rule was enough to once again revive pro-Napoleonic sentiment in France. Louis XVIII published a constitutional charter in May 1814. According to it, the king's power was limited to a 2-chamber parliament. However, the old French aristocracy and clergy demanded from the government the complete restoration of feudal rights and privileges and the return of land holdings.

Napoleon took advantage of the dissatisfaction with the Bourbons, who secretly left the island of Elba and landed on the southern coast of France on March 1, 1815 in order to regain power. As he advanced towards Paris, people came over to his side. local authorities and the troops sent against him. On March 20, Napoleon triumphantly entered the capital, from which Louis XVIII, his ministers and dignitaries fled in panic.

The collapse of the Restoration stirred up the patriotic and democratic feelings of the French. They were again ready to defend “the homeland and freedom,” but at the same time they expected Napoleon to behave not like a despot, but like a revolutionary general. However, the additional act to the constitutions of the empire that he promulgated on April 22 caused deep disappointment in democratic circles: it differed little from the Bourbon Charter.

However, Napoleon had no time to engage in domestic politics. The governments of the European powers, which convened a congress in Vienna, declared him “an enemy and disturber of the peace of the whole world” and formed a new (seventh) anti-French coalition. Hastily gathering an army, Napoleon moved to the Netherlands, where near the town Waterloo June 18, 1815. A decisive battle took place with the coalition forces. Having suffered defeat, he was forced to abdicate the throne for the second time and surrendered to the British, who, in agreement with the allies, sent him to the place new link(actually imprisonment) to the island of St. Helena in the Atlantic Ocean (where he died in 1821)

A direct consequence of the Napoleonic Wars was the collapse of feudalism throughout Europe. These wars paved the way for progress, the main tenet of which is the recognition of the fact that every capable person can achieve much in life, regardless of his background. The consequences of the reforms carried out during the war in countries subject to the French invasion turned out to be lasting. Having freed themselves from Napoleonic France, the governments and peoples of Europe did not want to give up most of them, since they had already managed to appreciate their merits. New principles of rational law, which took root in most European countries, began to emerge in the 19th century. one of the most important prerequisites for their prosperity.

At the same time, the Napoleonic wars led to the rise of the patriotic movement throughout Europe. However, patriotism on the basis of absolutist states, which were the majority of the participants in the anti-French coalition, back at the beginning of the 19th century. divided into two currents. One of them inherited the rebellious, oppositional spirit of the American rebels and the French revolutionaries. His supporters did not share, but combined love for their homeland with the desire for transformation in accordance with the advanced theories of their time. Another current, under the influence of absolutist governments, was imbued with the official spirit and acquired a pronounced conservative, protective overtone. Both varieties of the patriotic movement manifested themselves during the 19th and 20th centuries.

Congress of Vienna 1814 – 1815 Theory and practice of the Holy Alliance of 1815

IN September 1814 An international congress opened in the capital of the Austrian Empire, Vienna. He was faced with the task of defining new rules of relations, including agreeing on the recognition of borders, in order to avoid new disputes and wars, of which the whole of Europe was quite tired. 216 representatives from all European countries (except the Ottoman Empire) arrived in Vienna to participate in the congress. Formally, all participants in the congress had equal rights. But the main role was played by 4 allied powers, the main participants in the fight against Napoleonic France - Russia, Great Britain, Prussia and the Austrian Empire. On behalf of the four powers, the negotiations were conducted by Russian Emperor Alexander I, British Foreign Secretary Lord Castlereagh, Prussian First Minister Prince von Hardenberg and Austrian First Minister Prince von Metternich. On Congress of Vienna Talleyrand, now Louis XVIII's foreign minister, also arrived.

The work of the congress was reduced mainly to meetings of representatives of the 4 powers, to which delegates from other countries were invited as needed. Informal meetings, exchanges of opinions, and conversations played a big role. At first, congress participants were distrustful of the French delegation. However, Talleyrand skillfully took advantage of the differences between the victorious powers to raise the prestige of France.

Almost all issues discussed at the congress caused controversy. Some congress participants advocated returning to the borders of 1792. But this was opposed by the largest states - Russia, Prussia and Austria, who were counting on territorial rewards for their contribution to the victory over Napoleonic France. The question of the existence of the Holy Roman Empire of the German people, abolished by Napoleon, caused a lot of controversy.

To justify their intentions, the monarchs referred to the theory of legitimism, or legality. But they interpreted the legitimate order itself differently, depending on their own interests and goals. Many understood legality, adhering to the principle of historical interpretation of legitimism (the basis of historical Legitimism is a return to time-tested values ​​- religion and church, the monarchical structure of the state, the class system). Such views are called reactionary.

Russia sought from other countries recognition of the legality of Finland joining it in 1809 and Bessarabia in 1812. The difficulty of the issue was that these acquisitions were made with the approval of Napoleonic France, with which Russia was in allied relations at that time. But most importantly, Russia sought to annex the territory of the Grand Duchy of Warsaw. Everyone objected to this large states. Prussia and Austria - because in this case we were talking about Polish lands that were transferred to these countries under treaties of the 18th century. about the divisions of Poland. Great Britain and France - because they believed that this would lead to an imbalance of power in Europe in favor of Russia.

Sharp disagreements arose between Austria and Prussia in connection with the latter's intention to seize Saxony. In the end, Russia and Prussia managed to come to an agreement among themselves. Prussia agreed to the transfer of the territory of the Grand Duchy of Warsaw to Russia in exchange for the latter's agreement to maintain its claims to Saxony. However, other states stubbornly refused to make any concessions. The contradictions reached such intensity that it seemed that a split between yesterday's allies was inevitable. At the beginning of 1815, Great Britain, France and the Austrian Empire entered into a secret military alliance against Russia and Prussia. There was a smell of a new war in Europe.

The fear of the “usurper” that gripped European courts (at this time Napoleon was fleeing the island of Elba) helped smooth out the contradictions between the powers and pushed them to seek a compromise.

As a result, Russia received the Grand Duchy of Warsaw, with the exception of some lands transferred to Prussia and Austria. In addition, the Congress of Vienna confirmed Russia's rights to Finland and Bessarabia. In both cases this was done in violation of historical law. The territory of the Duchy of Warsaw never belonged to Russia, and even in ethnically(language, religion) it had little to do with her. The same can be said about Finland, which has long been the possession of the Swedish kings. In compensation for the loss of Finland, Sweden, as an active participant in the wars against Napoleonic France, received Norway.

The dispute between Prussia and Austria over Saxony was settled amicably. Prussia eventually achieved part of Saxony, although it counted on its entire territory. However, Prussia was quite satisfied with this solution to the controversial issue, since it was additionally given vast lands in western Germany, including on the left bank of the Rhine. Austria also did not remain offended. Part of the Grand Duchy of Warsaw was returned to her, as well as possessions on the Balkan Peninsula, previously taken away by Napoleon. But Austria received the main reward for its contribution to the war against Napoleonic France in Northern Italy. She has been there since the beginning of the 16th century. owned Lombardy. Now, in addition to this, the territory of the Venetian Republic, including Dalmatia, passed to it. The small states of central Italy - Tuscany, Parma, Modena, etc. - were returned to Austrian control.

The Sardinian kingdom, captured by the French back in the 90s of the 18th century, was restored as an independent state. In recognition of his services, he was given the territory of the Genoese Republic, which had been abolished at one time by the French and was never restored at the end of the Napoleonic wars.

The fate of the largest republics of the Middle Ages - Genoese and Venetian - was shared by the Republic of the United Provinces (Holland). Its territory, together with the Southern Netherlands, which until the end of the 18th century. owned by the Austrian Habsburgs, became part of the rather large Kingdom of the Netherlands. It was supposed to serve as a buffer between France and the German states, who thus wanted to protect themselves from a repetition of French aggression.

Only the Swiss Confederation escaped the common fate of these republics of the Middle Ages and the beginning of the modern era. It was preserved by the Congress of Vienna and received the status of a neutral state.

European monarchs decided not to restore the Holy Roman Empire. In fact, they came to terms with many of the territorial changes that Napoleon carried out in Germany. In particular, they did not restore the hundreds of small states that he abolished. Most of them went to Austria, Prussia or other larger German states

At the Congress of Vienna, it was decided to form a new confederation within the borders of the Holy Roman Empire called the German Confederation.

As a result, after the Congress of Vienna, constitutions were introduced in France, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, and in a number of West German states. Alexander I granted constitutions to the Kingdom of Poland and the Grand Duchy of Finland, which enjoyed autonomy within the Russian Empire. The struggle for the introduction of constitutions unfolded in Spain, Prussia and the Italian states, however, it took revolutions in the early 20s in Spain, Portugal, Italy, Greece, as well as revolutions in the 1830s in France and Belgium, for the principle of constitutional government to be accepted in a number of other states. Nevertheless, after the Congress of Vienna, Europe became much freer politically than it was before it.

The Congress of Vienna had barely ended when September 26, 1815. The monarchs of Russia, Prussia and Austria signed an agreement in Paris to create the so-called Holy Alliance. It proclaimed the “unshakable determination” of the three sovereigns to be guided in their actions by “the commandments of the holy faith, love, truth and peace,” and also to “give each other assistance, reinforcement and assistance at any time and under any circumstances.” Over time, most other European states joined the Holy Alliance.

In the first years after the Congress of Vienna, the Holy Alliance represented one of the main forms of international cooperation between European states. Four of its congresses took place. The first of them took place in 1818 in the city of Aachen in Western Germany. At this congress, France was finally recognized as an equal by four other powers: Great Britain, Prussia, Austria and Russia signed an alliance treaty with it. The so-called “quintuple union” (pentarchy) was created, which formally remained until mid-19th V. and ensured the peace and stability of Europe during this time.

At the end of 1820 - beginning of 1821, a double congress of the Holy Alliance took place in Austria. It started in Troppau and ended in Laibach (Ljubljana) in Austria. Finally, the 1822 congress took place in Verona (Northern Italy). Since then, no congresses of the Holy Alliance have been held. The main form of interaction between the largest states in the international arena was conferences convened on any specific occasion, or consultations of ambassadors in London, St. Petersburg or the capitals of other powers.

Restoration of the monarchy. Reasons for the fall of Napoleon Bonaparte's empire.

Reasons for the fall of N.B. External:

1) N.B. had authority among the population as long as he waged successful wars of conquest and maintained the high international status of the country. When in 1813 the enemy invaded France for the first time since 1793, a catastrophe occurred and his authority was undermined.

Internal:

1) general fatigue of the population from wars;

2) depletion of human and material resources;

3) negative results of the continental blockade for France. French trade was damaged. Fr. entrepreneurs did not have access to goods from other countries (?).

4) constant recruitment into the army - shortage of workers in production.

5) the food crisis, which was associated with the crop failure of 1811-1812.

6) a constant increase in direct and indirect taxes, which were needed for military expenses. The poll tax, the salt tax, and a number of indirect taxes were doubled.

Factors for the restoration of the monarchy:

1) the population’s desire for the monarchy increased, since already during the revolution many republicans were discredited. They did not have the former value for the people.

2) foreign policy factor. Masters of the position ( monarchical countries- Russia, Austria, Prussia, England), who had been at war with revolutionary France for 25 years, believed that only the restoration of the Bourbons would have a positive effect.

1815, subsequently all the monarchs of continental Europe gradually joined, except the Pope and the Turkish Sultan. Not being in the exact sense of the word a formalized agreement of the powers that would impose certain obligations on them, the Holy Alliance, nevertheless, went down in the history of European diplomacy as “a close-knit organization with a sharply defined clerical-monarchist ideology, created on the basis of the suppression of the revolutionary spirit and political and religious free-thinking, wherever they appear."

History of creation

Castlereagh explained England's non-participation in the treaty by the fact that, according to the English constitution, the king does not have the right to sign treaties with other powers.

Signifying the character of the era, the Holy Alliance was the main organ of the pan-European reaction against liberal aspirations. Practical significance it was expressed in the resolutions of a number of congresses (Aachen, Troppaus, Laibach and Verona), at which the principle of intervention in the internal affairs of other states was fully developed with the aim of forcibly suppressing all national and revolutionary movements and maintaining existing system with its absolutist and clerical-aristocratic tendencies.

Congresses of the Holy Alliance

Aachen Congress

Congresses in Troppau and Laibach

Typically considered together as a single congress.

Congress in Verona

Collapse of the Holy Alliance

The post-war system of Europe created by the Congress of Vienna was contrary to the interests of the new emerging class - the bourgeoisie. Bourgeois movements against feudal-absolutist forces became the main driving force historical processes V continental Europe. The Holy Alliance prevented the establishment of bourgeois orders and increased the isolation of monarchical regimes. With the growth of contradictions between the members of the Union, there was a decline in the influence of the Russian court and Russian diplomacy on European politics.

By the end of the 1820s, the Holy Alliance began to disintegrate, which was facilitated, on the one hand, by a retreat from the principles of this Union on the part of England, whose interests at that time were very much in conflict with the policy of the Holy Alliance both in the conflict between the Spanish colonies in Latin America and metropolis, and in relation to the still ongoing Greek uprising, and on the other hand, the liberation of the successor of Alexander I from the influence of Metternich and the divergence of interests of Russia and Austria in relation to Turkey.

“As for Austria, I am confident in it, since our treaties determine our relations.”

But Russian-Austrian cooperation could not eliminate Russian-Austrian contradictions. Austria, as before, was frightened by the prospect of the emergence of independent states in the Balkans, probably friendly to Russia, the very existence of which would cause the growth of national liberation movements in a multinational Austrian Empire. As a result, in the Crimean War, Austria, without directly participating in it, took an anti-Russian position.

Bibliography

  • For the text of the Holy Alliance, see " Full Assembly Laws", No. 25943.
  • For the French original, see Part 1 of Vol. IV “Collections of treatises and conventions concluded by Russia with foreign powers” ​​by Professor Martens.
  • "Mémoires, documents et écrits divers laissés par le prince de Metternich", vol. I, pp. 210-212.
  • V. Danevsky, “Systems of political balance and legitimism” 1882.
  • Ghervas, Stella [Gervas, Stella Petrovna], Réinventer la tradition. Alexandre Stourdza et l’Europe de la Sainte-Alliance, Paris, Honoré Champion, 2008. ISBN 978-2-7453-1669-1
  • Nadler V.K. Emperor Alexander I and the idea of ​​the Holy Alliance. vol. 1-5. Kharkov, 1886-1892.

Links

  • Nikolai Troitsky Russia at the head of the Holy Alliance // Russia in the 19th century. Lecture course. M., 1997.

Notes


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

See what “Holy Alliance” is in other dictionaries:

    The alliance of Austria, Prussia and Russia, concluded in Paris on September 26, 1815, after the fall of the empire of Napoleon I. The goals of the Holy Alliance were to ensure the inviolability of the decisions of the Congress of Vienna 1814-1815. In 1815, France and... ... joined the Holy Alliance. Big Encyclopedic Dictionary

    SACRED ALLIANCE, alliance of Austria, Prussia and Russia, concluded in Paris on September 26, 1815, after the fall of Napoleon I. Objectives Holy Alliance were to ensure the inviolability of the decisions of the Congress of Vienna 1814 15. In 1815, the Holy Alliance was joined by... ... Modern encyclopedia

    The alliance of Austria, Prussia and Russia, concluded in Paris on September 26, 1815, after the fall of Napoleon I. The purpose of the Holy Alliance was to ensure the inviolability of the decisions of the Congress of Vienna in 1814-15. In November 1815, France joined the union,... ... Historical Dictionary